问题 InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|vm1]
Dear all
在创建实例的时候碰到这个问题：
{{
INFO [o.a.c.a.c.u.v.DeployVMCmd] (Job-Executor-15:ctx-1522f972
ctx-df9998b2) com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException:
Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|vm1]Scope=interface
com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
INFO [o.a.c.a.c.u.v.DeployVMCmd] (Job-Executor-15:ctx-1522f972
ctx-df9998b2) Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|vm1]
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a
deployment for VM[User|vm1]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
}}
再往前点日志：
{{
INFO [c.c.h.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl] (HA-2:ctx-6eacae6e)
checking health of usage server
WARN [o.a.c.alerts] (HA-2:ctx-6eacae6e) alertType:: 13 //
dataCenterId:: 0 // podId:: 0 // clusterId:: null // message:: No
usage server process running
INFO [c.c.n.v.VpcManagerImpl] (VpcChecker-1:ctx-f93671c3) Found 0
removed VPCs to cleanup
WARN [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl] (catalina-exec-18:ctx-4376b0fb
ctx-a51a5864) Unable to find provider Netscaler in physical network
id=200
WARN [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl] (catalina-exec-21:ctx-58ea5141
ctx-272a2b74) Unable to find provider Netscaler in physical network
id=200
WARN [o.a.c.alerts] (CapacityChecker:ctx-445e0e4f) alertType:: 0 //
dataCenterId:: 1 // podId:: 1 // clusterId:: null // message:: System
Alert: Low Available Memory in cluster kvmCluster1 pod pod1 of
availability zone C11F13
INFO [c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-23:ctx-c7f38f38 ctx-b1331d85)
The VLAN tag 177 is already being used for dynamic vlan allocation for
the guest network in zone C11F13
WARN [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-fe2dede2
ctx-0c9ac9f9) Unable to find provider Netscaler in physical network
id=200
WARN [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl] (catalina-exec-6:ctx-2d0b6f51
ctx-bd984fe7) Unable to find provider Netscaler in physical network
id=200
INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor] (Job-Executor-15:ctx-1522f972) Add
job-17 into job monitoring
WARN [o.a.c.alerts] (Job-Executor-15:ctx-1522f972 ctx-df9998b2)
alertType:: 8 // dataCenterId:: 1 // podId:: null // clusterId:: null
// message:: Failed to deploy Vm with Id: 3, on Host with Id: null
}}
这里有个警告说的是其中一台KVM内存不足，是因为这台KVM被装了SSVM CVM系统VM。
我有两个host，所以总的系统硬件应该是够了的。附件有截图。
我想解决的两个方法：
1. 打开更低级别的日志，看有没有更具体的办法？谁知道设置 /etc/cloudstack/management/log4j-cloud.xml
中的哪项？
2. 给那台KVM升级内存，直接关机插内存重启，cloudstack可以自动识别吗？
先谢过大家。
--
BR John (Pang Yujiang)
RE: Xenserver 6.2 SP1 Hotfix 4
Cheers Tim. I mean Hotfix 4 for SP1. http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX140417 Len -Original Message- From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 June 2014 15:48 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Xenserver 6.2 SP1 Hotfix 4 Len, 6.2 SP1 rolls up all previous hotfixes, plus adds a few of its own. I'd expect if you attempted to install HF004, that it would error out with a message about being already applied. -tim On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Len Bellemore len.bellem...@controlcircle.com wrote: Hi Guys, I've recently upgraded to XenServer 6.2 with CS 4.3. I've also applied XenServer 6.2 SP1. Do I need to apply Hotfix 4 as well? I read that it has some enhancements for CS built into the hotfix, but the release notes also state that I need to set up a dedicated SR for High Availability, which seems a bit odd. Do I need the hotfix? If so, do I really need to set up a dedicated HA SR? Cheers Len IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes
Re: Xenserver 6.2 SP1 Hotfix 4
Len, That release note was written from the perspective of a XenServer feature set which includes an HA capability. CloudStack doesn't use the native XenServer HA capability, and if you're using CloudStack you shouldn't enable the native XenServer HA environment lest it conflicts with the CloudStack HA service offering. Net of this, shared storage is required for native XenServer HA, but CloudStack has its own method. -tim On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Len Bellemore len.bellem...@controlcircle.com wrote: Cheers Tim. I mean Hotfix 4 for SP1. http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX140417 Len -Original Message- From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 June 2014 15:48 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Xenserver 6.2 SP1 Hotfix 4 Len, 6.2 SP1 rolls up all previous hotfixes, plus adds a few of its own. I'd expect if you attempted to install HF004, that it would error out with a message about being already applied. -tim On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Len Bellemore len.bellem...@controlcircle.com wrote: Hi Guys, I've recently upgraded to XenServer 6.2 with CS 4.3. I've also applied XenServer 6.2 SP1. Do I need to apply Hotfix 4 as well? I read that it has some enhancements for CS built into the hotfix, but the release notes also state that I need to set up a dedicated SR for High Availability, which seems a bit odd. Do I need the hotfix? If so, do I really need to set up a dedicated HA SR? Cheers Len IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes
RE: Xenserver 6.2 SP1 Hotfix 4
Cool, thanks Tim -Original Message- From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 June 2014 10:39 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Xenserver 6.2 SP1 Hotfix 4 Len, That release note was written from the perspective of a XenServer feature set which includes an HA capability. CloudStack doesn't use the native XenServer HA capability, and if you're using CloudStack you shouldn't enable the native XenServer HA environment lest it conflicts with the CloudStack HA service offering. Net of this, shared storage is required for native XenServer HA, but CloudStack has its own method. -tim On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Len Bellemore len.bellem...@controlcircle.com wrote: Cheers Tim. I mean Hotfix 4 for SP1. http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX140417 Len -Original Message- From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 June 2014 15:48 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Xenserver 6.2 SP1 Hotfix 4 Len, 6.2 SP1 rolls up all previous hotfixes, plus adds a few of its own. I'd expect if you attempted to install HF004, that it would error out with a message about being already applied. -tim On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Len Bellemore len.bellem...@controlcircle.com wrote: Hi Guys, I've recently upgraded to XenServer 6.2 with CS 4.3. I've also applied XenServer 6.2 SP1. Do I need to apply Hotfix 4 as well? I read that it has some enhancements for CS built into the hotfix, but the release notes also state that I need to set up a dedicated SR for High Availability, which seems a bit odd. Do I need the hotfix? If so, do I really need to set up a dedicated HA SR? Cheers Len IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes IMPORTANT NOTICE. This electronic message contains information from Control Circle Ltd, which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately. Activity and use of the ControlCircle e-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes
[URGENT] cloudstack SSVM and router failed to start after power blackout
OK this is my problem, after blackout I can''t start virtual router, and ssvm not detected in my cloudstack system. SSVM recreated itself but stuck in starting state. What should I do?Please help me..
Re: [URGENT] cloudstack SSVM and router failed to start after power blackout
Hi, SSVMs and VRs are stateless so if restarts are not working for you, you may (force) stop and remove them. The CloudStack HA thread(s) would kickstart new ones after a certain timeout, to speed this behaviour you may restart CloudStack as well. If your problem still persists after trying above you may try debugging the issue: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting Regards. On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:34 PM, dimas yoga pratama smid...@gmail.com wrote: OK this is my problem, after blackout I can''t start virtual router, and ssvm not detected in my cloudstack system. SSVM recreated itself but stuck in starting state. What should I do?Please help me..
Additional nics fails to get ip for ubuntu guest vm
Hello, We are running an ubuntu 13.10 vm. In addition to the default network, another nic has been added to the vm. Now when the vm boots up, the new interface eth1 is seen inside the guest but does not have an ip address. Executing a dhclient eth1 does get the correct IP. A look at the /etc/network/interaces file shows an entry corresponding to the eth0. There is no entry for eth1. On adding an entry for eth1, the problems appears to get fixed. Is this manual step to add the additional nics in the interfaces file missing in the documentation or is this a bug ? === auto eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp == Thanks Saurav
Re: [URGENT] cloudstack SSVM and router failed to start after power blackout
Hi, from the infrastructure tab I can detect the hosts, but both of the hosts show alert state., I already try to force reconnect but it fails. What should I do? Now the CPVM fail to start too. On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, SSVMs and VRs are stateless so if restarts are not working for you, you may (force) stop and remove them. The CloudStack HA thread(s) would kickstart new ones after a certain timeout, to speed this behaviour you may restart CloudStack as well. If your problem still persists after trying above you may try debugging the issue: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting Regards. On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:34 PM, dimas yoga pratama smid...@gmail.com wrote: OK this is my problem, after blackout I can''t start virtual router, and ssvm not detected in my cloudstack system. SSVM recreated itself but stuck in starting state. What should I do?Please help me..
Re: Cloud stack install issues
Hi Team cloudstack. I’ve recently installed cloudstack on CentOS 6.4. I’ve completed all the steps as explained at the “Apache cloudstack 4.0.2 quick install guide. But when I try to access cloud via http://lanip:8080/client, for the first time I get a white page no display. Can you please help me out on this because so far I can’t figure out what the issue might be. Thanks in advance!
Re: [URGENT] cloudstack SSVM and router failed to start after power blackout
I'm not sure what could be the specific issue. You can tail the management server logs to see what is failing. After you figure out the specific issue, you may share it with us with your host os, CloudStack version details and the connected host details. Regards. On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:01 PM, dimas yoga pratama smid...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, from the infrastructure tab I can detect the hosts, but both of the hosts show alert state., I already try to force reconnect but it fails. What should I do? Now the CPVM fail to start too. On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, SSVMs and VRs are stateless so if restarts are not working for you, you may (force) stop and remove them. The CloudStack HA thread(s) would kickstart new ones after a certain timeout, to speed this behaviour you may restart CloudStack as well. If your problem still persists after trying above you may try debugging the issue: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting Regards. On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:34 PM, dimas yoga pratama smid...@gmail.com wrote: OK this is my problem, after blackout I can''t start virtual router, and ssvm not detected in my cloudstack system. SSVM recreated itself but stuck in starting state. What should I do?Please help me..
Re: [URGENT] cloudstack SSVM and router failed to start after power blackout
management log : 2014-06-19 21:49:21,312 WARN [c.c.u.n.Link] (AgentManager-Selector:null) SSL: Fail to find the generated keystore. Loading fail-safe one to continue. 2014-06-19 21:49:11,585 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Ignoring VM in starting mode: r-71-VM 2014-06-19 21:49:11,585 DEBUG [c.c.h.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) VM does not require investigation so I'm marking it as Stopped: VM[DomainRouter|r-71-VM] 2014-06-19 21:49:11,585 WARN [o.a.c.f.j.AsyncJobExecutionContext] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Job is executed without a context, setup psudo job for the executing thread 2014-06-19 21:49:11,651 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Unable to transition the state but we're moving on because it's forced stop 2014-06-19 21:49:11,651 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Unable to cleanup VM: VM[DomainRouter|r-71-VM] ,since outstanding work item is not found 2014-06-19 21:49:11,651 ERROR [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Monitor ClusteredVirtualMachineManagerImpl says there is an error in the connect process for 2 due to Work item not found, We cannot stop VM[DomainRouter|r-71-VM] when it is in state Starting com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Work item not found, We cannot stop VM[DomainRouter|r-71-VM] when it is in state Starting at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStop(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1415) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStop(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1344) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStop(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1312) at com.cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.scheduleRestart(HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.java:346) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.compareState(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:2827) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.fullHostSync(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:2384) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.processConnect(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:3035) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.notifyMonitorsOfConnection(AgentManagerImpl.java:495) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.handleConnectedAgent(AgentManagerImpl.java:999) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.access$000(AgentManagerImpl.java:117) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl$HandleAgentConnectTask.runInContext(AgentManagerImpl.java:1082) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) 2014-06-19 21:49:08,251 DEBUG [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:ctx-c407a559) Zone 1 is not ready to launch secondary storage VM yet 2014-06-19 21:49:08,282 DEBUG [c.c.c.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-60f4b3c9) Zone 1 is not ready to launch console proxy yet 2014-06-19 21:49:01,197 DEBUG [c.c.n.NetworkUsageManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-342:ctx-b66d3294) Disconnected called on 2 with status Alert 2014-06-19 21:49:01,197 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-342:ctx-b66d3294) Sending Disconnect to listener: com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyListener 2014-06-19 21:49:01,198 DEBUG [c.c.h.Status] (AgentConnectTaskPool-342:ctx-b66d3294) Transition:[Resource state = Enabled, Agent event = AgentDisconnected, Host id = 2, name = host1.cloud.priv] 2014-06-19 21:49:01,259 DEBUG [c.c.h.Status] (AgentConnectTaskPool-342:ctx-b66d3294) Agent status update: [id = 2; name = host1.cloud.priv; old status = Connecting; event = AgentDisconnected; new status = Alert; old update count = 404; new update count = 405] 2014-06-19 21:49:01,259 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.ClusteredAgentManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-342:ctx-b66d3294) Notifying other nodes of to disconnect 2014-06-19 21:49:01,260 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-342:ctx-b66d3294) Failed to handle host connection: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to connect 2 2014-06-19 21:49:01,261 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-342:ctx-b66d3294) Can not send command com.cloud.agent.api.ReadyCommand due to Host 2 is
Re: [URGENT] cloudstack SSVM and router failed to start after power blackout
Hi Dimas, Looks like the VM is in starting state and CloudStack is unable to contact the agent. Hope you've removed the VR from CloudStack using the UI. You can try restarting the management server. The issue is of sync, where one party (mgmt server) has different view of the world than the other (the host/agent). In such cases, do not remove the host else when you re-add it, it may destroy all the (user) VMs on it or simply fail. If restarting won't fix the problem, in global settings reduce the expunge timeout (that's when CloudStack marks a VM as removed, since you've just destroyed it, it can take some time to get expunged) and try again. As a final course of action I would stop the management server, then ssh to the host and destroy SSVMs, using mysql client I would change db entries for SSVM to removed/expunged (simply mark by updating row, do not remove the row), start the mgmt server again and hope it would work this time. Suggestions anyone in such a case? Regards. On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:29 PM, dimas yoga pratama smid...@gmail.com wrote: management log : 2014-06-19 21:49:21,312 WARN [c.c.u.n.Link] (AgentManager-Selector:null) SSL: Fail to find the generated keystore. Loading fail-safe one to continue. 2014-06-19 21:49:11,585 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Ignoring VM in starting mode: r-71-VM 2014-06-19 21:49:11,585 DEBUG [c.c.h.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) VM does not require investigation so I'm marking it as Stopped: VM[DomainRouter|r-71-VM] 2014-06-19 21:49:11,585 WARN [o.a.c.f.j.AsyncJobExecutionContext] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Job is executed without a context, setup psudo job for the executing thread 2014-06-19 21:49:11,651 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Unable to transition the state but we're moving on because it's forced stop 2014-06-19 21:49:11,651 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Unable to cleanup VM: VM[DomainRouter|r-71-VM] ,since outstanding work item is not found 2014-06-19 21:49:11,651 ERROR [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Monitor ClusteredVirtualMachineManagerImpl says there is an error in the connect process for 2 due to Work item not found, We cannot stop VM[DomainRouter|r-71-VM] when it is in state Starting com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Work item not found, We cannot stop VM[DomainRouter|r-71-VM] when it is in state Starting at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStop(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1415) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStop(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1344) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStop(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1312) at com.cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.scheduleRestart(HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.java:346) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.compareState(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:2827) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.fullHostSync(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:2384) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.processConnect(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:3035) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.notifyMonitorsOfConnection(AgentManagerImpl.java:495) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.handleConnectedAgent(AgentManagerImpl.java:999) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.access$000(AgentManagerImpl.java:117) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl$HandleAgentConnectTask.runInContext(AgentManagerImpl.java:1082) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) 2014-06-19 21:49:08,251 DEBUG [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:ctx-c407a559) Zone 1 is not ready to launch secondary storage VM yet 2014-06-19 21:49:08,282 DEBUG [c.c.c.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-60f4b3c9) Zone 1 is not ready to launch console proxy yet 2014-06-19 21:49:01,197 DEBUG [c.c.n.NetworkUsageManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-342:ctx-b66d3294) Disconnected called
Re: [URGENT] cloudstack SSVM and router failed to start after power blackout
Thanks Rohit, I will give feedback as soon as I tried it On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi Dimas, Looks like the VM is in starting state and CloudStack is unable to contact the agent. Hope you've removed the VR from CloudStack using the UI. You can try restarting the management server. The issue is of sync, where one party (mgmt server) has different view of the world than the other (the host/agent). In such cases, do not remove the host else when you re-add it, it may destroy all the (user) VMs on it or simply fail. If restarting won't fix the problem, in global settings reduce the expunge timeout (that's when CloudStack marks a VM as removed, since you've just destroyed it, it can take some time to get expunged) and try again. As a final course of action I would stop the management server, then ssh to the host and destroy SSVMs, using mysql client I would change db entries for SSVM to removed/expunged (simply mark by updating row, do not remove the row), start the mgmt server again and hope it would work this time. Suggestions anyone in such a case? Regards. On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:29 PM, dimas yoga pratama smid...@gmail.com wrote: management log : 2014-06-19 21:49:21,312 WARN [c.c.u.n.Link] (AgentManager-Selector:null) SSL: Fail to find the generated keystore. Loading fail-safe one to continue. 2014-06-19 21:49:11,585 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Ignoring VM in starting mode: r-71-VM 2014-06-19 21:49:11,585 DEBUG [c.c.h.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) VM does not require investigation so I'm marking it as Stopped: VM[DomainRouter|r-71-VM] 2014-06-19 21:49:11,585 WARN [o.a.c.f.j.AsyncJobExecutionContext] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Job is executed without a context, setup psudo job for the executing thread 2014-06-19 21:49:11,651 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Unable to transition the state but we're moving on because it's forced stop 2014-06-19 21:49:11,651 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Unable to cleanup VM: VM[DomainRouter|r-71-VM] ,since outstanding work item is not found 2014-06-19 21:49:11,651 ERROR [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-344:ctx-07431045) Monitor ClusteredVirtualMachineManagerImpl says there is an error in the connect process for 2 due to Work item not found, We cannot stop VM[DomainRouter|r-71-VM] when it is in state Starting com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Work item not found, We cannot stop VM[DomainRouter|r-71-VM] when it is in state Starting at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStop(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1415) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStop(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1344) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStop(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1312) at com.cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.scheduleRestart(HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.java:346) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.compareState(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:2827) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.fullHostSync(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:2384) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.processConnect(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:3035) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.notifyMonitorsOfConnection(AgentManagerImpl.java:495) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.handleConnectedAgent(AgentManagerImpl.java:999) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.access$000(AgentManagerImpl.java:117) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl$HandleAgentConnectTask.runInContext(AgentManagerImpl.java:1082) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) 2014-06-19 21:49:08,251 DEBUG [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:ctx-c407a559) Zone 1 is not ready to launch secondary storage VM yet
Re: [POLL] Who uses awsapi with CloudStack in production?
Hi Daan, I have not tried 4.3. I saw some of the issues people were having and decided to hold off from trying. Do you suggest I try with 4.3 or should I build my own deb packages and try 4.4? BTW I am on ubuntu 12.04 + XenServer 6.0.2 On Jun 19, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Carlos, please export your db and do a test upgrade on a lab machine? Now is the time to solve any upgrade issues in 4.4. Have you tried the 4.3 upgrade already? regards, Daan On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rohit, The awsapi was one of the reasons we chose to use ACS. We have developed some internal tools and apps to manage our deployments on AWS that we want to re-use on ACS. We have not been able to use it yet because it was broken in 4.1.1. We tried to upgrade to 4.2 and were unsuccessful and are now waiting for 4.4 to finally upgrade and hopefully be able to use the awsapi. We use ACS internally for development and testing of our applications that we push to AWS. thanks, Carlos On Jun 18, 2014, at 12:11 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Who uses awsapi or any other EC2 compatible interface such as ec2stack with CloudStack (or CloudStack distros such as Citrix CloudPlatform) in production? And, if marketing and publicity are/were big motivation(s)? In case you don't want to discuss on this thread, please take this anonymous poll: http://www.polljunkie.com/poll/fbyfdc/who-uses-awsapi-with-cloudstack-in-prouduction # Some stats I've been watching Collab14 videos and found references where many speakers reference overall CloudStack codebase to be about 1.5M (million) lines of Java code which is not exactly true. Let me share some findings; - As of today, CloudStack master is about 1.7M lines of Java code [1] - CloudStack awsapi artifact is 1.04M lines of Java code [2] - Code excluding awsapi, tests and license/comment is about 590k lines of Java code [3] - The core excluding plugins, api and the above is about 300k lines of Java code [4] Why should I care: - some useful/fun stats to keep in mind - it's not a giant mammoth that cannot be fixed or developed upon - encouraging for new developers that if they try they can understand and fix it FYI, this started on twitter yesterday: https://twitter.com/_bhaisaab/status/479007075414974465 [1] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [2] cd cloudstack-repo find awsapi | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [3] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [tT]est | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l [4] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [Tt]est | grep -v plugins | grep -v api | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l Regards. -- Daan
Re: [POLL] Who uses awsapi with CloudStack in production?
