Re: Form autocomplete property

2004-12-31 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:49:04 +0800, Andrew Hill
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> a rather puritanical approach
> 
> 
> Yes, that about sums it up.

Except that it was really a *deliberate* puritannical approach :-).

Part of the thing about "doing open source" is the opportunity to make
political statements -- in this case, "just say no" to supporting what
was originally solely an IE capability (and this is one of several
popular nonstandard attributes we don't support).  Historically, I and
the other Struts committers have maintained that attitude, even though
some other browsers have supported some of the nonstandard attributes
on some of the elements, with some level of fidelity to the way that
IE does it.  (As you can see from that sentence, supporting this kind
of thing would be a testing nightmare, especially for those of us who
don't run Windows at all.)

I see no reason to change that attitude -- instead, I see an
opportunity for people who really want that capability to create their
own extended versions of the tags, that do whatever you want.  It
certainly makes sense for the base tag classes themselves to be
internally organized to make such specializatied subclasses relatively
painless (and there's been quite a bit of progress in that direction
over the years), but fundamentally the development and testing burden
should be on yourselves.

Or, band together at someplace like struts.sourceforge.net and create
a "value add" tag library that adds all the attributes you want.

> 
> Im rather of the opinion that all the struts html tags should have some
> kind of generic mechanism to allow you to specify any non-standard
> attributes you want. Perhaps something like:
> 
> 
>
> 
> 
> Though that would have problems with those that have body content.
> hmm... :-(

Besides being technically problematic, that would also violate the
"just say no" spirit :-).

Craig

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Form autocomplete property

2004-12-31 Thread Andrew Hill

a rather puritanical approach

Yes, that about sums it up.
Im rather of the opinion that all the struts html tags should have some 
kind of generic mechanism to allow you to specify any non-standard 
attributes you want. Perhaps something like:


  

Though that would have problems with those that have body content.
hmm... :-(
Though
Flemming G. Jensen wrote:
Hi List,
First: I wish you all will have a happy 2005 with a lot of good Struts  
based applications!

Now my question:
The Struts html-tag library does not support the autocomplete property.
Why not? I know that the autocomplete property is not in the W3Org  
standard, but that
does not mean it is un-important to web-applications with on-line payments.

The autocomplete property is an IE extension, but Opera and Firefox  
support it. However,
Firefox 1.0 has a bug in its implementation, which you have to 
circumvent  in a javascript in order to
make it work properly, if you do not have the time to extend the Struts  
html-tag lib.

I am asking this question due to these facts:
Our team has just gone live with a Struts based web-application  
http://www.fisketegn.dk. The
site runs on an Oracle Application Server and an Oracle Database. The  
customer is a department
under the Danish Ministry of Food and Agriculture. On the site persons 
as  well as certified shops
can buy a public fishing license, since you have to buy a license in 
order  to angle in the sea, lakes or streams
in Denmark.

Many people, for example turists, buy their licenses in shops, where 
many  people have access to the same PC.
So it was a customer demand to the application that we turned off the  
autocomplete function in html input fields, which
take care of any login or payment functionality.

In this case we were not happy to discover that the Struts developers 
have  taken a rather puritanical approach to standards.

So I hope you will improve this great API with better properties 
support  in future releases.

Regards
Flemming G. Jensen


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Form autocomplete property

2004-12-31 Thread Flemming G. Jensen
Hi List,
First: I wish you all will have a happy 2005 with a lot of good Struts  
based applications!

Now my question:
The Struts html-tag library does not support the autocomplete property.
Why not? I know that the autocomplete property is not in the W3Org  
standard, but that
does not mean it is un-important to web-applications with on-line payments.

The autocomplete property is an IE extension, but Opera and Firefox  
support it. However,
Firefox 1.0 has a bug in its implementation, which you have to circumvent  
in a javascript in order to
make it work properly, if you do not have the time to extend the Struts  
html-tag lib.

I am asking this question due to these facts:
Our team has just gone live with a Struts based web-application  
http://www.fisketegn.dk. The
site runs on an Oracle Application Server and an Oracle Database. The  
customer is a department
under the Danish Ministry of Food and Agriculture. On the site persons as  
well as certified shops
can buy a public fishing license, since you have to buy a license in order  
to angle in the sea, lakes or streams
in Denmark.

Many people, for example turists, buy their licenses in shops, where many  
people have access to the same PC.
So it was a customer demand to the application that we turned off the  
autocomplete function in html input fields, which
take care of any login or payment functionality.

In this case we were not happy to discover that the Struts developers have  
taken a rather puritanical approach to standards.

So I hope you will improve this great API with better properties support  
in future releases.

Regards
Flemming G. Jensen
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]