Re: Best first steps for performance tuning
Devin, Please consider watching this talk by Ivan Rakov, one of main contributors to the native persistence. Rewind to 28 minutes 14 seconds for performance consideration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2ArcJPH4iU Let us know if any piece of advice was helpful and we’ll put the knowledge on paper then for better discoverability. Denis On Thursday, August 6, 2020, Evgenii Zhuravlev wrote: > Hi Devin, > > Yes, you're right, the first step could be increasing the amount of > offheap memory used for data(data region size). By default, Ignite uses 20% > of available RAM. > > After that, I would recommend finding where the bottleneck is for your > system - you can check CPU, disk and network to find it. > > Best Regards, > Evgenii > > чт, 6 авг. 2020 г. в 12:49, Devin Bost : > >> While looking at the docs, there are a lot of available parameters for >> performance tuning. >> We have several high-velocity Ignite operations, and Ignite is having >> trouble keeping up. We are using native persistence, and I suspect we will >> get more value from increasing the amount of memory used since I think the >> default memory utilization is low if I remember correctly. >> >> We're wondering what the first few things should be for us to look at for >> performance tuning and wondering if anyone has some guidance so we know >> what to start with. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Devin G. Bost >> > -- - Denis
Re: Best first steps for performance tuning
Hi Devin, Yes, you're right, the first step could be increasing the amount of offheap memory used for data(data region size). By default, Ignite uses 20% of available RAM. After that, I would recommend finding where the bottleneck is for your system - you can check CPU, disk and network to find it. Best Regards, Evgenii чт, 6 авг. 2020 г. в 12:49, Devin Bost : > While looking at the docs, there are a lot of available parameters for > performance tuning. > We have several high-velocity Ignite operations, and Ignite is having > trouble keeping up. We are using native persistence, and I suspect we will > get more value from increasing the amount of memory used since I think the > default memory utilization is low if I remember correctly. > > We're wondering what the first few things should be for us to look at for > performance tuning and wondering if anyone has some guidance so we know > what to start with. > > Thanks, > > Devin G. Bost >
Best first steps for performance tuning
While looking at the docs, there are a lot of available parameters for performance tuning. We have several high-velocity Ignite operations, and Ignite is having trouble keeping up. We are using native persistence, and I suspect we will get more value from increasing the amount of memory used since I think the default memory utilization is low if I remember correctly. We're wondering what the first few things should be for us to look at for performance tuning and wondering if anyone has some guidance so we know what to start with. Thanks, Devin G. Bost
