Re: Validator, Indexed Properties and error messages.
Check out http://www.niallp.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/strutsvalidatorextends.html - Original Message - From: Cruz, Edward J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List user@struts.apache.org Subject: Validator, Indexed Properties and error messages. Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:03:26 -0500 Hello all, In review various documentation and several google search's I have found how to use the validator framework to validate indexed properties. In looking at the javadocs for the validator framework I see that the field class has an attribute called 'property' which (I think) tells the validator what property to associate any error message encountered during validation. My question is how do we associate the indexed properties error messages with different properties in the errors queue? For instance, if I have an indexed property that represents a list of items is there anyway to associate any error message for item 1 in the list using the property field. I want something like itemX as the property when the ActionMessage is placed into the queue as the property where the X represents the index of the item that the error happened on? Thanks for any Help Jamie Cruz Software Engineering - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Antony Joseph Available for consulting http://www.logicden.com -- ___ Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Validator, Indexed Properties and error messages.
Thank you for your help. Antony Joseph ajosephmi at lycos.com writes: Check out http://www.niallp.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/strutsvalidatorextends.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Validator, Indexed Properties and error messages.
Just my 2 cents here, but isn't this an awfully awkward way of extending validations? Tiles does it nicely by putting an extend attribute on the tile definition, which allows sub-definitions to do overriding. I would expect that when Struts 1.3+ allows extending on all configuration elements, it mimics what Tiles has achieved. Thanks, Paul -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Cruz Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:55 PM To: user@struts.apache.org Subject: Re: Validator, Indexed Properties and error messages. Thank you for your help. Antony Joseph ajosephmi at lycos.com writes: Check out http://www.niallp.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/strutsvalidatorextends.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Validator, Indexed Properties and error messages.
Its not down to Struts, since Validator is a separate project and form ineritance (using extends) has already been put into the development version of Validator (i.e. Validator 1.2) - so its arrival is purely dependant on a release of that version of Validator. http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/validator/changes-report.html I agree with you, it is awkward and has limitations http://www.mail-archive.com/user@struts.apache.org/msg21389.html but its available to use now until better versions are released. Niall - Original Message - From: Benedict, Paul C [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 8:39 PM Just my 2 cents here, but isn't this an awfully awkward way of extending validations? Tiles does it nicely by putting an extend attribute on the tile definition, which allows sub-definitions to do overriding. I would expect that when Struts 1.3+ allows extending on all configuration elements, it mimics what Tiles has achieved. Thanks, Paul -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Cruz Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:55 PM Thank you for your help. Antony Joseph ajosephmi at lycos.com writes: Check out http://www.niallp.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/strutsvalidatorextends.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
