[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2018-12-19 Thread Tfa7
(In reply to main.haarp from comment #31)
> Do you happen to have a more recent patch?

1.19.3: http://git.altlinux.org/gears/x/xorg-server.git?p=xorg-
server.git;a=commitdiff;h=c5b77a90d7e0d6a1874fcb545969f355d1ed0293

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485

Title:
  Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/589485/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2018-12-19 Thread Tfa7
FWIW we've patched xorg-server in the distribution.
Shame on those breaking base functionality instead of fixing their crap!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485

Title:
  Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/589485/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2014-10-03 Thread Tfa7
ping

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485

Title:
  Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/589485/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2013-07-04 Thread Tfa7
It dawned on me that a proposed replacement might lack such an, um,
feature of hardwired 96 dpi.  Now if that will be called progress I'll
invest some time into finding those who arranged that and ruining their
remnants of reputation.

(creating and improving is vastly more important but the feeling of
impunity results in *evil* things, unfortunately)

Folks, hey let's just get this crap fixed, are you still listening to
the community?  XFree86 project used to skip that at times, please
don't.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485

Title:
  Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/589485/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2013-06-27 Thread Tfa7
(In reply to comment #14)
 See also https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AsusZenbook#LCD
Heh, UX31A I'm typing this at has 166 dpi.

Those who forced the 96dpi kludge into xorg should be forced to walk in
my shoes till the end of their lives with no chance to change those.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485

Title:
  Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/589485/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2013-06-27 Thread Tfa7
(In reply to comment #16)
 See http://pastebin.com/vtzyBK6e for #xorg-devel discussion about this.
Some comments:

 ohsix not a lot of people are bothered, since getting the per display dpi
 right is a hard problem, even if you can set it for one single monitor in
 particular, 'fixed' is handling some difference in dpi across displays,
 which doesn't happen in the toolkits or anything

Wrong.  *I* am bothered, and *I* operate a few dual-monitor setup
including those with different display DPI.  That ohsix windows migrant
would have a hard time telling me that forcing DPI to a semi-arbitrary
value to follow the obsolete windows suit is right (and that it is worth
breaking what used to work since last century).

 ohsix maybe you misunderstood me, i was telling you what's expected
to do it

By whom?  Those who smoked windows crack and a gazillion of tray
notifiers?

Thanks but no thanks.  I've seen enough weird video hardware (e.g. Acer
V550 monitors reported those funny EDID values) but those are rather
*exceptions* to be handled, and one can even automate that -- if a
display has DPI less than e.g. 30 or higher than e.g. 300 (as of today)
then it might be treated as a reason to fall back to default (96 is ok
here) since those who operate special cases *can* be expected to know
their ways around hi-res displays or display walls.

 ohsix any cobbled together thing where nobody really cares
 is going to miss details like that

This bastard should not continue to erode free software.  *He* doesn't
care.

Seems that Red Hat has hired too many dumb morons who took their windows
habits and attitude there, see also
http://people.freedesktop.org/~cbrill/dri-log/?channel=dri-
develdate=2012-12-13 /fedora -- and recall the F12 PackageKit saga of
Richard Hughes fame:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534047#c9

PS: just in case, I'm using and developing free software since 1998 and
have done numerous migrations for people and companies.  I know that
care *is* crucial.  Good luck to Xorg team with preserving that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485

Title:
  Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/589485/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1043575]

2013-03-26 Thread Tfa7
Still in 1.14.0, spoils similar icewm themes as well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043575

Title:
  Xubuntu 12.10 + Xorg server 1.13 = Window decoration missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1043575/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 521877]

2012-08-22 Thread Tfa7
(In reply to comment #20)
 It was chosen in order to make display of web pages using Xorg more consistent
 with the way they get displayed on Windows, which by default assumes 96.
It's called bug compatibility, and there's a knob in a browser for that already.

-- 
1400x1050@122, 1600x1200+1920x1080@varied

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521877

Title:
  [gm45] wrong screen size detected on X200s

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/521877/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2012-08-22 Thread Tfa7
May the so called developers with I know better attitude be treated by
physicists with the same attitude!

They broke the thing for BUG compatibility with an obsolete piece of
crap for a single use case already handled in corresponding application
(a web browser), they told us to go sink in the mailing lists and now
they are too busy to at least accept the knob.

Folks, hallo!  Anyone there?  Or everyone reading mail on a low DPI 64
plasma?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485

Title:
  Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/589485/+subscriptions

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp