qemu-kvm tweaking (CloudStack-2.2.14)
Dear colleagues, Has anybody managed to set/change parameters of qemu-kvm for certain instance before it launches? For example, if I want to add the 3rd drive or to emulate some different model of the NIC and so on... Are there any working hacks for that? Thanks! -- V.Melnik
Re: Choosing VMWare SCSI Controller Type
Hi Sean, I have tried this in 4.1.1 and 4.2. I have tried the HDD adapter type in the register template screen like you also suggested but that did not have an effect. Unless I am mistaken, I think that option will set the disk type to ide or scsi and not change the actual controller type that the scsi disk uses. Thanks, Chris On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Sean Hamilton s...@seanhamilton.co.ukwrote: Hey Chris, What version of CS are you running? I've seen a bug in the Register Template screen. If you select the location for the template it should open up more options, one of which is the HDD adapter type. Let me know how it goes. On 2 October 2013 05:12, Chris Sciarrino chris.sciarr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am having an issue where my vmware templates are being deployed with the lsi parallel scsi controller type which is causing them to blue screen. Is there any way to choose which scsi controller type it will be deployed with? Or is there any other way to make it deploy the lsi sas controller? Thanks, Chris
4.2.0 Install guide, section 4.4.2 RPM Repo
Has anyone thought of updating the section 4.4.2 on the yum repo from: [cloudstack] name=cloudstack baseurl=http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.1/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 To [cloudstack] name=cloudstack baseurl=http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.2/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 After I changed it I see: [root@lab2-mgt-cloud-1 ~]# yum list cloud* Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.nexcess.net * extras: mirror.es.its.nyu.edu * updates: mirror.trouble-free.net cloudstack | 1.1 kB 00:00 cloudstack/primary | 2.6 kB 00:00 cloudstack 7/7 Available Packages cloudstack-agent.x86_64 4.2.0-1.el6 cloudstack cloudstack-awsapi.x86_64 4.2.0-1.el6 cloudstack cloudstack-baremetal-agent.x86_64 4.2.0-1.el6 cloudstack cloudstack-cli.x86_64 4.2.0-1.el6 cloudstack cloudstack-common.x86_64 4.2.0-1.el6 cloudstack cloudstack-management.x86_64 4.2.0-1.el6 cloudstack cloudstack-usage.x86_64 4.2.0-1.el6 cloudstack Just a thought, and sorry if this has been brought up already :-) Curtis Old Neustar, Inc. / Neustarlabs / Senior Research Engineer 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166 Office: +1.571.434.5384 Mobile: +1.540.532.2230 / curtis@neustar.bizmailto:curtis@neustar.biz / www.neustar.bizhttp://www.neustar.biz/ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
Re: migration fails when iso is attached to running vm
Hello Valery, That is expected. You'll need to always unmount ISO files from a VM before migrating. Travis On Oct 2, 2013, at 5:26 AM, Valery Ciareszka valery.teres...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all. I am testing CS 4.2+KVM and when I try to migrate running VM I get following error: jobresult: errorcode = 530 errortext = Failed to migrate vm jobresultcode = 530 jobresulttype = object jobstatus = 2 According to the logs, vm fails to migrate due to secondary storage is not mounted on the node this vm is trying to migrate to: 2013-10-02 09:15:19,124 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-16:job-1573 = [ 7b3332b4-dcfa-4a82-847f-d3f6159e65c0 ]) Unable to migrate due to cannot open file '/mnt/ae12c83d-5bc2-3bdb-9a83-f181209879c5/225-2-78686e44-457d-34e2-afb6-926583401caf.iso': No such file or directory If I detach iso from vm, migration works correctly. Is this expected behaviour or should I report a bug ? -- Regards, Valery http://protocol.by/slayer
Migrating/managing secondary storages
Hi everyone. I have a CS 4.2 and 4 secondary NFS storages (s1, s2, s3, s4). I'd like to migrate everything (all the templates, snapshots,…) from s1 and s2 to s3 and s4 and then shutdown s1 s2. Is there a way to do it via GUI? The only instructions I found are to stop CloudStack, copy everything from one secondary storage to another change the references to that secondary storage in the database to the new secondary storage and restart cloudstack. Any first hand experiences/advices on how to do it, what to look out for? Best regards, F.
Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
Dear all, I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 on my test environment and getting below error message: MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database worked fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade. Below is more logs from the management-server.log: 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select user.id, user.uuid, user.username, user.password, user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email, user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key, user.created, user.removed, user.timezone, user.registration_token, user.is_registered, user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default, account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid, account.account_name account_name, account.type account_type, domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid, domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path, async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid, async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id = user.id and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status = 0 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) Error executing: ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select user.id, user.uuid, user.username, user.password, user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email, user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key, user.created, user.removed, user.timezone, user.registration_token, user.is_registered, user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default, account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid, account.account_name account_name, account.type account_type, domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid, domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path, async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid, async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id = user.id and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status = 0 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation 2013-10-02 20:33:06,009 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (Timer-1:null) Unable to execute upgrade script: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:193) at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:87) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.runScript(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:201) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:262) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:391) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentContext.initComponentsLifeCycle(ComponentContext.java:90) at com.cloud.servlet.CloudStartupServlet$1.run(CloudStartupServlet.java:54) at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:534) at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:484) 2013-10-02 20:33:06,011 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (Timer-1:null) Unable to upgrade the database com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to execute upgrade script: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.runScript(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:210) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:262) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:391)
Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database on Amazon RDS? 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Dear all, I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 on my test environment and getting below error message: MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database worked fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade. Below is more logs from the management-server.log: 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select user.id, user.uuid, user.username, user.password, user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email, user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key, user.created, user.removed, user.timezone, user.registration_token, user.is_registered, user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default, account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid, account.account_name account_name, account.type account_type, domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid, domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path, async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid, async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id = user.id and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status = 0 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) Error executing: ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select user.id, user.uuid, user.username, user.password, user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email, user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key, user.created, user.removed, user.timezone, user.registration_token, user.is_registered, user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default, account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid, account.account_name account_name, account.type account_type, domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid, domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path, async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid, async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id = user.id and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status = 0 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation 2013-10-02 20:33:06,009 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (Timer-1:null) Unable to execute upgrade script: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:193) at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:87) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.runScript(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:201) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:262) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:391) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentContext.initComponentsLifeCycle(ComponentContext.java:90) at com.cloud.servlet.CloudStartupServlet$1.run(CloudStartupServlet.java:54) at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:534) at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:484) 2013-10-02 20:33:06,011 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (Timer-1:null) Unable to upgrade the database com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to execute upgrade script: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql at
Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
Hi Rafael, What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test VM, restore the dump backup of our production database into the test environment, and try to upgrade to 4.2.0. Could it be because the database was taken from a different environment? However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment after the dump restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database on Amazon RDS? 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Dear all, I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 on my test environment and getting below error message: MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database worked fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade. Below is more logs from the management-server.log: 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select user.id, user.uuid, user.username, user.password, user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email, user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key, user.created, user.removed, user.timezone, user.registration_token, user.is_registered, user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default, account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid, account.account_name account_name, account.type account_type, domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid, domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path, async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid, async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id = user.id and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status = 0 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) Error executing: ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select user.id, user.uuid, user.username, user.password, user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email, user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key, user.created, user.removed, user.timezone, user.registration_token, user.is_registered, user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default, account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid, account.account_name account_name, account.type account_type, domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid, domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path, async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid, async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id = user.id and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status = 0 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation 2013-10-02 20:33:06,009 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (Timer-1:null) Unable to execute upgrade script: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:193) at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:87) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.runScript(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:201) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:262) at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:391)
Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
Hi Rafael, May I know how did you resolve the problem? Do we need to manually grant super privilege to an account, e.g. 'cloud'@'%'? Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: I had the exactly same problem when I was backing up my CS database on a Amazon RDS. There was a problem with some DEFINER command generated by the mysqldump. 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Hi Rafael, What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test VM, restore the dump backup of our production database into the test environment, and try to upgrade to 4.2.0. Could it be because the database was taken from a different environment? However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment after the dump restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database on Amazon RDS? 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Dear all, I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 on my test environment and getting below error message: MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database worked fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade. Below is more logs from the management-server.log: 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select user.id, user.uuid, user.username, user.password, user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email, user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key, user.created, user.removed, user.timezone, user.registration_token, user.is_registered, user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default, account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid, account.account_name account_name, account.type account_type, domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid, domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path, async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid, async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id = user.id and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status = 0 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) Error executing: ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select user.id, user.uuid, user.username, user.password, user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email, user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key, user.created, user.removed, user.timezone, user.registration_token, user.is_registered, user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default, account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid, account.account_name account_name, account.type account_type, domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid, domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path, async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid, async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id = user.id and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status = 0 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation 2013-10-02 20:33:06,009 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (Timer-1:null) Unable to execute
Re: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'
On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Sebastien, If the web server hosting the template is on the same network as the management server, you need to configure the following global setting with the IP range secstorage.allowed.internal.sites I did that thanks, but my secondary storage is not mounted in the ssvm. I can mount it by hand, the ssvm is up, yet I get: There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary -sebastien Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 October 2013 13:06 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...' HI, I am setting up basic zone. I have one mgt, one hypervisor (KVM, Ubuntu 12.04), I am on ACS 4.1.1 Everything seems fine, the ssvm starts, I can log into it. Everything is on a private network without outside connectivity. I am serving a template from that private network. From the ssvm I can ping the mgt server and the hypervisor, I can also mount the secondary storage by hand. However it does not get mounted automatically and when I try to register the template I get the dreaded: 2013-10-02 05:00:13,407 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-20:null) ===START=== 172.16.153.1 -- GET command=registerTemplateresponse=jsonsessionkey=ErhEwVpkdKXC3br3zZUoAyaFY7E%3Dname=totodisplayText=totourl=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.38.100%3A80%2Ftinylinux.qcow2zoneid=-1format=QCOW2isextractable=falsepasswordEnabled=falseosTypeId=278f54ca-29d1-11e3-9b24-000c290705d2hypervisor=KVMispublic=trueisfeatured=true_=1380715213357 2013-10-02 05:00:13,452 WARN [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] (catalina-exec-20:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary I am at a loss on this one.. -sebastien This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
Could you log in to the database with the user you are using to execute the upgrade and use the command show grants; and post me the results? 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Hi Rafael, I believe the upgrade script is run by 'cloud' user, correct? By default full permission to the 'cloud' user has been given, and I even added 'super' privilege to the cloud user but the problem still persists. May I know how to change the DEFINER statement? Which statement you are referring to? Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I was getting this error because I was using an Amazon RDS database, and there the users, even the master do not have super privileges. So, I could not create a table logged with a user (e.g. root) and using DEFINER=cloud@'%'. But, since you have full access to the database, I do believe that you just need to give grant permission to the user you are using to run the queries, or simple try to change the DEFINER statement to something like: DEFINER=CURRENT_USER 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Hi Rafael, May I know how did you resolve the problem? Do we need to manually grant super privilege to an account, e.g. 'cloud'@'%'? Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: I had the exactly same problem when I was backing up my CS database on a Amazon RDS. There was a problem with some DEFINER command generated by the mysqldump. 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Hi Rafael, What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test VM, restore the dump backup of our production database into the test environment, and try to upgrade to 4.2.0. Could it be because the database was taken from a different environment? However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment after the dump restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database on Amazon RDS? 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Dear all, I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 on my test environment and getting below error message: MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database worked fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade. Below is more logs from the management-server.log: 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select user.id, user.uuid, user.username, user.password, user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email, user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key, user.created, user.removed, user.timezone, user.registration_token, user.is_registered, user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default, account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid, account.account_name account_name, account.type account_type, domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid, domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path, async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid, async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id = user.id and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status = 0 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) Error executing:
Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
