Re: Date format changing to dd-mm-yyyy

2009-10-22 Thread Ananth



Adrian Crum wrote:
> 
> UtilDateTime.java would need to be modified. The static date/time format 
> string would need to be loaded from a properties file.
> 
> -Adrian
> 
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> This does not exist yet OOTB. Though I think I remember Adrian began 
>> some effort around. Not quite sure, you may may have a look using 
>> MarkMail or Nabble.
>> 
>> Jacques
>> 
>> From: "naveen chanda" 
>>>
>>> Dear Pradeep,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much.
>>>
>>> But, when it is the forms, than how can i proceed it.
>>>
>>> When we select the calendar, i have changed the format to display but 
>>> when i
>>> use the update, the format is changing to -mm-dd.
>>>
>>> How can it be done ?
>>>
>>> Is OFBiz provides any settings for date ? So, that modification in one 
>>> place
>>> can effect the entire application.
>>>
>>> Please help me.
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>> Naveen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> naveen chanda wrote:

 Dear all,

 I have a requirement to change the default date format of ofbiz to
 dd-mm- in entire application.

 So, could any one explain me the way to do this task.

 Thanks,
 Naveen Chanda

>>>
>>> -- 
>>> View this message in context: 
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Date-format-changing-to-dd-mm--tp25745093p25799185.html
>>>  
>>>
>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>> 
>>
>  Hello Adrian,
> 
> I changed Date format in UtilDateTime.java "-MM-dd" to "dd-MM-".
> It was effected in forms after that I again  changed date format in
> UtilDateTime.java  "dd-MM-" to "-MM-dd" but it is not effecting in
> forms. Can you help me on this?
> 
> Regards
> Ananth
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/Date-format-changing-to-dd-mm--tp165544p276412.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Feedbacks on Bluelight theme

2009-10-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Thanks Bruno,

I saw it's fixed at r828882, thanks Adrian.
What a quick team we have :o)

Jacques

From: "Bruno Busco" 

Jacques,
please find attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3044
a new patch to fix this.

-Bruno

2009/10/22 Bruno Busco :

Hi Jacques,
thank you for reporting this is related to this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3044

I will attach a patch soon to fix this...
-Bruno

2009/10/22 Jacques Le Roux :

Hi Bruno,

I have noticed that with Blue Light in all(?) Catalog Manager screens but
Product (ie Prices, Content, etc.) you don't see product Id, annoying ;o)
It was there sometimes ago

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" 


Hi Bruno,

Actually I use more, in that order, Flat Grey and Business Time. There are
no real reasons. I will try to use it a bit more and will give you a feedbak
then.

Cheers

Jacques

From: "Bruno Busco" 


Hi users!
I would like to have your feedback on the Bluelight theme.

- Do you find it is usable?
- Do you find it is user friendly?
- How would you like it to be improved?

Please fill free to report any issue.

Thank you very much,
Bruno
















Re: Question about authorize.net and PCI compliance [ was on the dev list as Re: Clearing credit card data after capture ]

2009-10-22 Thread Tim Ruppert

Ok - great - thanks Scott - I'm sure the other Scott will thank you.

Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

On Oct 22, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Scott Gray wrote:

It actually never made it back into the trunk, the differences  
between the trunk and revision I was working on were too large for a  
simple merge and I was quite strapped for time.


Thanks for the reminder though, I'll definitely look at putting this  
in there within the next weekend or two.


Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 23/10/2009, at 5:11 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:


I hope this thread helps Scott.

Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

Begin forwarded message:


From: Scott Gray 
Date: June 5, 2009 5:12:47 AM MDT
To: d...@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Clearing credit card data after capture
Reply-To: d...@ofbiz.apache.org

Cool thanks, I'll look into it.

Regards
Scott

On 5/06/2009, at 11:10 PM, David E Jones wrote:



The more common recurring stuff in OFBiz right now is recurring  
orders using an auto-order shopping list. You could certainly  
check those before whacking the CC# and that would handle it.


-David


On Jun 5, 2009, at 4:58 AM, Scott Gray wrote:


Thanks David, ProductStore it is.

About the recurring billing I was hoping there would be someway  
to check if the cc is being used for it and to leave the  
information in place.  That way we'd only be clearing unused cc  
data.  I'm going to need to check for any pending transactions/ 
payment prefs before clearing the data anyway, would that check  
be sufficient to pick up on recurring payments do you think?


