Re: Trafodion Logo is LIVE!
Looks very good! The installation procedure, especially, now looks very streamlined and should make it easier for users to download and play with the product. Thanks Gunnar! Atanu Atanu Mishra On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Amanda Moran <amanda.mo...@esgyn.com> wrote: > Looks good! > > I think we made a good choice, the logo is cute! > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Please checkout the web site and the documentation PDF files. >> >> Also, we've updated the Download page with an easy-to-use installation >> procedure and created a Quick Start page to make it easy to try out >> Trafodion. >> >> Please take a look at your earliest convenience. >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> >> Gunnar >> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.* >> > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Amanda Moran >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Trafodion Logo Proposal
+1-13 Atanu Mishra On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Roberta Marton <roberta.mar...@esgyn.com> wrote: > There has been quite a lot of discussion on our user list regarding the > proposed Apache Trafodion logos. > > It has now come time for a formal vote on the two most popular logos > fondly known as 4g and 13. > > Both have been attached for your reference > > > > Please respond as follows: > > > > [ ] +1-4g approve option 4g > > [ ] +1-13 approve option 13 > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > >Regards, > >Roberta Marton > > >
Re: Logo Proposal
I like Hans' suggestion for lower-case letters for Trafodion. Both options were better than the previous, but not quite there. Getting close. Regards, Atanu Atanu Mishra On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Eric Owhadi <eric.owh...@esgyn.com> wrote: > +1 option 4 > > > > *From:* Anuradha Hegde [mailto:anuradha.he...@esgyn.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 4:57 PM > > *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org > *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal > > > > +1 option 4 > > > > *From:* Ken Holt [mailto:knhknhknh...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:51 PM > *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal > > > > Seems like the dragon logo itself is a winner - most everyone liked that. > > But the combined logo and name was definitely not popular. > > > > Here are a couple of new suggestions for the combined logo and name. > > > > Option 4 > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4T3o3YVBDakNtQkU/view?usp=sharing > > > > Option 6 > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4Y082OHhNNXBwazA/view?usp=sharing > > > > Don't ask for options 1-3, & 5 - they didn't make it passed my limited > field testing! > > Comments on 4 & 6? > > > > Cheers, Ken > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan < > sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote: > > I’d say there is enough “curliness” going on with the dragon. So we could > try with a simple bold font . Perhaps with an outline of a different color > like Hadoop’s/Mahouts is and tie it in with the dragon’s colors as well. > > > > *From:* Hans Zeller [mailto:hans.zel...@esgyn.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 3:46 PM > > > *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal > > > > +1 for the dragon as well. We used to have an informal logo with another > somewhat cursive font, it shows in one of the carousel pictures on the > trafodion.apache.org site. That might be better (although still not my > favorite). > > > Hans > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Ken Holt <knhknhknh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > By the way, the size of the example logo is arbitrary. The original is a > vector graphics file that will scale up or down with no loss of quality, > which I will make available when the debate has settled on something. > > > > I'll make a stab at changing the font and size relative to the dragon and > post another version of that. > > > > Agree that separating the dragon from the name/font makes sense. > > Cheers, Ken > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > +1 on dragon. > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Carol Pearson <carol.pearson...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > +1 on the Dragon!!! Looks great! > > > > On the writing, cursive is hard to read, so I'm up for replacing it > separately. Maybe we vote on each separately (as Sandhya and Amanda did)? > > > > > > Voting separately is a good idea. Having engineers vote on 'designs' is > always a tough one. Sounds like folks like the dragon but not the > cursive... so suggest splitting out what we vote on so at least the dragon > carries. > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > -Carol P. > > > --- > > Email:carol.pearson...@gmail.com > > Twitter: @CarolP222 > > --- > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Sandhya Sundaresan < > sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote: > > +1 for Dragon. > > The Trafodion cursive writing and color -1. IMHO we need to rework the > writing for sure and try various colors. It’s looking cluttered and > complicated with the cursive. > > > > > > *From:* Amanda Moran [mailto:amanda.mo...@esgyn.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 10:13 AM > *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal > > > > +10 for dragon! Very cute! > > > > Not a huge fan of the cursive writing myself... but if everyone else > likes... I give it a +0 > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Christophe LeRouzo <c...@esgyn.com> > wrote: > > Thanks Ken, the standalone dragon looks really good. It complements really > well the yellow elephant! > > > > Regards, > > -clr > > > > > > *From:* Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birds...@esgyn.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 9:53 AM > *To:* use
Re: Trafodion Release 2.0 Hadoop/HBase Versions?
