Re: See us on MacWorld and Macnn
The second article kept referring to the product as Revolution - a very bad thing. Let me be my usual blunt self: this product can not be taken seriously with the name Revolution! I have to say that I've always liked the name Revolution. It's unique. I always verbally and mentally call the product Revolution. I search the web for runrev because that's the easiest way that returns relevant results, and also use RunRev as an abbreviation for the company in writing. I abbreviate the product as Rev when writing it down repeatedly, such as in an e-mail. For me, these are simply different variations adapted for different uses; searching for runrev or writing about Rev doesn't mean I don't like Revolution. So I don't see anything wrong with using either Revolution or RunRev. Then again, I'm not swayed much by social trends. I just like what I like. If using one term over another increases revenue then so be it. Anyway, congrats Heather and Rev team on the press coverage! Curry ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
See us on MacWorld and Macnn
Dear list folks, If you're interested, we're starting to get the word out about revMedia. There are some nice articles here: http://www.macnn.com/articles/09/07/22/revmedia.40.alpha.test/ and http://www.macworld.com/article/141876/2009/07/revmedia.html Regards, Heather Heather Nagey Customer Services Manager Runtime Revolution Ltd http://www.runrev.com follow me on twitter http://www.twitter.com/lainopik ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: See us on MacWorld and Macnn
Heather, Great to see the company getting good press. But... The first article seemed to imply that the name Revolution was retired - a good thing. The second article kept referring to the product as Revolution - a very bad thing. Let me be my usual blunt self: this product can not be taken seriously with the name Revolution! It is long passed time time to kill it. I hate to think how much money this has cost RunRev Ltd. The names revMedia, revStudio, and revEnterprise are going in the right direction. This brings us to the language: revTalk = hyperTalk = toy language (I'm talking perception, not necessarily reality). You can write real code with Rev. So, why not join the big leagues with revCode? Regards, Paul Looney On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Heather Nagey wrote: Dear list folks, If you're interested, we're starting to get the word out about revMedia. There are some nice articles here: http://www.macnn.com/articles/09/07/22/revmedia.40.alpha.test/ and http://www.macworld.com/article/141876/2009/07/revmedia.html Regards, Heather Heather Nagey Customer Services Manager Runtime Revolution Ltd http://www.runrev.com follow me on twitter http://www.twitter.com/lainopik ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: See us on MacWorld and Macnn
Le 23 juil. 09 à 22:46, Paul Looney a écrit : Heather, Great to see the company getting good press. But... The first article seemed to imply that the name Revolution was retired - a good thing. The second article kept referring to the product as Revolution - a very bad thing. Let me be my usual blunt self: this product can not be taken seriously with the name Revolution! It is long passed time time to kill it. I hate to think how much money this has cost RunRev Ltd. The names revMedia, revStudio, and revEnterprise are going in the right direction. This brings us to the language: revTalk = hyperTalk = toy language (I'm talking perception, not necessarily reality). You can write real code with Rev. So, why not join the big leagues with revCode? Regards, Paul Looney Shared... Paul's feeling need probably attention and discuss. Best Regards, -- Pierre Sahores mobile : 06 03 95 77 70 www.sahores-conseil.com On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Heather Nagey wrote: Dear list folks, If you're interested, we're starting to get the word out about revMedia. There are some nice articles here: http://www.macnn.com/articles/09/07/22/revmedia.40.alpha.test/ and http://www.macworld.com/article/141876/2009/07/revmedia.html Regards, Heather Heather Nagey Customer Services Manager Runtime Revolution Ltd http://www.runrev.com follow me on twitter http://www.twitter.com/lainopik ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: See us on MacWorld and Macnn
On 23/07/2009 21:46, Paul Looney simpl...@aol.com wrote: Great to see the company getting good press. But... The first article seemed to imply that the name Revolution was retired - a good thing. The second article kept referring to the product as Revolution - a very bad thing. Let me be my usual blunt self: this product can not be taken seriously with the name Revolution! It is long passed time time to kill it. I hate to think how much money this has cost RunRev Ltd. The names revMedia, revStudio, and revEnterprise are going in the right direction. This brings us to the language: revTalk = hyperTalk = toy language (I'm talking perception, not necessarily reality). You can write real code with Rev. So, why not join the big leagues with revCode? We've done our homework on this - actually rather a lot of homework. We can't be all things to all people, we need to play to our strengths and present a coherent brand image. We have an easy-to-use language and the name needs to reflect that. There is nothing to say that that language is not powerful or highly capable. Those capabilities are reflected in the feature set, the case studies and the quality of the branding. But at the end of the day the language name needs to be catchy, memorable and clearly put forward our core advantage. revCode is none of those things, and that's not just my opinion, we've done the market research into this. Kind regards, Kevin Kevin Miller ~ ke...@runrev.com ~ http://www.runrev.com/ Runtime Revolution - User-Centric Development Tools ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: See us on MacWorld and Macnn
Yes, I like RevTalk more than RevCode... On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Kevin Millerke...@runrev.com wrote: On 23/07/2009 21:46, Paul Looney simpl...@aol.com wrote: Great to see the company getting good press. But... The first article seemed to imply that the name Revolution was retired - a good thing. The second article kept referring to the product as Revolution - a very bad thing. Let me be my usual blunt self: this product can not be taken seriously with the name Revolution! It is long passed time time to kill it. I hate to think how much money this has cost RunRev Ltd. The names revMedia, revStudio, and revEnterprise are going in the right direction. This brings us to the language: revTalk = hyperTalk = toy language (I'm talking perception, not necessarily reality). You can write real code with Rev. So, why not join the big leagues with revCode? We've done our homework on this - actually rather a lot of homework. We can't be all things to all people, we need to play to our strengths and present a coherent brand image. We have an easy-to-use language and the name needs to reflect that. There is nothing to say that that language is not powerful or highly capable. Those capabilities are reflected in the feature set, the case studies and the quality of the branding. But at the end of the day the language name needs to be catchy, memorable and clearly put forward our core advantage. revCode is none of those things, and that's not just my opinion, we've done the market research into this. Kind regards, Kevin Kevin Miller ~ ke...@runrev.com ~ http://www.runrev.com/ Runtime Revolution - User-Centric Development Tools ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution -- http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: See us on MacWorld and Macnn
FWIW, I liked revScript best -- analogous to javascript, and it is a scripting language after all, more so than javascript. -- Peter Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.com http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:01 PM, Andre Garzia wrote: Yes, I like RevTalk more than RevCode... On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Kevin Millerke...@runrev.com wrote: On 23/07/2009 21:46, Paul Looney simpl...@aol.com wrote: Great to see the company getting good press. But... The first article seemed to imply that the name Revolution was retired - a good thing. The second article kept referring to the product as Revolution - a very bad thing. Let me be my usual blunt self: this product can not be taken seriously with the name Revolution! It is long passed time time to kill it. I hate to think how much money this has cost RunRev Ltd. The names revMedia, revStudio, and revEnterprise are going in the right direction. This brings us to the language: revTalk = hyperTalk = toy language (I'm talking perception, not necessarily reality). You can write real code with Rev. So, why not join the big leagues with revCode? We've done our homework on this - actually rather a lot of homework. We can't be all things to all people, we need to play to our strengths and present a coherent brand image. We have an easy-to-use language and the name needs to reflect that. There is nothing to say that that language is not powerful or highly capable. Those capabilities are reflected in the feature set, the case studies and the quality of the branding. But at the end of the day the language name needs to be catchy, memorable and clearly put forward our core advantage. revCode is none of those things, and that's not just my opinion, we've done the market research into this. Kind regards, Kevin Kevin Miller ~ ke...@runrev.com ~ http://www.runrev.com/ Runtime Revolution - User-Centric Development Tools ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution -- http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
