Re: Communication between Management Server and guest vm deployed by root admin user
Sanjeev, That will only work if the Guest traffic and Management traffic share the same NICs, if they are on different NICs (controlled by the traffic labels) simply setting the same VLAN ID will not be enough. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37 On 14 Jan 2014, at 05:55, Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.commailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Saurav, If you want your guest vm to be in the management network, you can create a shared network with vlan id and CIDR matching your management network and deploy a vm in that network. This way you don't have to make any changes to the DB. Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 5:38 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Communication between Management Server and guest vm deployed by root admin user Saurav, A method I have used in the past is to create a new Gust Physical Network which uses the same NICs as the Management Traffic (in this case it was a XenServer environment where the Management Traffic had a dedicated Bond). Then I created a Guest Network with the same VLAN ID and CIDR as the Management Network, obviously using a range of IP which was not already in use. If I recall correctly, cloudstack did not let me do this directly, so I had to manipulate the settings in the DB. Then simply create a VM on this network, and they are on the Network as your Management Infrastructure. If you have to create a 2nd Guest Physical Network, you will need to implement Network Tags ALL of your Network Offerings, however if your Hosts have only a single Bond, then this step is not required. You obviously need to run this past your security people, as you could be opening up holes in your system. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Shanker Balan [mailto:shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2014 11:56 To: CloudStack-Users Subject: Re: Communication between Management Server and guest vm deployed by root admin user Comments inline. PS: I am moving this discussison to the user's list which I feel is a more appropriate place to discuss this query. On 13-Jan-2014, at 1:10 pm, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.commailto:saurav.lah...@sungard.com wrote: Hi, Would anybody know if there is a way that guest vms deployed by root admin can be included in the system management network or routing configured to allow traffic flow between the management server and this guest vm. I have a shared network called Admin where I run my admin services like logstash, Nagios, collectd, remote syslog server etc. L3 routes are also in place to ensure that Vms on the Public subnet can reach the admin VMs on the shared Admin network. All VMs are configured to push data to the log server, mon servers etc. What I am trying to achieve is push the management server logs to a guest vm(deployed by the root admin user) which will parse/index the log files. It appears that since the guest vm is not part of the system management network, the cloudstack management server is unable to reach it. As long as you have routes in place (and proper firewall rules to allow traffic), you would be able to push your logs from guest VMs (or physical hosts like hypervisors) to the designated log collection server(s) buffy:~ shanu$ traceroute log1.prod.internal traceroute to log1.prod.internal (192.168.65.102), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 gw (192.168.44.1) 1.499 ms 1.260 ms * 2 gw2-1 (192.168.44.251) 4.906 ms 1.512 ms 10.242 ms 3 192.168.65.102 (192.168.65.102) 3.961 ms 3.597 ms 4.418 ms 192.168.44.1 is my edge router which has routes to reach my shared admin network 192.168.65.0/24 via 192.168.44.251. Hth. -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.commailto:shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhttp://www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055 Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 08/09 January 2014, Londonhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 13-17 January
RE: Communication between Management Server and guest vm deployed by root admin user
Yes if Guest and Management traffic are on the different NIC we have to give traffic labels while creating physical networks. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 1:40 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Communication between Management Server and guest vm deployed by root admin user Sanjeev, That will only work if the Guest traffic and Management traffic share the same NICs, if they are on different NICs (controlled by the traffic labels) simply setting the same VLAN ID will not be enough. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37 On 14 Jan 2014, at 05:55, Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.commailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Saurav, If you want your guest vm to be in the management network, you can create a shared network with vlan id and CIDR matching your management network and deploy a vm in that network. This way you don't have to make any changes to the DB. Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 5:38 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Communication between Management Server and guest vm deployed by root admin user Saurav, A method I have used in the past is to create a new Gust Physical Network which uses the same NICs as the Management Traffic (in this case it was a XenServer environment where the Management Traffic had a dedicated Bond). Then I created a Guest Network with the same VLAN ID and CIDR as the Management Network, obviously using a range of IP which was not already in use. If I recall correctly, cloudstack did not let me do this directly, so I had to manipulate the settings in the DB. Then simply create a VM on this network, and they are on the Network as your Management Infrastructure. If you have to create a 2nd Guest Physical Network, you will need to implement Network Tags ALL of your Network Offerings, however if your Hosts have only a single Bond, then this step is not required. You obviously need to run this past your security people, as you could be opening up holes in your system. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Shanker Balan [mailto:shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2014 11:56 To: CloudStack-Users Subject: Re: Communication between Management Server and guest vm deployed by root admin user Comments inline. PS: I am moving this discussison to the user's list which I feel is a more appropriate place to discuss this query. On 13-Jan-2014, at 1:10 pm, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungard.commailto:saurav.lah...@sungard.com wrote: Hi, Would anybody know if there is a way that guest vms deployed by root admin can be included in the system management network or routing configured to allow traffic flow between the management server and this guest vm. I have a shared network called Admin where I run my admin services like logstash, Nagios, collectd, remote syslog server etc. L3 routes are also in place to ensure that Vms on the Public subnet can reach the admin VMs on the shared Admin network. All VMs are configured to push data to the log server, mon servers etc. What I am trying to achieve is push the management server logs to a guest vm(deployed by the root admin user) which will parse/index the log files. It appears that since the guest vm is not part of the system management network, the cloudstack management server is unable to reach it. As long as you have routes in place (and proper firewall rules to allow traffic), you would be able to push your logs from guest VMs (or physical hosts like hypervisors) to the designated log collection server(s) buffy:~ shanu$ traceroute log1.prod.internal traceroute to log1.prod.internal (192.168.65.102), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 gw (192.168.44.1) 1.499 ms 1.260 ms * 2 gw2-1 (192.168.44.251) 4.906 ms 1.512 ms 10.242 ms 3 192.168.65.102 (192.168.65.102) 3.961 ms 3.597 ms 4.418 ms 192.168.44.1 is my edge router which has routes to reach my shared admin network 192.168.65.0/24 via 192.168.44.251. Hth. -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.commailto:shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhttp://www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade
RE: Regarding cloudstack automation
Umesh, Lets put steps so that we are in same page: 1. When we deploy a VM, we use get_template function which basically retrieves the template information matching the description you provided under services class for ostype under test module EX: test_loadbalance.py. I am surprised that you are receiving a featured and builtin template as windows template as output for this function. We are explicitly verifiying the template type as BUILTIN to retrieve the template information. So, a windows template cannot be a BUILTIN Template. Either it could be a bug in this function, or something with API. But, to double confirm, Can you please check whats the template information you are retrieving from this function matching with listTemplates API output( run either from your browser or script ) passing the same arguments as passed inside get_template? Inside if we see, basically it gets the id matching with that ostype description using listOsTypes and then use listTemplates command. So, this template is used to deploy the vm. As far as i know, a builtin template cannot be a windows template? Here, we use a featured and builtin template along with description filter passed. So, please check whether the template you are retrieving is windows or otherwise. Check for the field ostypename for the output you receive? Provide the output here for get_template copy pasted with dir(template) for return value? 2. To double confirm that it is template issue and not any other issue related to ssh like ( firewall\iptables\network connectivity issue) for ssh, please manually check for that particular ip in the test case whether ssh works or not and is not a windows machine? 3. Run one test case, first by adding a tag EX: umesh to the tags list as mentioned below for a particular test case under test module EX: test_loadbalance.py, then run with nose command passing in tags argument mentioned below. @attr(tags = [advanced, advancedns, smoke, umesh]) def test_01_create_lb_rule_src_nat(self): nosetests-2.7 -v --with-marvin --marvin-config=/root/softwares/cscode/setup/dev/advanced.cfg --load -a -w /root/softwares/cscode/test/integration/smoke/ -a tags=umesh Let me know. Regards, Santhosh From: umesh kute [umeshvk...