Regards
Scott

On 5/06/2009, at 9:54 PM, David E Jones wrote:



On Jun 4, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Scott Gray wrote:


Hi All,

I plan to add a configuration option to clear credit card data  
once there are no more auths pending against it.  When I say  
clear the data I mean remove the expiry date and credit card  
number except for the last 4 digits.


Any thoughts on where this should be configurable/how it  
should be implemented?  I think the card clearing logic may  
have to be specific to the gateway being used, e.g. authorize.net 
 needs you to keep the last 4 digits for refunds but others  
may not.
I'm thinking perhaps I could add a new product store payment  
service type enumeration record, something like  
PRDS_PAY_CLEAR_DATA and the defined service would run after  
the capture and release services.


That sounds pretty complex, and I'm wondering if the complexity  
is needed. I guess to really answer more research would be  
required, or maybe not. Keeping the last 4 digits should be  
pretty safe, although these days I suppose that could be  
valuable information for a hacker since for authentication over  
the phone banks and others generally just ask for the last 4  
digits of your government ID#, the last 4 of your CC#, etc.


Anyway, it would be more consistent and more simple to just  
have a setting on the ProductStore, and perhaps one with 3  
options: keep CC #s, keep only last 4 digits of CC #s, don't  
keep CC #s.


Recurring billing is the other thing I'm not sure about, I  
guess I'd need to leave the card data alone in that case but  
I've never worked with recurring payments so I'm not sure how  
I would detect if the card is being used for them.


If an organization wants to avoid keeping CC #s then it will  
certainly limit certain otherwise automated things. Recurring  
orders or recurring billing would be something that is not  
possible, unless a third party payment provider is used that  
keeps the CC #. This is actually one of the very appealing  
things about services like PayPal or GoogleCheckout where the  
ecommerce site doesn't ever even accept payment information.


In fact, for anyone who wants a feature like (ie remove CC  
numbers after use), they might consider using a third party  
payment site instead of the more transparent option of handling  
it through their application.


-David















smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Feedbacks on Bluelight theme

2009-10-22 Thread Bruno Busco
Jacques,
please find attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3044
a new patch to fix this.

-Bruno

2009/10/22 Bruno Busco :
> Hi Jacques,
> thank you for reporting this is related to this:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3044
>
> I will attach a patch soon to fix this...
> -Bruno
>
> 2009/10/22 Jacques Le Roux :
>> Hi Bruno,
>>
>> I have noticed that with Blue Light in all(?) Catalog Manager screens but
>> Product (ie Prices, Content, etc.) you don't see product Id, annoying ;o)
>> It was there sometimes ago
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" 
>>>
>>> Hi Bruno,
>>>
>>> Actually I use more, in that order, Flat Grey and Business Time. There are
>>> no real reasons. I will try to use it a bit more and will give you a feedbak
>>> then.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Bruno Busco" 

 Hi users!
 I would like to have your feedback on the Bluelight theme.

 - Do you find it is usable?
 - Do you find it is user friendly?
 - How would you like it to be improved?

 Please fill free to report any issue.

 Thank you very much,
 Bruno

>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>


Re: Question about authorize.net and PCI

2009-10-22 Thread BJ Freeman
in a nut shell if you through ofbiz collect a CC # you are under PCI.
the only way is to send the customer to a site that handles CC and all
ofbiz does is store the authorization code.
I use Paypal that way.
Paypal also lets you style you payment page on there site.
it is transparent to the customer.

Scott. sent the following on 10/22/2009 8:47 AM:
> Hello all,
> 
> We are very close to finalizing our method of credit card processing within
> ofbiz and of course, PCI compliance is taking a front seat. We will be using
> authorize.net as our gateway and they several different methods with regards
> to integration. The easy thing would be to use the current supported method
> but my preference would be to not store credit card info at all.
> 
> They are the Simple Checkout, Server Integration Method (SIM) and the
> Advanced Integration Method (AIM). I believe that ofbiz natively supports
> AIM. The main difference between the three is that from a PCI standpoint the
> simple and the SIM method store the credit card data on the Authorize.Net
> PCI-compliant servers thus eliminate the PCI compliance for our company. If
> I am correct, the SIM method keeps your checkout pages looking the way they
> were designed and being able to use the native ofbiz to actually charge
> authorizations, etc.
> 
> Has anyone implemented this with ofbiz successfully? How much trouble will
> be to modify the ofbiz payment services not to store/read any sensitive
> credit card information. 
> 
> Thanks in advance for any thoughts.
> 

-- 
BJ Freeman
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro
Systems Integrator.



