Re: struts 1 to struts2 migration.
Hi Arpan, We too did a struts1 to strust2 migration in recent past, its not so easy to migrate as it is. Since Struts2 gives more importance to security nowadays its always advisable to learn the correct implementation from struts2 doc and migrate your struts1 actions one by one. Strust2 and struts1 can co-exist inside same application till you migrate it fully. -- Thanks & Regards Srikanth On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Arpan wrote: > Thank you so much Lukasz.. While migrating I found few more problems. Such > as > > In struts 1 JSP I have used name="FormName" /> > In scriplet there are many places we used <% String s = x.getName(); %> > > In struts 2 we can write > > Now how can I use the "x" object in scriplet. As there are many references > of "x" already written, I don't want to change so much code for now. Hence > like to use scriplet only. > > Thanks > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Lukasz Lenart >wrote: > > > You can try to write your own ActionMapper which will extract request > > parameter "action" and base on that lookup for action. > > > > 2013/8/7 Arpan : > > > Anybody to help here... > > > > > > Thanks in Advance. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Arpan wrote: > > > > > >> Hi All, > > >> > > >> We are migrating from struts1 to struts2. > > >> > > >> In our pages we have multiple buttons which through struts1 > > DispatchAction > > >> can be guided to different methods in Action class. For that we need > > >> minimal changes. Such as > > >> In action mapping if we add parameter="action" and in JSP if the URL > is > > >> like x.do?action=method1, it happily directs the control to method1 in > > >> Action class. > > >> > > >> I got the bellow link for struts2, but for that also we need much > > changes > > >> to be done. > > >> > > > http://struts.apache.org/development/2.x/docs/multiple-submit-buttons.html > > >> > > >> Is there any such way we do similar functionality in struts2 with > > minimal > > >> changes. > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > > > > >
Re: sj:select default value not load
here the value of why is representing key or value ? The value your are
providing to *value* attribute (value="%{why}"), it should always represent
the key (not the display value).
--
Thanks & Regards
Srikanth
Software Developer
eGovernments Foundations
www.egovernments.org
Mob : 9980078913
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:30 AM, john lee wrote:
>
> For struts2 sj:select tag from google
>
>
> href="%{remoteurl}"
> id="language"
> onChangeTopics="reloadsecondlist"
> name="language"
> list="languageObjList"
> listKey="myKey"
> listValue="myValue"
> emptyOption="true"
> headerKey="-1"
> headerValue="Select Category"
> value="why"
> />
>
> for above jsp file, i can retrieve the data from KeywordcategoryAction for
> no problem
>
> but, the default value(why) as defined from KeywordcategoryAction did not
> working at all
>
> I try to change from value="why" to value="%{why}", but still not working,
>
> the setting inside KeywordcategoryAction is the following
>...
> public String getWhy(String why) { return why; }
> public void setWhy(String why) { this.why=why; }
> why="Temperature";
> return success;
>
>
> please advise, thanks in advance
>
> john
Re: Annotation Support for bypassing prepare
I admit it, thats why i mentioned it as a pinch of performance :) .
--
Thanks & Regards
Srikanth
Software Developer
eGovernments Foundations
www.egovernments.org
Mob : 9980078913
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I don't see a performance concern here. Checking a few strings isn't going
> to slow down anything.
> On Aug 8, 2013 12:06 AM, "Sreekanth S. Nair" <
> sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote:
>
> > Guess same performance concern is applicable for that as well. Any ideas
> of
> > making it simpler for existing app without much coding, performance and
> > clumsiness could be better. And i think @SkipPreapre at method level
> gives
> > more visibility than at class level
> > @SkipPrepare({"xdsdasds",ydsdsdsdsds","zsdsdsdsdsds"}).
> >
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards
> > Srikanth
> > Software Developer
> >
> > eGovernments Foundations
> > www.egovernments.org
> > Mob : 9980078913
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Paul Benedict
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Not an array of prepares, but an array of strings for which "execute"
> > > methods the Preaparable callback should be excluded.
> > > On Aug 7, 2013 11:09 PM, "Sreekanth S. Nair" <
> > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > With all gratitude, I strongly disagree with that idea . That bring
> > more
> > > > clumsiness to big strust2 applications. And the idea of taking an
> array
> > > of
> > > > Prepare is a good idea but don't you think it consumes a pinch of
> > runtime
> > > > performance.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Annotation Support for bypassing prepare
I don't see a performance concern here. Checking a few strings isn't going
to slow down anything.
On Aug 8, 2013 12:06 AM, "Sreekanth S. Nair" <
sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote:
> Guess same performance concern is applicable for that as well. Any ideas of
> making it simpler for existing app without much coding, performance and
> clumsiness could be better. And i think @SkipPreapre at method level gives
> more visibility than at class level
> @SkipPrepare({"xdsdasds",ydsdsdsdsds","zsdsdsdsdsds"}).
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards
> Srikanth
> Software Developer
>
> eGovernments Foundations
> www.egovernments.org
> Mob : 9980078913
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Paul Benedict
> wrote:
>
> > Not an array of prepares, but an array of strings for which "execute"
> > methods the Preaparable callback should be excluded.
> > On Aug 7, 2013 11:09 PM, "Sreekanth S. Nair" <
> > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote:
> >
> > > With all gratitude, I strongly disagree with that idea . That bring
> more
> > > clumsiness to big strust2 applications. And the idea of taking an array
> > of
> > > Prepare is a good idea but don't you think it consumes a pinch of
> runtime
> > > performance.
> > >
> >
>
Re: Annotation Support for bypassing prepare
Guess same performance concern is applicable for that as well. Any ideas of
making it simpler for existing app without much coding, performance and
clumsiness could be better. And i think @SkipPreapre at method level gives
more visibility than at class level
@SkipPrepare({"xdsdasds",ydsdsdsdsds","zsdsdsdsdsds"}).
--
Thanks & Regards
Srikanth
Software Developer
eGovernments Foundations
www.egovernments.org
Mob : 9980078913
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Not an array of prepares, but an array of strings for which "execute"
> methods the Preaparable callback should be excluded.
> On Aug 7, 2013 11:09 PM, "Sreekanth S. Nair" <
> sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote:
>
> > With all gratitude, I strongly disagree with that idea . That bring more
> > clumsiness to big strust2 applications. And the idea of taking an array
> of
> > Prepare is a good idea but don't you think it consumes a pinch of runtime
> > performance.
> >
>
Re: Annotation Support for bypassing prepare
Not an array of prepares, but an array of strings for which "execute" methods the Preaparable callback should be excluded. On Aug 7, 2013 11:09 PM, "Sreekanth S. Nair" < sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: > With all gratitude, I strongly disagree with that idea . That bring more > clumsiness to big strust2 applications. And the idea of taking an array of > Prepare is a good idea but don't you think it consumes a pinch of runtime > performance. >
Re: Annotation Support for bypassing prepare
With all gratitude, I strongly disagree with that idea . That bring more clumsiness to big strust2 applications. And the idea of taking an array of Prepare is a good idea but don't you think it consumes a pinch of runtime performance.
RE: sj:select value problem
Thanks Lukasz,
David
> From: lukaszlen...@apache.org
> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 12:01:23 +0200
> Subject: Re: sj:select value problem
> To: user@struts.apache.org
>
> 2013/8/7 David Wang :
> > value="%{patternKeyword2}" />
>
> I don't know if this supports anything else than just a String. Please
> ask question on the user group or directly under the wiki page
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/struts2-jquery
> https://code.google.com/p/struts2-jquery/wiki/SelectTag
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
>
RE: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd
I dont know which DTD reference in which validator.xml is going fubar assume the dtd is co-located in same folder where Login-validation.xml is located at /pathToLoginValidationXML/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd you would need to change the http protocol to file protocol in the specified DOCTYPE declarator (In other words for every xml where a reference to xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd is encountered change 'http' to 'file' for all declarators referencing xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd) HTH! Martin __ Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > From: mgai...@hotmail.com > To: user@struts.apache.org > Subject: RE: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd > Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 13:30:39 -0400 > > Hi John > > xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd *should* be in xwork-core-.jar > > jar -tvf xwork-.jar | grep xwork-validator > > ? > Martin Gainty > __ > Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité > > Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger > sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung > oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich > dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche > Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen > wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. > > Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le > destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez > l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci > est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas > n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email > peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter > aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > > > > From: j...@rodaxsoft.com > > Subject: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: > > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd > > Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:14:21 -0700 > > To: user@struts.apache.org > > > > Hi: > > > > Suddenly, in-production, we're getting file-not-found errors for the > > xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd at http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork. > > > > How can resolve this problem? We're running Struts 2 v2.3.4.1 > > > > Thanks, John > > > > - > > > > 10:01:18 ERROR http-8443-1 > > com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.AnnotationActionValidatorManager - Caught > > exception while loading file XXX-validation.xml > > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd - Class: > > sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection > > File: HttpURLConnection.java > > Method: getInputStream > > Line: 1311 - sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1311:-1 > > ceptor.intercept(I18nInterceptor.java:176) > > ... > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:588) > > at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489) > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > > Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: > > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd > > ... > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > > >
Re: Annotation Support for bypassing prepare
I wonder if perhaps there should be a Preparable2 interface that passes in the name of the method that will execute. That might be more advanced than the annotation. OTOH, @SkipPreparable could take an array of method names. Which is more functional? On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Sreekanth S. Nair < sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: > Attaching SkippablePrepareInterceptor and SkipPrepare Annotation Code, I > hope it may helpful for other who have similar requirement. Struts2 can > include it, if strust2 developer think its worthy. > > > -- > Thanks & Regards > Srikanth > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Sreekanth S. Nair < > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: > >> Hi Chris, i already answered for the same, we have more than 50 modules >> and 1000 of Action classes. Doing what you say is not an easy task for us >> instead of adding a simple annotation on those method. >> >> -- >> Thanks & Regards >> Srikanth >> Software Developer >> >> eGovernments Foundations >> www.egovernments.org >> Mob : 9980078913 >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Chris Pratt wrote: >> >>> Why not just take your action and move the Preparable interface and >>> prepare() function to a subclass with the methods that require it's >>> support? Seems a lot easier than creating more infrastructure. >>> (*Chris*) >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Sreekanth S. Nair < >>> sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: >>> >>> > Okay, i can create one for mine, leaving to struts2 framework developer >>> > whether strust2 need an annotation like @SkipPrepare. Thanks for your >>> > support Dave. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Thanks & Regards >>> > Srikanth >>> > Software Developer >>> > >>> > eGovernments Foundations >>> > www.egovernments.org >>> > Mob : 9980078913 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Dave Newton >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > Technically it already *is* part of S2 in the MethodFilterInterceptor >>> > > class. >>> > > >>> > > I'm not particularly excited about an annotation to skip >>> Prepareable, but >>> > > I'm not fundamentally opposed, either. >>> > > >>> > > Dave >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Sreekanth S. Nair < >>> > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > The idea is precisely good, thats what i wanted but do you think it >>> > will >>> > > be >>> > > > a good addition to strust2 framework by any chance then i hope the >>> same >>> > > > could be a part of struts2 framework itself. >>> > > > >>> > > > -- >>> > > > Thanks & Regards >>> > > > Srikanth >>> > > > Software Developer >>> > > > >>> > > > eGovernments Foundations >>> > > > www.egovernments.org >>> > > > Mob : 9980078913 >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Dave Newton < >>> davelnew...@gmail.com> >>> > > > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > If you'll note in the docs the interceptor extends >>> > > > MethodFilterInterceptor, >>> > > > > so one trivial way to fix it is to configure the interceptor for >>> the >>> > > > > specific actions. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Another option is to take the existing interceptor and extend it >>> to >>> > > > support >>> > > > > something like annotations, a naming convention, etc. to skip >>> either >>> > > > > specific or general methods. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > E.g., if your validation call was always named the same thing, >>> you >>> > > could >>> > > > > either configure the interceptor package-wide, or change the >>> prepare >>> > > > > interceptor to always skip preparation for methods annotated with >>> > > > > @DoNotPrepare, etc. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Dave >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Sreekanth S. Nair < >>> > > > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > Too many methods :( needs its own prepare then. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > -- >>> > > > > > Thanks & Regards >>> > > > > > Srikanth >>> > > > > > Software Developer >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > eGovernments Foundations >>> > > > > > www.egovernments.org >>> > > > > > Mob : 9980078913 >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Dave Newton < >>> > davelnew...@gmail.com> >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Did you try `prepareWhateverMethodThatNeedsPrepare`? I don't >>> > recall >>> > > > if >>> > > > > > that >>> > > > > > > works or not. >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Sreekanth S. Nair < >>> > > > > > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > No i can't do that, because that Action contains other >>> method >>> > > which >>> > > > > > needs >>> > > > > > > > P
Re: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd
Hi Srikanth: That fixed it. Thank you! John On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Sreekanth S. Nair wrote: > use this > >"-//Apache Struts//XWork Validator 1.0.2//EN" > "http://struts.apache.org/dtds/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd";> > > > -- > Regards > Srikanth > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:06 PM, John Boyer wrote: > >> Hi Martin: >> >> Okay, but my validation XML is pointing to >> http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd, which is no >> longer available. What should it point to now? >> >> Thanks, John >> >> --- >> >> > 1.0.2//EN" >> "http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd";> >> >> >> >> >>Password is required >> >> >> >> >> >>8 >>Password must be eight characters or >> more. >> >> >> >> >> >>Password is required >> >> >> >> >> >>8 >>Password must be eight characters or >> more. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Martin Gainty wrote: >> >>> Hi John >>> >>> xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd *should* be in xwork-core-.jar >>> >>> jar -tvf xwork-.jar | grep xwork-validator >>> >>> ? >>> Martin Gainty >>> __ >>> Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité >>> >>> Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene >> Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte >> Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht >> dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine >> rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von >> E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. >>> >>> Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas >> le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire >> informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie >> de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura >> pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email >> peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter >> aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. >>> >>> From: j...@rodaxsoft.com Subject: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: >> http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:14:21 -0700 To: user@struts.apache.org Hi: Suddenly, in-production, we're getting file-not-found errors for the >> xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd at http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork. How can resolve this problem? We're running Struts 2 v2.3.4.1 Thanks, John - 10:01:18 ERROR http-8443-1 >> com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.AnnotationActionValidatorManager - Caught >> exception while loading file XXX-validation.xml http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd - Class: >> sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection File: HttpURLConnection.java Method: getInputStream Line: 1311 - sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1311:-1 ceptor.intercept(I18nInterceptor.java:176) ... >> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:588) at >> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: >> http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd ... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Getting lists back from struts
Check this tutorial might help you
http://www.mkyong.com/struts2/how-to-set-default-value-for-multiple-checkboxes-in-struts-2/
--
Thanks & Regards
Srikanth
Software Developer
eGovernments Foundations
www.egovernments.org
Mob : 9980078913
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Fabian Richter wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have encountered this issue a couple of times, always found a way to
> code around but now I really need to ask:
>
> Can struts create lists/arrays (or whatever collection) when e.g. using
>
> public class MyAction extends ActionSupport {
> public List getChoices() {
>
> }
>
> public List getPreSelectedChoices() {
> // returns a list of Choice.getKey(), which is a String
>
> }
> }
>
> public class Choice {
> public String getKey() { ...}
> public String getDisplayName() { ... }
>
> }
>
> list="%{choices}"
> listKey="%{'key'}"
> listValue="%{'displayName'}"
> value="%{preSelectedChoices}" />
>
> The selected values are sent to
>
> public void setMyChoice(String myChoice){
> ...
> }
>
> correct? There is no way somthing like
>
> public void setMyChoice(String[] myChoice){
> ...
> }
>
> works in struts?
>
> If not, whats the common way to get the values back from the String
> myChoice? Use Split on it?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Best
> Fabian
>
>
Re: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd
I don't know if it's the latest, but http://struts.apache.org/dtds/xwork-validator-1.0.3.dtd appears to work. (*Chris*) On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:36 AM, John Boyer wrote: > Hi Martin: > > Okay, but my validation XML is pointing to > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd, which is no > longer available. What should it point to now? > > Thanks, John > > --- > > 1.0.2//EN" >"http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd";> > > > > > Password is required > > > > > > 8 > Password must be eight characters or > more. > > > > > > Password is required > > > > > > 8 > Password must be eight characters or > more. > > > > > > On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Martin Gainty wrote: > > > Hi John > > > > xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd *should* be in xwork-core-.jar > > > > jar -tvf xwork-.jar | grep xwork-validator > > > > ? > > Martin Gainty > > __ > > Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité > > > > Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene > Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte > Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht > dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine > rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von > E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. > > > > Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas > le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire > informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie > de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura > pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email > peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter > aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > > > > > >> From: j...@rodaxsoft.com > >> Subject: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd > >> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:14:21 -0700 > >> To: user@struts.apache.org > >> > >> Hi: > >> > >> Suddenly, in-production, we're getting file-not-found errors for the > xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd at http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork. > >> > >> How can resolve this problem? We're running Struts 2 v2.3.4.1 > >> > >> Thanks, John > >> > >> - > >> > >> 10:01:18 ERROR http-8443-1 > com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.AnnotationActionValidatorManager - Caught > exception while loading file XXX-validation.xml > >> http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd - Class: > sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection > >> File: HttpURLConnection.java > >> Method: getInputStream > >> Line: 1311 - sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1311:-1 > >> ceptor.intercept(I18nInterceptor.java:176) > >> ... > >> > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:588) > >> at > org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489) > >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > >> Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd > >> ... > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >> > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >
Re: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd
use this http://struts.apache.org/dtds/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd";> -- Regards Srikanth On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:06 PM, John Boyer wrote: > Hi Martin: > > Okay, but my validation XML is pointing to > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd, which is no > longer available. What should it point to now? > > Thanks, John > > --- > > 1.0.2//EN" >"http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd";> > > > > > Password is required > > > > > > 8 > Password must be eight characters or > more. > > > > > > Password is required > > > > > > 8 > Password must be eight characters or > more. > > > > > > On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Martin Gainty wrote: > > > Hi John > > > > xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd *should* be in xwork-core-.jar > > > > jar -tvf xwork-.jar | grep xwork-validator > > > > ? > > Martin Gainty > > __ > > Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité > > > > Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene > Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte > Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht > dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine > rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von > E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. > > > > Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas > le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire > informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie > de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura > pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email > peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter > aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > > > > > >> From: j...@rodaxsoft.com > >> Subject: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd > >> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:14:21 -0700 > >> To: user@struts.apache.org > >> > >> Hi: > >> > >> Suddenly, in-production, we're getting file-not-found errors for the > xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd at http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork. > >> > >> How can resolve this problem? We're running Struts 2 v2.3.4.1 > >> > >> Thanks, John > >> > >> - > >> > >> 10:01:18 ERROR http-8443-1 > com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.AnnotationActionValidatorManager - Caught > exception while loading file XXX-validation.xml > >> http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd - Class: > sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection > >> File: HttpURLConnection.java > >> Method: getInputStream > >> Line: 1311 - sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1311:-1 > >> ceptor.intercept(I18nInterceptor.java:176) > >> ... > >> > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:588) > >> at > org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489) > >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > >> Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd > >> ... > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >> > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >
RE: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd
Hi John xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd *should* be in xwork-core-.jar jar -tvf xwork-.jar | grep xwork-validator ? Martin Gainty __ Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > From: j...@rodaxsoft.com > Subject: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd > Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:14:21 -0700 > To: user@struts.apache.org > > Hi: > > Suddenly, in-production, we're getting file-not-found errors for the > xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd at http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork. > > How can resolve this problem? We're running Struts 2 v2.3.4.1 > > Thanks, John > > - > > 10:01:18 ERROR http-8443-1 > com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.AnnotationActionValidatorManager - Caught > exception while loading file XXX-validation.xml > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd - Class: > sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection > File: HttpURLConnection.java > Method: getInputStream > Line: 1311 - sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1311:-1 > ceptor.intercept(I18nInterceptor.java:176) > ... > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:588) > at > org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd > ... > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >
Re: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd
Hi Martin: Okay, but my validation XML is pointing to http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd, which is no longer available. What should it point to now? Thanks, John --- http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd";> Password is required 8 Password must be eight characters or more. Password is required 8 Password must be eight characters or more. On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Martin Gainty wrote: > Hi John > > xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd *should* be in xwork-core-.jar > > jar -tvf xwork-.jar | grep xwork-validator > > ? > Martin Gainty > __ > Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité > > Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger > sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung > oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich > dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche > Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen > wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. > > Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le > destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez > l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci > est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas > n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email > peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter > aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > > >> From: j...@rodaxsoft.com >> Subject: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: >> http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd >> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:14:21 -0700 >> To: user@struts.apache.org >> >> Hi: >> >> Suddenly, in-production, we're getting file-not-found errors for the >> xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd at http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork. >> >> How can resolve this problem? We're running Struts 2 v2.3.4.1 >> >> Thanks, John >> >> - >> >> 10:01:18 ERROR http-8443-1 >> com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.AnnotationActionValidatorManager - Caught >> exception while loading file XXX-validation.xml >> http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd - Class: >> sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection >> File: HttpURLConnection.java >> Method: getInputStream >> Line: 1311 - sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1311:-1 >> ceptor.intercept(I18nInterceptor.java:176) >> ... >> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:588) >> at >> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489) >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) >> Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: >> http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd >> ... >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: [struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd
Try changing you xxx-validation.xml file dtd url declaration with the latest available dtd inside xwork-core.jar -- Thanks & Regards Srikanth On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:44 PM, John Boyer wrote: > Hi: > > Suddenly, in-production, we're getting file-not-found errors for the > xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd at http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork. > > How can resolve this problem? We're running Struts 2 v2.3.4.1 > > Thanks, John > > - > > 10:01:18 ERROR http-8443-1 > com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.AnnotationActionValidatorManager - Caught > exception while loading file XXX-validation.xml > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd - Class: > sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection > File: HttpURLConnection.java > Method: getInputStream > Line: 1311 - sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1311:-1 > ceptor.intercept(I18nInterceptor.java:176) > ... > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:588) > at > org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: > http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd > ... > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >
[struts 2] java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd
Hi: Suddenly, in-production, we're getting file-not-found errors for the xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd at http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork. How can resolve this problem? We're running Struts 2 v2.3.4.1 Thanks, John - 10:01:18 ERROR http-8443-1 com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.AnnotationActionValidatorManager - Caught exception while loading file XXX-validation.xml http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd - Class: sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection File: HttpURLConnection.java Method: getInputStream Line: 1311 - sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1311:-1 ceptor.intercept(I18nInterceptor.java:176) ... org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:588) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd ... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: struts 1 to struts2 migration.
