Re: Queue Creation

2006-05-17 Thread ian . d . stewart
Aaron,

Any chance of getting this included in a 'Samples' section on
geronimo.apache.org?


Ian

It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not

Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078



  
  Aaron Mulder
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   
user@geronimo.apache.org  
  nceton.edu cc:   
  
  Sent by:Subject:  Re: Queue Creation  
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 

  

  
  05/17/2006 11:13 AM   
  
  Please respond to 
  
  user  
  

  




I'm afraid the JMS features in the console don't work as well in 1.0
-- they've been replaced in 1.1.  Your best best is to write a JMS
deployment plan by hand.

I've attached an example you can use with a connection factory and a
queue.  You can just change the resourceadapter-name (for the whole
deployment), connectiondefinition-instance/name (for the connection
factory), and message-destination-name and PhysicalName (for the
queue).

Thanks,
 Aaron

On 5/17/06, Anshuk Chinmoy Pal Chaudhuri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Hi,

 I am trying to create a new Destination Queue from the  console of
Geronimo 1.0 Admin Console.
 The JMS Destination Manager help says that there is a  link  Add
Queue/Topic   for adding the queues and stuff. But the link is  not working
?
 How do I then do that? Any  pointers?


 Warm Regards,
 Anshuk Pal Chaudhuri
   CAUTION -Disclaimer *
 This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED ANDCONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
intended solely for the use of the addressee(s).If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mailand delete
the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose,or
distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such
actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken
every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for
any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You
should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or
attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content
of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or
from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mailsystem.
 ***INFOSYS End of DisclaimerINFOSYS***

(See attached file: sample-jms-queue.xml)

sample-jms-queue.xml
Description: Binary data


Re: Geronimo Eclipse plugin error

2006-05-16 Thread ian . d . stewart
Sachin,

Do we have estimated release date for the next release of the Geronimo
Eclipse plugin?


Thanks,
Ian

It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not

Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078



   
  Sachin Patel  
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   
user@geronimo.apache.org  
  om  cc:  
   
   Subject:  Re: Geronimo Eclipse 
plugin error 
  05/15/2006 07:15  
   
  PM
   
  Please respond to 
   
  user  
   

   




My guess is that you're launching Eclipse on a 1.5 JVM.  You''ll need
to launch and new workspace under 1.4 and this should fix it.  The
next release of the plugin will support 1.5.

On May 15, 2006, at 3:37 PM, Roman Kharkovski wrote:

 Folks,
 I just started using the latest Geronimo Eclipse plugin and it
 allows me to
 build simple web app and start the local test server, but does not
 deploy
 the webapp to the server. I can export webapp and manually install
 it into
 Geronimo, but the Eclipse plugin fails to do the deployment. My
 webapp has
 one index.jsp file - nothing complicated.

 Here are my configuration details:

 Windows XP sp 2
 Eclipse 3.1.2 w/ plugins listed below:
 WST 1.0.2,
 J2EE Standard Tools 1.0.2
 Geronimo plugin 1.0
 Geronimo 1.0 on Sun JDK 1.4.2_11

 Is above configuration working for anyone to create/deploy/debug
 apps into
 Geronimo 1.0?

 Roman K.





-sachin






Getting Started Walk-thru (was Re: Docs for 1.1?)

2006-05-16 Thread ian . d . stewart
Ok.  So I fire up Firefox, go to http://geronimo.apache.org.  We've got a
little welcome blurb, with news items below it.  The most recent of these
is almost three months old, with almost half of them over six months old.
Not sure new that is, but we're here for the documentation, so let's move
on.

On the right hand of the screen we have a nav bar: Quick Links, Community
and Development.  No Getting Started document.  There is a link to an FAQ
and Wiki in the Community section, but no link to documentation.  But there
is a Documentation tab on top, so let's check that out.

Hmm.  We start off with a warning about the lack of documentation.  This
doesn't look good.  Below that, we have Online documentation.  Here we have
Apache Geronimo V1 Documentation which is a link to...in-progress
documentation on many areas of Geronimo...not real descriptive, but we'll
get back to that later.

Below that we have Apache Geronimo Development Process.  I would have
expected to see that under the Development section, not Documentation.  Ok,
skip that.  Next we have Quick Start, covering installation, configuration
of database pools and security realms.  Now this looks promising!  Would
have been nice if this was the first item in the documentation listing.
Even better if there was a link to this document on the main page.  No
matter.