Re: Question about authorize.net and PCI compliance [ was on the dev list as Re: Clearing credit card data after capture ]

2009-10-22 Thread Scott Gray
It actually never made it back into the trunk, the differences between  
the trunk and revision I was working on were too large for a simple  
merge and I was quite strapped for time.


Thanks for the reminder though, I'll definitely look at putting this  
in there within the next weekend or two.


Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 23/10/2009, at 5:11 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:


I hope this thread helps Scott.

Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

Begin forwarded message:


From: Scott Gray 
Date: June 5, 2009 5:12:47 AM MDT
To: d...@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Clearing credit card data after capture
Reply-To: d...@ofbiz.apache.org

Cool thanks, I'll look into it.

Regards
Scott

On 5/06/2009, at 11:10 PM, David E Jones wrote:



The more common recurring stuff in OFBiz right now is recurring  
orders using an auto-order shopping list. You could certainly  
check those before whacking the CC# and that would handle it.


-David


On Jun 5, 2009, at 4:58 AM, Scott Gray wrote:


Thanks David, ProductStore it is.

About the recurring billing I was hoping there would be someway  
to check if the cc is being used for it and to leave the  
information in place.  That way we'd only be clearing unused cc  
data.  I'm going to need to check for any pending transactions/ 
payment prefs before clearing the data anyway, would that check  
be sufficient to pick up on recurring payments do you think?


Regards
Scott

On 5/06/2009, at 9:54 PM, David E Jones wrote:



On Jun 4, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Scott Gray wrote:


Hi All,

I plan to add a configuration option to clear credit card data  
once there are no more auths pending against it.  When I say  
clear the data I mean remove the expiry date and credit card  
number except for the last 4 digits.


Any thoughts on where this should be configurable/how it should  
be implemented?  I think the card clearing logic may have to be  
specific to the gateway being used, e.g. authorize.net needs  
you to keep the last 4 digits for refunds but others may not.
I'm thinking perhaps I could add a new product store payment  
service type enumeration record, something like  
PRDS_PAY_CLEAR_DATA and the defined service would run after the  
capture and release services.


That sounds pretty complex, and I'm wondering if the complexity  
is needed. I guess to really answer more research would be  
required, or maybe not. Keeping the last 4 digits should be  
pretty safe, although these days I suppose that could be  
valuable information for a hacker since for authentication over  
the phone banks and others generally just ask for the last 4  
digits of your government ID#, the last 4 of your CC#, etc.


Anyway, it would be more consistent and more simple to just have  
a setting on the ProductStore, and perhaps one with 3 options:  
keep CC #s, keep only last 4 digits of CC #s, don't keep CC #s.


Recurring billing is the other thing I'm not sure about, I  
guess I'd need to leave the card data alone in that case but  
I've never worked with recurring payments so I'm not sure how I  
would detect if the card is being used for them.


If an organization wants to avoid keeping CC #s then it will  
certainly limit certain otherwise automated things. Recurring  
orders or recurring billing would be something that is not  
possible, unless a third party payment provider is used that  
keeps the CC #. This is actually one of the very appealing  
things about services like PayPal or GoogleCheckout where the  
ecommerce site doesn't ever even accept payment information.


In fact, for anyone who wants a feature like (ie remove CC  
numbers after use), they might consider using a third party  
payment site instead of the more transparent option of handling  
it through their application.


-David













smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Feedbacks on Bluelight theme

2009-10-22 Thread Bruno Busco
Hi Jacques,
thank you for reporting this is related to this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3044

I will attach a patch soon to fix this...
-Bruno

2009/10/22 Jacques Le Roux :
> Hi Bruno,
>
> I have noticed that with Blue Light in all(?) Catalog Manager screens but
> Product (ie Prices, Content, etc.) you don't see product Id, annoying ;o)
> It was there sometimes ago
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" 
>>
>> Hi Bruno,
>>
>> Actually I use more, in that order, Flat Grey and Business Time. There are
>> no real reasons. I will try to use it a bit more and will give you a feedbak
>> then.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Bruno Busco" 
>>>
>>> Hi users!
>>> I would like to have your feedback on the Bluelight theme.
>>>
>>> - Do you find it is usable?
>>> - Do you find it is user friendly?
>>> - How would you like it to be improved?
>>>
>>> Please fill free to report any issue.
>>>
>>> Thank you very much,
>>> Bruno
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


Re: Question about authorize.net and PCI compliance [ was on the dev list as Re: Clearing credit card data after capture ]

2009-10-22 Thread Tim Ruppert

I hope this thread helps Scott.

Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

Begin forwarded message:


From: Scott Gray 
Date: June 5, 2009 5:12:47 AM MDT
To: d...@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Clearing credit card data after capture
Reply-To: d...@ofbiz.apache.org

Cool thanks, I'll look into it.

Regards
Scott

On 5/06/2009, at 11:10 PM, David E Jones wrote:



The more common recurring stuff in OFBiz right now is recurring  
orders using an auto-order shopping list. You could certainly check  
those before whacking the CC# and that would handle it.


-David


On Jun 5, 2009, at 4:58 AM, Scott Gray wrote:


Thanks David, ProductStore it is.

About the recurring billing I was hoping there would be someway to  
check if the cc is being used for it and to leave the information  
in place.  That way we'd only be clearing unused cc data.  I'm  
going to need to check for any pending transactions/payment prefs  
before clearing the data anyway, would that check be sufficient to  
pick up on recurring payments do you think?


Regards
Scott

On 5/06/2009, at 9:54 PM, David E Jones wrote:



On Jun 4, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Scott Gray wrote:


Hi All,

I plan to add a configuration option to clear credit card data  
once there are no more auths pending against it.  When I say  
clear the data I mean remove the expiry date and credit card  
number except for the last 4 digits.


Any thoughts on where this should be configurable/how it should  
be implemented?  I think the card clearing logic may have to be  
specific to the gateway being used, e.g. authorize.net needs you  
to keep the last 4 digits for refunds but others may not.
I'm thinking perhaps I could add a new product store payment  
service type enumeration record, something like  
PRDS_PAY_CLEAR_DATA and the defined service would run after the  
capture and release services.


That sounds pretty complex, and I'm wondering if the complexity  
is needed. I guess to really answer more research would be  
required, or maybe not. Keeping the last 4 digits should be  
pretty safe, although these days I suppose that could be valuable  
information for a hacker since for authentication over the phone  
banks and others generally just ask for the last 4 digits of your  
government ID#, the last 4 of your CC#, etc.


Anyway, it would be more consistent and more simple to just have  
a setting on the ProductStore, and perhaps one with 3 options:  
keep CC #s, keep only last 4 digits of CC #s, don't keep CC #s.


Recurring billing is the other thing I'm not sure about, I guess  
I'd need to leave the card data alone in that case but I've  
never worked with recurring payments so I'm not sure how I would  
detect if the card is being used for them.


If an organization wants to avoid keeping CC #s then it will  
certainly limit certain otherwise automated things. Recurring  
orders or recurring billing would be something that is not  
possible, unless a third party payment provider is used that  
keeps the CC #. This is actually one of the very appealing things  
about services like PayPal or GoogleCheckout where the ecommerce  
site doesn't ever even accept payment information.


In fact, for anyone who wants a feature like (ie remove CC  
numbers after use), they might consider using a third party  
payment site instead of the more transparent option of handling  
it through their application.


-David











smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Question about authorize.net and PCI

2009-10-22 Thread Tim Ruppert
I'm not sure about your specific needs here being provided OOTB, but  
we recently added the ability to clean out the actual credit card  
information.  I think that Scott did this at the product store level  
and we're using Authorize.net in this capacity.  Sorry, I can't  
remember the flag off the top of my head - but I know that it was  
around June of this year.


Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

On Oct 22, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Scott. wrote:



Hello all,

We are very close to finalizing our method of credit card processing  
within
ofbiz and of course, PCI compliance is taking a front seat. We will  
be using
authorize.net as our gateway and they several different methods with  
regards
to integration. The easy thing would be to use the current supported  
method

but my preference would be to not store credit card info at all.

They are the Simple Checkout, Server Integration Method (SIM) and the
Advanced Integration Method (AIM). I believe that ofbiz natively  
supports
AIM. The main difference between the three is that from a PCI  
standpoint the

simple and the SIM method store the credit card data on the Authorize.Net
PCI-compliant servers thus eliminate the PCI compliance for our  
company. If
I am correct, the SIM method keeps your checkout pages looking the  
way they
were designed and being able to use the native ofbiz to actually  
charge

authorizations, etc.

Has anyone implemented this with ofbiz successfully? How much  
trouble will
be to modify the ofbiz payment services not to store/read any  
sensitive

credit card information.