I am saying you should export your db and run a test upgrade against it using the 4.4 branch so we can make sure it works correctly by the time we release. Op 19 jun. 2014 19:10 schreef Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com: Hi Daan, I have not tried 4.3. I saw some of the issues people were having and decided to hold off from trying. Do you suggest I try with 4.3 or should I build my own deb packages and try 4.4? BTW I am on ubuntu 12.04 + XenServer 6.0.2 On Jun 19, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Carlos, please export your db and do a test upgrade on a lab machine? Now is the time to solve any upgrade issues in 4.4. Have you tried the 4.3 upgrade already? regards, Daan On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rohit, The awsapi was one of the reasons we chose to use ACS. We have developed some internal tools and apps to manage our deployments on AWS that we want to re-use on ACS. We have not been able to use it yet because it was broken in 4.1.1. We tried to upgrade to 4.2 and were unsuccessful and are now waiting for 4.4 to finally upgrade and hopefully be able to use the awsapi. We use ACS internally for development and testing of our applications that we push to AWS. thanks, Carlos On Jun 18, 2014, at 12:11 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Who uses awsapi or any other EC2 compatible interface such as ec2stack with CloudStack (or CloudStack distros such as Citrix CloudPlatform) in production? And, if marketing and publicity are/were big motivation(s)? In case you don't want to discuss on this thread, please take this anonymous poll: http://www.polljunkie.com/poll/fbyfdc/who-uses-awsapi-with-cloudstack-in-prouduction # Some stats I've been watching Collab14 videos and found references where many speakers reference overall CloudStack codebase to be about 1.5M (million) lines of Java code which is not exactly true. Let me share some findings; - As of today, CloudStack master is about 1.7M lines of Java code [1] - CloudStack awsapi artifact is 1.04M lines of Java code [2] - Code excluding awsapi, tests and license/comment is about 590k lines of Java code [3] - The core excluding plugins, api and the above is about 300k lines of Java code [4] Why should I care: - some useful/fun stats to keep in mind - it's not a giant mammoth that cannot be fixed or developed upon - encouraging for new developers that if they try they can understand and fix it FYI, this started on twitter yesterday: https://twitter.com/_bhaisaab/status/479007075414974465 [1] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [2] cd cloudstack-repo find awsapi | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [3] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [tT]est | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l [4] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [Tt]est | grep -v plugins | grep -v api | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l Regards. -- Daan
Re: [POLL] Who uses awsapi with CloudStack in production?
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Daan, I have not tried 4.3. I saw some of the issues people were having and decided to hold off from trying. Do you suggest I try with 4.3 or should I build my own deb packages and try 4.4? BTW I am on ubuntu 12.04 + XenServer 6.0.2 Carlos, Daan is suggesting that you help us test our upcoming 4.4 release :) using the 4.4 branch [1] [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.4 Cheers. On Jun 19, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Carlos, please export your db and do a test upgrade on a lab machine? Now is the time to solve any upgrade issues in 4.4. Have you tried the 4.3 upgrade already? regards, Daan On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rohit, The awsapi was one of the reasons we chose to use ACS. We have developed some internal tools and apps to manage our deployments on AWS that we want to re-use on ACS. We have not been able to use it yet because it was broken in 4.1.1. We tried to upgrade to 4.2 and were unsuccessful and are now waiting for 4.4 to finally upgrade and hopefully be able to use the awsapi. We use ACS internally for development and testing of our applications that we push to AWS. thanks, Carlos On Jun 18, 2014, at 12:11 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Who uses awsapi or any other EC2 compatible interface such as ec2stack with CloudStack (or CloudStack distros such as Citrix CloudPlatform) in production? And, if marketing and publicity are/were big motivation(s)? In case you don't want to discuss on this thread, please take this anonymous poll: http://www.polljunkie.com/poll/fbyfdc/who-uses-awsapi-with-cloudstack-in-prouduction # Some stats I've been watching Collab14 videos and found references where many speakers reference overall CloudStack codebase to be about 1.5M (million) lines of Java code which is not exactly true. Let me share some findings; - As of today, CloudStack master is about 1.7M lines of Java code [1] - CloudStack awsapi artifact is 1.04M lines of Java code [2] - Code excluding awsapi, tests and license/comment is about 590k lines of Java code [3] - The core excluding plugins, api and the above is about 300k lines of Java code [4] Why should I care: - some useful/fun stats to keep in mind - it's not a giant mammoth that cannot be fixed or developed upon - encouraging for new developers that if they try they can understand and fix it FYI, this started on twitter yesterday: https://twitter.com/_bhaisaab/status/479007075414974465 [1] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [2] cd cloudstack-repo find awsapi | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [3] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [tT]est | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l [4] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [Tt]est | grep -v plugins | grep -v api | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l Regards. -- Daan
Kemp load balancers
Hi Can I use Kemp LM2600 for load balancing VMs in cloudstack. I was looking to install Openstack but struggling so want to try cloudstack but have these LBs as I require SSL offloading. Regards Ian
Re: [POLL] Who uses awsapi with CloudStack in production?
I can do that. My current install is from the repo http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu. Do you know if that is built with -Dnoredist? I would like to make sure I build and package the same way. Thanks Carlos On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Daan, I have not tried 4.3. I saw some of the issues people were having and decided to hold off from trying. Do you suggest I try with 4.3 or should I build my own deb packages and try 4.4? BTW I am on ubuntu 12.04 + XenServer 6.0.2 Carlos, Daan is suggesting that you help us test our upcoming 4.4 release :) using the 4.4 branch [1] [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.4 Cheers. On Jun 19, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Carlos, please export your db and do a test upgrade on a lab machine? Now is the time to solve any upgrade issues in 4.4. Have you tried the 4.3 upgrade already? regards, Daan On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rohit, The awsapi was one of the reasons we chose to use ACS. We have developed some internal tools and apps to manage our deployments on AWS that we want to re-use on ACS. We have not been able to use it yet because it was broken in 4.1.1. We tried to upgrade to 4.2 and were unsuccessful and are now waiting for 4.4 to finally upgrade and hopefully be able to use the awsapi. We use ACS internally for development and testing of our applications that we push to AWS. thanks, Carlos On Jun 18, 2014, at 12:11 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Who uses awsapi or any other EC2 compatible interface such as ec2stack with CloudStack (or CloudStack distros such as Citrix CloudPlatform) in production? And, if marketing and publicity are/were big motivation(s)? In case you don't want to discuss on this thread, please take this anonymous poll: http://www.polljunkie.com/poll/fbyfdc/who-uses-awsapi-with-cloudstack-in-prouduction # Some stats I've been watching Collab14 videos and found references where many speakers reference overall CloudStack codebase to be about 1.5M (million) lines of Java code which is not exactly true. Let me share some findings; - As of today, CloudStack master is about 1.7M lines of Java code [1] - CloudStack awsapi artifact is 1.04M lines of Java code [2] - Code excluding awsapi, tests and license/comment is about 590k lines of Java code [3] - The core excluding plugins, api and the above is about 300k lines of Java code [4] Why should I care: - some useful/fun stats to keep in mind - it's not a giant mammoth that cannot be fixed or developed upon - encouraging for new developers that if they try they can understand and fix it FYI, this started on twitter yesterday: https://twitter.com/_bhaisaab/status/479007075414974465 [1] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [2] cd cloudstack-repo find awsapi | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [3] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [tT]est | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l [4] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [Tt]est | grep -v plugins | grep -v api | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l Regards. -- Daan
Re: [POLL] Who uses awsapi with CloudStack in production?
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com wrote: I can do that. My current install is from the repo http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu. Do you know if that is built with -Dnoredist? I would like to make sure I build and package the same way. Wido maintains it and only hosts released versions of CloudStack and AFAIK we don't have an active nightlies debian build repo for users. That means, you'll have to build from source which is not very hard to do (you may even automate it): 1. Download the 4.4 branch zipball: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/archive/4.4.zip 2. Follow this: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/building_from_source.html#prerequisites-for-building-apache-cloudstack If you're stuck or have any issues reach out to the community, we're good people :) @Wido: Hey! Can you start the nightlies again so users don't have to do debian builds themselves? Regards. Thanks Carlos On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Daan, I have not tried 4.3. I saw some of the issues people were having and decided to hold off from trying. Do you suggest I try with 4.3 or should I build my own deb packages and try 4.4? BTW I am on ubuntu 12.04 + XenServer 6.0.2 Carlos, Daan is suggesting that you help us test our upcoming 4.4 release :) using the 4.4 branch [1] [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.4 Cheers. On Jun 19, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Carlos, please export your db and do a test upgrade on a lab machine? Now is the time to solve any upgrade issues in 4.4. Have you tried the 4.3 upgrade already? regards, Daan On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rohit, The awsapi was one of the reasons we chose to use ACS. We have developed some internal tools and apps to manage our deployments on AWS that we want to re-use on ACS. We have not been able to use it yet because it was broken in 4.1.1. We tried to upgrade to 4.2 and were unsuccessful and are now waiting for 4.4 to finally upgrade and hopefully be able to use the awsapi. We use ACS internally for development and testing of our applications that we push to AWS. thanks, Carlos On Jun 18, 2014, at 12:11 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Who uses awsapi or any other EC2 compatible interface such as ec2stack with CloudStack (or CloudStack distros such as Citrix CloudPlatform) in production? And, if marketing and publicity are/were big motivation(s)? In case you don't want to discuss on this thread, please take this anonymous poll: http://www.polljunkie.com/poll/fbyfdc/who-uses-awsapi-with-cloudstack-in-prouduction # Some stats I've been watching Collab14 videos and found references where many speakers reference overall CloudStack codebase to be about 1.5M (million) lines of Java code which is not exactly true. Let me share some findings; - As of today, CloudStack master is about 1.7M lines of Java code [1] - CloudStack awsapi artifact is 1.04M lines of Java code [2] - Code excluding awsapi, tests and license/comment is about 590k lines of Java code [3] - The core excluding plugins, api and the above is about 300k lines of Java code [4] Why should I care: - some useful/fun stats to keep in mind - it's not a giant mammoth that cannot be fixed or developed upon - encouraging for new developers that if they try they can understand and fix it FYI, this started on twitter yesterday: https://twitter.com/_bhaisaab/status/479007075414974465 [1] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [2] cd cloudstack-repo find awsapi | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [3] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [tT]est | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l [4] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [Tt]est | grep -v plugins | grep -v api | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l Regards. -- Daan
building and testing 4.4.
Hi Rohit, Thanks for the info, but I was asking about the non-oss. Is that included in Wido's released versions? I'm assuming the zip file you linked below will give me the same as: git checkout remotes/origin/4.4 Also, what is the issue with tomcat 6.0.35? I just noticed that my Management Server is running the default Ubuntu tomcat6 which is 6.0.35. Are all versions of CloudStack affected? thanks, Carlos PS figured it would be good to change the subject of this thread On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com wrote: I can do that. My current install is from the repo http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu. Do you know if that is built with -Dnoredist? I would like to make sure I build and package the same way. Wido maintains it and only hosts released versions of CloudStack and AFAIK we don't have an active nightlies debian build repo for users. That means, you'll have to build from source which is not very hard to do (you may even automate it): 1. Download the 4.4 branch zipball: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/archive/4.4.zip 2. Follow this: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/building_from_source.html#prerequisites-for-building-apache-cloudstack If you're stuck or have any issues reach out to the community, we're good people :) @Wido: Hey! Can you start the nightlies again so users don't have to do debian builds themselves? Regards. Thanks Carlos On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Daan, I have not tried 4.3. I saw some of the issues people were having and decided to hold off from trying. Do you suggest I try with 4.3 or should I build my own deb packages and try 4.4? BTW I am on ubuntu 12.04 + XenServer 6.0.2 Carlos, Daan is suggesting that you help us test our upcoming 4.4 release :) using the 4.4 branch [1] [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.4 Cheers. On Jun 19, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Carlos, please export your db and do a test upgrade on a lab machine? Now is the time to solve any upgrade issues in 4.4. Have you tried the 4.3 upgrade already? regards, Daan On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rohit, The awsapi was one of the reasons we chose to use ACS. We have developed some internal tools and apps to manage our deployments on AWS that we want to re-use on ACS. We have not been able to use it yet because it was broken in 4.1.1. We tried to upgrade to 4.2 and were unsuccessful and are now waiting for 4.4 to finally upgrade and hopefully be able to use the awsapi. We use ACS internally for development and testing of our applications that we push to AWS. thanks, Carlos On Jun 18, 2014, at 12:11 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Who uses awsapi or any other EC2 compatible interface such as ec2stack with CloudStack (or CloudStack distros such as Citrix CloudPlatform) in production? And, if marketing and publicity are/were big motivation(s)? In case you don't want to discuss on this thread, please take this anonymous poll: http://www.polljunkie.com/poll/fbyfdc/who-uses-awsapi-with-cloudstack-in-prouduction # Some stats I've been watching Collab14 videos and found references where many speakers reference overall CloudStack codebase to be about 1.5M (million) lines of Java code which is not exactly true. Let me share some findings; - As of today, CloudStack master is about 1.7M lines of Java code [1] - CloudStack awsapi artifact is 1.04M lines of Java code [2] - Code excluding awsapi, tests and license/comment is about 590k lines of Java code [3] - The core excluding plugins, api and the above is about 300k lines of Java code [4] Why should I care: - some useful/fun stats to keep in mind - it's not a giant mammoth that cannot be fixed or developed upon - encouraging for new developers that if they try they can understand and fix it FYI, this started on twitter yesterday: https://twitter.com/_bhaisaab/status/479007075414974465 [1] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [2] cd cloudstack-repo find awsapi | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [3] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [tT]est | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l [4] cd
Re: building and testing 4.4.