Thank you so much Lukasz.. While migrating I found few more problems. Such as In struts 1 JSP I have used In scriplet there are many places we used <% String s = x.getName(); %> In struts 2 we can write Now how can I use the "x" object in scriplet. As there are many references of "x" already written, I don't want to change so much code for now. Hence like to use scriplet only. Thanks On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > You can try to write your own ActionMapper which will extract request > parameter "action" and base on that lookup for action. > > 2013/8/7 Arpan : > > Anybody to help here... > > > > Thanks in Advance. > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Arpan wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> We are migrating from struts1 to struts2. > >> > >> In our pages we have multiple buttons which through struts1 > DispatchAction > >> can be guided to different methods in Action class. For that we need > >> minimal changes. Such as > >> In action mapping if we add parameter="action" and in JSP if the URL is > >> like x.do?action=method1, it happily directs the control to method1 in > >> Action class. > >> > >> I got the bellow link for struts2, but for that also we need much > changes > >> to be done. > >> > http://struts.apache.org/development/2.x/docs/multiple-submit-buttons.html > >> > >> Is there any such way we do similar functionality in struts2 with > minimal > >> changes. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >
Re: struts 1 to struts2 migration.
You can try to write your own ActionMapper which will extract request parameter "action" and base on that lookup for action. 2013/8/7 Arpan : > Anybody to help here... > > Thanks in Advance. > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Arpan wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> We are migrating from struts1 to struts2. >> >> In our pages we have multiple buttons which through struts1 DispatchAction >> can be guided to different methods in Action class. For that we need >> minimal changes. Such as >> In action mapping if we add parameter="action" and in JSP if the URL is >> like x.do?action=method1, it happily directs the control to method1 in >> Action class. >> >> I got the bellow link for struts2, but for that also we need much changes >> to be done. >> http://struts.apache.org/development/2.x/docs/multiple-submit-buttons.html >> >> Is there any such way we do similar functionality in struts2 with minimal >> changes. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: struts 1 to struts2 migration.
Anybody to help here... Thanks in Advance. On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Arpan wrote: > Hi All, > > We are migrating from struts1 to struts2. > > In our pages we have multiple buttons which through struts1 DispatchAction > can be guided to different methods in Action class. For that we need > minimal changes. Such as > In action mapping if we add parameter="action" and in JSP if the URL is > like x.do?action=method1, it happily directs the control to method1 in > Action class. > > I got the bellow link for struts2, but for that also we need much changes > to be done. > http://struts.apache.org/development/2.x/docs/multiple-submit-buttons.html > > Is there any such way we do similar functionality in struts2 with minimal > changes. > > Thanks > > >
Getting lists back from struts
Hi
I have encountered this issue a couple of times, always found a way to
code around but now I really need to ask:
Can struts create lists/arrays (or whatever collection) when e.g. using
public class MyAction extends ActionSupport {
public List getChoices() {
}
public List getPreSelectedChoices() {
// returns a list of Choice.getKey(), which is a String
}
}
public class Choice {
public String getKey() { ...}
public String getDisplayName() { ... }
}
The selected values are sent to
public void setMyChoice(String myChoice){
...
}
correct? There is no way somthing like
public void setMyChoice(String[] myChoice){
...
}
works in struts?
If not, whats the common way to get the values back from the String
myChoice? Use Split on it?
Thank you!
Best
Fabian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift
Re: sj:select value problem
2013/8/7 David Wang :
> value="%{patternKeyword2}" />
I don't know if this supports anything else than just a String. Please
ask question on the user group or directly under the wiki page
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/struts2-jquery
https://code.google.com/p/struts2-jquery/wiki/SelectTag
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
