RE: Idea about Norton
Looks like we'd have to request user to disable or ignore both AV SW and Microsoft's Smartscreen (Win 8 and 10) before installation. As a Norton user myself, I just downloaded on Windows 10 a code signed test file of my own, and Norton's screens were less off-putting and more informative than Microsoft's Smartscreen warnings. ( how-the-smartscreen-filter-works-in-windows <http://www.howtogeek.com/123938/htg-explains-how-the-smartscreen-filter-works-in-windows-8/> ) Tom B. -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Idea-about-Norton-tp4711879p4711884.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
RE: Idea about Norton
I have a Adobe CC business account. When the problem requires a re-install Adobe tech support always has me disable AV SW on any of the PCs with CC installed. If Adobe requires turning off the AV SW to install CC components then why would it be a problem for LC SW distribution to require the same? My Win 10 Pro PCs even ask for permission to uninstall SW. 2 cents Ralph DiMola IT Director Evergreen Information Services rdim...@evergreeninfo.net ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: Idea about Norton
Or, NOT off-list. Tom -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Idea-about-Norton-tp4711879p4711882.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: Idea about Norton
I think AV authors were onto this trick a long time ago. I've asked LC to look into seeing what can be done about this (mainly by contacting Norton), because we use NAV at our company, and for every new compile of every desktop app, we have to manually approve it on every workstation. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:12 PM, tbodine via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Hi Graham. > > I wanted to float a rough idea off-list... Tell me what you think. > > If Norton faults our files for being new and not (yet) popular, perhaps > we could generate a base of download activity ourselves to get over the > threshold. Specifically, I'm thinking of an informal group of software > authors who form a "mutual download society." > > Say we had 10 authors to start who agreed to download one another's > product file(s) once a day for a month. At worst, we'd probably learn some > things about what Norton counts, what it ignores, and what is the threshold > to move to a trusted level. At best, we might help each other to win > acceptance. > > For those of us with fast, unmetered connections, there's virtually no > cost to the downloading of files other than the time it takes to do it. And > with Livecode we could easily write a stack to automate that job. > > Thoughts? > > Tom Bodine > > _ > Sent from http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com > > > ___ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > -- On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth On the second day, God created the oceans. On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours, and did a little diving. And God said, "This is good." ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: Idea about Norton
I think this is the wrong way to go about it. I don't think Norton simply counts the number of times software attempts to install without signing, and then has a threshold where it accepts the unsigned installation without challenge. I have noticed however that sometimes installation instructions include the disclaimer, "You may need to suspend or disable you Antivirus software to install this application." Or something along those lines. Perhaps you need to distribute an Installation Notes text file with your application? I actually have encountered print driver software that WOULD NOT WORK as long as a certain OEM distributed AV software was running on the workstation. Bob S On Jan 23, 2017, at 10:12 , tbodine via use-livecode> wrote: Hi Graham. I wanted to float a rough idea off-list... Tell me what you think. If Norton faults our files for being new and not (yet) popular, perhaps we could generate a base of download activity ourselves to get over the threshold. Specifically, I'm thinking of an informal group of software authors who form a "mutual download society." Say we had 10 authors to start who agreed to download one another's product file(s) once a day for a month. At worst, we'd probably learn some things about what Norton counts, what it ignores, and what is the threshold to move to a trusted level. At best, we might help each other to win acceptance. For those of us with fast, unmetered connections, there's virtually no cost to the downloading of files other than the time it takes to do it. And with Livecode we could easily write a stack to automate that job. Thoughts? Tom Bodine ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Idea about Norton
Hi Graham. I wanted to float a rough idea off-list... Tell me what you think. If Norton faults our files for being new and not (yet) popular, perhaps we could generate a base of download activity ourselves to get over the threshold. Specifically, I'm thinking of an informal group of software authors who form a "mutual download society." Say we had 10 authors to start who agreed to download one another's product file(s) once a day for a month. At worst, we'd probably learn some things about what Norton counts, what it ignores, and what is the threshold to move to a trusted level. At best, we might help each other to win acceptance. For those of us with fast, unmetered connections, there's virtually no cost to the downloading of files other than the time it takes to do it. And with Livecode we could easily write a stack to automate that job. Thoughts? Tom Bodine _ Sent from http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode