Re: [UC] Listserve Reform of the UC list - The Hood to Tony
In a message dated 7/29/2007 3:35:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, UC-list is also, and every bit as much, under the auspices of Penn, ... Obviously, you've done no research, or you are caught-up in some of this weekend's petty inconclusive sloganeering. Quite frankly, it is probably time to think of a technical successor vehicle to the Purple list. Nor do I suggest Kyle's Annenberg list is its best replacement, with what appears to be its unique parochial point of view . Corresponding with Jeff in late May and early June led me to believe he is very far removed from this list as well as the goings on in the neighborhood, and nothing he has published publicly do I believe supports Tony's contention. Oh, did I mention the suggestion that the UC-list work product of purple.com being under the auspices of Penn is a pretty pathetic allegation, if it was seriously meant to propel such a point of view? Sorry Tony, I expect a much better charade from you. Your again disappointed fan. Craig ** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour inline: charade.gif
Re: [UC] Listserve Reform of the UC list - The Hood to Tony
Craig, I don't understand the point of anything you just wrote. Mine was a technical observation from a non-technically savvy subscriber. What is the ultimate host of this list we are now writing on, UC-list? Who originally designed it and who owns it? Are or were Penn machines or Penn employees involved at any point? If that is so, then UC-list is, by definition, as much "under the auspices" of Penn as Kyle's is -- true? I did some research, on google. The home page of list.purple.com explains nothing to me about how it is organized, insitutionally. -- Tony West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 7/29/2007 3:35:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, UC-list is also, and every bit as much, "under the auspices of" Penn, ... Obviously, you've done no research, or you are caught-up in some of this weekend's petty inconclusive sloganeering. Quite frankly, it is probably time to think of a technical successor vehicle to the Purple list. Nor do Isuggest Kyle's Annenberg list is itsbest replacement, with what appears to be its unique parochial pointof view. Corresponding with Jeff in late May and early June led me to believe he is very far removed from this list as well as the goings on in the neighborhood, and nothing he has published publicly do I believe supports Tony's contention. Oh, did I mention the suggestion that the UC-list work product of purple.com being"under the auspices of" Penn is a pretty pathetic allegation, if it was seriously meant to propel such a point of view? Sorry Tony, I expect a muchbetter charade from you. Your again disappointed fan. Craig Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
Re: [UC] Listserve Reform of the UC list - The Hood to Tony #2
In a message dated 7/29/2007 5:27:14 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: He owned the machines and still does? He had no institutional affiliation with Penn? Who was he, who is he, whose idea was it, how does it work physically? Is this your idea of lamb skin draped ingenue polemics from the falsetto veiled voiced managing editor of our big city political intelligencer rag or do you just figure no on will notice the skid marks in the bowl your last two posts left as you tried to create linkage with purple dot com and the imprimatur of Penn?. Your quest to gore Laserbeam is making your toughts toxic. Come-in out of the Park; we don't want the gods to strike you with lightning. Ciao, Craig ** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
Re: [UC] Listserve Reform of the UC list - The Hood to Tony #2
What are you talking about, Craig? If you don't know how the internet works anymore than I do, just say so. I don't mind a dose of purple invective, but I prefer it to be connected to a topic. If you know how Purple works, please explain it. -- Tony West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 7/29/2007 5:27:14 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: He owned the machines and still does? He had no institutional affiliation with Penn? Who was he, who is he, whose idea was it, how does it work physically? Is this your idea of lamb skin draped ingenue polemics from the falsetto veiled voiced managing editor of our big city political intelligencer rag or do you just figure no on will notice the skid marks in the bowl your last two posts left as you tried to create linkage with purple dot com and the imprimatur of Penn?. Your quest to gore Laserbeam is making your toughts toxic. Come-in out of the Park; we don't want the gods to strike you with lightning. Ciao, Craig Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF0002000982.
