Re: Last Resort Font

2003-09-02 Thread Peter_Constable
Michael Eversion wrote on 08/19/2003 02:52:55 PM:

 p. 63 (Syloti Nagri): both top and bottom read SILOTI NAGRI.

 I will look into all of that, and thank you for it; but note that of 
 those only Thaana can be expected to display, as none of the others 
 have been encoded. So none of those could EVER be displayed; they are 
 just extra glyphs in the current font.

Syloti Nagri has been approved by UTC and assigned to A800..A82F, though 
this is yet to be ratified by WG2 (presumably will happen in October) and 
published in a new version of Unicode (will be 4.1) or an amendment to ISO 
10646 (I don't know what timetable is in place for publishing further 
amendments).



Peter Constable



Re: Last Resort Font

2003-09-02 Thread Michael Everson
At 06:48 -0700 2003-09-02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Eversion wrote on 08/19/2003 02:52:55 PM:

 p. 63 (Syloti Nagri): both top and bottom read SILOTI NAGRI.
  I will look into all of that, and thank you for it; but note that of
 those only Thaana can be expected to display, as none of the others
  have been encoded. So none of those could EVER be displayed; they are
 just extra glyphs in the current font.
Syloti Nagri has been approved by UTC and assigned to A800..A82F, though
this is yet to be ratified by WG2 (presumably will happen in October) and
published in a new version of Unicode (will be 4.1) or an amendment to ISO
10646 (I don't know what timetable is in place for publishing further
amendments).
And it will be two years before the LR font has to be updated
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com


Re: Last Resort Font

2003-08-19 Thread Owen Taylor
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 15:45, Michael Everson wrote:
 At 15:04 -0400 2003-08-19, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote:
John == John Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 John (Apple's LastResort font [contains every Unicode character],
 John of course, but by virtually of rampant reuse of glyphs.)
 
 Does this Generate glyphs like the following ascii-  utf8-art?
 
 No. It generates much much better glyphs than that. See 
 http://developer.apple.com/fonts/LastResortFont/

Of course, better here really depends on what you want. 
Prettier? Yes. More useful for Joe User who gets Sinhala
spam? Yes. More useful if you are trying to debug why, in
a span of Arabic text, some characters aren't being located
in a font? Not really. 

 I find it interesting, if so, that Apple uses a font to acheive that 
 rather than a bit of code in the rendering libs.
 
 What Mac OS X does is when it encounters a Unicode character, it sees 
 if it's in the current font. If it's not, it starts looking through 
 all the other fonts until it finds one that is suitable. The Last 
 Resort Font has glyphs for all the characters, so it's the last one 
 looked at.

If you have a Last Resort style font, Pango should pick it up
as well (*). The hex boxes are only drawn when *no* font
on the system contains the character.

Regards,
Owen

(*) With some caveats about fontconfig configuration that I'm
not going to get into here.





Re: Last Resort Font

2003-08-19 Thread Jim Allan
Michael Everson wrote:

The Last
Resort Font has glyphs for all the characters, so it's the last one
looked at. 
I hope that it is not just for that reason that it is the last one 
looked at.

Jim Allan




Re: Last Resort Font

2003-08-19 Thread Michael Everson
At 16:24 -0400 2003-08-19, Owen Taylor wrote:
  No. It generates much much better glyphs than that. See
 http://developer.apple.com/fonts/LastResortFont/
Of course, better here really depends on what you want. Prettier? Yes.
Thanks. :-)

More useful for Joe User who gets Sinhala spam? Yes.
Exactly.

More useful if you are trying to debug why, in a span of Arabic 
text, some characters aren't being located in a font? Not really.
The glyph (if you look at it zoomed in enough) tells you the block 
the character is encoded in. It doesn't tell you WHICH character 
isn't in any usable font.

If you have a Last Resort style font, Pango should pick it up as well.
I don't know what Pango is but I guess it isn't relevant to me...
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com


Re: Last Resort Font

2003-08-19 Thread Michael Everson
At 16:51 -0400 2003-08-19, Jim Allan wrote:

The Last Resort Font has glyphs for all the characters, so it's the last one
looked at.
I hope that it is not just for that reason that it is the last one looked at.
Eh? The system looks for Unicode glyphs in all the other fonts and if 
there's no available glyph the the LRF is displayed.  It's the last 
resort.

There are, of course, some lovely easter-eggs in the font
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com


Re: Last Resort Font

2003-08-19 Thread John Cowan
Michael Everson scripsit:

 No. It generates much much better glyphs than that. See
 http://developer.apple.com/fonts/LastResortFont/

Out of mild curiosity: (a) what font did you use to create the legends
in the frame of each glyph; (b) are all the various representative glyphs
drawn from a common font, and if so, which one?

Defect reports based on the 236-page PDF:

p. 17 (Thaana):  the bottom of the frame reads THAAN with a broken glyph
following.

p. 18 (Phoenician):  the top of the frame reads OENECIAN, the bottom is
blank, and the rest of the glyph is black.

p. 55 (Pahawh): bottom of frame is blank.

p. 63 (Syloti Nagri): both top and bottom read SILOTI NAGRI.

p. 171 (Brahmi): both top and bottom read BRAMHI.

-- 
One Word to write them all, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  One Access to find them,  http://www.reutershealth.com
One Excel to count them all,http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
  And thus to Windows bind them.--Mike Champion



Re: Last Resort Font

2003-08-19 Thread Owen Taylor
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 17:08, Michael Everson wrote:

 At 16:24 -0400 2003-08-19, Owen Taylor wrote:

 If you have a Last Resort style font, Pango should pick it up as well.
 
 I don't know what Pango is but I guess it isn't relevant to me...

It was mentioned in the mail that you replied to (because of
it's hex-box-drawing) so I didn't feel a need to gloss.

Pango is an text layout library roughly along the lines of
Uniscribe/ATSUI/etc, developed largely by myself, with
lots of help from the open-source community, including
various people on this list.

See http://www.pango.org for really outdated content. (Not
much time to update the web page these days.)

If you don't use Linux or Unix, it's likely not relevant to 
you. It's used pretty widely these days in that arena.

Regards,
Owen





Re: Last Resort Font

2003-08-19 Thread Michael Everson
At 17:26 -0400 2003-08-19, John Cowan wrote:
Michael Everson scripsit:

 No. It generates much much better glyphs than that. See
 http://developer.apple.com/fonts/LastResortFont/
Out of mild curiosity: (a) what font did you use to create the legends
in the frame of each glyph;
Chicago.

(b) are all the various representative glyphs
drawn from a common font, and if so, which one?
Of course they were not. No such font exists.

Defect reports based on the 236-page PDF:

p. 17 (Thaana):  the bottom of the frame reads THAAN with a broken glyph
following.
p. 18 (Phoenician):  the top of the frame reads OENECIAN, the bottom is
blank, and the rest of the glyph is black.
p. 55 (Pahawh): bottom of frame is blank.

p. 63 (Syloti Nagri): both top and bottom read SILOTI NAGRI.

p. 171 (Brahmi): both top and bottom read BRAMHI.
I will look into all of that, and thank you for it; but note that of 
those only Thaana can be expected to display, as none of the others 
have been encoded. So none of those could EVER be displayed; they are 
just extra glyphs in the current font.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com