RE: [uportal-dev] Welcome to new committer Andy Gherna, maintaining wiki page listing committers

2007-08-06 Thread Andy Gherna
Done.

 

  _  

From: Andrew Petro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 8:56 PM
To: uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org
Subject: [uportal-dev] Welcome to new committer Andy Gherna, maintaining
wiki page listing committers

 

Andy,

Welcome.

I see someone (presumably Eric) has already set you up with SVN credentials.
Please also update this http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/UPC/Committers
wiki page listing commiters, highlighting the areas of uPortal you're most
interested in contributing to.

Thanks,

Andrew




+1 

 Cris J H 

Eric Dalquist wrote: 



Andy has submitted several good patches for uPortal recently and is
interested in commit access. 

+1 from me. 

-Eric 

 

 

-- 
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

-- 
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Re: [uportal-dev] [VOTE] Commit access for Timothy Carroll

2007-08-06 Thread Susan Bramhall
+1 for Tim. 
Susan


Cris J Holdorph wrote:

+1 for Timothy Carroll

 Cris J H

Andrew Petro wrote:

Timothy,

This sounds like valuable experience to be bringing to uPortal, 
especially the accessibility in the theme.  We could do with being 
more attentive to accessibility and usability, and there's an 
especial opportunity here to leverage Fluid's interest in 
contributing to uPortal in this domain.


You have my +1 in support of your bid for commitership.

Andrew

most of my work has been involved in the rendering pipeline.  as 
andy mentioned, i did some significant analysis and troubleshoot to 
arrive at a solution to the 1040 fix.  in addition, i have made some 
significant accomplishments in creating accessible themes in alm, 
which i plan to convert and commit to dlm.


there are a few other internal improvements that i have made to help 
facilitate channel publishing, particularly as it relates to adding 
additional servers to an existing cluster.  these are also items 
that i will look to contribute back to the community by implementing 
in future releases of uportal.


Andrew Petro wrote:

(Forking thread for clarity)

We have a bid for commitership here for Timothy Carroll, with a +1 
from newest commiter Andy Gherna.


Timothy, could you post sharing a few more words about your 
background with uPortal, interests in contributing?


Andrew

Andy Gherna wrote:

I would second this.  Tim's work was instrumental to fixing UP-1040.

 Original message 
 

Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:53:42 -0500
From: Timothy Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Subject: Re: 
[uportal-dev] [VOTE] Commit access for Andy Gherna  To: 
uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org


i would like to piggy-back on this request, as andy and i work 
closely together on this project... and, i have recently 
introduced some fixes as well.


Eric Dalquist wrote:
 
Andy has submitted several good patches for uPortal recently and 
is interested in commit access.


+1 from me.

-Eric


--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev


--
Andy Gherna   |
Senior Research Programmer| Phone:  (217) 265-9490
CITES, University of Illinois | Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev









--
It's no use trying to be clever--we are all clever here; just try to be kind--a 
little kind.
-- F.J. Foakes Jackson


--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev


Re: [uportal-dev] [VOTE] Commit access for Timothy Carroll

2007-08-06 Thread Eric Dalquist
+1

Andrew Petro wrote:
 (Forking thread for clarity)

 We have a bid for commitership here for Timothy Carroll, with a +1 
 from newest commiter Andy Gherna.

 Timothy, could you post sharing a few more words about your background 
 with uPortal, interests in contributing?

 Andrew

 Andy Gherna wrote:
 I would second this.  Tim's work was instrumental to fixing UP-1040.

  Original message 
   
 Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:53:42 -0500
 From: Timothy Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 Subject: Re: [uportal-dev] [VOTE] Commit access for Andy Gherna  
 To: uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org

 i would like to piggy-back on this request, as andy and i work closely 
 together on this project... and, i have recently introduced some fixes 
 as well.

 Eric Dalquist wrote:
 
 Andy has submitted several good patches for uPortal recently and is 
 interested in commit access.

 +1 from me.