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Amanda Moran <amanda.mo...@esgyn.com> > wrote: > >> The core needs to change based on the CDH or HDP version (hbase-trx*.jar >> to be specific). >> >> > Is that because of the subclassing of regionservers? If so, can we fix > this; move on to coprocessors? > > Thanks, > St.Ack > No, afraid this is despite the move to coprocessors. Amanda is right. The core does need to change typically depending on the CDH or HDP version. Atanu > > > >> Other folks speak up on this one... I am no expert :) >> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> The Trafodion project needs to do everything it can to make it easy for >>> users to adopt the great software. Is there any special work that needs to >>> be done beyond maintaining the installer and running tests? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Gunnar >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Carol Pearson < >>> carol.pearson...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Atanu, >>>> >>>> Thanks! I think that we need to make it as easy as possible for our >>>> users to try Trafodion and to use Trafodion. I don't think most of our >>>> non-developer users will be using Trafodion on a plain Apache platform, >>>> especially if they're trying it in a commercial environment. Hortonworks >>>> and Cloudera have free community editions. >>>> >>>> As we're trying to increase our user base and grow our community, it >>>> seems to me that we want to make it easier for folks to try and to use >>>> Trafodion, rather than harder. So making sure we have basic functionality >>>> that works on the most common distros seems to me to be a basic requirement >>>> for success. >>>> >>>> -Carol P. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Email:carol.pearson...@gmail.com >>>> Twitter: @CarolP222 >>>> --- >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Atanu Mishra <atanumis...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Carol, >>>>> >>>>> Great question! Once Trafodion supports Apache Hadoop/HBase, I >>>>> question whether there is a reason to continue to support the Cloudera and >>>>> HortonWorks distros. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Atanu >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Carol Pearson [mailto:carol.pearson...@gmail.com] >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 4, 2016 4:53 PM >>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >>>>> *Subject:* Trafodion Release 2.0 Hadoop/HBase Versions? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Trafodion Fans, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm trying to make sure I'm clear on the targeted runtime environments >>>>> for our next release, which I think we're calling Trafodion 2.0. I've >>>>> seen >>>>> that it needs to support working with Apache Hadoop, since the 1.3 >>>>> release >>>>> supported only the Cloudera and Hadoop distros. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Trafodion 2.0* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From what's been discussed on the Dev list and here, I think the >>>>> target is: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - Linux Versions CentOS 6.5-6.7 (RHEL 6.5-6.7 - untested? but should >>>>> support) >>>>> >>>>> - SUSE? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hadoop/VersionHBase Version >>>>> >>>>> = >>>>> >>>>> Cloudera CDH 5.4.x 1.1 >>>>> >>>>> Hortonworks HDP 2.31.1 >>>>> >>>>> Apache Hadoop 2.7.11.1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>&
RE: Trafodion Release 2.0 Hadoop/HBase Versions?
Hi Carol, Thanks for putting together these charts and starting the discussion about supported versions. Once Trafodion supports Apache Hadoop/HBase, I question whether there is a reason to continue to support the Cloudera and HortonWorks distros. Thanks, Atanu - *From:* Carol Pearson [mailto:carol.pearson...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, February 4, 2016 4:53 PM *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org *Subject:* Trafodion Release 2.0 Hadoop/HBase Versions? Hi Trafodion Fans, I'm trying to make sure I'm clear on the targeted runtime environments for our next release, which I think we're calling Trafodion 2.0. I've seen that it needs to support working with Apache Hadoop, since the 1.3 release supported only the Cloudera and Hadoop distros. *Trafodion 2.0* >From what's been discussed on the Dev list and here, I think the target is: - Linux Versions CentOS 6.5-6.7 (RHEL 6.5-6.7 - untested? but should support) - SUSE? Hadoop/VersionHBase Version = Cloudera CDH 5.4.x 1.1 Hortonworks HDP 2.31.1 Apache Hadoop 2.7.11.1 Are these the targets that folks are working on Trafodion 2.0 to support? Are they the right ones? (For example, should we be looking at Apache Hadoop 2.6.3?) Are there other versions of software in the Hadoop ecosystem whose versions should be specified as targets, especially for distro-less vanilla Apache Hadoop? I think that once we release, we should identify the specific versions that folks have tested with (which might not be all versions and all distros). I think we should also list versions for software that we believe should work but have not been tested. As I was trying to understand which releases worked with what, I came across a great chart in the the HBase reference book in section 4.1: https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#basic.prerequisites then scroll down to see the Hadoop versions. It would be great to develop that chart for Trafodion as 2.0 goes forward. Thanks for any light people can shed on this! -Carol P. PS: For reference, here's my understanding of what Trafodion 1.3 supported: I've put together the following chart based on the notes from the Trafodion website for release 1.3 and my understanding of Trafodion 2.0: *Trafodion 1.3: (Current release)* - Linux Versions: CentOS 6.5-6.7, (RHEL 6.5-6.7 - untested? but should support) Hadoop/VersionHBase Version = Cloudera CDH 5.3.x 0.98 Hortonworks HDP 2.20.98 --- Email:carol.pearson...@gmail.com Twitter: @CarolP222 --- ____ Atanu Mishra