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 7:02 AM To: Santhosh Edukulla Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Chandan Purushothama; Sudha Ponnaganti Subject: Re: Regarding cloudstack automation I re-installed the marvin today to get the latest code. I am again facing the same problem in get_template. It is returning the windows template and creating the windows VM. Hence when it tries to do SSH for VM, it fails. I have also build the cloudstack to get the latest code for Marvin. PFA the script logs and test_loadbalance script for reference. Also, do let me know if I am missing some configuration or anything... Just an FYI.. I have executed 35 scripts in smoke test directory. Out of 35 scripts executed, 17-PASS, 18-FAIL. Around 50% failure are due to SSH related issue. Thanks and Regards -- Umesh Kute On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.commailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com wrote: 1. As such because of bug in get_template, you are getting windows machine in your setup and then ssh is tried in test module, so you are getting the error. 2. Now, to overcome, just checkout the latest marvin, it should have a fix. Note: It still has some other issues, but you can continue with your testing further. Let us know. Santhosh From: umesh kute [umeshvk...@gmail.commailto:umeshvk...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 5:19 AM To: Santhosh Edukulla Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org; Chandan Purushothama; Sudha Ponnaganti Subject: Re: Regarding cloudstack automation So far i have found the failure on following scripts: 1. test_loadbalance 2. test_network 3. test_nic In runinfo.txt log it is stuck at the step: SSH into VM (IPaddress: 10.1.1.55) NAT Rule (Public IP: 207.x.x.x) PFA the Marvin logs for the test_loadbalance.py script. I have modified the following entry in the script i.e. provided the correct template name which is present. ostype: CentOS 6.4 (64-bit), #ostype: CentOS 5.3 (64-bit), Please let me know for your comments. Thanks and Regards -- Umesh Kute On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.commailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.commailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.commailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com wrote: You can log the bug for this. We have fixed few other issues along with this in a private branch. Will soon merge with ACS. If you need a temporary fix, let me know. Question : Related to ssh issue, ssh to vm failing at which part? Can you add some information related to ssh failure which test module, which case etc? This may be related\unrelated to
Re: help testing 4.3
On 14.01.2014 14:13, sebgoa wrote: Hi, While 4.2.1 was just announced, 4.3 is coming in fast. To try to cut down on the number of votes necessary to get the release out we need any help we can get testing 4.3 you can grab the latest rpms at: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-package-rpm/ And the latest debs at: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-package-deb/ Please test in your own infrastructure and report any issues to d...@cloudstack.apache.org You can also create JIRA tickets at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK and put the 4.3 version number. thanks, -Sebastien Nice, will do! IS there anything in particular we should look for? What are new features that need more thorough testing? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: help testing 4.3
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:55 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tuna, send an email to dev with a pointer to the exact commits your are talking about will do. Thanks Sebastien! --Tuna
Re: help testing 4.3
On Jan 14, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 14.01.2014 14:13, sebgoa wrote: Hi, While 4.2.1 was just announced, 4.3 is coming in fast. To try to cut down on the number of votes necessary to get the release out we need any help we can get testing 4.3 you can grab the latest rpms at: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-package-rpm/ And the latest debs at: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-package-deb/ Please test in your own infrastructure and report any issues to d...@cloudstack.apache.org You can also create JIRA tickets at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK and put the 4.3 version number. thanks, -Sebastien Nice, will do! IS there anything in particular we should look for? What are new features that need more thorough testing? If you can test for your regular use cases -hypervisor, OS, snapshots etc..- as well as upgrade and upgrade docs, that would be great. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: [Doc] [4.3] Service Monitoring Tool for Virtual Router for Review [CLOUDSTACK-5292]