Regarding my tomcat question in the previous email, I have built the .deb files and noticed the dependency on tomcat6. I am confused by the statement in the build doc ( http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/building_from_source.html) to use 6.0.33 instead of 6.0.35. This is not mentioned in the installation doc ( http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/installation.html). If you simply do the apt-get install of cloudstack it will install tomcat 6.0.35 since that is whats current in Ubuntu 12.04 ( http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/web/tomcat6). So is this just a build dependency? thanks Carlos On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Thanks for the info, but I was asking about the non-oss. Is that included in Wido's released versions? I'm assuming the zip file you linked below will give me the same as: git checkout remotes/origin/4.4 Also, what is the issue with tomcat 6.0.35? I just noticed that my Management Server is running the default Ubuntu tomcat6 which is 6.0.35. Are all versions of CloudStack affected? thanks, Carlos PS figured it would be good to change the subject of this thread On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com wrote: I can do that. My current install is from the repo http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu . Do you know if that is built with -Dnoredist? I would like to make sure I build and package the same way. Wido maintains it and only hosts released versions of CloudStack and AFAIK we don't have an active nightlies debian build repo for users. That means, you'll have to build from source which is not very hard to do (you may even automate it): 1. Download the 4.4 branch zipball: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/archive/4.4.zip 2. Follow this: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/building_from_source.html#prerequisites-for-building-apache-cloudstack If you're stuck or have any issues reach out to the community, we're good people :) @Wido: Hey! Can you start the nightlies again so users don't have to do debian builds themselves? Regards. Thanks Carlos On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Daan, I have not tried 4.3. I saw some of the issues people were having and decided to hold off from trying. Do you suggest I try with 4.3 or should I build my own deb packages and try 4.4? BTW I am on ubuntu 12.04 + XenServer 6.0.2 Carlos, Daan is suggesting that you help us test our upcoming 4.4 release :) using the 4.4 branch [1] [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.4 Cheers. On Jun 19, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Carlos, please export your db and do a test upgrade on a lab machine? Now is the time to solve any upgrade issues in 4.4. Have you tried the 4.3 upgrade already? regards, Daan On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rohit, The awsapi was one of the reasons we chose to use ACS. We have developed some internal tools and apps to manage our deployments on AWS that we want to re-use on ACS. We have not been able to use it yet because it was broken in 4.1.1. We tried to upgrade to 4.2 and were unsuccessful and are now waiting for 4.4 to finally upgrade and hopefully be able to use the awsapi. We use ACS internally for development and testing of our applications that we push to AWS. thanks, Carlos On Jun 18, 2014, at 12:11 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Who uses awsapi or any other EC2 compatible interface such as ec2stack with CloudStack (or CloudStack distros such as Citrix CloudPlatform) in production? And, if marketing and publicity are/were big motivation(s)? In case you don't want to discuss on this thread, please take this anonymous poll: http://www.polljunkie.com/poll/fbyfdc/who-uses-awsapi-with-cloudstack-in-prouduction # Some stats I've been watching Collab14 videos and found references where many speakers reference overall CloudStack codebase to be about 1.5M (million) lines of Java code which is not exactly true. Let me share some findings; - As of today, CloudStack master is about 1.7M lines of Java code [1] - CloudStack awsapi artifact is 1.04M lines of Java code [2] - Code excluding awsapi, tests and license/comment is about 590k lines of Java code [3] - The core excluding
Adding ceph RBD storage failed in CentOS 6.5 KVM
Hi,
I am facing an issue in adding ceph RBD storage to CloudStack. It is failing
with Failed to add datasource error.
I have followed all the available instructions related to CloudStack, KVM and
ceph storage integration.
CenOS 6.5 KVM is used as KVM node here. I have read in some blog that we need
to compile LibVirt in CenOS KVM nodes to make Ceph storage to work with in
CloudStack.
Hence I have got git cloned LibVirt package from its source and upgraded
LibVirt and Qemu versions.
(Commands used -- git cone #, ./autogen.sh, make, make install).
It seems CentOS 6.5 KVM needs to be enabled for RBD (driver) support which
needs to be specified as a parameter while compiling LibVirt.
Can anyone throw some pointers on how to rectify this problem?
Management Server Exception:
2014-06-20 09:58:03,757 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (catalina-exec-6:null)
Seq 1-1602164611: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52234925782, via: 1, Ver: v1,
Flags: 10, { Answer } }
2014-06-20 09:58:03,757 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-6:null) Details from executing class
com.cloud.agent.api.ModifyStoragePoolCommand: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor.createStoragePool(LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java:531)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.KVMStoragePoolManager.createStoragePool(KVMStoragePoolManager.java:185)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.KVMStoragePoolManager.createStoragePool(KVMStoragePoolManager.java:177)
I even tried defining a pool using virsh command even that is failing with
internal error missing backend for pool type 8.
This indicates my KVM LibVirt is not supported for RBD.
Virsh exception on manual pool definition
pool type='rbd'
namec574980a-19fc-37e9-b6e3-788a7439575d/name
uuidc574980a-19fc-37e9-b6e3-788a7439575d/uuid
source
host name='192.168.153.25' port='6789'/
namecloudstack/name
auth username='cloudstack' type='ceph'
secret uuid='c574980a-19fc-37e9-b6e3-788a7439575d'/
/auth
/source
/pool
[root@kvm-ovs-002 agent]# virsh pool-define /tmp/rbd.xml
error: Failed to define pool from /tmp/rbd.xml
error: internal error missing backend for pool type 8
The Ceph storage is working fine and confirmed with following statistics of it.
Ceph output
[root@kvm-ovs-002 ~]# ceph auth list
installed auth entries:
osd.0
key: AQCwTKFTSOudGhAAsWAMRFuCqHjvTQKEV0zjvw==
caps: [mon] allow profile osd
caps: [osd] allow *
client.admin
key: AQBRQqFTWOjBKhAA2s7KnL1z3h7PuKeqXMd7SA==
caps: [mds] allow
caps: [mon] allow *
caps: [osd] allow *
client.bootstrap-mds
key: AQBSQqFTYKm6CRAAjjZotpN68yJaOjS2QTKzKg==
caps: [mon] allow profile bootstrap-mds
client.bootstrap-osd
key: AQBRQqFT6GzXNxAA4ZTmVX6LIu0k4Sk7bh2Ifg==
caps: [mon] allow profile bootstrap-osd
client.cloudstack
key: AQBNTaFTeCuwFRAA0NE7CCm9rwuq3ngLcGEysQ==
caps: [mon] allow r
caps: [osd] allow rwx pool=cloudstack
[root@ceph ~]# ceph status
cluster 9c1be0b6-f600-45d7-ae0f-df7bcd3a82cd
health HEALTH_WARN 292 pgs degraded; 292 pgs stale; 292 pgs stuck stale;
292 pgs stuck unclean; 1/1 in osds are down; clock skew detected on
mon.kvm-ovs-00
2
monmap e1: 2 mons at
{ceph=192.168.153.25:6789/0,kvm-ovs-002=192.168.160.3: 6789/0}, election epoch
10, quorum 0,1 ceph,kvm-ovs-002
osdmap e8: 1 osds: 0 up, 1 in
pgmap v577: 292 pgs, 4 pools, 0 bytes data, 0 objects
26036 MB used, 824 GB / 895 GB avail
292 stale+active+degraded
[root@kvm-ovs-002 agent]# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
The compiled LibVirt is showing upgraded version in virsh but still finding old
rpm packages in KVM.
Give me some hint on whether to clean-up these old RPMs?
Virsh version
[root@kvm-ovs-002 agent]# virsh version
Compiled against library: libvirt 1.2.6
Using library: libvirt 1.2.6
Using API: QEMU 1.2.6
Running hypervisor: QEMU 0.12.1
[root@kvm-ovs-002 agent]# rpm -qa | grep qemu
qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.10.x86_64
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph.x86_64
gpxe-roms-qemu-0.9.7-6.10.el6.noarch
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.10.x86_64
qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph.x86_64
qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.10.x86_64
qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph.x86_64
qemu-guest-agent-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.10.x86_64
You have mail in /var/spool/mail/root
[root@kvm-ovs-002 agent]# rpm -qa | grep libvirt
libvirt-python-0.10.2-29.el6_5.9.x86_64
libvirt-java-0.4.9-1.el6.noarch
libvirt-cim-0.6.1-9.el6_5.1.x86_64
libvirt-client-0.10.2-29.el6_5.9.x86_64
libvirt-devel-0.10.2-29.el6_5.9.x86_64
fence-virtd-libvirt-0.2.3-15.el6.x86_64
libvirt-0.10.2-29.el6_5.9.x86_64
libvirt-snmp-0.0.2-4.el6.x86_64
*Attached all the log files from management and kvm servers.