We click on the link and are taken to...chariotsolutions.com.  Well that
was unexpected!  But let's see what we have.  This appears to be part of
some larger document (yes, I know this is part of Aaron's online book, but
we're walking through as a novice user, so work with me :) ).

So Step 1 (or Step 2.2.1 if you prefer) is to download the .tar.gz or .zip
package.  No link in the document.  Better go back to geronimo.apache.org.
Ok, so we download geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.0.zip and extract to C:\  So far
so good.  Let's go back to our Getting Started document.  Ok, now time to
start the server.  Open a command prompt, cd to geronimo-1.0 and make sure
Java 1.4.2 is on the PATH.  Uh oh.  All I have is Java 1.5.  Guess I better
go download and install Java 1.4.2.

Ok.  Now that we've got Java 1.4.2 installed, with the PATH updated, let's
try this again.  Execute 'java -jar bin\server.jar'.  We get the text
progress bar and startup messages.  So far so good.  There don't appear to
be any issues with the ports, so we can skip Section 2.2.3 Customize
Network Ports (if necessary).

Alright.  Time to log into the console.  Navigate to
http://localhost:8080/console in Firefox and...we get a login screen
(complete with cute stylized 'G')!  Alright!  Now we're cooking with gas!
We log in with username 'system' and password 'manager'...and we've got
ourselves a working Geronimo Console!

A little bit of pain at the beginning there, but all in all, not too bad.


Ian



It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not

Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078



   
  Hernan Cunico 
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   
user@geronimo.apache.org  
  m   cc:  
   
   Subject:  Docs for 1.1?  
   
  05/15/2006 06:42  
   
  PM
   
  Please respond to 
   
  user  
   

   




Hi All,
We are getting close to get v1.1 out of the door. As it looks now we will
not have documentation. I
think we can have it if we all jump into it and come up with at least a
minimun of things to cover
and at least a few guys for tackling some of those topics.

What are the areas you consider to be more criticial? Which one do you need
the most?  (i.e. hot
deployment, db pools config, etc.)

Anyone out there who can contribute? If you have any notes laying around,
that will help. Anything
to get started.

We will also need some stuff for the web site for v1.1. A quick

Geronimo 1.1 and Apache Geronimo Development and Deployment

2006-05-04 Thread ian . d . stewart
I have started reading Aaron Mulder's online book, Apache Geronimo
Development and Deployment in order to get up to speed quickly with
Geronimo.  Are there any sections that are either made obsolute or
significantly out-of-date with the pending release of Geronimo 1.1?


Thanks,
Ian

It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not

Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078



Re: Version 1.1 Preliminary Build 20060502 Available for Testing and Feedback

2006-05-03 Thread ian . d . stewart
Matt,

Is it possible to configure Geronimo to use an existing Tomcat (or Jetty)
installation, or do we have to use the embedded version?


Thanks,
Ian

It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not

Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078



   
  Matt Hogstrom 
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   
dev@geronimo.apache.org, user@geronimo.apache.org 
  g   cc:  
   
   Subject:  Version 1.1 
Preliminary Build 20060502 Available for Testing and Feedback 
  05/03/2006 11:15  
   
  AM
   
  Please respond to 
   
  user  
   

   




All

The Geronimo Team is happy to provide you with a stable build of Geronimo
1.1 for your review,
testing and comments.  This is not the final release of Geronimo 1.1 but is
an excellent
representation of what will be available in 1.1.  I will follow this note
up with a set of
Preliminary Release Notes in another e-mail later today that will point out
the new features as well
as the known issues.

The following builds are available for *nix and Windows platforms which
also include Tomcat and
Jetty Versions depending on your Web Container Preference.

Tomcat Versions
http://people.apache.org:~/hogstrom/20060502/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1-20060502.tar.gz

http://people.apache.org:~/hogstrom/20060502/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1-20060502.zip


Jetty Versions
http://people.apache.org:~/hogstrom/20060502/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-20060502.tar.gz

http://people.apache.org:~/hogstrom/20060502/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-20060502.zip


Please direct your feedback to the dev@geronimo.apache.org mailing list or
please open JIRAs
documenting issues that need to be resolved.

Thanks for your time and looking forward to your feedback.

