Guess same performance concern is applicable for that as well. Any ideas of
making it simpler for existing app without much coding, performance and
clumsiness could be better. And i think @SkipPreapre at method level gives
more visibility than at class level
@SkipPrepare({"xdsdasds",ydsdsdsdsds","zsdsdsdsdsds"}).-- Thanks & Regards Srikanth Software Developer -------------------------------- eGovernments Foundations www.egovernments.org Mob : 9980078913 -------------------------------- On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > Not an array of prepares, but an array of strings for which "execute" > methods the Preaparable callback should be excluded. > On Aug 7, 2013 11:09 PM, "Sreekanth S. Nair" < > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: > > > With all gratitude, I strongly disagree with that idea . That bring more > > clumsiness to big strust2 applications. And the idea of taking an array > of > > Prepare is a good idea but don't you think it consumes a pinch of runtime > > performance. > > >