Thanks,
Praveen Kumar Buravilli
Re: Kemp load balancers
Ian Welcome to CloudStack user mailing list, To be honest, I've not heard of Kemp, but did research just now and it sounds interesting. As it stands, there isn't anything that i'm aware of that will work with Kemp and CloudStack natively. We have typical LB vendors like Citrix NetScaler, BigIP F5, Brocades and plenty of other providers, but nothing that would do load balancing with Kemp yet. There were talks of using nginx as LB as well, not certain how far it got. Perhaps you can try dev mailing list to see if anyone has any experience or plans on supporting it. Alternatively, you can place a feature request, but if demand is low, it will have the least priority. What generally happens as well - is vendor writting support for CloudStack and donating it to Apache Software Foundation. This is usually driven by demand from the customers. What many other companies do, is use their own dashboard with cloudstack engine behind the scenes, this way they can also tie in custom solutions including something like Kemp LB or any other technology. Last but not least you can contract someone to write a support for it, you can choose to donate it or not - but it would mean you have to continuously maintain the code base on your own, if you were to upgrade to the next version. Regards ilya PS: most of the folks who are now using CloudStack initially tried OpenStack and for obvious reasons you've mentioned - made the right choice. On 6/19/14, 11:40 AM, Ian Marshall wrote: Hi Can I use Kemp LM2600 for load balancing VMs in cloudstack. I was looking to install Openstack but struggling so want to try cloudstack but have these LBs as I require SSL offloading. Regards Ian
Re: Additional nics fails to get ip for ubuntu guest vm
Comments inline. On 19-Jun-2014, at 7:55 pm, Saurav Lahiri saurav.lah...@sungardas.com wrote: Hello, We are running an ubuntu 13.10 vm. In addition to the default network, another nic has been added to the vm. Now when the vm boots up, the new interface eth1 is seen inside the guest but does not have an ip address. Executing a dhclient eth1 does get the correct IP. A look at the /etc/network/interaces file shows an entry corresponding to the eth0. There is no entry for eth1. On adding an entry for eth1, the problems appears to get fixed. Is this manual step to add the additional nics in the interfaces file missing in the documentation or is this a bug ? === auto eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp == This is change that needs to be done by the creator of the template. CloudStack does not make any changes internal to the template as it does not (should not) have access to it. -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Cloud stack install issues
Hi, Did you start the services cloud-management, tomcat, mysql ? Check whether tomcat server is running or not, any permission issues.! check this for any errors /var/log/cloudstack/management/catalina.out I suggest you to use cloudstack 4.1.0 and above for better documentation/installation. -Harikrishna On 18-Jun-2014, at 5:35 pm, Bardhyl Brahimi b.brah...@intes.co wrote: Hi Team cloudstack. I’ve recently installed cloudstack on CentOS 6.4. I’ve completed all the steps as explained at the “Apache cloudstack 4.0.2 quick install guide. But when I try to access cloud via http://lanip:8080/client, for the first time I get a white page no display. Can you please help me out on this because so far I can’t figure out what the issue might be. Thanks in advance!
Re: Kemp load balancers
Hi Ilya I might of not been specific enough in my original email, I want to use the Kemps as load balancers/ssl termination for the VMs and not for the Cloudstack system. Yes, it would be great to have them integrated into Cloudstack like the Netscallers and F5 but I don't have the time and resource to consider using my java development team to write a plugin at this stage. My plan based on my Openstack scenario, is the Kemps which are clustered have VIPs set tot he front end web servers which are running on VMs inside the cloud. My setup is 2 management servers which would be running mariadb cluster and two KVM hosts and a Dell EQLX SAN for running the VMs [to replicate the 'running VMs from SAN - block storage' in Openstack. Is this workable and is there any potential issues with this setup? regards Ian Regards Ian On 20 June 2014 04:10, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Ian Welcome to CloudStack user mailing list, To be honest, I've not heard of Kemp, but did research just now and it sounds interesting. As it stands, there isn't anything that i'm aware of that will work with Kemp and CloudStack natively. We have typical LB vendors like Citrix NetScaler, BigIP F5, Brocades and plenty of other providers, but nothing that would do load balancing with Kemp yet. There were talks of using nginx as LB as well, not certain how far it got. Perhaps you can try dev mailing list to see if anyone has any experience or plans on supporting it. Alternatively, you can place a feature request, but if demand is low, it will have the least priority. What generally happens as well - is vendor writting support for CloudStack and donating it to Apache Software Foundation. This is usually driven by demand from the customers. What many other companies do, is use their own dashboard with cloudstack engine behind the scenes, this way they can also tie in custom solutions including something like Kemp LB or any other technology. Last but not least you can contract someone to write a support for it, you can choose to donate it or not - but it would mean you have to continuously maintain the code base on your own, if you were to upgrade to the next version. Regards ilya PS: most of the folks who are now using CloudStack initially tried OpenStack and for obvious reasons you've mentioned - made the right choice. On 6/19/14, 11:40 AM, Ian Marshall wrote: Hi Can I use Kemp LM2600 for load balancing VMs in cloudstack. I was looking to install Openstack but struggling so want to try cloudstack but have these LBs as I require SSL offloading. Regards Ian
Commercial Support Options
Hi Does anyone know of any commercial support options, ideally Uk or European based. As I am considering swapping from Openstack to Cloudstack [Yes, the pain of implementing Openstack is just too much] as I am implementing a private cloud, one of my requirements would be to have option for commercial support to help my team until they are experienced and confident to troubleshoot. It's a small setup - Site A : 2 x controller nodes, 2 x compute nodes, 1 x Dell EQLX SAN. Site B: 1 x controller node, 1 x compute node, 1 x Dell EQLX SAN. regards Ian
Re: Commercial Support Options
Hi, blueshape will do and they are pretty gold. Citrix will offer support as well. Kind Regards Kiste Am 20.06.2014 07:14 schrieb Ian Marshall i...@itlhosting.co.uk: Hi Does anyone know of any commercial support options, ideally Uk or European based. As I am considering swapping from Openstack to Cloudstack [Yes, the pain of implementing Openstack is just too much] as I am implementing a private cloud, one of my requirements would be to have option for commercial support to help my team until they are experienced and confident to troubleshoot. It's a small setup - Site A : 2 x controller nodes, 2 x compute nodes, 1 x Dell EQLX SAN. Site B: 1 x controller node, 1 x compute node, 1 x Dell EQLX SAN. regards Ian
Re: Commercial Support Options
Hi, I will also highly recommend Shapeblue, they are great. De: Uwe Kastens kiste...@googlemail.commailto:kiste...@googlemail.com Responder a: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Fecha: viernes, 20 de junio de 2014 12:22 a.m. Para: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Asunto: Re: Commercial Support Options Hi, blueshape will do and they are pretty gold. Citrix will offer support as well. Kind Regards Kiste Am 20.06.2014 07:14 schrieb Ian Marshall i...@itlhosting.co.ukmailto:i...@itlhosting.co.uk: Hi Does anyone know of any commercial support options, ideally Uk or European based. As I am considering swapping from Openstack to Cloudstack [Yes, the pain of implementing Openstack is just too much] as I am implementing a private cloud, one of my requirements would be to have option for commercial support to help my team until they are experienced and confident to troubleshoot. It's a small setup - Site A : 2 x controller nodes, 2 x compute nodes, 1 x Dell EQLX SAN. Site B: 1 x controller node, 1 x compute node, 1 x Dell EQLX SAN. regards Ian
Re: Kemp load balancers
