cloudstack 4.1 & vmware vsphere 5.1 works?

[Jose Merchan]

Hi all

We are testing Cloudstack 4.1 with VMware vSphere 5.1 We have installed 
CloudStack 4.1 in Ubuntu Precise from repository 
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu

We have a demo lab with 2 ESXi 5.1 and with vcenter 5.1
We follow instructions in documentation 
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/vmware-install.html 
but when we want to create a cluster in CloudStack we receive the error 
/vmware resource manager not found/

We need anything more?

Thanks

Delete an interface from VM

[Maxim Popov]

Hi.

Is there a way to delete a network interface from a VM ?
My VM has 2 interfaces, but i can't find a way to delete one of them in GUI.

Thank you.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: Delete an interface from VM

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Maxim,

This exact feature was introduced in the 4.1 release, but its API only.

I summarised the API call in this blog article on the features of 4.1

http://www.shapeblue.com/2013/05/29/apache-cloudstack-4-1-new-features/


Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Maxim Popov [mailto:popov@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 June 2013 09:51
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Delete an interface from VM

Hi.

Is there a way to delete a network interface from a VM ?
My VM has 2 interfaces, but i can't find a way to delete one of them in GUI.

Thank you.

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under 
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: Delete an interface from VM

[Maxim Popov]

Thanks, i removed the nics successfully. 

12.06.2013, в 11:54, Geoff Higginbottom  
написал(а):

> Maxim,
> 
> This exact feature was introduced in the 4.1 release, but its API only.
> 
> I summarised the API call in this blog article on the features of 4.1
> 
> http://www.shapeblue.com/2013/05/29/apache-cloudstack-4-1-new-features/
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Geoff Higginbottom
> 
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> 
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxim Popov [mailto:popov@gmail.com]
> Sent: 12 June 2013 09:51
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Delete an interface from VM
> 
> Hi.
> 
> Is there a way to delete a network interface from a VM ?
> My VM has 2 interfaces, but i can't find a way to delete one of them in GUI.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated 
> under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: cloudstack 4.1 & vmware vsphere 5.1 works?

[Jörgen Maas]

Those packages do not contain the non-oss components (like VMware support).
You should build your own packages.

HTH

Jörgen


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jose Merchan  wrote:

> Hi all
>
> We are testing Cloudstack 4.1 with VMware vSphere 5.1 We have installed
> CloudStack 4.1 in Ubuntu Precise from repository
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/**ubuntu
> We have a demo lab with 2 ESXi 5.1 and with vcenter 5.1
> We follow instructions in documentation http://cloudstack.apache.org/**
> docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/**4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/**
> vmware-install.htmlbut
>  when we want to create a cluster in CloudStack we receive the error
> /vmware resource manager not found/
> We need anything more?
>
> Thanks
>
>


-- 
Grtz,
Jörgen Maas

Re: cloudstack 4.1 & vmware vsphere 5.1 works?

[Jose Merchan]

ok, thanks

El 12/06/13 15:08, Jörgen Maas escribió:

Those packages do not contain the non-oss components (like VMware support).
You should build your own packages.

HTH

Jörgen


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jose Merchan  wrote:


Hi all

We are testing Cloudstack 4.1 with VMware vSphere 5.1 We have installed
CloudStack 4.1 in Ubuntu Precise from repository
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/**ubuntu
We have a demo lab with 2 ESXi 5.1 and with vcenter 5.1
We follow instructions in documentation http://cloudstack.apache.org/**
docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/**4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/**
vmware-install.htmlbut
 when we want to create a cluster in CloudStack we receive the error
/vmware resource manager not found/
We need anything more?

Thanks

RE: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

[William Jiang]

Hi Jessica,
Thanks for the response. What's the difference of those three roles?
If I understand right, I will give it the role of "normal-user" .

Thanks,
William

-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wang [mailto:jessica.w...@citrix.com]
Sent: June-11-13 6:23 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
users...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

> I want to give access to a user to see only a specific zone.

What is the role of the user that you want to give access to see only a 
specific zone?
A normal-user, a domain-admin, or a root-admin?


-Original Message-
From: William Jiang [mailto:william.ji...@manwin.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 3:17 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

Hi,

if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone? We have multiple 
zone in our cloudstack 3.0 and I want to give access to a user to see only a 
specific zone.

