Re: What is your setup?
What about Xen makes it superior to KVM? On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Serge van Ginderachter se...@vanginderachter.be wrote: KVM, as we need Ceph support On 6 February 2014 04:39, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote: Xen= BMW great ride, reasonable costs, easy to maintain BMW reasonable cost? You shouldn't drink and drive.
RE: Capture messages printed in the VM console
Hi Iliyas, The VM console which you see in browser is image. So its not possible to copy text from console. Regards, Anshul -Original Message- From: iliyas shirol [mailto:iliyas.shi...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 3:15 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Capture messages printed in the VM console Hi, Is there any way to copy the messages printed in the console opened for a VM in a browser ? I tried using the US Standard key pairs to copy but it didn't work. Thanks. -- - Md. Iliyas Shirol Mobile : +91 9902 977 800 Google : iliyas.shirol@ gmail.com
RE: Capture messages printed in the VM console
If you want to do it anyway take console's screenshot and then covert it into text or pdf. Thanks prashant -Original Message- From: Anshul Gangwar [mailto:anshul.gang...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 3:33 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Capture messages printed in the VM console Hi Iliyas, The VM console which you see in browser is image. So its not possible to copy text from console. Regards, Anshul -Original Message- From: iliyas shirol [mailto:iliyas.shi...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 3:15 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Capture messages printed in the VM console Hi, Is there any way to copy the messages printed in the console opened for a VM in a browser ? I tried using the US Standard key pairs to copy but it didn't work. Thanks. -- - Md. Iliyas Shirol Mobile : +91 9902 977 800 Google : iliyas.shirol@ gmail.com
Reg: Storage tags
Hi, I have setup storage tags for my infra. Then use that tag to create service offering and launch vms. Instance not launch also i am unable to remove storage tags any more. If i removed again it appears and set. Is this bug in cloudstack 4.2.1 Regards, Prakash.M
Re: Unusual bare-metal scenario - practical?
Hi Dustin, I am far from an expert on all of the baremetal stuff but I'll try and take a first stab; and I've cced some folks who should be able to help provide better answers. Thanks! Apologies for the delay in replying - I was hoping to hear from Frank or others, and in the interim I was getting a simple CS instance set up using KVM, so I could be confident that the non-baremetal stuff was functional. I think the documents that you found are largely from a wiki migration - I've linked to some of the others below that are a bit more updated. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+KickStart https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Enhanced+Baremetal+support+on+Cisco+UCS https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Plug-ins%2C+Modules%2C+and+Extensions Thanks! It took me a lot of staring at the first link to realize that Use cases is not use cases at all, but a cleverly disguised set of steps to use baremetal support: create a network offering with network service: userdata, sercuritygroup, baremetalpxeservice selected, we assume using external DHCP service in this example. Using external DHCP appears not to work - when creating the pod later, I see Service Dhcp is not supported by the network offering [Network Offering [15-Guest-BareMetal]. Enabling this, with the bare-metal provider, helps. create a basic zone with aforementioned network offering. create a Pod. The guest ip range adding to Pod must be in the same subnet of host's IPMI ip. Reserved ip range for CloudStack service VM is never used. This requirement will be problematic. Is it necessary that it be in the same subnet, or just that it have IP connectivity to that subnet? configure hosts and write up information of IPMI ip, IPMI account/password, MAC address of nic which will broadcast DHCP request install a CentOS VM to the zone. Install CloudStack baremetal agent in it and run cloud-setup-baremetal, write up information printed out. for each switch in the zone enable DHCP forwarding to this CentOS VM. This zone doesn't support KVM, so I can't create a VM in it. Any idea what was intended here? add OS installed in step 5 to CloudStack by API addBaremetalPxeKickStartServer create a Cluster with hypervisor type BareMetal And I tried to jump ahead to this part, but the cluster I added is now wedged: just shows the spinner in the UI, and the settings tab says ERROR. So I'm a bit stuck right now. Can anyone help? Dustin
XEN vs. KVM
Dear colleagues, I'm using CloudStack with KVM for a year and a half, but, as I can see, some people would recommend to use XEN instead of KVM, because it's better. Would anybody be so kind as to explain why XEN is better than KVM? Thank you very much in advance! -- Best regards and wishes, Vladimir Melnik
XEN vs KVM
Dear colleagues, I'm using CloudStack with KVM for a year and a half, but, as I can see, some people would recommend to use XEN instead of KVM, because it's better. Would anybody be so kind as to explain why XEN is better than KVM? Thank you very much in advance! -- Best regards and wishes, Vladimir Melnik
Re: What is your setup?
All of the above. KVM is our leading hypervisor at the moment. On 02/05/2014 08:24 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: Just a general question What is YOUR favorite setup? KVM? Xen? VmWare? - Maurice -- Thanks, *Dave Hoffman* System Administrator | Appcore - the business of cloud computing® Office +1.800.735.7104 | Fax +1.515.612.7878 Direct +1.515.612.7808 | Mobile +1.515.966.4633 dave.hoff...@appcore.com mailto:dave.hoff...@appcore.com | www.appcore.com http://www.appcore.com -- The information in this message is intended for the named recipients only. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, do not print it or disseminate it or its contents. In such event, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the e-mail file immediately thereafter. Thank you.
Re: XEN vs. KVM
On 06.02.2014 12:48, v.mel...@uplink.ua wrote: Dear colleagues, I'm using CloudStack with KVM for a year and a half, but, as I can see, some people would recommend to use XEN instead of KVM, because it's better. Would anybody be so kind as to explain why XEN is better than KVM? Thank you very much in advance! Hello, This has been discussed recently, check this http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.user/9516 HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: What is your setup?
On 06.02.2014 08:03, Zack Payton wrote: What about Xen makes it superior to KVM? On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Serge van Ginderachter se...@vanginderachter.be wrote: KVM, as we need Ceph support On 6 February 2014 04:39, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote: Xen= BMW great ride, reasonable costs, easy to maintain BMW reasonable cost? You shouldn't drink and drive. Check this http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.user/9516 -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
RE: XEN vs. KVM
The following slides Hypervisor Selection in CloudStack may also be helpful. They also present the capabilities of CloudStack which can be enabled based on the hypervisor selection: http://www.slideshare.net/TimMackey/collab-hypervisor-selection-28746763 Best Regards, Tariq Iqbal S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447909911600 tariq.iq...@shapeblue.com | Twitter: @TariqIqbal_ -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 06 February 2014 14:43 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: XEN vs. KVM On 06.02.2014 12:48, v.mel...@uplink.ua wrote: Dear colleagues, I'm using CloudStack with KVM for a year and a half, but, as I can see, some people would recommend to use XEN instead of KVM, because it's better. Would anybody be so kind as to explain why XEN is better than KVM? Thank you very much in advance! Hello, This has been discussed recently, check this http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.user/9516 HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Basic Zone Configuration
Thanks to all, I'll try it and I'll report you if it works! * Jose * El 05/02/2014 20:50, Umair Azam escribió: Lopez, You can specify google DNS 8.8.8.8 and internal DNS which is used by your company, I would suggest to google such issues first, you would get solutions as they have been addressed previously many times. Umair Azam Associate Systems Administrator Network Operations Center i2c Incorporated 1300 Island Drive, Suite 105 Redwood City, CA 94065-5170 Desk: +1 650.480.5291 PBX: +1 650.593.5400 x 4244 24x7 NOC: +1 650.480.5291 Fax: +1 650.593.5402 URL: www.i2cinc.com ** CONFIDENTIALITY CAUTION This communication (including any accompanying documents) is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) and contains information that is PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. Unauthorized reading, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, telephone or fax and promptly destroy the original communication. Thank you for your cooperation. On 2/5/2014 11:58 PM, José Egas López wrote: Hi, I have a doubt about the DNS Servers when adding a zone. I have one DNS (Active Directory) on my datacenter, when adding a zone it asks to enter DNS 1 and 2, and also Internal DNS 1 and 2, what does it exactly means? Do I have to create new DNS servers? or is enough with the one I have? I don't understand it at all, thanks for your help! FARMAENLACE ha procesado su mensaje y esta limpio No imprima este mail a menos que sea necesario FARMAENLACE ha procesado su mensaje y esta limpio No imprima este mail a menos que sea necesario
Re: CS 4.2 KVM - unable to give instances more than 3GB or RAM