Hi Radhika, Sanjeev: Thanks for the answer, makes a bit more sense now. --David On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote: Hi David, For this release, there is no admin-specific actions, but in the coming releases there are enhancements coming which alerts the admin. Keeping those enhancements in mind, I added this content. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 7:59 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [Doc] [4.3] Service Monitoring Tool for Virtual Router for Review [CLOUDSTACK-5292] Hi Radhika: So I read this section and while the documentation is clear on what it does; it's not clear on how I use it. If it isn't intended to be exposed to the administrator and just runs in the background like so many things in CloudStack does already, why document it at all in the admin guide? Why I read that there is a monitoring tool it instantly makes me want to go check status, so that I know that I can verify status if something goes awry. --David On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, 4.3 Documentation is getting ready to be reviewed. I have prepared the first draft for the feature, Enhanced Upgrade for Virtual Router. Please see section 16.5.4. Service Monitoring Tool for Virtual Router, and let me know your feedback. 1.The documentation is uploaded at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ CLOUDSTACK-5292https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5292 2. Regards -Radhika
Where can I find the latest Cloudstack XenServer 6.2.0 supplemental package ? (need OVS tunnel functionality)
Hi everyone, I am currently building a test environment comprised of: - Cloudstack version 4.2.0 - Citrix XenServer 6.2.0 (free trial version from store.citrix.com) The final purpose is to create an advanced zone with GRE isolation. I have been running into a number of problems and finally narrowed it down to these 2 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4599 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3174 CLOUDSTACK-3174 seems to be the actual problem and I can see there is a fix provided: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12445/diff/#1 If I check '/etc/xapi.d/plugins/ovstunnel' plugin on my XenServer, I can see that I am missing the fix mentioned in CLOUDSTACK-3174. During XenServer installation, a CloudStack XenServer support package was installed as mentioned in the install guide section 8.2.7, from the following link: http://download.cloud.com/releases/3.0.1/XS-6.0.2/xenserver-cloud-supp.tgz Is there an updated version of this support package ? How can I browse a list of these packages ? Or to put it simply in other words, how can I make XenServer 6.2.0 and Cloudstack 4.2.0 work with the following fetaures: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/OVS+Tunnel+Manager+for+CloudStack https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Add+Xen+and+XCP+support+for+GRE+SDN+controller (I think it is worth mentioning that in my setup, advanced zone with VLAN isolation is also not working due to the same OVS tunnel issues) Thank you in advance, Florin - Florin Dumitrascu Senior Software Engineer Intune Networks Ltd Park West Business Park Dublin 12, Ireland - IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
Active-Active CloudStack, what about cloudstack-usage?
Quick question, We deployed two management servers for CloudStack, and they are behind a load balancer to be able to use them in active-active. What about the usage service? Does it need to run only on one node or both? Thanks! -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_
Re: Active-Active CloudStack, what about cloudstack-usage?
It needs to run only on one node - but I don't think there are any deleterious effects (aside from wasted CPU cycles) from having more than one. --David On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote: Quick question, We deployed two management servers for CloudStack, and they are behind a load balancer to be able to use them in active-active. What about the usage service? Does it need to run only on one node or both? Thanks! -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_
Re: Active-Active CloudStack, what about cloudstack-usage?
OK. Any chance of duplicate entries if we have two usage server running? Francois On 1/14/2014, 2:19 PM, David Nalley wrote: It needs to run only on one node - but I don't think there are any deleterious effects (aside from wasted CPU cycles) from having more than one. --David On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote: Quick question, We deployed two management servers for CloudStack, and they are behind a load balancer to be able to use them in active-active. What about the usage service? Does it need to run only on one node or both? Thanks! -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_ -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_
Re: just 2 questions
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Shanker Balan shanker.ba...@shapeblue.comwrote: 1. it's possible expand the hard drive for an instance? how ? You can’t resize the “root” disk as of now. A data disk can be resized. http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Admin_Guide/working-with-volumes.html do you know if this option will be ported in a new version of CloudStack? -- Hollman Eduardo Enciso R. http://nexxuz.com http://algolibre.com http://www.hollmanenciso.com/ @hollman
Re: Active-Active CloudStack, what about cloudstack-usage?