 -Eric
   
   
 -- 
 You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
 http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
 
 --
 Andy Gherna   |
 Senior Research Programmer| Phone:  (217) 265-9490
 CITES, University of Illinois | Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   


 -- 
 You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
 http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: [uportal-dev] Welcome to new committer Andy Gherna, maintaining wiki page listing committers

2007-08-06 Thread Eric Dalquist
Thanks Andy.


Now that CVS is in read-only mode and has been for a while can we prune 
that wiki page down to just those folks with SVN commit access?

-Eric

Andy Gherna wrote:

 Done.

  

 

 *From:* Andrew Petro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* Saturday, August 04, 2007 8:56 PM
 *To:* uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org
 *Subject:* [uportal-dev] Welcome to new committer Andy Gherna, 
 maintaining wiki page listing committers

  

 Andy,

 Welcome.

 I see someone (presumably Eric) has already set you up with SVN 
 credentials. Please also update this wiki page listing commiters 
 http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/UPC/Committers, highlighting the 
 areas of uPortal you're most interested in contributing to.

 Thanks,

 Andrew


 +1

  Cris J H

 Eric Dalquist wrote:

 Andy has submitted several good patches for uPortal recently and is 
 interested in commit access.

 +1 from me.

 -Eric

  

  

 -- 
 You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
 http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

 -- 
 You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
 http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[uportal-dev] Pruning the list of uPortal committers

2007-08-06 Thread Andrew Petro

Eric,

Are folks who haven't yet migrated their credentials to SVN no longer 
committers, or are they latent committers who have not yet addressed an 
annoying bit of administrivia?


Given the fun this weekend of getting Susan's SVN access figured out 
again, and that she definitely qualifies as a core commiter and an 
active contributor to present efforts, I think we should take care not 
to be too hasty to prune out folks who haven't made the jump.


Andrew


Thanks Andy.


Now that CVS is in read-only mode and has been for a while can we prune 
that wiki page down to just those folks with SVN commit access?


-Eric

Andy Gherna wrote:
  

Done.

 




--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev


[uportal-dev] 2.4.2-derived ALM maintenance branch

2007-08-06 Thread Andrew Petro

uPortal developers,

A client [1] has been generous enough to throw me a few [2] hours to 
work on ALM diagnostics, error detection, and bugfixing, with an 
especial need to apply these changes to 2.4.2.  I'd like to create a 
2-4-2-alm-maint exploratory branch for the purpose of sharing this 
maintenance code.  I hope this will be of interest and use to fewer and 
fewer uPortals as folks migrate to DLM, but since this is maintenance of 
uPortal itself it seems to me to belong in uPortal source control.


Andrew



[1]: I dislike that cloak and dagger some client, somewhere allusion 
probably even more than you do, and I'll see about giving credit where 
credit is due on any fruits of this labor.  More openness is better.  
Unfortunately, it's not always clear how much it is acceptable to share 
when.


[2]: Don't expect the realization of all ALM hopes and dreams ever had 
out of this effort -- it's a very few hours involved.  However, with a 
maintenance branch to explore mitigating issues in ALM in older uPortal 
environments, there's a place for continued collaboration on this if 
desired.


--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev


Re: [uportal-dev] 2.4.2-derived ALM maintenance branch

2007-08-06 Thread Andrew Petro

Eric,

The branch would be ad-hoc -- for the specific purpose of exploring ALM 
maintenance against uPortal 2.4.2, and not for other general fixes.


I expect it would be temporary in that over time people will care about 
ALM maintenance less and less, having moved on to DLM and bigger and 
better things.


I'm not volunteering to merge this code into the real ongoing 
2-4-patches branch.  I'd be open to doing that work if it proves 
desirable.  Presently I'm looking to do the simplest thing that could 
possibly work to do uPortal 2.4.2 ALM triage in an open way.


Downsides of patching up the existing 2-4-patches branch include: having 
to patch up this deployment to latest 2-4-patches or having to deal with 
unrelated differences since 2.4.2.  Presumably valuable but not the 
present project.  The ALM-specific exploratory branch is not guaranteed 
to be backwards compatible and countenances more daring changes.  Its 
purpose is different from that of 2-4-patches.