Thanks in advance for any thoughts.

--
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/Question-about-authorize-net-and-PCI-tp276274p276274.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Question about authorize.net and PCI

2009-10-22 Thread Scott.

Hello all,

We are very close to finalizing our method of credit card processing within
ofbiz and of course, PCI compliance is taking a front seat. We will be using
authorize.net as our gateway and they several different methods with regards
to integration. The easy thing would be to use the current supported method
but my preference would be to not store credit card info at all.

They are the Simple Checkout, Server Integration Method (SIM) and the
Advanced Integration Method (AIM). I believe that ofbiz natively supports
AIM. The main difference between the three is that from a PCI standpoint the
simple and the SIM method store the credit card data on the Authorize.Net
PCI-compliant servers thus eliminate the PCI compliance for our company. If
I am correct, the SIM method keeps your checkout pages looking the way they
were designed and being able to use the native ofbiz to actually charge
authorizations, etc.

Has anyone implemented this with ofbiz successfully? How much trouble will
be to modify the ofbiz payment services not to store/read any sensitive
credit card information. 

Thanks in advance for any thoughts.

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/Question-about-authorize-net-and-PCI-tp276274p276274.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Feedbacks on Bluelight theme

2009-10-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Hi Bruno,

I have noticed that with Blue Light in all(?) Catalog Manager screens but Product (ie Prices, Content, etc.) you don't see product 
Id, annoying ;o)

It was there sometimes ago

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" 

Hi Bruno,

Actually I use more, in that order, Flat Grey and Business Time. There are no real reasons. I will try to use it a bit more and 
will give you a feedbak then.


Cheers

Jacques

From: "Bruno Busco" 

Hi users!
I would like to have your feedback on the Bluelight theme.

- Do you find it is usable?
- Do you find it is user friendly?
- How would you like it to be improved?

Please fill free to report any issue.

Thank you very much,
Bruno









Re: Forecast datetime problem

2009-10-22 Thread zhiyongcui

If you create a new sales forecast ,you can select a time period through
Custom Time Period Id .  when you run a mrp, it will treat a sales forecast
as a sales order .

Pierre Smits-3 wrote:
> 
> How so? Please elaborate.
> Regards,
> 
> Pierre
> 
> 2009/10/21 zhiyongcui 
> 
>>
>> We are wrong.
>>
>> Pierre Smits-3 wrote:
>> >
>> > It is not in yet. Create a JIRA to address the improvement.
>> >
>> > 2009/10/21 zhiyongcui 
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I think  that the forecast detail should have a field to indicate the
>> >> time
>> >> period for which the forecast ,but I could not find it .If I am wrong
>> ,
>> >> pls
>> >> point to me . If I am not wrong then how to implement it ?
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >> http://n4.nabble.com/Forecast-datetime-problem-tp275498p275498.html
>> >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n4.nabble.com/Forecast-datetime-problem-tp275498p275962.html
>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/Forecast-datetime-problem-tp275498p276253.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Forecast datetime problem

2009-10-22 Thread Pierre Smits
How so? Please elaborate.
Regards,

Pierre

2009/10/21 zhiyongcui 

>
> We are wrong.
>
> Pierre Smits-3 wrote:
> >
> > It is not in yet. Create a JIRA to address the improvement.
> >
> > 2009/10/21 zhiyongcui 
> >
> >>
> >> I think  that the forecast detail should have a field to indicate the
> >> time
> >> period for which the forecast ,but I could not find it .If I am wrong ,
> >> pls
> >> point to me . If I am not wrong then how to implement it ?
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://n4.nabble.com/Forecast-datetime-problem-tp275498p275498.html
> >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n4.nabble.com/Forecast-datetime-problem-tp275498p275962.html
> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


Re: Forecast datetime problem

2009-10-22 Thread Pierre Smits
2009/10/21 zhiyongcui 

>
> We are wrong.
>
> Pierre Smits-3 wrote:
> >
> > It is not in yet. Create a JIRA to address the improvement.
> >
> > 2009/10/21 zhiyongcui 
> >
> >>
> >> I think  that the forecast detail should have a field to indicate the
> >> time
> >> period for which the forecast ,but I could not find it .If I am wrong ,
> >> pls
> >> point to me . If I am not wrong then how to implement it ?
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://n4.nabble.com/Forecast-datetime-problem-tp275498p275498.html
> >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n4.nabble.com/Forecast-datetime-problem-tp275498p275962.html
> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>