RE: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
But it's a property on the Action! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE : RE : Orthognal OGNL!
Have you tryed #yourproperty ? If that doesn't work, can you send your code ? Ezequiel. -Message d'origine- De : Big Stick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 9 juillet 2007 15:05 À : Struts Users Mailing List Objet : RE: RE : Orthognal OGNL! But it's a property on the Action! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
--- Big Stick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But it's a property on the Action! s:iterator.../ pushes each iteration onto the value stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or model), but each element of the iteration. d. Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396545433 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
There is no searching up the stack beyond the top? On 7/9/07, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Big Stick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But it's a property on the Action! s:iterator.../ pushes each iteration onto the value stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or model), but each element of the iteration. d. Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396545433 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
the easiest solution would be to s:set the property name you want to reference with a different name s:set value=myprop name=mynewname/ and then access it in your loop under the new name. s:iterator ... s:property value=#mynewname/ /s:iterator stanlick wrote: There is no searching up the stack beyond the top? On 7/9/07, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Big Stick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But it's a property on the Action! s:iterator.../ pushes each iteration onto the value stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or model), but each element of the iteration. d. Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396545433 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11506986 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
Seems like you should be able to say s:property value=#action.myattr/ But since there's no getAction in the ActionContext, I doubt that will work. Maybe it should be added? (*Chris*) On 7/9/07, cilquirm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the easiest solution would be to s:set the property name you want to reference with a different name s:set value=myprop name=mynewname/ and then access it in your loop under the new name. s:iterator ... s:property value=#mynewname/ /s:iterator stanlick wrote: There is no searching up the stack beyond the top? On 7/9/07, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Big Stick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But it's a property on the Action! s:iterator.../ pushes each iteration onto the value stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or model), but each element of the iteration. d. Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396545433 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11506986 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
technically, if you knew the index of where the action was in your value stack, you could use the index notation. so you might want to try : s:property value=[1].myattr/ assuming the action is the second root down. but i do agree that'd it be nice to stuff the action into #action. Chris Pratt wrote: Seems like you should be able to say s:property value=#action.myattr/ But since there's no getAction in the ActionContext, I doubt that will work. Maybe it should be added? (*Chris*) On 7/9/07, cilquirm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the easiest solution would be to s:set the property name you want to reference with a different name s:set value=myprop name=mynewname/ and then access it in your loop under the new name. s:iterator ... s:property value=#mynewname/ /s:iterator stanlick wrote: There is no searching up the stack beyond the top? On 7/9/07, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Big Stick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But it's a property on the Action! s:iterator.../ pushes each iteration onto the value stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or model), but each element of the iteration. d. Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396545433 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11506986 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11507650 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
+1 for that :) https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2034 musachy On 7/9/07, cilquirm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: technically, if you knew the index of where the action was in your value stack, you could use the index notation. so you might want to try : s:property value=[1].myattr/ assuming the action is the second root down. but i do agree that'd it be nice to stuff the action into #action. Chris Pratt wrote: Seems like you should be able to say s:property value=#action.myattr/ But since there's no getAction in the ActionContext, I doubt that will work. Maybe it should be added? (*Chris*) On 7/9/07, cilquirm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the easiest solution would be to s:set the property name you want to reference with a different name s:set value=myprop name=mynewname/ and then access it in your loop under the new name. s:iterator ... s:property value=#mynewname/ /s:iterator stanlick wrote: There is no searching up the stack beyond the top? On 7/9/07, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Big Stick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But it's a property on the Action! s:iterator.../ pushes each iteration onto the value stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or model), but each element of the iteration. d. Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396545433 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11506986 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11507650 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone? Pink Floyd
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
Thanks brother. This is what I wound up doing, but it sure seemed weird!
Why should properties available to a page somehow be made invisible while
looping?
Parent Id: s:property value=model.parentId / //works fine here!
s:set name=pid value=model.parentId scope=request/s:set //GOOFY!
s:iterator value=notes
s:url id=url action=%{baseActionClass}_edit
s:param name=model.parentId s:property value=#request.pid / /
s:param
/s:url
... CRAZY!
s:a href=%{url}Edit/s:a
On 7/9/07, cilquirm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the easiest solution would be to s:set the property name you want to
reference with a different name
s:set value=myprop name=mynewname/
and then access it in your loop under the new name.
s:iterator ...
s:property value=#mynewname/
/s:iterator
stanlick wrote:
There is no searching up the stack beyond the top?
On 7/9/07, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Big Stick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it's a property on the Action!
s:iterator.../ pushes each iteration onto the value
stack. So what's at the top then? Not the action (or
model), but each element of the iteration.
d.
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone
who
knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396545433
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Orthognal-OGNL%21-tf4048748.html#a11506986
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... CRAZY! ... STACK! d. Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
I always thought a stack implied levels! Am I strange to think maybe the stack search should consider this capability? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE : Orthognal OGNL!
--- Big Stick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I always thought a stack implied levels! Am I strange to think maybe the stack search should consider this capability? I think you and Musachy have the right idea with an #action (or whatever; I'd actually go for something quicker to type) rather than a stack search; technically it could be arbitrarily deep, and that makes me nervous. But I'm naturally jittery. (I actually thought there already *was* an #action doohickey on the stack but it turns out that was something I had experimented with quite some time ago; it was pretty useful--but it almost made me screw up the answer to your ModelDriven question of a week or few ago.) d. We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