Thanks,
William
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not 
waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of 
this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient 
is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by 
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ?lectronique est 
confidentiel et prot?g?. L'exp?diteur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations 
qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des 
renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) 
destinataire(s) d?sign?(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier 
?lectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser imm?diatement, par retour de 
courrier ?lectronique ou par un autre moyen.
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not 
waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of 
this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient 
is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by 
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est 
confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations 
qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des 
renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) 
destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier 
électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de 
courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.

RE: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

[William Jiang]

Hi Nitin,
Thanks for the response, but I can't open the link you send to me, would you 
mind double check and re-send to me?
Thanks.

William

-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: June-12-13 2:08 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

William - good use case, CS has the ability to dedicate resources to an account 
domain, but not restrict them. You can read about that here - 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dedicated+Resources+
-+Private+zone%2C+pod%2C+cluster%2C+host+Functional+Spec

Do you want to raise an enhancement for restricting a domain/account to a zone ?

Thanks,
-Nitin

On 12/06/13 3:47 AM, "William Jiang"  wrote:

>Hi,
>
>if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone? We have
>multiple zone in our cloudstack 3.0 and I want to give access to a user
>to see only a specific zone.
>
>Thanks,
>William
>This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does
>not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or
>copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an
>intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in
>error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce
>courrier ?lectronique est confidentiel et prot?g?. L'exp?diteur ne
>renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute
>diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements
>qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s)
>d?sign?(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ?lectronique par
>erreur, veuillez m'en aviser imm?diatement, par retour de courrier 
>?lectronique ou par un autre moyen.

This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not 
waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of 
this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient 
is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by 
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est 
confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations 
qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des 
renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) 
destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier 
électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de 
courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.

RE: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

[Pranav Saxena]

Hi ,

You could let the root admin dedicate a zone to specific domain/account . In 
that case only that user would have access to that zone.  This is a new feature 
introduced in 4.2

Thanks,
Pranav

-Original Message-
From: William Jiang [mailto:william.ji...@manwin.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 7:45 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org; 
users...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

Hi Jessica,
Thanks for the response. What's the difference of those three roles?
If I understand right, I will give it the role of "normal-user" .

Thanks,
William

-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wang [mailto:jessica.w...@citrix.com]
Sent: June-11-13 6:23 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
users...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

> I want to give access to a user to see only a specific zone.

What is the role of the user that you want to give access to see only a 
specific zone?
A normal-user, a domain-admin, or a root-admin?


-Original Message-
From: William Jiang [mailto:william.ji...@manwin.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 3:17 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

Hi,

if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone? We have multiple 
zone in our cloudstack 3.0 and I want to give access to a user to see only a 
specific zone.

Thanks,
William
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not 
waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of 
this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient 
is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by 
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ?lectronique est 
confidentiel et prot?g?. L'exp?diteur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations 
qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des 
renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) 
destinataire(s) d?sign?(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier 
?lectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser imm?diatement, par retour de 
courrier ?lectronique ou par un autre moyen.
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not 
waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of 
this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient 
is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by 
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est 
confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations 
qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des 
renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) 
destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier 
électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de 
courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.

RE: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

[Pranav Saxena]

Here is the functional spec -

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dedicated+Resources+-+Private+zone,+pod,+cluster,+host+Functional+Spec
 
In my last statement ,  a user anyways can't see the infrastructure section on 
the UI . So by  allowing the root admin to dedicate a  zone to an 
domain/account , that account can only use that zone's resources.

-Original Message-
From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 7:54 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
users...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

Hi ,

You could let the root admin dedicate a zone to specific domain/account . In 
that case only that user would have access to that zone.  This is a new feature 
introduced in 4.2

Thanks,
Pranav

-Original Message-
From: William Jiang [mailto:william.ji...@manwin.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 7:45 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org; 
users...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

Hi Jessica,
Thanks for the response. What's the difference of those three roles?
If I understand right, I will give it the role of "normal-user" .

Thanks,
William

-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wang [mailto:jessica.w...@citrix.com]
Sent: June-11-13 6:23 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
users...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

> I want to give access to a user to see only a specific zone.

What is the role of the user that you want to give access to see only a 
specific zone?
A normal-user, a domain-admin, or a root-admin?


