Re: OT religious controversy
--- Ken Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I must have missed something. Was this a > response to something, or just > a statement? nothing really to notice, no harm intended by anyone. i happen to play organ for a fundamentalist church, so i can see (or imagine) how the "saints" might take offense at something poking fun at their literal interpretation of "Genesee". Erik Hansen = [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: OT religious controversy
On Feb 24, 2005, at 1:58 PM, Raymond E. Griffith wrote: Well, in Program Philosophy I am an "intelligent design" advocate. If a program isn't intelligently designed, it doesn't matter that someone created it. That was why Hypercard got a bad name. There was lots of creationism, but not as much intelligent design. Which is why, I've always suspected, HC was put on the v-e-r-y s-l-o-w upgrade path and then abandoned altogether by Apple. Far too easy for us commoners to make buggy, bad-looking apps that ran poorly. And as home-brewed stacks got a bad name, what parent company was going to get a bad name by association? Mark ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: OT religious controversy
> Hi Erik, > > I must have missed something. Was this a response to something, or just > a statement? > > Ken N. > >> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:42:57 -0800 (PST) >> From: Erik Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: OT religious controversy >> >> >> i don't happen to be a "creationist" or >> "intelligent design" advocate, but about >> half of the people in this country >> are. i am certain that some people on the >> list are as well. Well, in Program Philosophy I am an "intelligent design" advocate. If a program isn't intelligently designed, it doesn't matter that someone created it. That was why Hypercard got a bad name. There was lots of creationism, but not as much intelligent design. Regards, Raymond E. Griffith ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
OT religious controversy
Hi Erik, I must have missed something. Was this a response to something, or just a statement? Ken N. Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:42:57 -0800 (PST) From: Erik Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: OT religious controversy i don't happen to be a "creationist" or "intelligent design" advocate, but about half of the people in this country are. i am certain that some people on the list are as well. religion and politics are two areas where we should agree to disagree and leave it at that. this list is a community of sorts. with so many interests in common, polarization and marginalization detract from the common goal(s). ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: OT religious controversy
Message: 17 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:42:57 -0800 (PST) From: Erik Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: OT religious controversy To: How to use Revolution Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii i don't happen to be a "creationist" or "intelligent design" advocate, but about half of the people in this country are. i am certain that some people on the list are as well. religion and politics are two areas where we should agree to disagree and leave it at that. this list is a community of sorts. with so many interests in common, polarization and marginalization detract from the common goal(s). [steps down from soap box] Erik Hansen = I hope no one considered my comments to hold any religious significance. Actually they were a snippet from a humor article I submitted to the New Yorker last year. They didn't think it was funny either. I need to learn the smiley face conventions :-) Jim ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
RE: OT religious controversy
If anyone likes debating religion - I suggest www.onlinedebate.net - I used to be a moderator there, before I had to quit because I was getting too caught up in the debates and thus ignoring more important things in my life. The guy who runs that site is religious but very fair minded - and the site is designed to balanced, with moderators of all persuasions. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: OT religious controversy
I didn't know there was a controversy?? HHmmm Tom On Feb 23, 2005, at 10:42 PM, Erik Hansen wrote: [steps down from soap box] Erik Hansen Thomas J McGrath III [EMAIL PROTECTED] 412-831-3094 220 Drake Road Bethel Park, PA 15102 <*)) >=< "Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - a Cigar in one hand - a large steak in the other - your body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming - WOO HOO! What a Ride!" ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: OT religious controversy
Mark To what was this a response? Dan On Feb 23, 2005, at 7:42 PM, Erik Hansen wrote: i don't happen to be a "creationist" or "intelligent design" advocate, but about half of the people in this country are. i am certain that some people on the list are as well. religion and politics are two areas where we should agree to disagree and leave it at that. this list is a community of sorts. with so many interests in common, polarization and marginalization detract from the common goal(s). [steps down from soap box] Erik Hansen = [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball. http://baseball.fantasysports.yahoo.com/ ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: OT religious controversy
There is a discussion list for Christian xTalk users (Rev and other IDE's) at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cxtalk/ This is offered for those who wish to talk about their faith, projects, and xTalk IDEs with other users. (Not for pro/con religious controversy and politics per se, sorry, can't help there!) Curry -- religion and politics are two areas where we should agree to disagree and leave it at that. this list is a community of sorts. with so many interests in common, polarization and marginalization detract from the common goal(s). ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
OT religious controversy
i don't happen to be a "creationist" or "intelligent design" advocate, but about half of the people in this country are. i am certain that some people on the list are as well. religion and politics are two areas where we should agree to disagree and leave it at that. this list is a community of sorts. with so many interests in common, polarization and marginalization detract from the common goal(s). [steps down from soap box] Erik Hansen = [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball. http://baseball.fantasysports.yahoo.com/ ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