Matt Hogstrom




Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-04-04 Thread ian . d . stewart
I would at to the other requests:

  Support for JSR-168 (Portlet API)

If memory serves, the Geronimo Console is actually a Portal App, so this is
probably already implemented, but I didn't see this documented at
http://geronimo.apache.org (which doesn't necessarily mean that it isn't
documented, just that I couldn't find it).


Ian

It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not

Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078



   
  Werner Punz   
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   To:   
user@geronimo.apache.org  
  Sent by: newscc:  
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:  Re: User Feedback 
Request -- this means you!  
  rg   
   

   

   
  04/04/2006 05:54  
   
  AM
   
  Please respond to 
   
  user  
   

   




Dain Sundstrom schrieb:
 On Mar 28, 2006, at 12:50 PM,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 2) Implementation of J2EE 1.5 (or JEE 5 or whatever we're calling it
 these
 days)

 JEE 5 is a huge cacophony of specifications. Can you be more specific
 about which specs you would like to see finished first?

javax.persistence
and the annotated session beans.

JSF is probably a plug and play anyway so no reason to have
that one there ;-)





Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-29 Thread ian . d . stewart
+1

It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not

Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078


   
  Mario Rübsam   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   
user@geronimo.apache.org
  com cc: 
   Subject:  Re: User Feedback 
Request -- this means you!
  03/29/2006 03:15 
  AM   
  Please respond to
  user 
   




Hi,

Jian Liao wrote:
 Setup something like JBoss Certified Partner Program
 http://www.jboss.org/partners/program. I would like to see Jetspeed-2
 joined Geronimo Certfied Partner Program:)
 It will encourage more program, opensource project to integrate with
 Geronimo.

 - Jian Liao


I really don't know why a partner program encourages integration.
There are some reasons why we moved to Geronimo. One is that certified
thingy, which brings more commercial pressure in development. I really
like the open documentation and discussion with geronimo community and
committers. No need for privileged certified partners.

-Mario





Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread ian . d . stewart
Here are my top five, with the caveat that the order does not necessarily
reflect relative priority, just the order that I think of them:

1) Support for JDK1.5 (both for Geronimo itself and the Geronimo Eclipse
Plugin)
2) Implementation of J2EE 1.5 (or JEE 5 or whatever we're calling it these
days)
3) Migration path from Tomcat to Geronimo
4) More Documentation (HOWTO's, Tutorials, Cookbooks, etc)
5) And I'll go ahead and second David's #2, more frequent minor releases


Ian

It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not

Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078



   
  David Blevins 
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   
user@geronimo.apache.org  
  si.com  cc:  
   
   Subject:  User Feedback Request 
-- this means you!  
  03/28/2006 03:00  
   
  PM
   
  Please respond to 
   
  user  
   

   




So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event.
Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your
humble servants.  To serve you best, we need some critical high level
feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most
to you!

Please, every user out there, give us your top 5 things we can do to
make Geronimo better for you.  Here is my list:

1)  More interaction with you guys, the users!
2)  More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year)
3)  Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
4)  More application validation at deployment
5)  More powerful text configuration

That's just to get the ball rolling.  More detail is always good if
you have the time.  In general anything you think we need to correct
as a community, technical or non-technical.  Let us know.

If you've ever uttered the words, Geronimo would be such a great
project if it only then now is your time to shine.

We want to hear from everyone!  This is not just for the hard-core
Geronimo users or J2EE experts.  If you are new to J2EE and
downloaded Geronimo and had to give up after an hour of no progress,
let us know what we might do!


It's all about you.


Best Regards,
David Blevins






Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread ian . d . stewart
This is my personal order based on 1) what I'm using today, and 2) Where I
see potential for use in the near future.  Obviously, others will have
their own priorities.

1) Java Servlet 2.5
2) Java ServerPages 2.1
3) Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library
4) Java Persistence Architecture (is this part of Java EE?)
5) Java Transaction API (JTA)
6) J2EE Management
7) Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0
8) J2EE Connector Architecture


Ian

It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not

Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078



   
  Dain Sundstrom
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  To:   
user@geronimo.apache.org  
   cc:  
   
  03/28/2006 04:05 Subject:  Re: User Feedback 
Request -- this means you!  
  PM
   
  Please respond to 
   
  user  
   

   




On Mar 28, 2006, at 12:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 2) Implementation of J2EE 1.5 (or JEE 5 or whatever we're calling
 it these
 days)

JEE 5 is a huge cacophony of specifications. Can you be more specific
about which specs you would like to see finished first?

-dain