Re: does anyone know ofbiz?

2010-01-26 Thread Chris Snow

David E Jones wrote:

Your best bet to find things in OFBiz is to gain an understanding of the data 
model, and then to use tools like the Artifact Info stuff in web tools to find 
related artifacts (ie controller requests and views, screens, forms, service 
definitions, service implementations, and so on. When you do this you'll see a 
number of process snippets that are modeled as services (like creating an 
order), or triggers that get other processes going in the form of ECA rules 
(like creating an invoice for part or all of an order when items from that 
order are in a packed shipment).

  
Perhaps an eclipse ofbiz plug would be more useful than process 
documentation?  I.e. being able to efficiently navigate all this meta 
data from within the development environment?


Re: does anyone know ofbiz?

2010-01-26 Thread Jacques Le Roux

I agree,

Something that would be very interesting for OFBiz and would give us  more power, David already suggested that, would be to use the 
artifact info underneath to provide a tool, like an Eclipse plugin, to navigate in OFBiz, like you do in Java. But yes, it's not the 
same scope at the same level, in the past this was called RAD


Jacques

From: David E Jones d...@me.com


The UBPL stories might be helpful for you Chris, but I think they are different 
from what you are looking for.

The goal of UBPL is to get people collaborating in a more structured way on gathering requirements, and then based on those 
requirements collaborate on designs, and THEN collaborate on implementation of those designs. It is not an attempt to document 
what is already in OFBiz, but rather to document common business requirements in the form of processes to help refine and 
flesh-out OFBiz (ie to drive the future of OFBiz).


The reason for this goal is that typically there has been little if any collaboration on requirements and designs in OFBiz. This 
works to some extent because the OFBiz base applications (those in the components in the ofbiz/applications directory) are meant 
to be generic and reusable, and that means organized around a data model and NOT around business processes in order to support a 
wider variety of business processes, and so the artifacts are reusable in custom or derived applications that are designed to 
support a wide variety of business processes.


In other words, you could try to document the business processes supported by OFBiz, but you would never finish because there is 
no single process or even a small set of processes that OFBiz supports... it really a very large set of processes.


Your best bet to find things in OFBiz is to gain an understanding of the data model, and then to use tools like the Artifact Info 
stuff in web tools to find related artifacts (ie controller requests and views, screens, forms, service definitions, service 
implementations, and so on. When you do this you'll see a number of process snippets that are modeled as services (like creating 
an order), or triggers that get other processes going in the form of ECA rules (like creating an invoice for part or all of an 
order when items from that order are in a packed shipment).


I'm actually a little bit surprised that no one else has brought up these points. This has been discussed many many times. Or 
maybe I've presented it many many times and no one believes me...?


-David



On Jan 25, 2010, at 8:25 AM, Jeroen van der Wal wrote:


Hi Chris,

There is already an initiative do document high-level processes:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Universal+Business+Process+Library+Index

Jeroen van der Wal
Stromboli b.v.
+31 655 874050


On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Chris Snow sno...@snowconsulting.co.ukwrote:


Hi Ruth,

I wouldn't even say it's difficult to figure out the existing applications.
It is very time consuming.  Without high level overview documentation, the
only way to understand the existing apps is to go through each line of code.

I really think there should be a process documentation effort - of which
I'm willing to give my time...

Cheers,

Chris


Ruth Hoffman wrote:


Hi Chris:
I think you are spot on. Once you understand the basics, it is relatively
easy to develop data driven web applications with the OFBiz framework. I've
been doing just that for several years now. All that nasty database stuff
is taken care of - leaving me free to develop real world solutions in short
order.

What is much more difficult is to figure out how to use the existing
applications to solve real world problems. I'm still struggling with that.

Regards,
Ruth

Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword myofbiz
ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com

Chris Snow wrote:


Hi Marc,

This is one of the reasons I have been pushing for and independent ofbiz
framework.  It's is relatively quick to learn how to develop standalone apps
in ofbiz.  I believe with ofbiz, you can develop small applications as
quickly as you can in MS Access - with a lot more benefits when using ofbiz
(multiuser, web enabled, extendable, etc).