I had the exactly same problem when I was backing up my CS database on a Amazon RDS. There was a problem with some DEFINER command generated by the mysqldump. 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Hi Rafael, What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test VM, restore the dump backup of our production database into the test environment, and try to upgrade to 4.2.0. Could it be because the database was taken from a different environment? However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment after the dump restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database on Amazon RDS? 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Dear all, I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 on my test environment and getting below error message: MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database worked fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade. Below is more logs from the management-server.log: 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select user.id, user.uuid, user.username, user.password, user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email, user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key, user.created, user.removed, user.timezone, user.registration_token, user.is_registered, user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default, account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid, account.account_name account_name, account.type account_type, domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid, domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path, async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid, async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id = user.id and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status = 0 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) Error executing: ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select user.id, user.uuid, user.username, user.password, user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email, user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key, user.created, user.removed, user.timezone, user.registration_token, user.is_registered, user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default, account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid, account.account_name account_name, account.type account_type, domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid, domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path, async_job.id job_id, async_job.uuid job_uuid, async_job.job_status job_status, async_job.account_id job_account_id from `cloud`.`user` inner join `cloud`.`account` ON user.account_id = account.id inner join `cloud`.`domain` ON account.domain_id = domain.id left join `cloud`.`async_job` ON async_job.instance_id = user.id and async_job.instance_type = 'User' and async_job.job_status = 0 2013-10-02 20:33:06,007 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation 2013-10-02 20:33:06,009 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (Timer-1:null) Unable to execute upgrade script: /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:193) at com.cloud.utils.db.ScriptRunner.runScript(ScriptRunner.java:87)
Re: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'
On Oct 2, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Did you by chance configure the 'Storage' network when you created the Zone Found the issue, the host IP of the mgt server was wrong ( I have two interfaces) and the ssvm was on private network. Fixed that and the templates are downloading, but it's stuck at 99% in the UI….hunting that one now Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 October 2013 14:13 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...' On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Sebastien, If the web server hosting the template is on the same network as the management server, you need to configure the following global setting with the IP range secstorage.allowed.internal.sites I did that thanks, but my secondary storage is not mounted in the ssvm. I can mount it by hand, the ssvm is up, yet I get: There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary -sebastien Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 October 2013 13:06 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...' HI, I am setting up basic zone. I have one mgt, one hypervisor (KVM, Ubuntu 12.04), I am on ACS 4.1.1 Everything seems fine, the ssvm starts, I can log into it. Everything is on a private network without outside connectivity. I am serving a template from that private network. From the ssvm I can ping the mgt server and the hypervisor, I can also mount the secondary storage by hand. However it does not get mounted automatically and when I try to register the template I get the dreaded: 2013-10-02 05:00:13,407 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-20:null) ===START=== 172.16.153.1 -- GET command=registerTemplateresponse=jsonsessionkey=ErhEwVpkdKXC3br3zZUoAyaFY7E%3Dname=totodisplayText=totourl=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.38.100%3A80%2Ftinylinux.qcow2zoneid=-1format=QCOW2isextractable=falsepasswordEnabled=falseosTypeId=278f54ca-29d1-11e3-9b24-000c290705d2hypervisor=KVMispublic=trueisfeatured=true_=1380715213357 2013-10-02 05:00:13,452 WARN [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] (catalina-exec-20:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary I am at a loss on this one.. -sebastien This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 Released
Indra, I have downloaded new system vm and registered it, it didn't make much difference, usage logs is overwriting management logs and all hypervisors are in disconnected state. So, I guess this upgrade wasn't tested properly on Ubuntu unfortunately. Dean On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:00 AM, benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com wrote: Very great Job all of you !! I'm very excited to be able to use the new version of cloudstack 4.2 !! There were several weeks (months ?) that i was expecting features such load balancing betweens vpc tiers. Now it's done !! I have upgraded my preproduction environment from cs 4.1 to cs 4.2 and all is clear, the upgrade worked nice !! I use mgmt server with centos 6.3 with xcp and xenserver 6.2 hypervisors and it rocks a lot !! Very nice work guys !! Now i can prepare my future production environment Best regards, Benoit 2013/10/2 Kirk Kosinski kirkkosin...@gmail.com I filed a bug for the error when running cloudstack-sysvmadm on Ubuntu. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778 Best regards, Kirk On 10/01/2013 10:09 PM, Indra Pramana wrote: Hi Dean, I encountered exactly the same error message when running the cloudstack-sysvmadm script. I am also using Ubuntu but using KVM hypervisor. Some things to check: 1. Have you registered the system VM template for 4.2 prior to the upgrade? If not yet, you need to register the template first. 2. After upgrading both the management server and the hypervisor hosts, log in to the GUI and ensure that the hosts are up, before performing the cloudstack-sysvmadm script. Thank you. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: update: I'm using Ubuntu on my management server, and currently all of my hypervisors are in disconnected state, I have also noticed that usage server log is overwriting management logs I must say ouch! D On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Travis Any one have tried to upgrade? I followed upgrade process from 4.1.1 to 4.2 (xenserver) is running on all of my hyperviroues However when I try and run cloudstack-sysvmadm to stop then start all running SSVMs, Console Proxies, and Virtual Routers I get the following: /usr/bin/cloudstack-sysvmadm: line 21: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions: No such file or directory Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)... ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 5 Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s) Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)... ERROR: Failed to stop console proxy vm with id 19 Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) . Stopping and starting 6 running routing vm(s)... ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 13 ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 112 ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 108 ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 94 ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 120 ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 83 Done restarting router(s). Any ideas? On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Travis Graham tgra...@tgraham.us wrote: Hey Dean, I've had the same problem this morning. It's actually from the old docs site being cached. You'll want to clear your cache or use a different browser. Here's a direct link: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Release_Notes/index.html Travis On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you, I'm very excited, where can we find the release notes? they are not on http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/index.html yet! I'm actually more interested in upgrade notes for xenserver from 4.1.1 Thanks again On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Animesh anim...@apache.org wrote: The Apache CloudStack project is excited to announce the 4.2 feature release of the CloudStack cloud orchestration platform. This is the next feature release of the 4.0 branch which first released on November 6, 2012 with the 4.1 release on June 5. This is the second major release from Apache CloudStack since its graduation from the Apache Incubator on March 20th. This release represents over six months of work from the Apache CloudStack community with 57 new and 29 improved features being provided. Many new features incorporate contributions from major corporations and support for industry standards. New integrated support of the Cisco UCS compute chassis, SolidFire storage arrays, and the S3 storage protocol are just a few of the features available in this release. ## Documentation The 4.2 release
[SOLVED] Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation
Hi Rafael, I managed to resolve the problem by removing all the DEFINER statements from the dump .sql file. sed '/^\/\*\!50013 DEFINER/d' cloudstack-backup-2013100201-fix.sql cloudstack-backup-2013100201-fix-without-definer.sql I then restored the cloudstack-backup-2013100201-fix-without-definer.sql into the database and the upgrade works. Thank you for your help. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: Could you log in to the database with the user you are using to execute the upgrade and use the command show grants; and post me the results? 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Hi Rafael, I believe the upgrade script is run by 'cloud' user, correct? By default full permission to the 'cloud' user has been given, and I even added 'super' privilege to the cloud user but the problem still persists. May I know how to change the DEFINER statement? Which statement you are referring to? Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I was getting this error because I was using an Amazon RDS database, and there the users, even the master do not have super privileges. So, I could not create a table logged with a user (e.g. root) and using DEFINER=cloud@'%'. But, since you have full access to the database, I do believe that you just need to give grant permission to the user you are using to run the queries, or simple try to change the DEFINER statement to something like: DEFINER=CURRENT_USER 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Hi Rafael, May I know how did you resolve the problem? Do we need to manually grant super privilege to an account, e.g. 'cloud'@'%'? Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: I had the exactly same problem when I was backing up my CS database on a Amazon RDS. There was a problem with some DEFINER command generated by the mysqldump. 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Hi Rafael, What I did is just to setup a new CloudStack 4.1.1 on a test VM, restore the dump backup of our production database into the test environment, and try to upgrade to 4.2.0. Could it be because the database was taken from a different environment? However, I tested accessing the GUI of the test environment after the dump restore and I can access it, prior to the upgrade. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting errors, just by any change are you using the database on Amazon RDS? 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Dear all, I tried to simulate upgrading the database from Cloudstack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 on my test environment and getting below error message: MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation Anyone can advise what super privilege is required? The database worked fine on 4.1.1 prior to the upgrade. Below is more logs from the management-server.log: 2013-10-02 20:33:05,876 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`account` SET `cloud`.`account`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,913 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud_usage`.`account` SET `default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,914 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) UPDATE `cloud`.`user` SET `cloud`.`user`.`default`=1 WHERE id IN (1,2) 2013-10-02 20:33:05,915 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null) ALTER VIEW `cloud`.`user_view` AS select user.id, user.uuid, user.username, user.password, user.firstname, user.lastname, user.email, user.state, user.api_key, user.secret_key, user.created, user.removed, user.timezone, user.registration_token, user.is_registered, user.incorrect_login_attempts, user.default, account.idaccount_id, account.uuid account_uuid, account.account_name account_name, account.type account_type, domain.iddomain_id, domain.uuid domain_uuid, domain.name domain_name, domain.path domain_path,
Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0
Hi Wei Zhou, Thank you for your e-mail. May I know where is this script ConfigurationServerImpl located? Can we run this script manually? Is there a way we can run the script so that it will insert the records without having to check for any conditions? Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote: ConfigurationServerImpl will insert missing records to resource_count table at management server startup. It is strange you meet some issues others do not meet. 2013/10/2 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id Dear Animesh, Sanjay and all, Latest test that I and Abhinav done earlier this morning: - Abhinav tested upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 on his lab and he noticed that the additional resource_count types (total 4 of them: cpu, memory, primary_storage and secondary_storage) were added automatically during DB schema upgrade. Excerpts from his management-server.log file: 2013-10-01 23:56:46,318 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) resource_count table has records missing for some domains...going to insert them 2013-10-01 23:56:46,339 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type cpu for domain id=1 2013-10-01 23:56:46,341 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type memory for domain id=1 2013-10-01 23:56:46,349 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type primary_storage for domain id=1 2013-10-01 23:56:46,351 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type secondary_storage for domain id=1 2013-10-01 23:56:46,362 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) resource_count table has records missing for some accounts...going to insert them 2013-10-01 23:56:46,372 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type cpu for account id=1 2013-10-01 23:56:46,379 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type memory for account id=1 2013-10-01 23:56:46,381 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type primary_storage for account id=1 2013-10-01 23:56:46,388 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type secondary_storage for account id=1 2013-10-01 23:56:46,418 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type cpu for account id=2 2013-10-01 23:56:46,420 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type memory for account id=2 2013-10-01 23:56:46,428 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type primary_storage for account id=2 2013-10-01 23:56:46,429 DEBUG [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Inserting resource count of type secondary_storage for account id=2 2013-10-01 23:56:46,439 INFO [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) Processing updateSSLKeyStore 2013-10-01 23:56:46,499 INFO [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:null) SSL keystore located at /etc/cloudstack/management/cloud.keystore However, I didn't have the above during the DB schema upgrade. May I know which process triggers the above situation and leads to the additional records to be inserted? Tried to go through the /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-410to420.sql script and cannot find the above. Any reason why my upgrade didn't trigger the insertion of the additional records? Urgently looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Copying Sanjay Animesh -Original Message- From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 11:06 AM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0 Dear all, Further investigation reveals that there might be some issues with the schema upgrade. When we check the resource_count table for the account ID: mysql select * from resource_count where account_id=2; +++---+---+---+ | id | account_id | domain_id | type | count | +++---+---+---+ | 17 | 2 | NULL | user_vm |30 | | 18 | 2 | NULL | public_ip | 4 | | 19 | 2 | NULL | volume|40 | | 20 | 2 | NULL | snapshot | 1 | | 21 | 2 | NULL | template |40 | | 22 | 2 |
Re: GPG key expired
Hi Markus. That repository is maintained by Wido den Hollander - and I just spoke with him on IRC and he indicates that he has updated the key located there. Let us know if you have any other problems. --David On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Dietsch, Markus m.diet...@mid.de wrote: Hi list, ** ** the gpg key of http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/release.asc seems to be expired: ** ** apt-key list /etc/apt/trusted.gpg pub 2048R/86C278E3 2012-09-07 [expired: 2013-09-07] uid Apache CloudStack cloudstack-...@apache.org ** ** After updating the sources.list I always get the following error: ** ** W: GPG error: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu precise Release: The following signatures were invalid: KEYEXPIRED 1378559179 KEYEXPIRED 1378559179 KEYEXPIRED 1378559179 ** ** Can you please provide a new key? ** ** Sorry for writing directly but I don’t want to subcribe to the list but only report this issue. ** ** Thanks in advance and cheers, ** ** Markus ** ** [image: http://www.mid.de/fileadmin/templates/mid_v2/images/MID_Logo_RGB_80_40.jpg] Markus Dietsch, Administrator MID GmbH | Kressengartenstr. 10 | 90402 Nürnberg | Germany phone: +49 911 96836-433 | fax: +49 911 96836-100 email: m.diet...@mid.de | www.mid.de http://mid.de/ Sitz des Unternehmens/Registered Office: Nürnberg Handelsregister/Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Nürnberg HRB Nr. 21108 Vorsitzender Geschäftsführer/CEO: Bertram Geck Geschäftsführer/Management Board: Andreas Ditze, Jürgen Leuschel, Jochen Seemann ** ** ** ** http://mid.de/insight * * http://www.insight2013.dehttp://www.mid.de/produkte/innovator-for-business-analysts/bpmn-tool-download.html Sichern Sie sich schon jetzt Ihren Frühbuchervorteil für die Insight 2013http://mid.de/insightund erleben Sie einen Tag zu den Themen BPMN, SOA, Process Optimization, Big Data, BI, Innovation uvm.. Wir freuen uns auf Sie!
