Re: Simple Socket Saga
Message path questions - answers Your idea of putting the accept further down in the message path is what I wanted to do but the documentation seemed to indicate this was not possible. Try it, my friend! The worst that can happen is that it won't work. When doing investigation of the message path, try the following logic: Create a handler. Put the SAME handler in several script containers, such as stack, card, group, button, etc. steps to follow -- -1- create a new stack -2- add a button named catchInButton -3- add a field named catchInField; lock this field -4- select both the button and field; then do 'group selected' from the Object menu name this group catchInGroup copy and paste the script into the stack script --- on catchThis put msg cr Got my attention the short name of me into msg pass catchThis end catchThis now use the message box to set the script of this card to the script of this stack set the script of group 1 to the script of this stack set the script of button 1 to the script of this stack set the script of field 1 to the script of this stack now ADD this to two objects, the button and the locked field on mouseUp put empty into msg send catchThis to me in 10 milliseconds end mouseUp --- The test is to click on the button and the locked field and read the message box. EXTRA points What happens if you do the following two lines from the message box insert the script of group 1 into back insert the script of group 1 into front EXTRA points insert the script of button 1 into front Experts will understand the answers once they see them. Try using this line instead for more details put msg cr Got my attention the short name of me the long id of me into msg Hope this helps give someone a method to find message path answers quickly Jim Ault Las Vegas ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: [ANN] Stacks published on the Web
I understand your concern, Coliln. What I did was to create a new user with no admin rights, then log in as that user and download and run the stacks within the plugin (fast user switching makes that so easy). Even if a stack contained the equivalent of 'rm -rf', such a command would only affect that temporary user's directories. I'd be interested to know, do you never download stacks from revOnline? Or if you download a stack from Richard Gaskin's or Sarah Reichelt's website, would you type 'set the secureMode to true' before you did that? At some level I think we need to trust the other users on this list (especially those like Alejandro who have been around a while). In 7 years on this list I don't remember a single instance of someone reporting that another user had distributed malicious code. Maybe this is going to be a serious problem in distributing apps via the plugin. When someone downloads an app themselves, they (generally) don't worry about what it might do to their system. But when the plugin presents a warning dialog like it currently does, it might make people reluctant to let the code run, when they would have had no worries about running an application they had downloaded themselves. I don't think Flash apps running in a plugin even have the possibility to access the filesystem. I think users may be alarmed by the warning that the Rev plugin throws up, because it's not behaviour they're used to seeing within their browser. Bernard On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Colin Holgateco...@rcn.com wrote: I have no idea what the other two links do, because I'm not going to allow permission for the stacks to write files to my hard drive. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Command-line screen recorder for Mac and PC?
Practical? Yes. Acceptable - maybe not? That is a 17MB download is in the days of Word-of-Warcraft Patches is nothing, and you could go to the trouble of embedding the app and installing it from Rev. Given the regular updates, ease of install, and general usefulness of VLC - it is really better just to get the user to install it themselves with a provided link from your app. Support issues are reduced that way. Acceptable? Well it's not really expected - particularly if you charge for the app - to make your app so visibly dependent on another app in this way. So with regard to your customers, you have more of a marketing problem than a practical one. AFAIK - VLC on OSX is entirely contained in the bundle, The same may be true for windows (the Linux version most probably places one or more executable in the relevant bin directory). Generally it is a very clean install, but as I haven't gone down the route of embedding it myself I'd have to say I don't really know. There are no cleanly seperable command line components - it's all part of the same thing. It is for these reasons bundling Mplayer, or FFMPEG with your app is often preferred to using VLC. But it's only VLC that you get everything with (including live streaming and screencasting) - for which you pay the 17mb download price. 2009/8/1 Richard Miller w...@together.net But is it practical to have the core VLC application (and associated files, whatever they may be) installed on the users computer, along with a Rev app? The VLC download is 17 MB, but perhaps that includes many files not needed to actually run the commands in command-line mode. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Not clear about revMedia vs revEnterprise
It's the browser that will do the https for the plugin - the plugin will just need to pass any additional security requirements which AFAIK there aren't any as https is basically and encrypted wrapper around a normal http stream. My guess on this would be that there will be no major issues with secure https issues and the plugin - it should just work? 2009/8/1 Bernard Devlin bdrun...@gmail.com During the webinar concerning Rev 4 I asked an unanswered question about SSL and the new rev plugin. We were told these questions would make their way into a FAQ, but I haven't seen any further reference to these FAQs. So what I'm saying here is just my deductions. On the belief that revMedia is being made free because it is this that is the basis for the browser plugin, I really don't see how any rev code running inside the plugin could access a URL using https (since SSL is an enterprise-only feature). So, it looks like one cannot expect an application built with Enterprise to necessarily work inside the plugin. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Not clear about revMedia vs revEnterprise
Think of the hassle that would logically accompany three different downloads for the three editions: revMedia (neither databases nor SSL), revStudio (databases but no SSL) and revEnterprise (databases and SSL). It is far more likely that there is a single runtime for the browser plug-in, but the revlet can only do what is supported in the edition that you build it with. The potential for business applications is huge, and it will be a lot easier to build than with Java applet/JNLP constructs. Jan Schenkel = Quartam Reports PDF Library for Revolution http://www.quartam.com = As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time. (La Rochefoucauld) --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Bernard Devlin bdrun...@gmail.com wrote: From: Bernard Devlin bdrun...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Not clear about revMedia vs revEnterprise To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 11:25 PM During the webinar concerning Rev 4 I asked an unanswered question about SSL and the new rev plugin. We were told these questions would make their way into a FAQ, but I haven't seen any further reference to these FAQs. So what I'm saying here is just my deductions. On the belief that revMedia is being made free because it is this that is the basis for the browser plugin, I really don't see how any rev code running inside the plugin could access a URL using https (since SSL is an enterprise-only feature). So, it looks like one cannot expect an application built with Enterprise to necessarily work inside the plugin. Bernard On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:20 AM, stevex64steve...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all, I played with one sample revMedia app embedded in a web page. That was pretty cool. Does anyone know if you can embed a full-blown app developed in revEnterprise in a web page somehow? It could have interesting distribution and update implications. Thanks, Steve ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Not clear about revMedia vs revEnterprise
If this is true then it's good news. However, since plugins like Flash are able to make their own multiple network connections once they are instantiated, I'd be surprised to learn that plugin network connections piggy-back on the browser's connection. Since the revPlugin is visible as an application distinct from the browser in the running processes of the OS, the plugin is clearly not subsumed within the browser. If you're right, then it sounds like providing Rev as a browser plugin might be even more complex than I'd imagined. Anyway, it's speculation like this that should have been resolved with a list of FAQs. I don't see myself using the plugin, so it's of academic interest to me. Bernard On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:20 AM, David Bovilldavid.bov...@gmail.com wrote: It's the browser that will do the https for the plugin - the plugin will just need to pass any additional security requirements which AFAIK there aren't any as https is basically and encrypted wrapper around a normal http stream. My guess on this would be that there will be no major issues with secure https issues and the plugin - it should just work? ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: [ANN] Stacks published on the Web
I have downloaded stacks before, but playing stacks in a plugin should just load and run, and not be asking permission to write files to the hard drive. If the files needing to be written are just preference settings, then the language of the warning should change. As it stands you could be giving permission for the stack to completely fill up your drive with large movie files or images. I don't think that the plugin should insist on asking the user for permission to load content from the web. After all, the stack itself came from the web, so it's too late already! The way it is in Shockwave works ok. If the content being loaded is from the same web site, there is no warning, if it's from another web site, the user is presented a dialog at the time of the reading of the data, and there are three options to choose from. You can see that in action here: http://xfiles.funnygarbage.com/~colinholgate/dcr/solarsystem.dcr Click past the first screen, then click on the cartoon looking element, and click in the 3D space to make a planet with that texture. At that instant you get asked for permission. The actual texture doesn't work, Cartoon Network removed that file long ago. The way that Flash works with writing local content works well. Flash can, by default, write up to 100k of local data without asking for permission. The user can increase or decrease that at any time. So, in coming up with the best ways to warn people, take a good look at how it's done in Flash and Shockwave. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Naive question 1000
Somehow this passed me by . . . How do I tell if a check button is checked ? tried: if the checkMark of btn CHECK is true then put selected end if and got nowehere. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Naive question 1000
Try the hilite, like you would for a radio button As mentioned in the docs, 'checkmark' is purely for Hypercard compatibility. Ian On 2 Aug 2009, at 17:16, Richmond Mathewson wrote: Somehow this passed me by . . . How do I tell if a check button is checked ? tried: if the checkMark of btn CHECK is true then put selected end if and got nowehere. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Naive question 1000
Hi Richmond: Try if the hilite of btn Check = true then ... Paul Gabel --- On Aug 2, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote: Somehow this passed me by . . . How do I tell if a check button is checked ? tried: if the checkMark of btn CHECK is true then put selected end if and got nowehere. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: [ANN] Stacks published on the Web
Le 2 août 09 à 17:24, Colin Holgate a écrit : I don't think that the plugin should insist on asking the user for permission to load content from the web My personal tought : Yes, as long as this web contents can only interact with the user without any local-filesystem access, but only as inside the plugin runnable code and medias. No, in any other cases. The way that Flash works with writing local content works well. Flash can, by default, write up to 100k of local data without asking for permission. The user can increase or decrease that at any time. But in terms of real ability to fill very unfriendly code to the client-side computer, 100 k is enought to kill anything of the local file-system and even the hard-disk it-self by speeding it up until it definitivelly crash via a 6ko sniplet. So, if 100 k is enought to kill and hack anything, both, the Java or Flash security models are only non-sense in anything else out of marketing considerations. In my humble advice, as a real honest team, management and company, RunRev know and does exactly what need to be done to protect the client-side computer and i think for my own that they are just doing the best of what need to be done. On the other hand, i would appreciate to be able to avoid the display of any local-file system access autorisation demand, each time i purpose a plugin-app witch don't interact in any way with the local file system (updating it-self via post, get, realtime video-streaming, video-conferencing, etc...) even if to stay fluent in terms of user's experience, this need for me, to be able to save its personal plugin's preferences to my own server, instead of in writing them to its local file-system. Mes deux centimes d'Euro ;-) Pierre -- Pierre Sahores mobile : 06 03 95 77 70 www.sahores-conseil.com ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: [ANN] Stacks published on the Web
On Aug 2, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Pierre Sahores wrote: But in terms of real ability to fill very unfriendly code to the client-side computer, 100 k is enought to kill anything of the local file-system and even the hard-disk it-self by speeding it up until it definitivelly crash via a 6ko sniplet. So, if 100 k is enought to kill and hack anything, both, the Java or Flash security models are only non-sense in anything else out of marketing considerations. This isn't a worry, because the 100k is effectively a text file, and Flash has no way to execute the file. It's only for storing things like preferences. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Not clear about revMedia vs revEnterprise
Ok - their are two things going on. First viewing a secure https page with a plugin on the page (that is the bit the browser does), second any network connectivity the revlet does - that's not the browsers business but down to the capabilities of the plugin. I was just talking of the former. We'll have to wait till the FAQ to get an idea about the latter - though I've always felt RunRev was shooting itself in the foot by only including https functionality with enterprise editions, and doing the same for the plugin really makes no sense - so I'd be surprised if they prevent anyone from developing plugin based ecommerce solutions. 2009/8/2 Bernard Devlin bdrun...@gmail.com If this is true then it's good news. However, since plugins like Flash are able to make their own multiple network connections once they are instantiated, I'd be surprised to learn that plugin network connections piggy-back on the browser's connection. Since the revPlugin is visible as an application distinct from the browser in the running processes of the OS, the plugin is clearly not subsumed within the browser. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Naive question 1000
Many Thanks to Paul Gabel and Ian Wood! Although how a checkmark in a check button constitutes hiliting escapes me . . . :) Paul Gabel wrote: Hi Richmond: Try if the hilite of btn Check = true then ... Paul Gabel --- On Aug 2, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote: Somehow this passed me by . . . How do I tell if a check button is checked ? tried: if the checkMark of btn CHECK is true then put selected end if and got nowehere. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: [ANN] Stacks published on the Web
Le 2 août 09 à 18:43, Colin Holgate a écrit : On Aug 2, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Pierre Sahores wrote: But in terms of real ability to fill very unfriendly code to the client-side computer, 100 k is enought to kill anything of the local file-system and even the hard-disk it-self by speeding it up until it definitivelly crash via a 6ko sniplet. So, if 100 k is enought to kill and hack anything, both, the Java or Flash security models are only non-sense in anything else out of marketing considerations. This isn't a worry, because the 100k is effectively a text file, and Flash has no way to execute the file. It's only for storing things like preferences. Would not be a good idea to insist and i will hangup there after just some last words : this is just what the marketing says. Any master2 n- tier security course just make us green about all what can, in fact, be done behind the scene. In my own case, the best i learned about the subject credits more an army officier thesis than the unmodeled course contents... ..., Pierre -- Pierre Sahores mobile : 06 03 95 77 70 www.sahores-conseil.com ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: [ANN] Stacks published on the Web
Bernard Devlin wrote: Maybe this is going to be a serious problem in distributing apps via the plugin. When someone downloads an app themselves, they (generally) don't worry about what it might do to their system. But when the plugin presents a warning dialog like it currently does, it might make people reluctant to let the code run, when they would have had no worries about running an application they had downloaded themselves. I have to agree that the generic warning is a little too scary to encourage widespread adoption. Allowing developers to supply their own warning would help. For example, if the warning said This Revlet wants permission to write a preference file to your hard drive I wouldn't have many qualms. On the other hand, if RR gives control over the prompt to the developer, there's no way to police it. The prompt could ask for permission to write a text file and instead proceed to wipe the drive. I'm not sure what the right approach is. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Naive question 1000
Obviously it's different for other OSes, but on OS X, checkboxes do indeed get highlighted when checked... ;-) Ian On 2 Aug 2009, at 18:15, Richmond Mathewson wrote: Although how a checkmark in a check button constitutes hiliting escapes me . . . :) ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Naive question 1000
Actually, the script can be even simpler: if the hilite of btn check then Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Multimedia Design -Original Message- From: Richmond Mathewson richmondmathew...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:15:51 To: How to use Revolutionuse-revolution@lists.runrev.com Subject: Re: Naive question 1000 Many Thanks to Paul Gabel and Ian Wood! Although how a checkmark in a check button constitutes hiliting escapes me . . . :) Paul Gabel wrote: Hi Richmond: Try if the hilite of btn Check = true then ... Paul Gabel --- On Aug 2, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote: Somehow this passed me by . . . How do I tell if a check button is checked ? tried: if the checkMark of btn CHECK is true then put selected end if and got nowehere. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: [ANN] Stacks published on the Web
On Aug 2, 2009, at 1:26 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: I have to agree that the generic warning is a little too scary to encourage widespread adoption. An example of too many dialogs preventing adoption is Shockwave. Even with 60% of people having Shockwave installed, clients tend not to want to use it because installing the plugin has opt-out add-ons, and if you access content on another valid site for the same company, Shockwave would show that security dialog. With the latest Shockwave version you can now check the crossdomain.xml policy file, and so at last can get around that issue for using content on another one of the client's sites. Flash security is extremely tough and limiting, and manages to do all that without having to bother the user with permission dialogs. About 15 years of effort has gone into the thinking behind how Shockwave and Flash security is handled, so there is a chance that some of what they have done is a good way to work. So, Rev stacks online for your relatives to see your work is fine, but for real large client work it won't succeed if every user that uses the piece has to cope with security and permissions dialogs, because clients will tell you to use Flash instead. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: [ANN] Stacks published on the Web
Hi there, I think this problem is a huge mess! I found myself feeling really paranoid about trying the stacks due to the nasty sounding dialogs. There has to be a better solution or people will not adopt using the plug-in. Just my 2 cents. Rick On Aug 2, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Colin Holgate wrote: On Aug 2, 2009, at 1:26 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: I have to agree that the generic warning is a little too scary to encourage widespread adoption. An example of too many dialogs preventing adoption is Shockwave. Even with 60% of people having Shockwave installed, clients tend not to want to use it because installing the plugin has opt-out add-ons, and if you access content on another valid site for the same company, Shockwave would show that security dialog. With the latest Shockwave version you can now check the crossdomain.xml policy file, and so at last can get around that issue for using content on another one of the client's sites. Flash security is extremely tough and limiting, and manages to do all that without having to bother the user with permission dialogs. About 15 years of effort has gone into the thinking behind how Shockwave and Flash security is handled, so there is a chance that some of what they have done is a good way to work. So, Rev stacks online for your relatives to see your work is fine, but for real large client work it won't succeed if every user that uses the piece has to cope with security and permissions dialogs, because clients will tell you to use Flash instead. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution __ Rick Harrison You can buy my $10 music album Funny Time Machine digital CD on the iTunes Store Now! To visit the iTunes Store now to listen to samples of my CD please click on the following link. (Please note you must have iTunes installed on your computer for this link to work.) http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAlbum?playListId=213668290 ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: start using...
Le 01-août-09 à 19:43, Yves COPPE a écrit : Hi list I want to use the following script start using stack xxx on a server with a revlet how can I get the directory of a stack on a server ? the stack is in the same folder (dir) as the revlet on the server thanks. Greetings. Yves COPPE yvesco...@skynet.be Re List Has anybody any suggestion for my question above ? Thanks. Greetings. Yves COPPE yvesco...@skynet.be ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: start using...
Hi Yves, In remote access mode, the directory of the stack can be handled as any other kind of http url (html, xml, txt,etc...). If you just try to have the server's stack available as a script lib of the revlet in following the start using stack n by insert the script of cd/script of stack n in the back/front, the simplest way to try would be to just use a 1.- put url http;//yourdomainnameserver/thepathtoyourfile into myscriptlib_var where yourfile is a txt file containing the scripts you want to to run inside the plugin, 2.- and than make myscriptlib_var available inside the plugin ram instance in running the command insert myscriptlib_var in the back/ front. Should this be handy ? Else, could you explain a little more about the process you want to set up, including the type of communication you want to establish beetwin the revlet and the server stack ? Best Regards, -- Pierre Sahores mobile : 06 03 95 77 70 www.sahores-conseil.com Le 2 août 09 à 22:09, Yves COPPE a écrit : Le 01-août-09 à 19:43, Yves COPPE a écrit : Hi list I want to use the following script start using stack xxx on a server with a revlet how can I get the directory of a stack on a server ? the stack is in the same folder (dir) as the revlet on the server thanks. Greetings. Yves COPPE yvesco...@skynet.be Re List Has anybody any suggestion for my question above ? Thanks. Greetings. Yves COPPE yvesco...@skynet.be ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: start using...
Le 02-août-09 à 22:46, Pierre Sahores a écrit : Hi Yves, In remote access mode, the directory of the stack can be handled as any other kind of http url (html, xml, txt,etc...). If you just try to have the server's stack available as a script lib of the revlet in following the start using stack n by insert the script of cd/script of stack n in the back/front, the simplest way to try would be to just use a 1.- put url http;//yourdomainnameserver/thepathtoyourfile into myscriptlib_var where yourfile is a txt file containing the scripts you want to to run inside the plugin, 2.- and than make myscriptlib_var available inside the plugin ram instance in running the command insert myscriptlib_var in the back/ front. Should this be handy ? Else, could you explain a little more about the process you want to set up, including the type of communication you want to establish beetwin the revlet and the server stack ? Re, Surely, I have a library in a stack. This library is not the mine. The stack with the library is password protected So the only way to use the library is to start with Start using sack containing the lib If I write put url (binfile:http://www.mydomainname.com/myFolder/mystack; into myscriptlib and then start using stack myscriptlib it fails If I write start using stack http://www.mydomainname.com/myFolder/mystack it also fails If I write on my main stack, when this stack becomes a revlet answer the filename of this stack I get an empty answer So I cannot set the defaultFolder and I cannot pick a scrip tof a library How do I do in this case ? Thanks. Greetings. Yves COPPE yvesco...@skynet.be ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: start using...
Hi Yves, you can always make the library a substack of your mainstack. Open the messagebox and type set the mainstack of stack myLibrary to myManstack This will embed the library into your revLet. For dynamically loading and unloading: I want to know that too. I hope one of the Rev folks chimes in and give answers. All the best, Malte ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: start using...
I thought library stacks was something that had already been stated as not in this version? Ian On 2 Aug 2009, at 23:20, Malte Brill wrote: For dynamically loading and unloading: I want to know that too. I hope one of the Rev folks chimes in and give answers. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: start using...
Hi Ian, I successfully tested AE and charts in revLets. For on-rev we can not use stacks as yet, but in a revLet it works like a charm. Cheers, Malte ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: start using...
Le 2 août 09 à 23:08, Yves COPPE a écrit : Le 02-août-09 à 22:46, Pierre Sahores a écrit : Hi Yves, In remote access mode, the directory of the stack can be handled as any other kind of http url (html, xml, txt,etc...). If you just try to have the server's stack available as a script lib of the revlet in following the start using stack n by insert the script of cd/script of stack n in the back/front, the simplest way to try would be to just use a 1.- put url http;//yourdomainnameserver/thepathtoyourfile into myscriptlib_var where yourfile is a txt file containing the scripts you want to to run inside the plugin, 2.- and than make myscriptlib_var available inside the plugin ram instance in running the command insert myscriptlib_var in the back/ front. Should this be handy ? Else, could you explain a little more about the process you want to set up, including the type of communication you want to establish beetwin the revlet and the server stack ? Re, Surely, I have a library in a stack. This library is not the mine. The stack with the library is password protected So the only way to use the library is to start with Start using sack containing the lib If I write put url (binfile:http://www.mydomainname.com/myFolder/mystack; into myscriptlib and then start using stack myscriptlib it fails If I write start using stack http://www.mydomainname.com/myFolder/mystack it also fails If I write on my main stack, when this stack becomes a revlet answer the filename of this stack I get an empty answer So I cannot set the defaultFolder and I cannot pick a scrip tof a library How do I do in this case ? Need, at least, to get an unlocked version of the stack/the contained scrpts you want to use. Why don't you ask about your need to the copyright older of the stack ? Best, Pierre Thanks. Greetings. Yves COPPE yvesco...@skynet.be ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution -- Pierre Sahores mobile : (33) 6 03 95 77 70 www.wrds.com www.sahores-conseil.com ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Command-line screen recorder for Mac and PC?
Hi Richard, Yes, Snapper makes screenshots and uses EnhancedQT to assemble a movie and add the audio track. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering http://economy-x-talk.com Submit your software products to http://www.quickestpublisher.com and get found! If you sent me an e-mail before 8th July and haven't got a reply yet, please send me a reminder. On 1 aug 2009, at 01:53, Richard Miller wrote: Hi Mark, So is this basically a matter of taking repeated screen shots through Rev and piecing these together into a movie through the EQT functions? I suppose one can then overlay an audio track as well. Is that the basic game plan? Thanks. Richard ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