However, in my opinion, it takes years of experience to be able to use
the existing apps (partymgmt, ordermgmt, etc).

Cheers,

Chris


Marc Morin wrote:


It's taken us about 6-12 months to get proficient in ofbiz  mostly
because we mostly resisted doing things the ofbiz way

- Original Message -
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 7:04:01 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: does anyone know ofbiz?

--- On Fri, 1/22/10, Chris Snow sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk wrote:



Is it possible for one person to have a deep understanding
of how ALL of the components in ofbiz work?  It is
vast.  I have found that the only way to tackle the
problem is to 

Re: Eclipse plugin.

2010-01-26 Thread Hans Bakker
The current status of this plugin:

can browse through the components and show java service definitions and
implementations works also in Eclipse 3.5

demo:
http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/ofbizexplorer.htm

download:
http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/index.php?page=sourcecode
(to be put in the eclipse plugin directory

I think it is very promising, has apache 2.0 license so can be included
in the ofbiz system

Regards,
Hans


On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:33 -0700, snowc wrote:
 Has anyone made any advances on an eclipse plugin for ofbiz?
-- 
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates



Re: Eclipse plugin.

2010-01-26 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Thanks Hans,

I completly forgot about this, though I think the last time I had a look it was 
not so advanced

Jacques

From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com

The current status of this plugin:

can browse through the components and show java service definitions and
implementations works also in Eclipse 3.5

demo:
http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/ofbizexplorer.htm

download:
http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/index.php?page=sourcecode
(to be put in the eclipse plugin directory

I think it is very promising, has apache 2.0 license so can be included
in the ofbiz system

Regards,
Hans


On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:33 -0700, snowc wrote:

Has anyone made any advances on an eclipse plugin for ofbiz?

--
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates





Re: Eclipse plugin.

2010-01-26 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Hans,

I don't remember why I did not decide to use it. Do you use it regularly, is it stable ? 


Jacques

From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com

Thanks Hans,

I completly forgot about this, though I think the last time I had a look it was 
not so advanced

Jacques

From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com

The current status of this plugin:

can browse through the components and show java service definitions and
implementations works also in Eclipse 3.5

demo:
http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/ofbizexplorer.htm

download:
http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/index.php?page=sourcecode
(to be put in the eclipse plugin directory

I think it is very promising, has apache 2.0 license so can be included
in the ofbiz system

Regards,
Hans


On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:33 -0700, snowc wrote:

Has anyone made any advances on an eclipse plugin for ofbiz?

--
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates







Re: Eclipse plugin.

2010-01-26 Thread Hans Bakker
Hi Jaques,

I just tried it again and looks like it is working.

it however only does java services. I do not think it is very difficult
to extend it to minilanguage services, entities def files, config files
etc. The source is downloadable too and i am just looking at it in the
eclipse plugin developer.

the big job has been done actually so far as i can see.I do not have
much experience with eclipse plugin development however.

Regards,
Hans

On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 11:17 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
 Hans,
 
 I don't remember why I did not decide to use it. Do you use it regularly, is 
 it stable ? 
 
 Jacques
 
 From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
  Thanks Hans,
  
  I completly forgot about this, though I think the last time I had a look it 
  was not so advanced
  
  Jacques
  
  From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
  The current status of this plugin:
  
  can browse through the components and show java service definitions and
  implementations works also in Eclipse 3.5
  
  demo:
  http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/ofbizexplorer.htm
  
  download:
  http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/index.php?page=sourcecode
  (to be put in the eclipse plugin directory
  
  I think it is very promising, has apache 2.0 license so can be included
  in the ofbiz system
  
  Regards,
  Hans
  
  
  On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:33 -0700, snowc wrote:
  Has anyone made any advances on an eclipse plugin for ofbiz?
  -- 
  Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
 
 
 
-- 
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates



set / for eeca and seca

2010-01-26 Thread cqnunez

We have added updatedByUserLogin and updateDate as fields for the
orderHeader entity.

