[ANNOUNCE] Apache UIMA DUCC 2.0.1 released

2015-10-26 Thread Jaroslaw Cwiklik
The Apache UIMA team is pleased to announce the release of the UIMA DUCC,
version 2.0.1.

DUCC stands for Distributed UIMA Cluster Computing. DUCC is a cluster
management system providing tooling, management, and scheduling facilities
to automate the scale-out of applications written to the UIMA framework.
Core UIMA provides a generalized framework for applications that process
unstructured information such as human language, but does not provide a
scale-out mechanism. UIMA-AS provides a scale-out mechanism to distribute
UIMA pipelines over a cluster of computing resources, but does not provide
job or cluster management of the resources. DUCC defines a formal job model
that closely maps to a standard UIMA pipeline. Around this job model DUCC
provides cluster management services to automate the scale-out of UIMA
pipelines over computing clusters.

This is a bug release, addressing bugs found since DUCC 2.0.0 release. For
a full list of the changes, please refer to Jira report:
http://uima.apache.org/d/uima-ducc-2.0.1/issuesFixed/jira-report.html

More information about DUCC can be found here:
http://uima.apache.org/doc-uimaducc-whatitam.html

-Jerry Cwiklik, for the Apache UIMA community


Re: Selecting all connected annotations by type.

2015-10-26 Thread José Tomás Atria
Hi Jens,

I did indeed use those methods for a while and they were working fine, but
I was mostly using them to perform sanity checks on some arbitrary span
annotations, and once I made sure those were being created OK I reverted
back to stock uima-fit.

They should be ok, though; the patch basically adds very little variation
on Richard's methods for indexing covered/covering annotations, and while I
was using them, they worked.

Funny coincidence: Just a few days ago I was thinking that it would be
possible to provide most of the indexing features of CASUtil via interval
trees. No idea about how expensive this would be, though. This may be a
good direction to look into if you happen to feel inclined to rewrite those
methods :)

Best,
jta



On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Jens Grivolla  wrote:

> Ok Richard, I'll look into it, but I don't promise anything at this point
> (tons of project deliverables coming up)...
>
> -- Jens
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho <
> r...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jens,
> >
> > :) don't you want to test and apply it? My next projected time slot for
> > uimaFIT is in December.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > -- Richard
> >
> > > On 23.10.2015, at 11:09, Jens Grivolla  wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd really like to have that functionality also (we'll need to do
> > something
> > > like that quite soon), so I just voted on the issue...
> > >
> > > I haven't tested the patch yet. José, have you been using this over the
> > > last few months?
> > >
> > > -- Jens
> >
> >
>



-- 
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem


Re: Selecting all connected annotations by type.

2015-10-26 Thread Jens Grivolla
Ok Richard, I'll look into it, but I don't promise anything at this point
(tons of project deliverables coming up)...

-- Jens

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho 
wrote:

> Hi Jens,
>
> :) don't you want to test and apply it? My next projected time slot for
> uimaFIT is in December.
>
> Best,
>
> -- Richard
>
> > On 23.10.2015, at 11:09, Jens Grivolla  wrote:
> >
> > I'd really like to have that functionality also (we'll need to do
> something
> > like that quite soon), so I just voted on the issue...
> >
> > I haven't tested the patch yet. José, have you been using this over the
> > last few months?
> >
> > -- Jens
>
>