cannot delete primary storage
Hi Guys, I've got an iSCSI-based Primary Storage pool that I am unable to delete. I'm running XenServer 6.1 and have created the storage pool via the PreSetup option in CS. I've had other pools set up exactly the same way and they have removed without problems. When I try to delete the pool (via the GUI or the API) the state of the storage pool goes to Removed and throws an error: errorcode530/errorcodecserrorcode/cserrorcodeerrortextFailed to finish storage pool removal. The storage pool will not be used but cleanup is needed/errortext/deletestoragepoolresponse Anyone seen this before? thanks Len IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes
Re: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...'
On Oct 2, 2013, at 3:43 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 2, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Did you by chance configure the 'Storage' network when you created the Zone Found the issue, the host IP of the mgt server was wrong ( I have two interfaces) and the ssvm was on private network. Fixed that and the templates are downloading, but it's stuck at 99% in the UI….hunting that one now It works fine if I register an ISO, but for a qcow2 image (KVM hypervisor), the download happens and completes (file totally downloaded on systemvm mounted secondary storage), but the percentage completion of the download on the UI is stuck 99%, 84%, 67%…. Any idea why the mgt server would not think that the template has finished downloading ? Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 October 2013 14:13 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...' On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Sebastien, If the web server hosting the template is on the same network as the management server, you need to configure the following global setting with the IP range secstorage.allowed.internal.sites I did that thanks, but my secondary storage is not mounted in the ssvm. I can mount it by hand, the ssvm is up, yet I get: There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary -sebastien Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 October 2013 13:06 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: dreaded 'there is no secondary storage vm for ...' HI, I am setting up basic zone. I have one mgt, one hypervisor (KVM, Ubuntu 12.04), I am on ACS 4.1.1 Everything seems fine, the ssvm starts, I can log into it. Everything is on a private network without outside connectivity. I am serving a template from that private network. From the ssvm I can ping the mgt server and the hypervisor, I can also mount the secondary storage by hand. However it does not get mounted automatically and when I try to register the template I get the dreaded: 2013-10-02 05:00:13,407 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-20:null) ===START=== 172.16.153.1 -- GET command=registerTemplateresponse=jsonsessionkey=ErhEwVpkdKXC3br3zZUoAyaFY7E%3Dname=totodisplayText=totourl=http%3A%2F%2F192.168.38.100%3A80%2Ftinylinux.qcow2zoneid=-1format=QCOW2isextractable=falsepasswordEnabled=falseosTypeId=278f54ca-29d1-11e3-9b24-000c290705d2hypervisor=KVMispublic=trueisfeatured=true_=1380715213357 2013-10-02 05:00:13,452 WARN [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl] (catalina-exec-20:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host nfs://192.168.38.100/export/secondary I am at a loss on this one.. -sebastien This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Bare Metal Docs for 4.2.0?
Looking at the release notes it looks like Bare Metal guests are back from their hiatus! Looking around however, I'm not seeing any documentation for this as of yet. Is there any documentation available and if so, where can it be found as it's not on the official documentation portion of the website.
RE: cannot delete primary storage
Hi Len, I've had similar with NFS Storage and had to revert to changing settings directly in the DB Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Len Bellemore [mailto:len.bellem...@controlcircle.com] Sent: 02 October 2013 15:32 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: cannot delete primary storage Hi Guys, I've got an iSCSI-based Primary Storage pool that I am unable to delete. I'm running XenServer 6.1 and have created the storage pool via the PreSetup option in CS. I've had other pools set up exactly the same way and they have removed without problems. When I try to delete the pool (via the GUI or the API) the state of the storage pool goes to Removed and throws an error: errorcode530/errorcodecserrorcode/cserrorcodeerrortextFailed to finish storage pool removal. The storage pool will not be used but cleanup is needed/errortext/deletestoragepoolresponse Anyone seen this before? thanks Len IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: cannot delete primary storage
Ditto to Geoff - when I've had issues deleting primary storages in the past, I've ended up having to delete volumes that were still associated with the datastore from the cloud.volumes table. Regards, Kirk Jantzer http://about.me/kirkjantzer On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Len, I've had similar with NFS Storage and had to revert to changing settings directly in the DB Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Len Bellemore [mailto:len.bellem...@controlcircle.com] Sent: 02 October 2013 15:32 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: cannot delete primary storage Hi Guys, I've got an iSCSI-based Primary Storage pool that I am unable to delete. I'm running XenServer 6.1 and have created the storage pool via the PreSetup option in CS. I've had other pools set up exactly the same way and they have removed without problems. When I try to delete the pool (via the GUI or the API) the state of the storage pool goes to Removed and throws an error: errorcode530/errorcodecserrorcode/cserrorcodeerrortextFailed to finish storage pool removal. The storage pool will not be used but cleanup is needed/errortext/deletestoragepoolresponse Anyone seen this before? thanks Len IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Choosing VMWare SCSI Controller Type