We defined an eeca 

eca entity=OrderStatus operation=create event=return
condition field-name=orderId operator=is-not-empty /
condition field-name=orderItemSeqId operator=is-empty /
set field-name=updatedByUserLogin env-name=statusUserLogin /
set field-name=updateDate env-name=statusDatetime/
action service=updateOrderHeader mode=sync /
  /eca

and got the ff error msg

Error in Service [changeOrderStatus]: ERROR : Could not change order status
(The current transaction is marked for rollback, not beginning a new
transaction and aborting current operation; the rollbackOnly was caused by:
Service [changeOrderStatus] threw an unexpected
exception/errororg.ofbiz.service.GenericServiceException: Service
[changeOrderStatus] target threw an unexpected exception
(java.sql.Timestamp) (Service [changeOrderStatus] target threw an unexpected
exception (java.sql.Timestamp))).

The service is called when set field-name=updateDate
env-name=statusDatetime/ is removed.

Does the set / definition for eeca and seca only accept String values from
the parameter?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/set-for-eeca-and-seca-tp1290226p1290226.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Eclipse plugin.

2010-01-26 Thread Ruth Hoffman

Hi Hans:
The Wink demo is really nice and informative!
On a side note: How hard is it to use Wink?

TIA
Ruth

Hans Bakker wrote:

The current status of this plugin:

can browse through the components and show java service definitions and
implementations works also in Eclipse 3.5

demo:
http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/ofbizexplorer.htm

download:
http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/index.php?page=sourcecode
(to be put in the eclipse plugin directory

I think it is very promising, has apache 2.0 license so can be included
in the ofbiz system

Regards,
Hans


On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:33 -0700, snowc wrote:
  

Has anyone made any advances on an eclipse plugin for ofbiz?



Re: Eclipse plugin.

2010-01-26 Thread Hans Bakker
Hi Ruth, i did not make the demo...it was done by he creator of the
plugin: Anders Hessellund.

he just mailed me and informed that Daniel Rosowski
daniel.rosow...@lynx.de has plans to complete the plugin

Also one of my people Chatree Srichart chatree.srich...@gmail.com will
have  look at it

get together and see who is doing what?

Regards,
Hans

On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 08:10 -0500, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
 Hi Hans:
 The Wink demo is really nice and informative!
 On a side note: How hard is it to use Wink?
 
 TIA
 Ruth
 
 Hans Bakker wrote:
  The current status of this plugin:
 
  can browse through the components and show java service definitions and
  implementations works also in Eclipse 3.5
 
  demo:
  http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/ofbizexplorer.htm
 
  download:
  http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/index.php?page=sourcecode
  (to be put in the eclipse plugin directory
 
  I think it is very promising, has apache 2.0 license so can be included
  in the ofbiz system
 
  Regards,
  Hans
 
 
  On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:33 -0700, snowc wrote:

  Has anyone made any advances on an eclipse plugin for ofbiz?
  
-- 
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates



Re: Eclipse plugin.

2010-01-26 Thread Ruth Hoffman

Hi Hans,
Thanks. I'll contact Anders directly.
Regards,
Ruth

Hans Bakker wrote:

Hi Ruth, i did not make the demo...it was done by he creator of the
plugin: Anders Hessellund.

he just mailed me and informed that Daniel Rosowski
daniel.rosow...@lynx.de has plans to complete the plugin

Also one of my people Chatree Srichart chatree.srich...@gmail.com will
have  look at it

get together and see who is doing what?

Regards,
Hans

On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 08:10 -0500, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
  

Hi Hans:
The Wink demo is really nice and informative!
On a side note: How hard is it to use Wink?

TIA
Ruth

Hans Bakker wrote:


The current status of this plugin:

can browse through the components and show java service definitions and
implementations works also in Eclipse 3.5

demo:
http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/ofbizexplorer.htm

download:
http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/index.php?page=sourcecode
(to be put in the eclipse plugin directory

I think it is very promising, has apache 2.0 license so can be included
in the ofbiz system

Regards,
Hans


On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:33 -0700, snowc wrote:
  
  

Has anyone made any advances on an eclipse plugin for ofbiz?




Re: Eclipse plugin.

2010-01-26 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Good news!

Jacques

From: Ruth Hoffman rhoff...@aesolves.com

Hi Hans,
Thanks. I'll contact Anders directly.
Regards,
Ruth

Hans Bakker wrote:

Hi Ruth, i did not make the demo...it was done by he creator of the
plugin: Anders Hessellund.

he just mailed me and informed that Daniel Rosowski
daniel.rosow...@lynx.de has plans to complete the plugin

Also one of my people Chatree Srichart chatree.srich...@gmail.com will
have  look at it

get together and see who is doing what?

Regards,
Hans

On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 08:10 -0500, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
  

Hi Hans:
The Wink demo is really nice and informative!
On a side note: How hard is it to use Wink?

TIA
Ruth

Hans Bakker wrote:


The current status of this plugin:

can browse through the components and show java service definitions and
implementations works also in Eclipse 3.5

demo:
http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/ofbizexplorer.htm

download:
http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/index.php?page=sourcecode
(to be put in the eclipse plugin directory

I think it is very promising, has apache 2.0 license so can be included
in the ofbiz system

Regards,
Hans


On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:33 -0700, snowc wrote:
  
  

Has anyone made any advances on an eclipse plugin for ofbiz?








Re: Eclipse plugin.

2010-01-26 Thread Tim Ruppert
Wink's a really nice program - good to see it put to such good use.

Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:20 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:

 Hi Hans,
 Thanks. I'll contact Anders directly.
 Regards,
 Ruth
 
 Hans Bakker wrote:
 Hi Ruth, i did not make the demo...it was done by he creator of the
 plugin: Anders Hessellund.
 
 he just mailed me and informed that Daniel Rosowski
 daniel.rosow...@lynx.de has plans to complete the plugin
 
 Also one of my people Chatree Srichart chatree.srich...@gmail.com will
 have  look at it
 
 get together and see who is doing what?
 
 Regards,
 Hans
 
 On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 08:10 -0500, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
  
 Hi Hans:
 The Wink demo is really nice and informative!
 On a side note: How hard is it to use Wink?
 
 TIA
 Ruth
 
 Hans Bakker wrote:

 The current status of this plugin:
 
 can browse through the components and show java service definitions and
 implementations works also in Eclipse 3.5
 
 demo:
 http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/ofbizexplorer.htm
 
 download:
 http://www.itu.dk/~hessellund/smartemf/index.php?page=sourcecode
 (to be put in the eclipse plugin directory
 
 I think it is very promising, has apache 2.0 license so can be included
 in the ofbiz system
 
 Regards,
 Hans
 
 
 On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:33 -0700, snowc wrote:

 Has anyone made any advances on an eclipse plugin for ofbiz?




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Eclipse plugin.

2010-01-26 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
Hey everybody,

yep Daniel Rosowski, a colleque of mine, began to extend the plugin and we 
still keep working on it. 
For now the features are in early development state but it will grow :-) 
(hopefully soon)

Have a nice Day
Sascha




Sascha Rodekamp
Consultant
Lynx-Consulting GmbH
Johanniskirchplatz 6
33615 Bielefeld
Deutschland
Fon: +49 521 5247-0
Fax: +49 521 5247-250
Mobil: +49 151 140 698 93


Company and Management Headquarters:
Lynx-Consulting GmbH, Johanniskirchplatz 6, 33615 Bielefeld, Deutschland
Fon: +49 521 5247-0, Fax: +49 521 5247-250, www.lynx.de

Court Registration: Amtsgericht Bielefeld HRB 35946
Chief Executive Officers: Karsten Noss, Dirk Osterkamp


This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise 
confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are 
hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly 
prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. 
Thank you for your cooperation. 



SAP Special Expertise Partner ERP Upgrade

Erfolg ist eine Folge. 20 Jahre Lynx

Re: tests are slow

2010-01-26 Thread Scott Gray
Hi Chris,

You're most welcome to create a jira issue, I can't guarantee I'll be able to 
work on it anytime soon however.

Regards
Scott

On 25/01/2010, at 6:53 AM, Chris Snow wrote:

 Hi Scott,
 
 That works great - much quicker!
 
 I have started up the normal container and I have created a service 
 (runTestSuite) that instantiates the TestRunContainer.  The service is marked 
 as exported, so I am just running the tests via a SOAP call at the moment.
 
 This functionality would be good in webtools.  It would also be good if a 
 test could be executed against a running ofbiz via the main build ant script. 
  Using ant, we could easily run tests from eclipse by creating an external 
 run task for each test.
 
 Shall I raise this as a JIRA improvement?
 
 Many thanks,
 
 Chris
 
 
 Scott Gray wrote:
 You could try manually initializing and starting the TestRunContainer, but 
 obviously changes to java files will only take effect after you recompile.
 
 Let me know how it goes, there is potential that we could put something like 
 this into webtools alongside the selenium tests.
 
 Regards
 Scott
 
 HotWax Media
 http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
 
 On 23/01/2010, at 11:41 AM, chris snow wrote:
 
  
 Scott Gray-2 wrote:

 It should be possible to run a test suite against an already running  
 instance, assuming no compilation is required and the database is in  the 
 state required by the tests (i.e. pretty much unchanged from a  fresh 
 install).
 
  
 I'm lovin the test framework, but I'm still finding the startup time to be a
 pain.  What would need to be done to run the tests against an already
 running instance?
 
 Many thanks,
 
 Chris
 
 -- 
 View this message in context: 
 http://n4.nabble.com/tests-are-slow-tp1014608p1288334.html
 Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 
  
 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: does anyone know ofbiz?

2010-01-26 Thread David E Jones

On Jan 26, 2010, at 2:43 AM, Chris Snow wrote:

 David E Jones wrote:
 Your best bet to find things in OFBiz is to gain an understanding of the 
 data model, and then to use tools like the Artifact Info stuff in web tools 
 to find related artifacts (ie controller requests and views, screens, forms, 
 service definitions, service implementations, and so on. When you do this 
 you'll see a number of process snippets that are modeled as services (like 
 creating an order), or triggers that get other processes going in the form 
 of ECA rules (like creating an invoice for part or all of an order when 
 items from that order are in a packed shipment).
 
  
 Perhaps an eclipse ofbiz plug would be more useful than process 
 documentation?  I.e. being able to efficiently navigate all this meta data 
 from within the development environment?

The original intent of the Artifact Info stuff was to gather the information 
that would be necessary for something like an Eclipse plugin.

Until someone writes and Eclipse plugin the information is only available 
through the web-based UI.

-David



Re: How to get a handle on the e-commerce engine?

2010-01-26 Thread Ylan Segal
On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:

 Hi Patrick:
 You could purchase and read my 2 books. (http://www.myofbiz.com) They explain 
 OFBiz ecommerce from an end-user's point of view. What you get OOTB. Once you 
 understand what comes with OFBiz, it makes it much easier to customize. Some 
 other people have found these useful.

Ruth, 

From what I see on your website, your books are for release 4.0, and the 
current release of 9.04. How different are the releases? I usually try to avoid 
books that are for previous releases of software, but I guess it depends on how 
much has changed. 

Thanks, 

-- 
Ylan Segal





multiple merchants upload their own products -- extend catalog manager?

2010-01-26 Thread Patrick
I see that I can upload products and catalogs via the catalog manager.
 If I want multiple merchants to upload their own products, vaguely
analogous to ebay, is it correct to say that I need to extend the
catalog manager? or is that functionality already available?  Thanks,
Patrick


Re: does anyone know ofbiz?

2010-01-26 Thread Sharan-F

Hi

For the last couple of years I've been looking at OFBiz from a business
process perspective and I would suggest that many businesses wanting to find
out if OFBiz would work for them will want to know  if their business
processes are supported or not. It is a key question and if it cant be
answered fairly quickly then they will go and look elsewhere.

My experience with ERPs is that many of them do support many types of
business processes and an important area is understanding how to configure
the system to adapt to the differing needs and this is where I'm looking to
position. 

At the moment I'm looking  into the possibility of putting together some
resources together (eg documentation or training material, etc)  based
on business processes. Before starting I'd  like to find out whether anyone
else is working on this (so perhaps we could pool resources!) and also
whether people think it would be a good idea or not.

Thanks
Sharan


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/does-anyone-know-ofbiz-tp1128127p1310910.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: does anyone know ofbiz?

2010-01-26 Thread Ruth Hoffman

Hi Sharan:
I'm working towards that end. I'm certainly a long way off. But 
ultimately, I'd like to have a set of resources available to:
1) Train end users on how to use OFBiz to run their business. (I guess 
that starts with, should you even be looking at OFBiz to run your business.)
2) Train consultants on how to configure (setup, customize - whatever 
you want to call it) primary OFBiz features to meet specific business 
requirements.
I'm not so much interested in showing developers how to write new OFBiz 
applications. I think there is an abundance of that kind of information 
out there. No?

I'd be happy to discuss this with you either through this forum or offline.
Regards,
Ruth


Sharan-F wrote:

Hi

For the last couple of years I've been looking at OFBiz from a business
process perspective and I would suggest that many businesses wanting to find
out if OFBiz would work for them will want to know  if their business
processes are supported or not. It is a key question and if it cant be
answered fairly quickly then they will go and look elsewhere.

My experience with ERPs is that many of them do support many types of
business processes and an important area is understanding how to configure
the system to adapt to the differing needs and this is where I'm looking to
position. 


At the moment I'm looking  into the possibility of putting together some
resources together (eg documentation or training material, etc)  based
on business processes. Before starting I'd  like to find out whether anyone
else is working on this (so perhaps we could pool resources!) and also
whether people think it would be a good idea or not.

Thanks
Sharan


  


Re: does anyone know ofbiz?

2010-01-26 Thread Sharan-F

Hi Ruth

We seem to be thinking along similar lines so yes I think it would be good
to discuss things. I'll just give it until tomorrow to see if I get any
other mailing responses about this – otherwise if it's just you, me and
Chris then we can take the discussion offline.

Thanks
Sharan

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/does-anyone-know-ofbiz-tp1128127p1311027.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Selenium status for release 9.04

2010-01-26 Thread Hans Bakker
Please check the following document:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features

Regards,
Hans


On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 21:02 -0500, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
 Hello List:
 I want to try experimenting with Selenium and am curious about what 
 is/is not in release 9.04. It looks like from a recent download that 
 there is no embedded Selenium support. Is this true? Am I just not 
 looking in the right place?
 
 Regards,
 Ruth
-- 
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates



Re: Selenium status for release 9.04

2010-01-26 Thread Ruth Hoffman

Hi Hans:
Thanks. It wasn't clear that I needed to click through to the 
documentation. After reading that, I want to ask: this will work for 
which versions of Release 9.04?


TIA
Ruth

Hans Bakker wrote:

Please check the following document:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features

Regards,
Hans


On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 21:02 -0500, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
  

Hello List:
I want to try experimenting with Selenium and am curious about what 
is/is not in release 9.04. It looks like from a recent download that 
there is no embedded Selenium support. Is this true? Am I just not 
looking in the right place?


Regards,
Ruth



ant download-selenium returns build fail error

2010-01-26 Thread Ruth Hoffman
According to the documentation, I should be able to download the 
necessary Selenium server.jar file as so:


ant download-selenium

This returns the following error:

Target download-selenium does not exist in the project OFBiz Main Build.

for Release 9.04 version 899857

Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version 899857?

Regards,
Ruth


Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error

2010-01-26 Thread Scott Gray
Hi Ruth,

I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase 

Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com


On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:

 According to the documentation, I should be able to download the necessary 
 Selenium server.jar file as so:
 
 ant download-selenium
 
 This returns the following error:
 
 Target download-selenium does not exist in the project OFBiz Main Build.
 
 for Release 9.04 version 899857
 
 Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version 899857?
 
 Regards,
 Ruth



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: ant download-selenium returns build fail error

2010-01-26 Thread Ruth Hoffman

Hi Scott:
Thanks for this reply. I guess that is why I asked the original question.
Next question: should it? Or should the documentation be amended to 
reflect this?

Regards,
Ruth

Scott Gray wrote:

Hi Ruth,

I don't believe selenium has a presence at all in the 9.04 codebase 


Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com


On 26/01/2010, at 7:59 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:

  

According to the documentation, I should be able to download the necessary 
Selenium server.jar file as so:

ant download-selenium

This returns the following error:

Target download-selenium does not exist in the project OFBiz Main Build.

for Release 9.04 version 899857

Is this a bug or is Selenium not supported in Release 9.04 version 899857?

Regards,
Ruth



  


Re: Selenium status for release 9.04

2010-01-26 Thread Hans Bakker
there are only fault fixes in rel 9.04, no functional enhancements
so any item on the list mentioned after april 2009 is not in 9.04

regards,
Hans

On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 21:31 -0500, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
 Hi Hans:
 Thanks. It wasn't clear that I needed to click through to the 
 documentation. After reading that, I want to ask: this will work for 
 which versions of Release 9.04?
 
 TIA
 Ruth
 
 Hans Bakker wrote:
  Please check the following document:
 
  http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features
 
  Regards,
  Hans
 
 
  On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 21:02 -0500, Ruth Hoffman wrote:

  Hello List:
  I want to try experimenting with Selenium and am curious about what 
  is/is not in release 9.04. It looks like from a recent download that 
  there is no embedded Selenium support. Is this true? Am I just not 
  looking in the right place?
 
  Regards,
  Ruth
  
-- 
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates



Re: Selenium status for release 9.04

2010-01-26 Thread Ruth Hoffman

Hi Hans:
Thanks for the clarification.
Regards,
Ruth

Hans Bakker wrote:

there are only fault fixes in rel 9.04, no functional enhancements
so any item on the list mentioned after april 2009 is not in 9.04

regards,
Hans

On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 21:31 -0500, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
  

Hi Hans:
Thanks. It wasn't clear that I needed to click through to the 
documentation. After reading that, I want to ask: this will work for 
which versions of Release 9.04?


TIA
Ruth

Hans Bakker wrote:


Please check the following document:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features

Regards,
Hans


On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 21:02 -0500, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
  
  

Hello List:
I want to try experimenting with Selenium and am curious about what 
is/is not in release 9.04. It looks like from a recent download that 
there is no embedded Selenium support. Is this true? Am I just not 
looking in the right place?


Regards,
Ruth




Re: Update entity product - mass update for producut price

2010-01-26 Thread Rishi Solanki
Hi,
Have a look at the ImprotProductServices.java 
productImportFromSpreadsheet.
More you find at -
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Import+Data+Using+Apache+POI+api

Rishi Solanki
Enterprise Software Developer
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.


On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:17 PM, su2 shu...@pexsupply.com wrote:


 Hello All,

 We have requirement where we need to do mass update on product price(also
 few other things, supplier etc) once every two weeks, we have thousands of
 products for which manual updates are not possible.

 I would really appreciate if someone can give me some idea. We have
 ProductID and Product Price in one excel.

 Thank you in advance.
 Su-


 --
 View this message in context:
 http://n4.nabble.com/Update-entity-product-mass-update-for-producut-price-tp1289414p1289414.html
 Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: does anyone know ofbiz?

2010-01-26 Thread Raj Saini

Hi Sharan,

I think would be a very interesting and I would like to participate in 
it. Also, I think it would be better to discuss this here as other 
specially the developers associated with the project for long time may 
provide their valuable input.


Thanks,

Raj

Sharan-F wrote:

Hi Ruth

We seem to be thinking along similar lines so yes I think it would be good
to discuss things. I'll just give it until tomorrow to see if I get any
other mailing responses about this – otherwise if it's just you, me and
Chris then we can take the discussion offline.

Thanks
Sharan