OpenBase - WAS: Re: Filemaker through ODBC

2007-10-03 Thread Luis

Hiya,

Anyone tried OpenBase (http://www.openbase.com/) as an alternative?
I'll admit I haven't used it much, but found performance much better  
that FMP.


I have seen a very impressive POS made with it, can't recall the name.

Nice thing I noticed was that some functions are available as standard,
whereas they're plugins in FMP (like integrated email for instance,  
although basic).


Cheers,

Luis.


On 3 Oct 2007, at 11:01, Ben Rubinstein wrote:


Mark Schonewille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


I might start a project that should connect a Revolution front-end to
a FM Pro database. One of the candidates to do this is ODBC. Reading
the archives, I can't help thinking that the combination of ODBC and
FM Pro may not be the best option. Does anyone have good experiences
with ODBC and FM Pro? How easy or difficult is it to accomplish this?


Hi Mark,

We have several installations that routinely extract data from FMP  
via ODBC.  It
works fine, with a few minor limitations (which may by now have  
been dealt with
anyway, these were set up a few years ago).  The app itself  
routinely extracts
data from various different databases, so the good thing about FMP  
via ODBC, as
far as I'm concerned, is that configuring the app in these cases to  
extract from
FMP was reasonably trivial.  It is necessary to throw a dialog on  
screen to tell
the user to make sure that Filemaker is open and has these  
databases open.


However, one caveat:  for the last 18 months, we've been having  
horrendous
problems with one client using this facility.  Their database  
solution, built
for them in FMP by a third party developer, is the most insanely  
architected
I've seen in a long while.  Apart from a shudder of disgust, I  
didn't think it
would be a problem; but in fact, especially as the client has added  
considerably
more data, we've found this impacts on getting the data out over  
ODBC.  In some
cases it times out; even worse, in some cases it doesn't, but  
doesn't return all

the data.

I mostly blame the madmen who so badly designed the database  
solution; but the
fact is that it 'works' viewed through FileMaker itself, but fails  
in various

ways over ODBC.

So just be aware, that while I don't think you should have a  
problem, if you
were to try to connect to an exceptionally badly designed database  
(eg one in
which extracting simple items of data required FileMaker to  
undertake chains of

calculations) you might run into difficulties.


- Ben





___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OpenBase - WAS: Re: Filemaker through ODBC

2007-10-03 Thread Bruce Robertson
> Hiya,
> 
> Anyone tried OpenBase (http://www.openbase.com/) as an alternative?
> I'll admit I haven't used it much, but found performance much better
> that FMP.
> 
> I have seen a very impressive POS made with it, can't recall the name.
> 
> Nice thing I noticed was that some functions are available as standard,
> whereas they're plugins in FMP (like integrated email for instance,
> although basic).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Luis.

Not quite true.

FileMaker has built in scriptable email generation that sends message
through your mail client application.

For a broader range of features such as multiple attachments you do need a
plugin.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OpenBase - WAS: Re: Filemaker through ODBC

2007-10-04 Thread Luis

True, I should have clarified.

FMP pushes it through your OS mail client, the mail.it plugin (among  
others) will email from within FMP

(the mail.it plugin is excellent btw).

Cheers,

Luis.


On 4 Oct 2007, at 05:03, Bruce Robertson wrote:


Hiya,

Anyone tried OpenBase (http://www.openbase.com/) as an alternative?
I'll admit I haven't used it much, but found performance much better
that FMP.

I have seen a very impressive POS made with it, can't recall the  
name.


Nice thing I noticed was that some functions are available as  
standard,

whereas they're plugins in FMP (like integrated email for instance,
although basic).

Cheers,

Luis.


Not quite true.

FileMaker has built in scriptable email generation that sends message
through your mail client application.

For a broader range of features such as multiple attachments you do  
need a

plugin.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution