Version questions

2007-04-24 Thread Bruno Melloni
A couple of basic questions:

Is version 1.1.1 the latest GA version?  Am I correct that versions 1.2
and 2.0 are not yet stable enough for general availability use?

I got a message from Eclipse indicating that version 1.1.1 is only
certified for JRE 1.4.x.  Is that true, or did I misunderstand?

Thanks again,

bruno


Geronimo's vision

2007-04-23 Thread Bruno Melloni
With thanks to IBM for their heavy contributions to Geronimo - about 50%
of Geronimo's contributors - and no criticism intended, I am wondering
about Apache's long term intent for the product.  

Is it intended to eventually be taken over by the Apache community at
large, with no single firm dominating the decision-making?  In such case
I can easily see it filling the vacuum left when jBoss was bought out by
RedHat.

Or is it intended to be/remain as an incubator for Websphere Community
Edition?

Bruno


RE: Geronimo's vision

2007-04-23 Thread Bruno Melloni
Thank you, that is the answer that I was wishing for, but not counting
on.  

When I first discovered Geronimo as an Apache project a couple of weeks
ago, I did not even consider the possibility of it being single product
focused.  It was obvious to me that this was the next server I'd use
for my personal work.  Then I saw a couple of minor troubling signs,
like the large percentage and how a bug report was handled, and I
started to worry about whether I'd done enough research.

Thanks for the info.  I hope other committers will also comment on the
vision.

bruno

-Original Message-
From: Jay D. McHugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 1:09 PM
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo's vision

Hello Bruno,

I'm not sure how anyone else would react, but I don't see Geronimo as
simply an incubator for WASCE.

I tried using WASCE about a year ago and after learning that it had
Geronimo as a base - I switched to Geronimo.  And, I haven't looked back
(no offense IBM).

In fact, CE's last release (last time I checked anyway) was based on
Geronimo 1.1 and was about a year ago.

In that time, Geronimo has made tremendous strides toward full JEE5
support (in the 2.0 branch) and towards a more than complete J2EE
version (in the 1.2 branch).

IBM may currently be the employer of a large number of commiters, but I
think that it is just a matter of time before non-IBMers begin to catch
up (and hopefully pass) in the committer base for the project.

I for one have never considered Geronimo as simply being the incubator
for WASCE .  Geronimo was around before WASCE ever did.  The fact that
IBM has used it as the base simply testifies to how complete a product
Geronimo is and the level of quality it possesses.

Jay

Bruno Melloni wrote:
 With thanks to IBM for their heavy contributions to Geronimo - about 
 50% of Geronimo's contributors - and no criticism intended, I am 
 wondering about Apache's long term intent for the product.

 Is it intended to eventually be taken over by the Apache community at 
 large, with no single firm dominating the decision-making?  In such 
 case I can easily see it filling the vacuum left when jBoss was bought

 out by RedHat.

 Or is it intended to be/remain as an incubator for Websphere Community

 Edition?

 Bruno



   


Comparison between Geronimo and Websphere Community Edition

2007-04-13 Thread Bruno Melloni
I am setting up a Eclipse 3.2.2 development environment for applications
that will be eventually deployed to Websphere 6 and 7.  I narrowed down
my choices for the J2EE server to Geronimo 1.1.1 and Websphere CE 1.0.  
 
I found lots of information saying that Websphere CE is *based* on
Geronimo, but no details on what is different.
 
Can somebody please point me to a comparison between the two?