Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both dictionary annotator components and create one new component? -- Michael Marshall Schor wrote: All committers have voted +1 to accept this. Voting +1 Joern Kottmann Marshall Schor Thilo Goetz Michael Baessler Eddie Epstein Adam Lally Voting 0 - none Voting -1 - none The vote passes. As soon as we get a software grant recorded by the secretary, we can put the code into SVN. -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: Michael Tanenblatt has offered to donate ConceptMapper to Apache UIMA. There was some discussion on the uima-users list about this. Thread: http://markmail.org/message/mfuubh5are7vs5ua Please vote on whether or not to accept this donation (conditional on receiving a software grant for it, of course) [ ] +1Accept the donation of ConceptMapper into the Apache UIMA sandbox [ ] 0Don't care [ ] -1Don't accept this donation - because ... -Marshall
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
Michael Baessler wrote: When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both dictionary annotator components and create one new component? -- Michael Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would just follow along with whatever you two think is best. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, the Cas Editor is now finally ready for release. - I finished the testing according to the CasEditor-2.2.2 test plan http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplancaseditor222.html - All issues for release 2.2.2CE are fixed The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/01 So please cast your vote: [ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-01 is ready and can be released [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues Jörn I checked the distributions and everything seems to be fine except one issue: the binary distribution includes Eclipse and Junit code. This needs to be mentioned in the NOTICE and LICENSE files. So here's what needs to be done: 1) The NOTICE file of the binary distribution needs to include the sentence This product includes software developed at the Eclipse Foundation (http://.eclipse.org/). 2) The LICENSE file of the binary distribution needs to include a copy of the EPL. 3) The about dialog of the CasEditor needs to include the same sentence as the NOTICE file. Does the junit plugin even need to be distributed? Other than that, everything is fine afaict. --Thilo
[DISCUSS][VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating
Forgot to mention: if we do want to distribute the junit code, we need similar verbiage as for eclipse, and the CPL in the LICENSE file. --Thilo Thilo Goetz wrote: Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, the Cas Editor is now finally ready for release. - I finished the testing according to the CasEditor-2.2.2 test plan http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplancaseditor222.html - All issues for release 2.2.2CE are fixed The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/01 So please cast your vote: [ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-01 is ready and can be released [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 don't release yet, I found some more issues Jörn I checked the distributions and everything seems to be fine except one issue: the binary distribution includes Eclipse and Junit code. This needs to be mentioned in the NOTICE and LICENSE files. So here's what needs to be done: 1) The NOTICE file of the binary distribution needs to include the sentence This product includes software developed at the Eclipse Foundation (http://.eclipse.org/). 2) The LICENSE file of the binary distribution needs to include a copy of the EPL. 3) The about dialog of the CasEditor needs to include the same sentence as the NOTICE file. Does the junit plugin even need to be distributed? Other than that, everything is fine afaict. --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
Thilo Goetz wrote: Michael Baessler wrote: When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both dictionary annotator components and create one new component? -- Michael Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would just follow along with whatever you two think is best. In addition to that principle, I would encourage the community to move in the direction of convergence to fewer, well-thought-out components, over time. This has to be carefully balanced with the let a 1000 flowers bloom principle, which permits new things to have room to develop. -Marshall
[jira] Created: (UIMA-1082) Improve JCas docs to recommend against depending on == JCas cover objects
Improve JCas docs to recommend against depending on == JCas cover objects - Key: UIMA-1082 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1082 Project: UIMA Issue Type: Improvement Components: Core Java Framework Affects Versions: 2.2.2 Reporter: Marshall Schor Priority: Minor Update the JCas docs to recommend against depending on getting the same cover JCas object for cas objects, which won't happen in some configurations including remotes, and if JCas caching is turned off (a new configuration option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
My personal preference is to put ConceptMapper out as a separate project for now, then merge the two over time. Realistically, I am not sure I have a huge amount of time to figure out how to merge these things right now (I am going to be on vacation starting Wednesday for 2 1/2 weeks, then I'll have to catch up with all the things that piled up over that time...). Ultimately, I agree that there should be one annotator that does this job, not two. On Jun 20, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: Michael Baessler wrote: When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both dictionary annotator components and create one new component? -- Michael Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would just follow along with whatever you two think is best. --Thilo