We came across the same issue at some point in the past, but we decided to change the templates to reflect to proper controller. There might be a thread on the dev list around that. Let me know the bug id once you create it, one of our customer might need that feature. Francois On 2013-10-02 1:43 PM, Kelven Yang wrote: On 10/2/13 3:00 AM, Chris Sciarrino chris.sciarr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sean, I have tried this in 4.1.1 and 4.2. I have tried the HDD adapter type in the register template screen like you also suggested but that did not have an effect. Unless I am mistaken, I think that option will set the disk type to ide or scsi and not change the actual controller type that the scsi disk uses. Please report it as a feature-request bug, choosing controller type is not currently supported yet Kelven Thanks, Chris On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Sean Hamilton s...@seanhamilton.co.ukwrote: Hey Chris, What version of CS are you running? I've seen a bug in the Register Template screen. If you select the location for the template it should open up more options, one of which is the HDD adapter type. Let me know how it goes. On 2 October 2013 05:12, Chris Sciarrino chris.sciarr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am having an issue where my vmware templates are being deployed with the lsi parallel scsi controller type which is causing them to blue screen. Is there any way to choose which scsi controller type it will be deployed with? Or is there any other way to make it deploy the lsi sas controller? Thanks, Chris -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_
CS 4.2 storage vm
Dear, I installed CS 4.2 from rpm packages to Centos 6.4. Everything works fine, with install, and with configuration, but after the CS deploy the storage VM I can't add ISO-s. After some research in the logs I found this on a secstorage system VM: s-1-VM: /var/log/cloud.log 2013-10-02 13:31:19,269 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Agent started 2013-10-02 13:31:19,273 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Implementation Version is 4.2.0 2013-10-02 13:31:19,274 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) agent.properties found at /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/conf/agent.properties 2013-10-02 13:31:19,281 DEBUG [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Found property: instance 2013-10-02 13:31:19,281 DEBUG [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Found property: resource 2013-10-02 13:31:19,281 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Defaulting to using properties file for storage 2013-10-02 13:31:19,283 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Defaulting to the constant time backoff algorithm 2013-10-02 13:31:19,290 INFO [cloud.utils.LogUtils] (main:null) log4j configuration found at /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/conf/log4j-cloud.xml 2013-10-02 13:31:19,318 DEBUG [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Checking to see if agent.SecStorage.pid exists. 2013-10-02 13:31:19,326 DEBUG [cloud.utils.ProcessUtil] (main:null) environment.properties could not be opened 2013-10-02 13:31:19,337 DEBUG [cloud.utils.ProcessUtil] (main:null) Executing: bash -c echo $PPID 2013-10-02 13:31:19,344 DEBUG [cloud.utils.ProcessUtil] (main:null) Execution is successful. 2013-10-02 13:31:19,345 ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) *Unable to start agent: Resource class not found: com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource due to: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource * Can somebody help me with this? Thanks, Peter ERDOSI
Re: Choosing VMWare SCSI Controller Type
I have reported it, the id is cloudstack-4787. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote: We came across the same issue at some point in the past, but we decided to change the templates to reflect to proper controller. There might be a thread on the dev list around that. Let me know the bug id once you create it, one of our customer might need that feature. Francois On 2013-10-02 1:43 PM, Kelven Yang wrote: On 10/2/13 3:00 AM, Chris Sciarrino chris.sciarr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sean, I have tried this in 4.1.1 and 4.2. I have tried the HDD adapter type in the register template screen like you also suggested but that did not have an effect. Unless I am mistaken, I think that option will set the disk type to ide or scsi and not change the actual controller type that the scsi disk uses. Please report it as a feature-request bug, choosing controller type is not currently supported yet Kelven Thanks, Chris On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Sean Hamilton s...@seanhamilton.co.uk**wrote: Hey Chris, What version of CS are you running? I've seen a bug in the Register Template screen. If you select the location for the template it should open up more options, one of which is the HDD adapter type. Let me know how it goes. On 2 October 2013 05:12, Chris Sciarrino chris.sciarr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am having an issue where my vmware templates are being deployed with the lsi parallel scsi controller type which is causing them to blue screen. Is there any way to choose which scsi controller type it will be deployed with? Or is there any other way to make it deploy the lsi sas controller? Thanks, Chris -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_
Re: Cloudstack 4.1
Hi, the log shows a VM being destroyed, which doesn't match the
description of the problem. If the description is correct, upload more
of the load to Pastebin. The log that needs to be provided will most
likely include the error text from the UI.