-Original Message-
From: William Jiang [mailto:william.ji...@manwin.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 3:17 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone

Hi,

if anybody know how to restrict access to a specific zone? We have multiple 
zone in our cloudstack 3.0 and I want to give access to a user to see only a 
specific zone.

Thanks,
William
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not 
waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of 
this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient 
is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by 
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ?lectronique est 
confidentiel et prot?g?. L'exp?diteur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations 
qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des 
renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) 
destinataire(s) d?sign?(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier 
?lectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser imm?diatement, par retour de 
courrier ?lectronique ou par un autre moyen.
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not 
waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of 
this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient 
is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by 
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est 
confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations 
qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des 
renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) 
destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier 
électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de 
courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.

RE: cloudstack 4.1 & vmware vsphere 5.1 works?

[Tamas Monos]

Hi,

I have upgraded from CS 3.0.2 -> to 4.1.
The only thing I did was yum update cloud-* and it works with vmware off the 
shelf.
Would that be because 3.0.2 had the vmware libs back then and the new packages 
getting installed are not removing them I can't tell.
It just works with 5.1 for me by default.
I have always used only vmware with CS from the beginning.

Should I worry/update those vmware libraries on the updated CS 4.1?

Regards
 
-Original Message-
From: Jörgen Maas [mailto:jorgen.m...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 12 June 2013 14:08
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: cloudstack 4.1 & vmware vsphere 5.1 works?

Those packages do not contain the non-oss components (like VMware support).
You should build your own packages.

HTH

Jörgen


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jose Merchan  wrote:

> Hi all
>
> We are testing Cloudstack 4.1 with VMware vSphere 5.1 We have 
> installed CloudStack 4.1 in Ubuntu Precise from repository 
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/**ubuntu ntu> We have a demo lab with 2 ESXi 5.1 and with vcenter 5.1 We follow 
> instructions in documentation http://cloudstack.apache.org/**
> docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/**4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/**
> vmware-install.html udStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/vmware-install.html>but when we 
> want to create a cluster in CloudStack we receive the error /vmware resource 
> manager not found/ We need anything more?
>
> Thanks
>
>


--
Grtz,
Jörgen Maas

Re: cloudstack 4.1 & vmware vsphere 5.1 works?

[David Nalley]

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Tamas Monos  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have upgraded from CS 3.0.2 -> to 4.1.
> The only thing I did was yum update cloud-* and it works with vmware off the 
> shelf.
> Would that be because 3.0.2 had the vmware libs back then and the new 
> packages getting installed are not removing them I can't tell.
> It just works with 5.1 for me by default.
> I have always used only vmware with CS from the beginning.
>
> Should I worry/update those vmware libraries on the updated CS 4.1?
>

No - the RPMs in Widos repo are built with VMware and other non-ASL
compatible bits compiled in.

--David

how to confirm xenserver 4.1 system vm template

[Brashear, Marc]

I would like to confirm I am using the correct system vm templates in an
upgraded a deployment upgraded from 2.2.14 to 4.1.  Per the release
notes the file /etc/cloudstack-release should contain "Cloudstack
Release 4.0.0-incubating Mon Oct 9 15:10:04 PST 2012", but mine
contains: "Cloudstack Release 3.0 Mon Feb  6 15:10:04 PST 2012".

 

The template was downloaded from
http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.vhd.bz
2
  and I am running XenServer as a hypervisor.  Can anybody help me
confirm this is correct for 4.1?

 

Thanks,

Marc

Re: how to confirm xenserver 4.1 system vm template

[Chiradeep Vittal]

Yes, this is correct, unless you want to use IPv6

On 6/12/13 3:28 PM, "Brashear, Marc"  wrote:

>I would like to confirm I am using the correct system vm templates in an
>upgraded a deployment upgraded from 2.2.14 to 4.1.  Per the release
>notes the file /etc/cloudstack-release should contain "Cloudstack
>Release 4.0.0-incubating Mon Oct 9 15:10:04 PST 2012", but mine
>contains: "Cloudstack Release 3.0 Mon Feb  6 15:10:04 PST 2012".
>
> 
>
>The template was downloaded from
>http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.vhd.bz
>2
>z2>  and I am running XenServer as a hypervisor.  Can anybody help me
>confirm this is correct for 4.1?
>
> 
>
>Thanks,
>
>Marc
>