Andrew

Would this branch be temporary and eventually the code is merged into 
the 'real' 2.4 and 2.5 branches or would this stick around for a while? 
What are the downsides of just patching up the existing 2.4 branch?


-Eriuc

Andrew Petro wrote:
  

uPortal developers,

A client [1] has been generous enough to throw me a few [2] hours to 
work on ALM diagnostics, error detection, and bugfixing, with an 
especial need to apply these changes to 2.4.2.  I'd like to create a 
2-4-2-alm-maint exploratory branch for the purpose of sharing this 
maintenance code.  I hope this will be of interest and use to fewer 
and fewer uPortals as folks migrate to DLM, but since this is 
maintenance of uPortal itself it seems to me to belong in uPortal 
source control.


Andrew



[1]: I dislike that cloak and dagger some client, somewhere allusion 
probably even more than you do, and I'll see about giving credit where 
credit is due on any fruits of this labor.  More openness is better.  
Unfortunately, it's not always clear how much it is acceptable to 
share when.


[2]: Don't expect the realization of all ALM hopes and dreams ever had 
out of this effort -- it's a very few hours involved.  However, with a 
maintenance branch to explore mitigating issues in ALM in older 
uPortal environments, there's a place for continued collaboration on 
this if desired.






--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev


Re: [uportal-dev] Purging a Channel from all layouts

2007-08-06 Thread Susan Bramhall
Another approach would be to change the layout manager (or ??) to remove 
the channel from the layout as it builds it instead of substituting the 
channel not found error.  We talked about doing this but decided 
against it.

Susan

Andrew Petro wrote:

Philip,

It might be best to write some Java code to actuate the layout 
management API to load each user's layout, change it as you desire, 
and save it again.  This would make a very nice addition to the 
channel manager -- perhaps a button to Remove this channel from all 
user layouts.


Andrew

PS: I'm becoming increasingly convinced that the approach in the 
sandbox uPortal code of storing layout fragments as really wide 
database columns containing the layout XML instead of representing 
each node  as a database row is a very good idea -- it's probably just 
as performant if not more performant for real uses, and it's a whole 
lot simpler to understand and code against.  I suspect that if layout 
storage were implemented this way, you'd be done with this 
remove-a-channel-from-everyone's-layout task already.


I'm looking for a way to purge a channel from both the channel 
registry and all layouts it is contained in.


Deleting a channel in ChannelManager gives 'Channel not found' errors 
in any layouts that already had the channel.  Deleting the record 
directly from the LAYOUT_STRUCT table seems to completely ruin that 
users layout.  (I've done deluser on myself a few times now.)


Are there multiple tables that would need to be changed in order to 
not destroy the layout?


Thanks
Phil


ps. Sorry, if there is some simple solution to this, and I'm 
completely over thinking the problem!


  





--
It's no use trying to be clever--we are all clever here; just try to be kind--a 
little kind.
-- F.J. Foakes Jackson


--
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev


Re: [uportal-dev] [VOTE] Commit access for Timothy Carroll

2007-08-06 Thread Mark Boyd
+1.

Mark

On 8/6/07, Eric Dalquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 +1

 Andrew Petro wrote:
  (Forking thread for clarity)
 
  We have a bid for commitership here for Timothy Carroll, with a +1
  from newest commiter Andy Gherna.
 
  Timothy, could you post sharing a few more words about your background
  with uPortal, interests in contributing?
 
  Andrew
 
  Andy Gherna wrote:
  I would second this.  Tim's work was instrumental to fixing UP-1040.
 
   Original message 
 
  Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:53:42 -0500
  From: Timothy Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [uportal-dev] [VOTE] Commit access for Andy Gherna
  To: uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org
 
  i would like to piggy-back on this request, as andy and i work closely
  together on this project... and, i have recently introduced some fixes
  as well.
 
  Eric Dalquist wrote:
 
  Andy has submitted several good patches for uPortal recently and is
  interested in commit access.
 
  +1 from me.
 
  -Eric
 
 
  --
  You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
 http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
 
  --
  Andy Gherna   |
  Senior Research Programmer| Phone:  (217) 265-9490
  CITES, University of Illinois | Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
  --
  You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
 http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev



-- 
You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev