Re: OFBiz Extensions Marketplace (OEM) - progress

2015-09-13 Thread Pierre Smits 
The correct url for a sneak peek into the OFBiz Extensions Marketplace is
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*OFBiz Extensions Marketplace*
http://oem.ofbizci.net

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Pierre Smits 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> While the development of the OEM is moving forward at a steady pace, I am
> pleased to be able to provide a sneak peek into the preliminary website.
> Please visit http://oem.ofbizci.net for a impression.
>
> Please be advised that it is still work in progress and that the actual
> theme and user experience might be subject to change.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *OFBiz Extensions Marketplace*
> http://oem.ofbizci.net
>

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace (OEM) - progress

2015-09-13 Thread Pierre Smits 
Hi all,

While the development of the OEM is moving forward at a steady pace, I am
pleased to be able to provide a sneak peek into the preliminary website.
Please visit http://oem.ofbizci.net for a impression.

Please be advised that it is still work in progress and that the actual
theme and user experience might be subject to change.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*OFBiz Extensions Marketplace*
http://oem.ofbizci.net

Re: OFBiz Extensions Marketplace (OEM) - progress

2015-09-13 Thread Michael Brohl 

Hi Pierre,

I very much like the idea of a community driven marketing initiative and 
I appreciate your efforts on this. It could be a great opportunity for 
the community members to present their skills and solutions and show the 
users what's possible to do with OFBiz outside the standard funtionality.


As you might be aware, there was another initiative by Hans with a 
similar approach, see http://ofbiz.info . As far as I see, this approach 
never gained significant success and it seems dead for a few years now 
(at least the latest news is from 2012).


My theory is, and I might be totally wrong with it, that this is caused 
by the fact that the platform is in the hands of a single company and 
primarily used to promote this company itself. This seems to be the plan 
of your approach also, your companies and trademarks are placed 
prominently at the starting page, using adserver links etc..


I think this approach goes in the wrong direction and won't get enough 
acceptance and support by the community to be successful.


From my perspective, the right approach would be to develop and host 
such a site in the hands of the community, just like the OFBiz official 
website and demo sites. It should be a neutral place where every 
contributor and service provider has the same space to present his 
services and solutions. It must be assured that the platform is 
supported over a long time and that the community can decide which way 
to go with it.


I think the risk to have it in the hands of a single person or company 
is too high to spent significant time and effort in it.


This is just my thought of the current state of the initiative and maybe 
I misunderstood the approach. My apologies if that's the case.


Maybe I'm right and you think over the approach. Any thoughts of you and 
the other community members are very welcome, I'm curious what you think.


Kind regards,

Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH
www.ecomify.de

Am 13.09.15 um 10:28 schrieb Pierre Smits:

The correct url for a sneak peek into the OFBiz Extensions Marketplace is
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*OFBiz Extensions Marketplace*
http://oem.ofbizci.net

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Pierre Smits 
wrote:


Hi all,

While the development of the OEM is moving forward at a steady pace, I am
pleased to be able to provide a sneak peek into the preliminary website.
Please visit http://oem.ofbizci.net for a impression.

Please be advised that it is still work in progress and that the actual
theme and user experience might be subject to change.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*OFBiz Extensions Marketplace*
http://oem.ofbizci.net






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Inventory Status Update - not changing the available to promise quantity

2015-09-13 Thread Jacques Le Roux 

Hi,

Has a Jira issue created for this?

Thanks

Jacques

Le 02/09/2015 09:49, Sharan-F a écrit :

Hi Dhananjay

Looking at it again I think you are right.The quantity on hand should be the
same because this is just tells you how many of the product you have
whatever the status. The ATP should be zero because you can't promise any of
the defective products. So now, yes I do think it is a minor bug.

I did some extra testing using the inventory item variances (at the bottom
of the inventory item screen) where you can adjust the ATP and QOH .e.g. I
put in a -8 variance on the ATP and a zero variance on the QOH to get a ATP
= 0 and QOH=8.

I'd suggest you take a look through our Jira Issue tracker just in case this
issue has been previously reported but if not the please create a new Jira
Issue for it.

Thanks
Sharan



--
View this message in context: 
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Inventory-Status-Update-not-changing-the-available-to-promise-quantity-tp4671743p4671803.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: OFBiz Extensions Marketplace (OEM) - progress

2015-09-13 Thread Gil portenseigne 

Hi Pierre, hi all,

I agree with Micheal opinion, since there was some others initiative 
about this kind of proposal (thinking about OFBiz-extra and OFBiz-france 
association proposals), none found enough adoption into the community to 
get it work (yet). So each had to work on its own creating its solutions 
(these add to Hans' one)


I'm convinced that an official Apache referencing website is the best 
way to do. Apache referencing has more value (and objectivity) than any 
external owning referencing tool but in that case, there must be some 
control about the references into the "marketplace" (don't like this 
word, I prefer "extension library"). Indeed, extension have to be tested 
and validated by the community to make the marketplace an Apache one... 
I guess there are quality/licensing/other responsibilities for 
extensions released under Apache OFBiz name.


So, in my opinion, there is some work to do before creating such a 
marketplace under Apache OFBiz name, writing some rules about extensions 
validations (using incubator to validation process), requirement... And 
moreover. This kind of work have already been done in OFbiz-france 
association... If this can be levered to the Apache level, it could be 
great...


It seems that more and more people are interested in this kind of 
solution, i wonder if it's possible to manage such a project ? WDYT ?


I'm thinking that doing a survey about this idea to get what kind of 
adoption there is around it could be a good start.


And for examples of implementation : OFBiz-france has worked on a POC 
and there you can see list of extensions and details of one :

 http://www.nomaka.fr/ofbiz/liste.html
 http://www.nomaka.fr/ofbiz/index.html

And for info all of this is designed like in the OFBiz-france website 
(created with OFBiz CMS :o) ).

 http://www.ofbiz-fr.org

I'm curious to have many thoughts about this subject.

Best Regards,

Gil

On 13/09/2015 12:54, Michael Brohl wrote:

Hi Pierre,

I very much like the idea of a community driven marketing initiative 
and I appreciate your efforts on this. It could be a great opportunity 
for the community members to present their skills and solutions and 
show the users what's possible to do with OFBiz outside the standard 
funtionality.


As you might be aware, there was another initiative by Hans with a 
similar approach, see http://ofbiz.info . As far as I see, this 
approach never gained significant success and it seems dead for a few 
years now (at least the latest news is from 2012).


My theory is, and I might be totally wrong with it, that this is 
caused by the fact that the platform is in the hands of a single 
company and primarily used to promote this company itself. This seems 
to be the plan of your approach also, your companies and trademarks 
are placed prominently at the starting page, using adserver links etc..


I think this approach goes in the wrong direction and won't get enough 
acceptance and support by the community to be successful.


From my perspective, the right approach would be to develop and host 
such a site in the hands of the community, just like the OFBiz 
official website and demo sites. It should be a neutral place where 
every contributor and service provider has the same space to present 
his services and solutions. It must be assured that the platform is 
supported over a long time and that the community can decide which way 
to go with it.


I think the risk to have it in the hands of a single person or company 
is too high to spent significant time and effort in it.


This is just my thought of the current state of the initiative and 
maybe I misunderstood the approach. My apologies if that's the case.


Maybe I'm right and you think over the approach. Any thoughts of you 
and the other community members are very welcome, I'm curious what you 
think.


Kind regards,

Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH
www.ecomify.de

Am 13.09.15 um 10:28 schrieb Pierre Smits:
The correct url for a sneak peek into the OFBiz Extensions 
Marketplace is

http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*OFBiz Extensions Marketplace*
http://oem.ofbizci.net

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Pierre Smits 
wrote:


Hi all,

While the development of the OEM is moving forward at a steady pace, 
I am
pleased to be able to provide a sneak peek into the preliminary 
website.

Please visit http://oem.ofbizci.net for a impression.

Please be advised that it is still work in progress and that the actual
theme and user experience might be subject to change.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*OFBiz Extensions Marketplace*
http://oem.ofbizci.net