Best regards,
Kirk
On 10/02/2013 09:59 AM, motty cruz wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to build a VM but I get the following error Unable to create a
deployment for VM[User]test4]
primary storage is up CLVM,
secondary storage nfs is up
logs:
2013-10-02 09:46:07,885 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-1:null) submit async job-50, details: AsyncJobVO {id:50,
userId: 2, accountId: 2, sessionKey: null, instanceT
ype: VirtualMachine, instanceId: 8, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DestroyVMCmd, cmdOriginator:
null, cmdInfo: {id:9a48d353-f57a-46b4-8a32-3f09fa114409,response:json
,sessionkey:XXXUS8OPHkdR1qhkb8bAUYFHfps\u003d,ctxUserId:2,_:1380732367999,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:204},
cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, s
tatus: 0, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid:
73644477032, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null,
created: null}
2013-10-02 09:46:07,887 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-50) Executing
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DestroyVMCmd for job-50
2013-10-02 09:46:07,892 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-1:null)
===END=== ... -- GET
command=destroyVirtualMachineid=9a48d353-f57a-46b4-8a32-3f09fa114409response=j
sonsessionkey=XXXUS8OPHkdR1qhkb8bAUYFHfps%3D_=1380732367999
2013-10-02 09:46:07,946 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-50) Destroying vm VM[User|test4]
2013-10-02 09:46:07,947 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-50) Stopped called on VM[User|test4] but the state is
Error
2013-10-02 09:46:07,963 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-50) VM state transitted from :Error to Expunging with
event: DestroyRequestedvm's original host id: n
ull new host id: null host id before state transition: null
2013-10-02 09:46:08,001 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-50) Complete async job-50, jobStatus: 1, resultCode: 0,
result: org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.UserV
mResponse@2d453a4b
2013-10-02 09:46:08,017 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-50) Done executing
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DestroyVMCmd for job-50
2013-10-02 09:46:10,931 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-5:null)
===START===...-- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=16b35e61-cedd-4173-90ce-aad61486b001respons
e=jsonsessionkey=XXXUS8OPHkdR1qhkb8bAUYFHfps%3D_=1380732371066
2013-10-02 09:46:10,974 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-5:null) Async job-50 completed
2013-10-02 09:46:11,003 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-5:null)
===END===... -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=16b35e61-cedd-4173-90ce-aad6148
Re: cloudstack 4.1 GRE/SDN
Have you tried to create a new isolated network for the VM after setting 'sdn.ovs.controller' to true? Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2878 On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Luca Salvatore l...@ninefold.com wrote: i'm trying to do some testing with cloudstack 4.1, specifically around the GRE and SDN features. I have configured the management server and I have two zones. Everything is working well, I can deploy VMs in each zone and everything there is good. Each zone is configured with GRE isolation. When I changed the sdn.ovs.controller to true and tried to deploy VMs they all failed, weird thing is that they don't even appear in the management console in a error state, just nothing happens. The logs do show an exception: 2013-10-03 11:48:47,171 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-20:null) Allocating entries for VM: VM[User|test1] 2013-10-03 11:48:47,172 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-20:null) Allocating nics for VM[User|test1] 2013-10-03 11:48:47,173 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-20:null) Allocating nic for vm VM[User|test1] in network Ntwk[208|Guest|8] with requested profile NicProfile[0-0-null-null-null 2013-10-03 11:48:47,179 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (catalina-exec-20:null) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 22 Name = createVirtualMachine; called by -Transaction.rollback:890-Transaction.removeUpTo:833-Transaction.close:657-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-VirtualMachineManagerImpl.allocate:304-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-CloudOrchestrator.createVirtualMachine:211-UserVmManagerImpl.createVirtualMachine:3384-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:125-UserVmManagerImpl.createAdvancedVirtualMachine:3101-DeployVMCmd.create:460 2013-10-03 11:48:47,189 ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-20:null) unhandled exception executing api command: deployVirtualMachine java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.allocateNic(NetworkManagerImpl.java:1267) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.allocate(NetworkManagerImpl.java:1206) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.allocate(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:304) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) Not sure what is going on here. Any thoughts? I'm using XenSever 6.1 with a single bond (2 NICs) for all networks, also using local storage for all VMs. Can't seem to find much doco on how to configure zones for SDN… Any help would be great Thanks Luca.
RE: cloudstack 4.1 KVM There no secondary storage for secondary VM
If you have created the bridges as per the instructions in section 8.1.8.3. Configuring the network bridges then you need to specify those bridge names (e.g cloudbr0 and cloudbr1) as traffic labels in the physical network for respective traffics like guest and management traffic. After this destroy all the vms (If any are already created) and re-launch. Hope this will solve the problem. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 11:05 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: cloudstack 4.1 KVM There no secondary storage for secondary VM yes, I did.however i think cloudstack traffic is trying to go through public network and NFS server in an a private network. each hypervisor has two network cards, public and private private is nic ifcfg-eth0 and public ifcfg-eth1 the management has only one network interface, configured to static on the private network(same subnet as nfs server) I believe that my problem is network bridges on my hypervisor machine, I followed this guide: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html#hypervisor-kvm-requirements but no success. On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:08 AM, dave.hoff...@appcore.com wrote: Do you have an NFS share created and added to Cloudstack for it to use as Secondary Storage? - Original Message - From: motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 8:43:05 PM Subject: cloudstack 4.1 KVM There no secondary storage for secondary VM Hello, I need help! I have installed CloudStack 4.1 on CentOS, I have two hypervisors KVM running on CentOS 6.4. both KVM hypervison have 2 network cards one have static public IP and 2nd has a private IP. can someone point the steps to have basic network to run with CloudStack? currently I have cloudstack working but the error I'm getting is There are no secondary storage for secondary VM I know is because my network interfaces are not configure correctly. Thanks, Motty
