Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Hi, I promised the results. Here they are, along with a short commentary: http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/23/poll-results-hbase-version-distribution/ Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Let's see where we are! :) 1-question poll: http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/ Btw: 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was: 60% 0.94 30% 0.96 10% 0.98 Another person said: *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98 rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96 within the next few months* See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y Thanks! Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Super useful, thanks Dave! On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Dave Latham lat...@davelink.net wrote: If you haven't already seen it - take a look at the bridge at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12814 We're using it to go through the process now. Dave On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Bryan Beaudreault bbeaudrea...@hubspot.com wrote: My only complaint about this poll is the labels: 0.94.x - I like stable releases. It's not really about the stable releases for me, it's more about the extremely difficulty of overcoming the singularity from 0.94 - 0.96+ with no downtime in a reasonably complex production system. Hortonwork's replication bridge may help with this, and we're hoping to put engineering effort into this sometime this year. But I'm sure I'm not the only one for whom this is the sole reason to still be on 0.94. Otherwise I can't wait for the features and bug fixes in later versions and would welcome *any* tools or JIRAs to help soften the blow of this upgrade. On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:09 PM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote: Realistically this should be weighed by number of machines.If you run a small 5 node cluster, sure, you can upgrade easily. But your vote does not count as much as somebody who's running 1000 machines. -- Lars From: Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com To: user@hbase.apache.org user@hbase.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:45 AM Subject: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version Hi, Let's see where we are! :) 1-question poll: http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/ Btw: 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was: 60% 0.94 30% 0.96 10% 0.98 Another person said: *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98 rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96 within the next few months* See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y Thanks! Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Hi, Esteban, yup, I remember your comment from back then and your name :) I think your observations were are right. Surprising number of people still on 0.94. Bryan, yes, I see why people are still on 0.94.x. We were on it for a long time, too, for the same reason. Sorry for the poor labeling. I didn't mean to imply things with that, but it looks like I inadvertently did. Lars, true but we'll leave that for another poll :) In the mean time, people, a few more votes, please: http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/ Thanks, Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Esteban Gutierrez este...@cloudera.com wrote: Hey Otis, Thanks for doing that poll! BTW, the other person you are mentioning is me :) From what I've seen so far is that there stills a large base of 0.94 deployments in production (30-40%) and mostly all of 0.96 clusters I saw around the time of that thread have moved to 0.98 (+50% on 0.98) or they are in the process to move to HBase 1.0 cheers, esteban. -- Cloudera, Inc. On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Let's see where we are! :) 1-question poll: http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/ Btw: 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was: 60% 0.94 30% 0.96 10% 0.98 Another person said: *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98 rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96 within the next few months* See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y Thanks! Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
My only complaint about this poll is the labels: 0.94.x - I like stable releases. It's not really about the stable releases for me, it's more about the extremely difficulty of overcoming the singularity from 0.94 - 0.96+ with no downtime in a reasonably complex production system. Hortonwork's replication bridge may help with this, and we're hoping to put engineering effort into this sometime this year. But I'm sure I'm not the only one for whom this is the sole reason to still be on 0.94. Otherwise I can't wait for the features and bug fixes in later versions and would welcome *any* tools or JIRAs to help soften the blow of this upgrade. On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:09 PM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote: Realistically this should be weighed by number of machines.If you run a small 5 node cluster, sure, you can upgrade easily. But your vote does not count as much as somebody who's running 1000 machines. -- Lars From: Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com To: user@hbase.apache.org user@hbase.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:45 AM Subject: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version Hi, Let's see where we are! :) 1-question poll: http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/ Btw: 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was: 60% 0.94 30% 0.96 10% 0.98 Another person said: *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98 rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96 within the next few months* See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y Thanks! Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
If you haven't already seen it - take a look at the bridge at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12814 We're using it to go through the process now. Dave On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Bryan Beaudreault bbeaudrea...@hubspot.com wrote: My only complaint about this poll is the labels: 0.94.x - I like stable releases. It's not really about the stable releases for me, it's more about the extremely difficulty of overcoming the singularity from 0.94 - 0.96+ with no downtime in a reasonably complex production system. Hortonwork's replication bridge may help with this, and we're hoping to put engineering effort into this sometime this year. But I'm sure I'm not the only one for whom this is the sole reason to still be on 0.94. Otherwise I can't wait for the features and bug fixes in later versions and would welcome *any* tools or JIRAs to help soften the blow of this upgrade. On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:09 PM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote: Realistically this should be weighed by number of machines.If you run a small 5 node cluster, sure, you can upgrade easily. But your vote does not count as much as somebody who's running 1000 machines. -- Lars From: Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com To: user@hbase.apache.org user@hbase.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:45 AM Subject: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version Hi, Let's see where we are! :) 1-question poll: http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/ Btw: 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was: 60% 0.94 30% 0.96 10% 0.98 Another person said: *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98 rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96 within the next few months* See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y Thanks! Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Realistically this should be weighed by number of machines.If you run a small 5 node cluster, sure, you can upgrade easily. But your vote does not count as much as somebody who's running 1000 machines. -- Lars From: Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com To: user@hbase.apache.org user@hbase.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:45 AM Subject: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version Hi, Let's see where we are! :) 1-question poll: http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/ Btw: 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was: 60% 0.94 30% 0.96 10% 0.98 Another person said: *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98 rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96 within the next few months* See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y Thanks! Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Hey Otis, Thanks for doing that poll! BTW, the other person you are mentioning is me :) From what I've seen so far is that there stills a large base of 0.94 deployments in production (30-40%) and mostly all of 0.96 clusters I saw around the time of that thread have moved to 0.98 (+50% on 0.98) or they are in the process to move to HBase 1.0 cheers, esteban. -- Cloudera, Inc. On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Let's see where we are! :) 1-question poll: http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/ Btw: 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was: 60% 0.94 30% 0.96 10% 0.98 Another person said: *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98 rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96 within the next few months* See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y Thanks! Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
