Re: SSH/TELNET - Horizontal Wrapping
Most telnet/ssh sessions we connect to have extremely long tables. Hence, why our entire company uses SecureCRT, because it is the only client available that can prevent wrapping. Sure putty works, and so does Guac. As you can see though, for our output, its not ideal and almost unreadable. http://i.imgur.com/WZ9Aj8S.png There is a massive hole for clients that can handle no-wrap. Honestly.. I've been looking for one, aside from SecureCRT, for at least 9 years. Nothing :( Would be an amazing feature. -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/SSH-TELNET-Horizontal-Wrapping-tp628p659.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SSH/TELNET - Horizontal Wrapping
So far I have found how to prevent guac from wrapping ssh/telnet, at least through developer tools. to This does prevent wrapping in ssh/telnet and adds a scrollbar, but the scrollbar doesnt recognize the width. This also likely would mess up how rdp sessions look. Going to have some css/markup guys look at the style and see if there is a way to prevent ssh/telnet only, from wrapping, and to provide a horizontal scrollbar for output. -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/SSH-TELNET-Horizontal-Wrapping-tp628p630.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: Connection errors on no-auth unless logout first.
But when you click back, its the exact same thing: ctrl-alt-shift -> disconnect: clicking back: Identical calls. Seems like something isnt working correctly. I can also reproduce this by actually doing ctl-alt-shift > disconnect. Then attempt a brand new connection. Same issue. I don't get why a second connection fails unless I log out first. Which makes no sense since its no auth and there shouldnt be a need to log out. Anyhow, thanks for confirming. -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/Connection-errors-on-no-auth-unless-logout-first-tp93p578.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Lack of support?
Open source is not an excuse. There are 100,000's of open source products that provide immeasurable support. They have taken the time to build a community. I started using this ~ 3 years ago, although sparingly and never dove into it. You had a community back on sourceforge. Look at it compared to this. There are posts that are a month old on here with not a single reply. I only wish I knew this product better so I could help too. But its really hard to learn it when there is a severe lack of information and documentation on it. No issue tracker, no issue submission for git.. A few quick google searches will lead you to dozens of pages that specifically state "the manual is missing most this information, and there isnt much support." I just dont want this to die, and the community from where it was, to where it is has gone down hill. -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/Lack-of-support-tp570p577.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: Lack of support?
I figured this would get a response. I am not concerned about my personal support, although thats lacking as well. All I am saying is, its depression when something as amazing as this comes out, and the support and help goes away. Look at the support that was provided back when this was on sourceforge. Discussions. Collaborations. Logs. Trial and error responses. Lots of help. Lots of people working together. Now look at the support here. Some of those posts have gone over a month without a reply. What happened? -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/Lack-of-support-tp570p576.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Lack of support?
Is there a better place to post for support? The support for this product seems nearly non existent. It's so bad we have considered dropping it entirely. Look at the main page of the list and most posts dont have a single reply. The ones that do are usually the original poster that is replying. What an amazing product, but what terrible terrible service and support. Going to be hard pressed to keep this thing going without increased care and support. Help these people out! -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/Lack-of-support-tp570.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Connection errors on no-auth unless logout first.
Does this mean I should/have to use the legacy URL extension? /c seems to do nothing but fail. -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/Connection-errors-on-no-auth-unless-logout-first-tp93p157.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Connection errors on no-auth unless logout first.
Same issue using /c. Actually if I use /c , I can't access any hosts, not even on the first try. -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/Connection-errors-on-no-auth-unless-logout-first-tp93p147.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Connection errors on no-auth unless logout first.
Thank you for your reply. I am not using the legacy URL extension. I just simply tried *http:// guachost:9000/guacamole/#/client/* to see if it would work and it did. I will try adding the /c on Monday and report back. -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/Connection-errors-on-no-auth-unless-logout-first-tp93p123.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Connection errors on no-auth unless logout first.
I use no-auth. I wrote a simple php script that checks if a server exists in noauth-config.xml. If it doesn't, it adds it and then redirects them to http://guachost:9000/guacamole/#/client/ This works all great, until I attempt to run this on the next host. Because it is using some sort of session or tokens?, it thinks that user doesnt have access to that new session. The only way I have found around this is to manually click logout. Then I can click on the new session that was added and access it just fine. My question is how can I get around this? I want to be able to just run the script and get directly to the host. Is there a way to create a new session/token/user ID each time something is added to noauth-config.xml? Thanks for any assistance. -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/Connection-errors-on-no-auth-unless-logout-first-tp93.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
