Re: karaf 2.3.x's notices file mentioned LGPL ??
My bad it is from http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net I thought Apache policy does allow direct usage of LGPL lib? Thanks -D On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/branches/karaf-2.3.x/NOTICE mentions about LGPL in summary section. which artifact is that? Thanks -D
Re: karaf 2.3.x's notices file mentioned LGPL ??
It's aopalliance, required by spring-aop. However, I think this dependency is no more required. I gonna take a look to remove the references. Regards JB On 02/03/2013 07:49 PM, Dan Tran wrote: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/branches/karaf-2.3.x/NOTICE mentions about LGPL in summary section. which artifact is that? Thanks -D -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: karaf 2.3.x's notices file mentioned LGPL ??
Correct, GPL and LGPL is category X license. However, as we don't embed it in the distribution, it's allowed. Anyway, I don't think that the dependency is required, I will remove it if it's really the case. Regards JB On 02/03/2013 07:52 PM, Dan Tran wrote: My bad it is from http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net I thought Apache policy does allow direct usage of LGPL lib? Thanks -D On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/branches/karaf-2.3.x/NOTICE mentions about LGPL in summary section. which artifact is that? Thanks -D -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: karaf 2.3.x's notices file mentioned LGPL ??
Super thanks for removing that -D Btw, http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net only use 'Public Domain' I dont see LPGL mentioned in that page On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Correct, GPL and LGPL is category X license. However, as we don't embed it in the distribution, it's allowed. Anyway, I don't think that the dependency is required, I will remove it if it's really the case. Regards JB On 02/03/2013 07:52 PM, Dan Tran wrote: My bad it is from http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net I thought Apache policy does allow direct usage of LGPL lib? Thanks -D On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/branches/karaf-2.3.x/NOTICE mentions about LGPL in summary section. which artifact is that? Thanks -D -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: karaf 2.3.x's notices file mentioned LGPL ??
AFAIR, it's a dual license. On 02/03/2013 07:59 PM, Dan Tran wrote: Super thanks for removing that -D Btw, http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net only use 'Public Domain' I dont see LPGL mentioned in that page On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Correct, GPL and LGPL is category X license. However, as we don't embed it in the distribution, it's allowed. Anyway, I don't think that the dependency is required, I will remove it if it's really the case. Regards JB On 02/03/2013 07:52 PM, Dan Tran wrote: My bad it is from http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net I thought Apache policy does allow direct usage of LGPL lib? Thanks -D On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/branches/karaf-2.3.x/NOTICE mentions about LGPL in summary section. which artifact is that? Thanks -D -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: karaf 2.3.x's notices file mentioned LGPL ??
According to the homepage [1] it's actually public domain. kind regards, christoph [1] http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/ On 2013-02-03 20:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: AFAIR, it's a dual license. On 02/03/2013 07:59 PM, Dan Tran wrote: Super thanks for removing that -D Btw, http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net only use 'Public Domain' I dont see LPGL mentioned in that page On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Correct, GPL and LGPL is category X license. However, as we don't embed it in the distribution, it's allowed. Anyway, I don't think that the dependency is required, I will remove it if it's really the case. Regards JB On 02/03/2013 07:52 PM, Dan Tran wrote: My bad it is from http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net I thought Apache policy does allow direct usage of LGPL lib? Thanks -D On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/branches/karaf-2.3.x/NOTICE mentions about LGPL in summary section. which artifact is that? Thanks -D -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