Shouldn't be any issue with that. --David On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote: OK. Any chance of duplicate entries if we have two usage server running? Francois On 1/14/2014, 2:19 PM, David Nalley wrote: It needs to run only on one node - but I don't think there are any deleterious effects (aside from wasted CPU cycles) from having more than one. --David On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote: Quick question, We deployed two management servers for CloudStack, and they are behind a load balancer to be able to use them in active-active. What about the usage service? Does it need to run only on one node or both? Thanks! -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_ -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_
RE: just 2 questions
If you need to, I believe you can resize the Root Volume on the Hypervisor, but obviously this will have be completed by Admins with Hypervisor access, and not normal users. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Hollman Enciso R. [mailto:hollman.enc...@gmail.com] Sent: 14 January 2014 20:51 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: just 2 questions On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Shanker Balan shanker.ba...@shapeblue.comwrote: 1. it's possible expand the hard drive for an instance? how ? You can’t resize the “root” disk as of now. A data disk can be resized. http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/A dmin_Guide/working-with-volumes.html do you know if this option will be ported in a new version of CloudStack? -- Hollman Eduardo Enciso R. http://nexxuz.com http://algolibre.com http://www.hollmanenciso.com/ @hollman Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 08/09 January 2014, Londonhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 13-17 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 20-24 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Cloudstack 4.2.1 / Xenserver 6.1 GRE tunnelling / createTunnelNetwork failed
Hi, I’ve spent a fair bit of lab time trying to get GRE tunnelling working in CloudStack 4.2.1 / Xenserver 6.1 but have had no luck so far. As per various posts, documents and wiki articles I’ve got: - Xenserver 6.1 cluster with all patches, CloudStack 4.2.1 installed from RPMs (CentOS 6.5). - Advanced zone configuration (no security groups). - Public and management networks configured with VLAN isolation (bonds). - sdn.ovs.controller set to “true, sdn.ovs.controller.default.label set to network label of the guest network. - Guest network traffic configured for GRE, IP interfaces configured on the guest network and “VLAN range” configured. The problem is tunnels won’t come up, tagged networks are created but no GRE tunnels are created between XS hosts. Whilst the SSVM and CP come online the domain router and the first VM fail to start. Checking the management server logs the root cause seems to point to a “createTunnelNetwork failed” error. Doing a bit more digging I found the following bug logged back in September: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4599 1) Considering the bug above was logged for CS4.1 - is GRE under active development as per 4.2.1/4.3? Is it considered to be a working component of CloudStack? 2) Has anyone managed to get GRE tunnelling working - if so are there any patches / workarounds / specific component versions required? Regards, Dag
CS 4.2 System VMs Secondary Storage VM
Hi all, my Secondary Storage VM Agent State keeps on changing Agent State connecting, change to Agent State Alert am unable to download ISOs, can someone help me? Thanks in advance!
Re: CS 4.2 System VMs Secondary Storage VM
Motty, What does your system look like? Is it single management server, or Multi management server? Basic or Advanced Networking? Hypervisor type? Was the SSVM previously working or is this a new build? Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37 On 14 Jan 2014, at 23:30, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.commailto:motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, my Secondary Storage VM Agent State keeps on changing Agent State connecting, change to Agent State Alert am unable to download ISOs, can someone help me? Thanks in advance! Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 08/09 January 2014, Londonhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 13-17 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 20-24 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: CS 4.2 System VMs Secondary Storage VM
I apologize for not being specific, is advance networking setup, hypervisor KVM. Management server is installed on a separate physical machine than the database and two KVM hypervisors in all four machines is a new setup, I have not being able to download ISOs successfully because of this program. Thanks for your reply On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Motty, What does your system look like? Is it single management server, or Multi management server? Basic or Advanced Networking? Hypervisor type? Was the SSVM previously working or is this a new build? Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37 On 14 Jan 2014, at 23:30, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.commailto: motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, my Secondary Storage VM Agent State keeps on changing Agent State connecting, change to Agent State Alert am unable to download ISOs, can someone help me? Thanks in advance! Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 08/09 January 2014, Londonhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 13-17 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 20-24 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: CS 4.2 System VMs Secondary Storage VM
How have you configured the networking on your hypervisors? What are your Bridges called? How many NICs? What KVM Traffic Labels have you used? Just heading off to the land of Nod, but will review in the morning (unless someone else does first) Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37 On 14 Jan 2014, at 23:55, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.commailto:motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: I apologize for not being specific, is advance networking setup, hypervisor KVM. Management server is installed on a separate physical machine than the database and two KVM hypervisors in all four machines is a new setup, I have not being able to download ISOs successfully because of this program. Thanks for your reply On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Motty, What does your system look like? Is it single management server, or Multi management server? Basic or Advanced Networking? Hypervisor type? Was the SSVM previously working or is this a new build? Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhttp://www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37 On 14 Jan 2014, at 23:30, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.commailto:motty.c...@gmail.commailto: motty.c...@gmail.commailto:motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, my Secondary Storage VM Agent State keeps on changing Agent State connecting, change to Agent State Alert am unable to download ISOs, can someone help me? Thanks in advance! Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 08/09 January 2014, Londonhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 13-17 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 20-24 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: CS 4.2 System VMs Secondary Storage VM
I have four network adapter two are going to storage, one is for public/guest and one for management so i have two briges cloudbr0 and cloudbr1 interface eth0 pong to cloudbr0 and eth1 poing to cloudbr1(management) I am able to ping to the bridges. when I go to Dashboard on the GUI, my secondary storage says 0 although I know we have used 5% of its capacity. I am able to ping storage server, even mount the a test directory. any suggestions? Thanks alot On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: How have you configured the networking on your hypervisors? What are your Bridges called? How many NICs? What KVM Traffic Labels have you used? Just heading off to the land of Nod, but will review in the morning (unless someone else does first) Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37 On 14 Jan 2014, at 23:55, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.commailto: motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: I apologize for not being specific, is advance networking setup, hypervisor KVM. Management server is installed on a separate physical machine than the database and two KVM hypervisors in all four machines is a new setup, I have not being able to download ISOs successfully because of this program. Thanks for your reply On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Motty, What does your system look like? Is it single management server, or Multi management server? Basic or Advanced Networking? Hypervisor type? Was the SSVM previously working or is this a new build? Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhttp://www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://37 On 14 Jan 2014, at 23:30, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.commailto: motty.c...@gmail.commailto: motty.c...@gmail.commailto:motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, my Secondary Storage VM Agent State keeps on changing Agent State connecting, change to Agent State Alert am unable to download ISOs, can someone help me? Thanks in advance! Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 08/09 January 2014, Londonhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 13-17 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 20-24 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from
Re: Active-Active CloudStack, what about cloudstack-usage?
I'm pretty sure this how we've run it in our shop since day one, and have had no issues. (we are in the 3.0.x stream however, so your mileage may vary) On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Pretty sure running on two nodes is not an issue, as all the data gets written into a single 'Cloud Usage' DB and gets de-duped etc. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: 14 January 2014 21:16 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com Subject: Re: Active-Active CloudStack, what about cloudstack-usage? Shouldn't be any issue with that. --David On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote: OK. Any chance of duplicate entries if we have two usage server running? Francois On 1/14/2014, 2:19 PM, David Nalley wrote: It needs to run only on one node - but I don't think there are any deleterious effects (aside from wasted CPU cycles) from having more than one. --David On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote: Quick question, We deployed two management servers for CloudStack, and they are behind a load balancer to be able to use them in active-active. What about the usage service? Does it need to run only on one node or both? Thanks! -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_ -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_ Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 08/09 January 2014, Londonhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 13-17 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 20-24 January 2014, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Cloudstack 4.2.1 / Xenserver 6.1 GRE tunnelling / createTunnelNetwork failed
Hi Dag, I updated GRE modules to make it work fine with XenServer and XCP during the summer. It now appears on master branch. Maybe it will added to future releases. Will looking into your issue to find out the problem. Thanks, --Tuna Sent from my GT-N7000 On Jan 15, 2014 5:53 AM, Dag Sonstebo d...@sonstebo.co.uk wrote: Hi, I’ve spent a fair bit of lab time trying to get GRE tunnelling working in CloudStack 4.2.1 / Xenserver 6.1 but have had no luck so far. As per various posts, documents and wiki articles I’ve got: - Xenserver 6.1 cluster with all patches, CloudStack 4.2.1 installed from RPMs (CentOS 6.5). - Advanced zone configuration (no security groups). - Public and management networks configured with VLAN isolation (bonds). - sdn.ovs.controller set to “true, sdn.ovs.controller.default.label set to network label of the guest network. - Guest network traffic configured for GRE, IP interfaces configured on the guest network and “VLAN range” configured. The problem is tunnels won’t come up, tagged networks are created but no GRE tunnels are created between XS hosts. Whilst the SSVM and CP come online the domain router and the first VM fail to start. Checking the management server logs the root cause seems to point to a “createTunnelNetwork failed” error. Doing a bit more digging I found the following bug logged back in September: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4599 1) Considering the bug above was logged for CS4.1 - is GRE under active development as per 4.2.1/4.3? Is it considered to be a working component of CloudStack? 2) Has anyone managed to get GRE tunnelling working - if so are there any patches / workarounds / specific component versions required? Regards, Dag
