Re: jsp:include or tile
by using tiles, you can define components. A component has a layout and a few jsp. Actually, the layout itself is a jsp written with tiles tags. A component can be nested in another component, just like swing. jsp:include is so simple, and to archive the same goal as tiles, you should do a lot of extra work. 2006/4/12, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Raghuveer ha scritto: > > hi Greg, > > How about performance issue if we go for tiles for application that has > 50 > > jsp's > > and that works 24 X 7 with minimum 4 users hitting site at same time ? > > > What I can say is "try and check it out!" ;-) > Anyway, through the performance perspective, Tiles is not so different > to simple 's. Tiles introduces a little overhead due to the > need of dispatching the tiles around, but it is a very little time > compared to the time that a JSP page needs to render itself. > Raghuveer, you're seeing it to the wrong point of view, Tiles does not > impact on performance when you have JSPs composed of different pieces. > It is different from having a single JSP page for a single HTML rendered > page, but it is the same if you use 's. > HTH > Antonio > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- 过犹不及
Re: jsp:include or tile
Raghuveer ha scritto: hi Greg, How about performance issue if we go for tiles for application that has 50 jsp's and that works 24 X 7 with minimum 4 users hitting site at same time ? What I can say is "try and check it out!" ;-) Anyway, through the performance perspective, Tiles is not so different to simple 's. Tiles introduces a little overhead due to the need of dispatching the tiles around, but it is a very little time compared to the time that a JSP page needs to render itself. Raghuveer, you're seeing it to the wrong point of view, Tiles does not impact on performance when you have JSPs composed of different pieces. It is different from having a single JSP page for a single HTML rendered page, but it is the same if you use 's. HTH Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: jsp:include or tile
hi Greg, How about performance issue if we go for tiles for application that has 50 jsp's and that works 24 X 7 with minimum 4 users hitting site at same time ? -Original Message- From: Greg Reddin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:20 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: jsp:include or tile On Apr 11, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Caroline Jen wrote: > Both the jsp:include tag and the Struts tiles can > incorporate dynamic resources into the current JSP. > > Is there rule of thumb that one is preferable over > another? To me, the benefit of Tiles is the fact that you can configure reusable page components and give them attributes and controllers. But if you were doing a very simplistic app and didn't need these features jsp:include works just as well. Greg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: jsp:include or tile
On Apr 11, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Caroline Jen wrote: Both the jsp:include tag and the Struts tiles can incorporate dynamic resources into the current JSP. Is there rule of thumb that one is preferable over another? To me, the benefit of Tiles is the fact that you can configure reusable page components and give them attributes and controllers. But if you were doing a very simplistic app and didn't need these features jsp:include works just as well. Greg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
