Re: G2.0.1 @Stateless and @Stateful name parameter ignored?

2007-09-10 Thread Rajan Mahadevan 
David,

This is awesome

Rajan


On 9/10/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 7, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Xh wrote:
>
> > Hi David!
> >
> > There were no errors during deployment.
> > Application deploys and starts. Bean does not work.
> >
> > Without name attribute, everything is OK.
>
> Not sure what you might be doing wrong, but I've created an example
> of both @Stateless and @Stateful beans using the name attribute and
> both deploy and run fine in Geronimo 2.0.1.
>
>   http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/tmp/examples/
>
> The source is buildable with maven2.  There's a prebuilt "ready to
> deploy" jar there as well.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> -David
>
>

Re: G2.0.1 @Stateless and @Stateful name parameter ignored?

2007-09-10 Thread David Blevins 


On Sep 7, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Xh wrote:


Hi David!

There were no errors during deployment.
Application deploys and starts. Bean does not work.

Without name attribute, everything is OK.


Not sure what you might be doing wrong, but I've created an example  
of both @Stateless and @Stateful beans using the name attribute and  
both deploy and run fine in Geronimo 2.0.1.


  http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/tmp/examples/

The source is buildable with maven2.  There's a prebuilt "ready to  
deploy" jar there as well.


Hope this helps!

-David

Re: G2.0.1 @Stateless and @Stateful name parameter ignored?

2007-09-07 Thread Xh 
Hi David!

There were no errors during deployment.
Application deploys and starts. Bean does not work.

Without name attribute, everything is OK.

best regards
Łukasz

- Original Message 
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, 8 September, 2007 12:44:42 AM
Subject: Re: G2.0.1 @Stateless and @Stateful name parameter ignored?


On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Xh wrote:

> Hi All!
>
> I've encountered a strange thing.
> I've noticed that all @State*(name="Name") definitions are ignored  
> by Geronimo 2.0.1.
> Application deploys successfully, but in JNDI Viewer there are no  
> session beans.
>
> Simple:
>
> @Stateless(name = "ModuleProxy")
> public class ModuleProxyBean implements ModuleProxy {
> ...
> }
>
> doesn't not work, but this:
>
> @Stateless
>  public class ModuleProxyBean implements ModuleProxy {
>  ...
>  }
>
> works.
>
> After removing name definition and redeploying application I can  
> see in JNDI Viewer my bean.
> Also, I can look it up in JNDI with this string (note the full  
> class name ModuleProxyBean):
> DataWeaver2EnterpriseProxyModule.jar/ModuleProxyBean/ 
> org.xh.dataweaver.interfaces.ejb.ModuleProxy
>
> Has somebody else experienced this? Is it normal Geronimo behaviour?
>

The 'name' attribute of @Stateless, @Stateful, and @MessageDriven is  
definitely used in the code and tested for.  Maybe there's another  
issue going on.  When you say there are no session beans in the JNDI  
Viewer, that would seem to imply a different issue such as the bean  
not getting deployed at all.


-David









___ 
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail 
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Re: G2.0.1 @Stateless and @Stateful name parameter ignored?

2007-09-07 Thread David Blevins 


On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Xh wrote:


Hi All!

I've encountered a strange thing.
I've noticed that all @State*(name="Name") definitions are ignored  
by Geronimo 2.0.1.
Application deploys successfully, but in JNDI Viewer there are no  
session beans.


Simple:

@Stateless(name = "ModuleProxy")
public class ModuleProxyBean implements ModuleProxy {
...
}

doesn't not work, but this:

@Stateless
 public class ModuleProxyBean implements ModuleProxy {
 ...
 }

works.

After removing name definition and redeploying application I can  
see in JNDI Viewer my bean.
Also, I can look it up in JNDI with this string (note the full  
class name ModuleProxyBean):
DataWeaver2EnterpriseProxyModule.jar/ModuleProxyBean/ 
org.xh.dataweaver.interfaces.ejb.ModuleProxy


Has somebody else experienced this? Is it normal Geronimo behaviour?



The 'name' attribute of @Stateless, @Stateful, and @MessageDriven is  
definitely used in the code and tested for.  Maybe there's another  
issue going on.  When you say there are no session beans in the JNDI  
Viewer, that would seem to imply a different issue such as the bean  
not getting deployed at all.



-David

G2.0.1 @Stateless and @Stateful name parameter ignored?

2007-09-07 Thread Xh 
Hi All!

I've encountered a strange thing.
I've noticed that all @State*(name="Name") definitions are ignored by Geronimo 
2.0.1.
Application deploys successfully, but in JNDI Viewer there are no session beans.

Simple:

@Stateless(name = "ModuleProxy")
public class ModuleProxyBean implements ModuleProxy {
...
}

doesn't not work, but this:

@Stateless
 public class ModuleProxyBean implements ModuleProxy {
 ...
 }

works.

After removing name definition and redeploying application I can see in JNDI 
Viewer my bean.
Also, I can look it up in JNDI with this string (note the full class name 
ModuleProxyBean):
DataWeaver2EnterpriseProxyModule.jar/ModuleProxyBean/org.xh.dataweaver.interfaces.ejb.ModuleProxy

Has somebody else experienced this? Is it normal Geronimo behaviour?

best regards
Łukasz







___ 
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail 
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com