RE: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
--- Big Stick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I always thought a stack implied levels! Am I > strange to think maybe the stack search should > consider this capability? I think you and Musachy have the right idea with an #action (or whatever; I'd actually go for something quicker to type) rather than a stack search; technically it could be arbitrarily deep, and that makes me nervous. But I'm naturally jittery. (I actually thought there already *was* an #action doohickey on the stack but it turns out that was something I had experimented with quite some time ago; it was pretty useful--but it almost made me screw up the answer to your ModelDriven question of a week or few ago.) d. We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
I always thought a stack implied levels! Am I strange to think maybe the stack search should consider this capability? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ... CRAZY! ... STACK! d. Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
Thanks brother. This is what I wound up doing, but it sure seemed weird! Why should properties available to a page somehow be made invisible while looping? Parent Id: //works fine here! //GOOFY! ... CRAZY! Edit On 7/9/07, cilquirm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the easiest solution would be to s:set the property name you want to reference with a different name and then access it in your loop under the new name. stanlick wrote: > > There is no searching up the stack beyond the top? > > On 7/9/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> --- Big Stick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > But it's a property on the Action! >> >> pushes each iteration onto the value >> stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or >> model), but each element of the iteration. >> >> d. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who >> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. >> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > Scott > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11506986 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
+1 for that :) https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2034 musachy On 7/9/07, cilquirm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: technically, if you knew the index of where the action was in your value stack, you could use the index notation. so you might want to try : assuming the action is the second root down. but i do agree that'd it be nice to stuff the action into #action. Chris Pratt wrote: > > Seems like you should be able to say > > > > But since there's no getAction in the ActionContext, I doubt that will > work. Maybe it should be added? > (*Chris*) > > On 7/9/07, cilquirm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> the easiest solution would be to s:set the property name you want to >> reference with a different name >> >> >> >> and then access it in your loop under the new name. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> stanlick wrote: >> > >> > There is no searching up the stack beyond the top? >> > >> > On 7/9/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> --- Big Stick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > But it's a property on the Action! >> >> >> >> pushes each iteration onto the value >> >> stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or >> >> model), but each element of the iteration. >> >> >> >> d. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone >> who >> >> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. >> >> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 >> >> >> >> - >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Scott >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11506986 >> Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11507650 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
technically, if you knew the index of where the action was in your value stack, you could use the index notation. so you might want to try : assuming the action is the second root down. but i do agree that'd it be nice to stuff the action into #action. Chris Pratt wrote: > > Seems like you should be able to say > > > > But since there's no getAction in the ActionContext, I doubt that will > work. Maybe it should be added? > (*Chris*) > > On 7/9/07, cilquirm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> the easiest solution would be to s:set the property name you want to >> reference with a different name >> >> >> >> and then access it in your loop under the new name. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> stanlick wrote: >> > >> > There is no searching up the stack beyond the top? >> > >> > On 7/9/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> --- Big Stick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > But it's a property on the Action! >> >> >> >> pushes each iteration onto the value >> >> stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or >> >> model), but each element of the iteration. >> >> >> >> d. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone >> who >> >> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. >> >> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 >> >> >> >> - >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Scott >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11506986 >> Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11507650 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
Seems like you should be able to say But since there's no getAction in the ActionContext, I doubt that will work. Maybe it should be added? (*Chris*) On 7/9/07, cilquirm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the easiest solution would be to s:set the property name you want to reference with a different name and then access it in your loop under the new name. stanlick wrote: > > There is no searching up the stack beyond the top? > > On 7/9/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> --- Big Stick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > But it's a property on the Action! >> >> pushes each iteration onto the value >> stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or >> model), but each element of the iteration. >> >> d. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who >> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. >> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > Scott > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11506986 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
the easiest solution would be to s:set the property name you want to reference with a different name and then access it in your loop under the new name. stanlick wrote: > > There is no searching up the stack beyond the top? > > On 7/9/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> --- Big Stick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > But it's a property on the Action! >> >> pushes each iteration onto the value >> stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or >> model), but each element of the iteration. >> >> d. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who >> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. >> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > Scott > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11506986 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
There is no searching up the stack beyond the top? On 7/9/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Big Stick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But it's a property on the Action! pushes each iteration onto the value stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or model), but each element of the iteration. d. Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
--- Big Stick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But it's a property on the Action! pushes each iteration onto the value stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or model), but each element of the iteration. d. Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE : RE : Orthognal OGNL!
Have you tryed #yourproperty ? If that doesn't work, can you send your code ? Ezequiel. -Message d'origine- De : Big Stick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 9 juillet 2007 15:05 À : Struts Users Mailing List Objet : RE: RE : Orthognal OGNL! But it's a property on the Action! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
But it's a property on the Action! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE : Orthognal OGNL!
Yes, Just try: value="#parameters.yourproperty" and if you want to know why that works, check: http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/ognl.html Ezequiel -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 9 juillet 2007 13:44 À : Struts Users Mailing List Objet : Orthognal OGNL! I have a property that I cannot access while inside an yet I can access it before and/or after the loop! It is as though the collection I'm iterating over has the same property which is causing an overshadowing. However, the collection does *not* contain the property! Is it possible to access properties outside the scope while looping? -- Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