Hi Marty, I am running CentOS 6.5 64bit host with CloudStack 4.2.0, I am having a lot of issues. I can't install FreeBSD 10 64bit only FreeBSD 9.2 i386. can't allocate more than 3GB of RAM on guest instances, running 64bit Centos on guest. any recommendations? On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote: This was brought up last month in the dev mailing list, look for 'KVM memory overprovision breaking me'. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201401.mbox/date?16 This explains the background behind it quite well: http://blog.braastad.org/?p=211 'rmmod virtio-balloon' is a temporary fix, however I am running KVM with 4.2.0 and I have never had this issue (currentMemory always equals memory). Marty On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:10 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for your reply namei-2-95-VM/name uuid129a3e1b-ce45-4d9f-9f3f-af95b82dfe09/uuid descriptionOther PV (64-bit)/description memory unit='KiB'8388608/memory currentMemory unit='KiB'4194304/currentMemory vcpu placement='static'2/vcpu cputune shares2000/shares /cputune os type arch='x86_64' machine='rhel6.5.0'hvm/type boot dev='cdrom'/ in the machines : [root@hdp1 ~]# free -m total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 3774 3610164 0 4553 -/+ buffers/cache: 3052722 Swap: 7999 1692 6307 [root@hdp1 ~]# uname -a Linux hdp1.fqdn.com 2.6.32-431.3.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jan 3 21:39:27 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote: Also, it might be worth confirming the VM is 64bit. # uname -a Marty On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Can you run the following command on the hypervisor where the VM resides: # virsh dumpxml i-X-XX Where i-X-XX is the internal system name of the VM. Marty On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:55 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, I created a System Offering with 2 Core CPU and 8GB or RAM. when I build the first Instance it only had 3GB, a CentOS VM 64bit less /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 3865376 KB. any idea how to fix this issue?
RE: change of Public IP range
Andrei, Is this a live production system with lots of customer VMs or just a test environment? Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com] Sent: 06 February 2014 16:53 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: change of Public IP range Hello guys, We are planning to change our public IP range and I was hoping some could help me with the procedure on how this could be done in ACS? I can't find a way to do it from GUI, so perhaps there are API calls that I am not aware of. Any help would be appreciated. Many thanks Andrei Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: change of Public IP range
Geoff, it's a live system with testing customers. It would be ideal to have this done without much of a downtime. We can schedule a maintenance window over a weekend if required. Cheers - Original Message - From: Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 6 February, 2014 4:56:23 PM Subject: RE: change of Public IP range Andrei, Is this a live production system with lots of customer VMs or just a test environment? Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com] Sent: 06 February 2014 16:53 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: change of Public IP range Hello guys, We are planning to change our public IP range and I was hoping some could help me with the procedure on how this could be done in ACS? I can't find a way to do it from GUI, so perhaps there are API calls that I am not aware of. Any help would be appreciated. Many thanks Andrei Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
change of Public IP range
Hello guys, We are planning to change our public IP range and I was hoping some could help me with the procedure on how this could be done in ACS? I can't find a way to do it from GUI, so perhaps there are API calls that I am not aware of. Any help would be appreciated. Many thanks Andrei
CS 4.2 KVM CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=yes
Hi, excuse me dumb questions, what file do I configure to enable this options CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=yes Centos 6.5 KVM Thanks,
RE: change of Public IP range
I was running a cloudstack bootcamp course last week and this very issue came up as we had to use a new CIDR for the Public traffic. Unfortunately the simple answer is that there is no official way of achieving this, but it can be achieved via some database 'manipulation' You first need to add the new Public IP Range, then locate the records for the System VMs and Virtual Routers and update them so they point at the new IPs and not the old ones, then restart all of them. Once the old Public IPs are no longer in use, you will be able to remove them from the UI. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com] Sent: 06 February 2014 17:00 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: change of Public IP range Geoff, it's a live system with testing customers. It would be ideal to have this done without much of a downtime. We can schedule a maintenance window over a weekend if required. Cheers - Original Message - From: Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 6 February, 2014 4:56:23 PM Subject: RE: change of Public IP range Andrei, Is this a live production system with lots of customer VMs or just a test environment? Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com] Sent: 06 February 2014 16:53 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: change of Public IP range Hello guys, We are planning to change our public IP range and I was hoping some could help me with the procedure on how this could be done in ACS? I can't find a way to do it from GUI, so perhaps there are API calls that I am not aware of. Any help would be appreciated. Many thanks Andrei Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: What is your setup?
I use all three of them regularly, but I find Xen the easiest with CloudStack. On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:26 PM, huzef...@gmail.com wrote: VMware On 06-Feb-2014, at 8:30 am, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Maurice Lawler maur...@daoenix.com wrote: Just a general question What is YOUR favorite setup? KVM? Xen? VmWare? XEN XEN XEN. - Maurice -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)*
Re: change of Public IP range
Geoff, Many thanks. I thought that it would not be easy, but it doesn't sound that bad. I've previously changed the internal IPs using database changes, so it looks likes a very similar procedure apart from the restart of the networks / VRs. Thanks for the tip Andrei - Original Message - From: Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 6 February, 2014 5:07:00 PM Subject: RE: change of Public IP range I was running a cloudstack bootcamp course last week and this very issue came up as we had to use a new CIDR for the Public traffic. Unfortunately the simple answer is that there is no official way of achieving this, but it can be achieved via some database 'manipulation' You first need to add the new Public IP Range, then locate the records for the System VMs and Virtual Routers and update them so they point at the new IPs and not the old ones, then restart all of them. Once the old Public IPs are no longer in use, you will be able to remove them from the UI. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com] Sent: 06 February 2014 17:00 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: change of Public IP range Geoff, it's a live system with testing customers. It would be ideal to have this done without much of a downtime. We can schedule a maintenance window over a weekend if required. Cheers - Original Message - From: Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 6 February, 2014 4:56:23 PM Subject: RE: change of Public IP range Andrei, Is this a live production system with lots of customer VMs or just a test environment? Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com] Sent: 06 February 2014 16:53 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: change of Public IP range Hello guys, We are planning to change our public IP range and I was hoping some could help me with the procedure on how this could be done in ACS? I can't find a way to do it from GUI, so perhaps there are API calls that I am not aware of. Any help would be appreciated. Many thanks Andrei Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: CS 4.2 KVM CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=yes
On 06.02.2014 17:03, motty cruz wrote: Hi, excuse me dumb questions, what file do I configure to enable this options CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=yes Centos 6.5 KVM Thanks, This is a kernel module required by KVM VMs in certain situations (not for ACS AFAIK). If it's not listed in `lsmod` you can do a modprobe virtio_balloon to load it. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: CS 4.2 KVM CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=yes
Thanks Nux, I am using over-provision, so I had to enable that feature in /boot/config--current-linux kernel. if I do rmmod virtio-balloon guest machines are able to see all RAM allocated to them but if I do modprobe virtio-balloon guest machines only see half of the RAM allocated. even if I turned over-provission off, guest machines only see half of RAM allocated to them. On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 06.02.2014 17:03, motty cruz wrote: Hi, excuse me dumb questions, what file do I configure to enable this options CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=yes Centos 6.5 KVM Thanks, This is a kernel module required by KVM VMs in certain situations (not for ACS AFAIK). If it's not listed in `lsmod` you can do a modprobe virtio_balloon to load it. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: CS 4.2 KVM CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=yes
On 06.02.2014 17:34, motty cruz wrote: Thanks Nux, I am using over-provision, so I had to enable that feature in /boot/config--current-linux kernel. if I do rmmod virtio-balloon guest machines are able to see all RAM allocated to them but if I do modprobe virtio-balloon guest machines only see half of the RAM allocated. even if I turned over-provission off, guest machines only see half of RAM allocated to them. Yeah, over-provisioning in KVM is a bit tricky. In 4.3 we'll have the option not to have the VMs memory size messed with and can use KSM for memory de-duplication. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: CS 4.2 KVM - unable to give instances more than 3GB or RAM
Hi Motty, I just saw your other email, found this ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5968) this morning, might be worth upgrading CS to the latest master? (or 4.3 forward?) Not sure why I haven't been hit by these memory commit issues, I have several VMS with 20GB and 60GB RAM with no issues. Host: Ubuntu 12.04, various Guests. Below is my overprovisioning factor: mem.overprovisioning.factorUsed for memory overprovisioning calculation1.5 I feel there is some confusion in the mailing list about this issue. My understanding is that the overprovisioning factor effects the overall statistics of the host, therefore, if a host had 10GB of RAM and a mem.overprovisioning.factor of 1.5, CS could allocate upto 15GB of VM memory. Is this incorrect? I came to this conclusion by the normal terminology of 'over-provisioning' and the basis that CPU is done in that fashion 'Used for CPU overprovisioning calculation; available CPU will be (actualCpuCapacity * cpu.overprovisioning.factor)', also storage Used for storage overprovisioning calculation; available storage will be (actualStorageSize * storage.overprovisioning.factor). It seems odd the random spike of people complaining about this issue, I personally have never seen CS do this before, either in real life or on the mailing lists last year. Marty On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Marty, I am running CentOS 6.5 64bit host with CloudStack 4.2.0, I am having a lot of issues. I can't install FreeBSD 10 64bit only FreeBSD 9.2 i386. can't allocate more than 3GB of RAM on guest instances, running 64bit Centos on guest. any recommendations? On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote: This was brought up last month in the dev mailing list, look for 'KVM memory overprovision breaking me'. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201401.mbox/date?16 This explains the background behind it quite well: http://blog.braastad.org/?p=211 'rmmod virtio-balloon' is a temporary fix, however I am running KVM with 4.2.0 and I have never had this issue (currentMemory always equals memory). Marty On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:10 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for your reply namei-2-95-VM/name uuid129a3e1b-ce45-4d9f-9f3f-af95b82dfe09/uuid descriptionOther PV (64-bit)/description memory unit='KiB'8388608/memory currentMemory unit='KiB'4194304/currentMemory vcpu placement='static'2/vcpu cputune shares2000/shares /cputune os type arch='x86_64' machine='rhel6.5.0'hvm/type boot dev='cdrom'/ in the machines : [root@hdp1 ~]# free -m total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 3774 3610164 0 4 553 -/+ buffers/cache: 3052722 Swap: 7999 1692 6307 [root@hdp1 ~]# uname -a Linux hdp1.fqdn.com 2.6.32-431.3.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jan 3 21:39:27 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote: Also, it might be worth confirming the VM is 64bit. # uname -a Marty On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Can you run the following command on the hypervisor where the VM resides: # virsh dumpxml i-X-XX Where i-X-XX is the internal system name of the VM. Marty On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:55 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, I created a System Offering with 2 Core CPU and 8GB or RAM. when I build the first Instance it only had 3GB, a CentOS VM 64bit less /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 3865376 KB. any idea how to fix this issue?
CLOUDSTACK-6015
Sebastien: I have some experience in writing selenium test scripts again web GUI. I'd like to work on this issue. We can talk about the scope of the tests. Could you please assign this issue to me? (I cannot do it myself [?]) Thanks. yichi
RE: change of Public IP range
I had a similar situation deploying AD w/ DNS on our CloudStack build, having to create a new type of network that can assign public IPs, get the vnet auto linked to the public bridge, etc. Basically had to create a shared network, then alter the database record for the network, vlan, and nics. Then I had to edit the entire user_ip_address entries to change the reserved IP list so DHCP would provide IPs on the same subnet as the public network. Fun stuff! -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 9:07 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: change of Public IP range I was running a cloudstack bootcamp course last week and this very issue came up as we had to use a new CIDR for the Public traffic. Unfortunately the simple answer is that there is no official way of achieving this, but it can be achieved via some database 'manipulation' You first need to add the new Public IP Range, then locate the records for the System VMs and Virtual Routers and update them so they point at the new IPs and not the old ones, then restart all of them. Once the old Public IPs are no longer in use, you will be able to remove them from the UI. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com] Sent: 06 February 2014 17:00 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: change of Public IP range Geoff, it's a live system with testing customers. It would be ideal to have this done without much of a downtime. We can schedule a maintenance window over a weekend if required. Cheers - Original Message - From: Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 6 February, 2014 4:56:23 PM Subject: RE: change of Public IP range Andrei, Is this a live production system with lots of customer VMs or just a test environment? Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com] Sent: 06 February 2014 16:53 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: change of Public IP range Hello guys, We are planning to change our public IP range and I was hoping some could help me with the procedure on how this could be done in ACS? I can't find a way to do it from GUI, so perhaps there are API calls that I am not aware of. Any help would be appreciated. Many thanks Andrei Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil
Re: Guest reports wrong amount of RAM with RAM overprovisioning
Hi Andrija, did you resolve issue you were having with RAM and over-provision? I'm having same issues. my cluster is a KVM, I have CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=y in /boot/config-'uname -r' Thanks On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.comwrote: Just lowered overprovisioning of RAM from 2 to 1, and started the same VM again, and I got good amount of RAM from inside the guest. when I do the ps aux thing from host, I get 100% same qemu-kvm parameters, confirmed by diff... How is this possible ? On 24 October 2013 22:53, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have updated to CS 4.2 (not sure that my problem has to do anything with that...) I have RAM overprovisioning level of 2 on Cluster level. And after I start VM with compute ofering of 2GHZ (1x2gHz) and 2GB of ram, it does invoke qemu-kvm with good parameters (2048M), but inside my VM when doing top, or free -m, it reports rougly 50% of that amount: Here is the ps axu | grep vname #from host on which VM is running: root 17264 5.9 2.1 3447568 1090636 ? Sl 22:35 0:23 /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -name i-2-248-VM -S -M rhel6.4.0 -enable-kvm *-m 2048 -*smp 1,sockets=1,cores=1,threads=1 -uuid 45087776-1238-4255-a87f-7ae6bcddc4a3 -nodefconfig -nodefaults -chardev socket,id=charmonitor,path=/ var/lib/libvirt/qemu/i-2-248-VM.monitor,server,nowait -mon chardev=charmonitor,id=monitor,mode=control -rtc base=utc -no-shutdown -device piix3-usb-uhci,id=usb,bus=pci.0,addr=0x1.0x2 -drive file=/var/lib/libvirt/images/aa0d036a-f814-4cd8-991f- d0a0ad21a7d4,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,format=qcow2,cache=none -device virtio-blk-pci,scsi=off,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4,drive=drive- virtio-disk0,id=virtio-disk0,bootindex=2 -drive if=none,media=cdrom,id=drive-ide0-1-0,readonly=on,format=raw,cache=none -device ide-drive,bus=ide.1,unit=0,drive=drive-ide0-1-0,id=ide0-1-0,bootindex=1 -netdev tap,fd=23,id=hostnet0,vhost=on,vhostfd=36 -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=06:b0:24:00:00:66,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3 -chardev pty,id=charserial0 -device isa-serial,chardev=charserial0,id=serial0 -device usb-tablet,id=input0 -vnc0.0.0.0:12,password -vga cirrus -device virtio-balloon-pci,id=balloon0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5 From inside VM: # free -m *total* used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: *853* 92761 0 5 28 -/+ buffers/cache: 58795 Swap: 4095 0 4095 Same for top. Not sure what is happening, has to do something with RAM overprovisioning factor ? How is this possible, when qemu-kvm parameteres seems fine (-m 2048) Thanks, -- Andrija Panić -- Andrija Panić -- http://admintweets.com --
RE: CLOUDSTACK-6015
There was some efforts on selenium earlier; please see https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;f=test/selenium;h=a395204062849493e44ac26964165ed855aa39d8;hb=refs/heads/master https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+Automation+using+Selenium+and+Python Regards, Rayees From: Yichi Lu [mailto:yichi...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 12:13 PM To: run...@gmail.com; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CLOUDSTACK-6015 Sebastien: I have some experience in writing selenium test scripts again web GUI. I'd like to work on this issue. We can talk about the scope of the tests. Could you please assign this issue to me? (I cannot do it myself [cid:33D@goomoji.gmail] ) Thanks. yichi
Re: CLOUDSTACK-6015
Rayees: Does that mean that someone else already owns this issue? Yichi On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Rayees Namathponnan rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com wrote: There was some efforts on selenium earlier; please see https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;f=test/selenium;h=a395204062849493e44ac26964165ed855aa39d8;hb=refs/heads/master https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+Automation+using+Selenium+and+Python Regards, Rayees From: Yichi Lu [mailto:yichi...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 12:13 PM To: run...@gmail.com; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CLOUDSTACK-6015 Sebastien: I have some experience in writing selenium test scripts again web GUI. I'd like to work on this issue. We can talk about the scope of the tests. Could you please assign this issue to me? (I cannot do it myself [cid:33D@goomoji.gmail] ) Thanks. yichi
RE: CLOUDSTACK-6015
No one owns it now. Parth has setup framework, developed and ran a few BVT scripts. You can own it now and change and expand it bases on your expertise. -Original Message- From: Yichi Lu [mailto:yichi...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 1:20 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: run...@gmail.com Subject: Re: CLOUDSTACK-6015 Rayees: Does that mean that someone else already owns this issue? Yichi On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Rayees Namathponnan rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com wrote: There was some efforts on selenium earlier; please see https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;f=test /selenium;h=a395204062849493e44ac26964165ed855aa39d8;hb=refs/heads/mas ter https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+Automation+u sing+Selenium+and+Python Regards, Rayees From: Yichi Lu [mailto:yichi...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 12:13 PM To: run...@gmail.com; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CLOUDSTACK-6015 Sebastien: I have some experience in writing selenium test scripts again web GUI. I'd like to work on this issue. We can talk about the scope of the tests. Could you please assign this issue to me? (I cannot do it myself [cid:33D@goomoji.gmail] ) Thanks. yichi
Fwd: CloudStack stops the machine for no reason
if someone could help..
After the upgrade from version 3.0.2 to 4.2.1 appeared very strange error
associated with self-stopping machine after changing the offering.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Running instance of the machine
2. Stop with the operating system
3. Change offering of machine
4. Start the machine
5. Waiting for 10 minutes
6. CloudStack stops the machine for no reason
7. Restart the machine
8. Sometimes this situation repeats few times
In the logs you can find information:
2014-02-05 06:27:00,974 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-316:null) 11. The VM i-41-824-VM is in Running state
2014-02-05 06:27:00,974 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(DirectAgent-316:null) Seq 50-1756626952: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
160544475005497, via: 50, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ClusterSyncAnswer:{_clusterId:2,_newStates:{i-41-824-VM:{t:f32a4fee-b64e-4868-9c52-2a27e32d4c0e,u:Running,v:viridian:true;acpi:true;apic:true;pae:true;nx:false;timeoffset:0;cores-per-socket:4}},_isExecuted:false,result:true,wait:0}}]
}
2014-02-05 06:27:00,981 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(DirectAgent-316:null) VM i-41-824-VM: cs state = Running and realState =
Running
2014-02-05 06:27:00,981 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(DirectAgent-316:null) VM i-41-824-VM: cs state = Running and realState =
Running
2014-02-05 06:36:01,240 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(HA-Worker-1:work-1511) Seq 51-1374970375: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
160544475005497, via: 51, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand:{isProxy:false,executeInSequence:true,vmName:i-41-824-VM,wait:0}}]
}
2014-02-05 06:36:01,240 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(HA-Worker-1:work-1511) Seq 51-1374970375: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId:
160544475005497, via: 51, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand:{isProxy:false,executeInSequence:true,vmName:i-41-824-VM,wait:0}}]
}
2014-02-05 06:36:01,383 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-150:null) 9. The VM i-41-824-VM is in Stopping state
2014-02-05 06:36:27,625 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-150:null) 10. The VM i-41-824-VM is in Stopped state
You will notice that the stop of the machine corresponds to the component
HA-Worker.
Such operation after the upgrade is complicating work of users.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tomasz Zięba t.a.zi...@gmail.com
Date: 2014-02-05 17:40 GMT+01:00
Subject: CloudStack stops the machine for no reason
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org, users@cloudstack.apache.org
Hello,
Today I've submitted this bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6036
Could someone confirm the existence of the problems after the migration
from 3.0.2 to 4.2.1.
--
Regards,
Tomasz Zięba
Twitter: @TZieba
LinkedIn:
pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/
--
Regards,
Tomasz Zięba
Twitter: @TZieba
LinkedIn:
pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/
Re: What is your setup?
I prefer QEMU-KVM. _ Il 6 febbraio 2014 alle 18.15 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com ha scritto: I use all three of them regularly, but I find Xen the easiest with CloudStack. On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:26 PM, huzef...@gmail.com wrote: VMware On 06-Feb-2014, at 8:30 am, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Maurice Lawler maur...@daoenix.com wrote: Just a general question What is YOUR favorite setup? KVM? Xen? VmWare? XEN XEN XEN. - Maurice -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)* __ Sergio Tonani CSI Piemonte C.so Tazzoli 215 B - 10135 Torino Tel. +39 011.316.5843 e-mail: sergio.ton...@csi.it www.csipiemonte.it