[jira] Created: (UIMA-1083) add Getting Started Guide: Working with PEARs
add Getting Started Guide: Working with PEARs - Key: UIMA-1083 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1083 Project: UIMA Issue Type: New Feature Components: Website Reporter: Michael Baessler Assignee: Michael Baessler Priority: Minor Add a new Getting Started Guide that explain how to work with PEARS. - What are PEAR files - How to generate PEARs - How to install PEAR - How to use installed PEARs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Tika UIMA integration
How should we call it ? Any ideas ? Jörn On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, I think it would be very interesting for our users to be able to use documents in various formarts as input for UIMA. Should we start a sandbox project to write a tika annotator ? +1 - yes, that would be great! -Marshall
Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable
Using the rc08 source package on a fresh [Linux] machine, the extended tests ran with no problem. (We need to add the eclipse run configuration for this test in the source :) There was a build problem with maven resolving 2 artifacts: Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.uima:uimaj-distr:jar:2.2.2-incubating 2) org.apache.uima:uimaj-ep-pear-packager:jar:2.2.2.incubating Any idea why? Eddie On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When running TestUimaAsExtended junit test, the testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed. But when rerunning, it ran OK. The failure was a resource initialization exception. Anyone else see this intermittant failure? -Marshall
Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable
Eddie Epstein wrote: Using the rc08 source package on a fresh [Linux] machine, the extended tests ran with no problem. (We need to add the eclipse run configuration for this test in the source :) There was a build problem with maven resolving 2 artifacts: Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.uima:uimaj-distr:jar:2.2.2-incubating 2) org.apache.uima:uimaj-ep-pear-packager:jar:2.2.2.incubating Any idea why? Did you (1) first download the uima-2.2.2 (base) src distr and run mvn install on uimaj? The uimaj-distr jar is an empty jar built as a side effect of running assembly:assembly. What part of the process is needed it? -Marshall Eddie On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When running TestUimaAsExtended junit test, the testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed. But when rerunning, it ran OK. The failure was a resource initialization exception. Anyone else see this intermittant failure? -Marshall
[jira] Created: (UIMA-1084) Uima AS JMX statistics are invalid
Uima AS JMX statistics are invalid -- Key: UIMA-1084 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1084 Project: UIMA Issue Type: Bug Components: Async Scaleout Reporter: Jerry Cwiklik The Cas Multiplier and Remote Aggregate delegate JMX statistics are invalid. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable
Did you (1) first download the uima-2.2.2 (base) src distr and run mvn install on uimaj? Um, nope :) Thanks, Eddie
Re: Tika UIMA integration
Jörn Kottmann wrote: How should we call it ? Any ideas ? Either something cute referring to Tika, or something that's explainitory, like textExtractionFromArtifacts or ?? Jörn On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, I think it would be very interesting for our users to be able to use documents in various formarts as input for UIMA. Should we start a sandbox project to write a tika annotator ? +1 - yes, that would be great! -Marshall
Re: Tika UIMA integration
Tika means in good in one of Hindi languages. People from India say Tika-Tika when they mean very well. So, how about Tika-Tika? Very well :) Ahmed On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jörn Kottmann wrote: How should we call it ? Any ideas ? Either something cute referring to Tika, or something that's explainitory, like textExtractionFromArtifacts or ?? Jörn On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, I think it would be very interesting for our users to be able to use documents in various formarts as input for UIMA. Should we start a sandbox project to write a tika annotator ? +1 - yes, that would be great! -Marshall
Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable
Well, the problem was nothing to do with base UIMA, rather it was due to me running mvn package instead of mvn install. Not sure if this is an issue or not, but certainly not a blocking issue for release. Eddie On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Eddie Epstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you (1) first download the uima-2.2.2 (base) src distr and run mvn install on uimaj? Um, nope :) Thanks, Eddie
[jira] Updated: (UIMA-1084) Uima AS JMX statistics are invalid
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jerry Cwiklik updated UIMA-1084: Attachment: uimaj-as-jms-UIMA-1084-patch.txt uimaj-as-core-UIMA-1084-patch.txt uimaj-as-activemq-UIMA-1084-patch.txt Fixes UIMA AS Cas Multiplier statistics. Uima AS JMX statistics are invalid -- Key: UIMA-1084 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1084 Project: UIMA Issue Type: Bug Components: Async Scaleout Reporter: Jerry Cwiklik Attachments: uimaj-as-activemq-UIMA-1084-patch.txt, uimaj-as-core-UIMA-1084-patch.txt, uimaj-as-jms-UIMA-1084-patch.txt The Cas Multiplier and Remote Aggregate delegate JMX statistics are invalid. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Tika UIMA integration
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Jörn Kottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How should we call it ? Any ideas ? Tikannotator?