Comments inline. On 20-Jun-2014, at 10:29 am, Ian Marshall i...@itlhosting.co.uk wrote: Hi Ilya I might of not been specific enough in my original email, I want to use the Kemps as load balancers/ssl termination for the VMs and not for the Cloudstack system. Yes, it would be great to have them integrated into Cloudstack like the Netscallers and F5 but I don't have the time and resource to consider using my java development team to write a plugin at this stage. My plan based on my Openstack scenario, is the Kemps which are clustered have VIPs set tot he front end web servers which are running on VMs inside the cloud. Since the vendor or the ACS community has not integrated ACS with Kemps, you can workaround the situation as below: 1) Spin up your VMs 2) Note down the IPs of the VMs 3) Run the Kemps in the same network or atleast ensure that the Kemp can route traffic to the VM subnet 4) Configure your VIP on the Kemp and add the VMs are reals 5) Modify VM’s ACLs to allow inbound traffic from the VIP With the Kemp integration into cloudstack, all of this should be doable from the ACS UI itself but that will have to wait. My setup is 2 management servers which would be running mariadb cluster and two KVM hosts and a Dell EQLX SAN for running the VMs [to replicate the 'running VMs from SAN - block storage' in Openstack. Is this workable and is there any potential issues with this setup? Looks straightforward enough to get started on ACS. Regards. @shankerbalan -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: Realhostip.com Migration
Yes its enabled by default in 4.1 and support for http method is newly introduced in 4.3 .you can disable it after upgrade by clearing the values of 2 global config parameters.(make it empty) secstorage.ssl.cert.domain consoleproxy.url.domain also change below setting from true to false secstorage.encrypt.copy=false -sadhu -Original Message- From: Carlos Reátegui [mailto:create...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 June 2014 23:04 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Realhostip.com Migration Since this is an internal deployment I don't really care about SSL at this time. Does 4.1 enable SSL by default? If so how do I disable it prior to upgrading? On Jun 18, 2014, at 9:18 PM, Suresh Sadhu suresh.sa...@citrix.com wrote: If you are upgrading from 4.2 to 4.4(before upgrade you uploaded certificates successfully) still you need to re-upload the your SSL certificates after upgrade for the new fixes to take effect. In 4.2 ssl is enabled(by default) and after upgrade CS keeps the same configuration(i.e ssl enabled by default) but for fresh 4.3/4.4 installations SSL is disabled by default. Regards Sadhu -Original Message- From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com] Sent: 19 June 2014 00:21 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Realhostip.com Migration Hi, If you wish to enable SSL for console access and SSVM, yes :-) For fresh installs, SSL would be disabled by default. Thanks, Amogh On 6/18/14 11:48 AM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com wrote: So if I upgrade to 4.4 once it is available do I still need to follow the steps for realhostip migration? On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Amogh Vasekar amogh.vase...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, Please refer to http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.user/12350 for the bugs that may exist in versions prior to CloudStack 4.4 Thanks, Amogh On 6/17/14 9:33 PM, Shweta Agarwal shweta.agar...@citrix.com wrote: Its supported for 4.2 , 4.3 and 4.4 as well. Shweta -Original Message- From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:50 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Realhostip.com Migration Rich, I followed the Citrix KB article referenced here ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Realhost+IP+ ch ang es ) with 4.2 and it worked fine for me using SSL. Just remember to get a wildcard SSL cert, and be careful pasting it into the CloudStack UI. -tim On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Richard Chatterton richard.chatter...@contegix.com wrote: Folks, I was just reading through my backlog of messages and I see that the Realhostip.com service has been extended to September 30th. Hurray! I also see the following in the message where that was announced: While testing Realhostip fixes additional product issues were found which are tracked in following three defects CLOUDSTACK-6499 [1], CLOUDSTACK-6599 [2], CLOUDSTACK-6824 [3] . These defects are fixed in 4.4 and master branch. Please verify in your setups. If you are on older version of CloudStack do plan on upgrading to 4.4 . Additional details on fixes are available in JIRA. Updated wiki with steps will be published shortly. Is it strictly necessary to upgrade CloudStack to 4.4 before migrating away from realhostip.com? Has anyone successfully migrated away from it on an older version of CloudStack? Best, Rich Chatterton
RE: Cloudstack/Xenserver/GPU support
Hi Vijay, If you want to use the GPU/vGPU functionality in CloudStack then you need to install XS62ESP1 hotfix on top of XenServer 6.2.0. Once you are done with patch installation, reconnect the host or restart the management server so that CloudStack can detect the GPU cards present in XS host. Also, as of now, CloudStack UI only supports NVIDIA k1 and NVIDIA k2 cards, so if you are using any other card apart from these two, than you need to make API call the API call createServiceOffering as mentioned in Web services APIs section here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/GPU+and+vGPU+support+for+CloudStack+Guest+VMs Please let me know if you any more queries. --Sanjay -Original Message- From: Vijay Ramadoss [mailto:vramad...@nvidia.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 11:03 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Cloudstack/Xenserver/GPU support The problem is that my host doesn’t show the gpu through cloudstack. Just using Xenserver direct passthrough, everything works. Just doesn’t work through cloudstack. Regards, Vijay R -Original Message- From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:24 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Cloudstack/Xenserver/GPU support From the FS [1], under Interoperability and compatibility, it is supported for 6.2 SP1 and later. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/GPU+and+vGPU+support+for+CloudStack+Guest+VMs Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Vijay Ramadoss [mailto:vramad...@nvidia.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 10:31 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Cloudstack/Xenserver/GPU support I am using Xenserver 6.2. Regards, Vijay R -Original Message- From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:49 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Cloudstack/Xenserver/GPU support Just to confirm, are you using XenServer 6.2 or XenServer 6.2 SP1? Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Vijay Ramadoss [mailto:vramad...@nvidia.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 10:01 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Cloudstack/Xenserver/GPU support Note that I am using 4.4 dev builds for this so it does have GPU support. So in service offerings I do see GPU options but just doesn't work. Regards Vijay R On Jun 17, 2014 9:27 PM, Shanker Balan shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Vijay, Comments inline: On 17-Jun-2014, at 9:28 pm, Vijay Ramadoss vramad...@nvidia.com wrote: Hi - I have setup a cloudstack management server and managing two xenserver 6.2 based hosts with NVIDIA GRID k2 gpus on them. I added the host to the pod/cluster but cloudstack is not detecting the gpu on it and showing it. How do I make gpu be available so that cloudstack could use it ? I created a service offering for gpu but I am not able to associate an instance with that service offering and it fails as cloudstack cant see the gpu. Please help. The last time I had a requirement to enable passthru of devices to the VMs, CloudStack didnt have support for this. While the XenServer itself can do passthru, CloudStack service offerings could not be taught to expose these to the VMs created via CloudStack. In short, someone will need to add this feature to ACS. The developer list might be a better place to ask this question. Regards. -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhttp://www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and- build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape
Re: Commercial Support Options
+1 on ShapeBlue, they are UK based as well and participate in community regularly, another option is Citrix. On 6/19/14, 10:13 PM, Ian Marshall wrote: Hi Does anyone know of any commercial support options, ideally Uk or European based. As I am considering swapping from Openstack to Cloudstack [Yes, the pain of implementing Openstack is just too much] as I am implementing a private cloud, one of my requirements would be to have option for commercial support to help my team until they are experienced and confident to troubleshoot. It's a small setup - Site A : 2 x controller nodes, 2 x compute nodes, 1 x Dell EQLX SAN. Site B: 1 x controller node, 1 x compute node, 1 x Dell EQLX SAN. regards Ian
