回复: 回复: systemvm64template-2014-09-24-4.3-kvm.qcow2.bz2 模板root密码

2014-10-31 Thread aix.niuy
3Q 赵涛

2014-10-31



aix.niuy



发件人:赵涛 zhaotao...@qq.com
发送时间:2014-10-31 14:56
主题:回复: systemvm64template-2014-09-24-4.3-kvm.qcow2.bz2 模板root密码
收件人:users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
抄送:

password 





-- 原始邮件 -- 
发件人: aix.niuy;aix.n...@gmail.com; 
发送时间: 2014年10月31日(星期五) 下午2:55 
收件人: users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org;  

主题:  systemvm64template-2014-09-24-4.3-kvm.qcow2.bz2 模板root密码 



官网下载的系统模板密码是什么? 
root/6m1ll10n 试过了 不好使了 
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-09-24-4.3-kvm.qcow2.bz2
 
有知道的朋友告诉下 谢谢 


2014-10-31  



aix.niuy 

答复: systemvm64template-2014-09-24-4.3-kvm.qcow2.bz2 模板root密码

2014-10-31 Thread 张仕博
试试
root/password

-邮件原件-
发件人: aix.niuy [mailto:aix.n...@gmail.com] 
发送时间: 2014年10月31日 14:56
收件人: users-cn
主题: systemvm64template-2014-09-24-4.3-kvm.qcow2.bz2 模板root密码

官网下载的系统模板密码是什么?
root/6m1ll10n 试过了 不好使了
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-09-24-4.3-kvm.qcow2.bz2
有知道的朋友告诉下 谢谢


2014-10-31 



aix.niuy 
---
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any 
accompanying attachment(s) 
is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential 
and/or privileged of 
Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of 
this communication is 
not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing,  storing, 
disclosure or copying 
is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this 
communication in error,please 
immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message 
and all copies from 
your system. Thank you. 
---


RE: XenServer

2014-10-31 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk
Hi all,

Wish to participate at this holly war as well :)
I am using KVM for hosting managment servers and other infrastructure that is 
outside of the cloud and XenServer 6.2 for cloud hosts.
1. Snapshotting : were problems with old version of virsh/qemu, but for 
1.2.2/2.0 snapshotting is working just fine. Slower than XenSererver does it, 
but still OK. IMHO snapshotting at KVM a bit more complicted: you should 
consider if it is a image snapshot or live snapshot, qcow2 or raw, etc.
2. Cloning VM-s at KVM also requre more steps to produce. XenServer is much 
simpler.
3. XenServer has XAPI and everything you need you do using xe command 
interface. Doesn't need CS agent, but this external vhd-util that you need to 
copy and keep an eye on it makes a scar on ideal picture.  
4. XenServer has support for vGPU/pGPU and Cloudstack has implemented it's 
management. No option if you wish to provide GPU-enabled resources.
5. KVM has nice tools to re-size Linux OS images together with extending FS. It 
is also aware of HDD partitions. Nice option that we used. Also it is possible 
to deploy diffrent external tools (like vm-builder) to automate installation of 
software for OS and set-up different options (users, root password, etc.)
6. KVM has RBD and supports Ceph. We have targeted for this storage type as it 
offers block storage and object storage at the same time. It is probably not 
yet ready for production, but seems very promissing.

As a result - I really like both hypervisors for their strong sides :). Will 
repeat Nux! words  -- make one hypervisor work for you. Don't try to find the 
best one - because there is no silver bullet. Don't be afraid to have a  zoo 
of technologies. Cloud is aready a Zoo, but as far as you control it and know 
it  -- you are fine. And the bigger the Zoo -- the more animals you can show to 
you clients ! :)

Good luck !

Vadim.  
   
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] 
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 1:25 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer

Andrei, I am hopeful the next incarnation of XenServer will be much 
better/modern, with support for CEPH, GlusterFS etc.

Re KVM snapshotting, KVM can do live snapshots of the volumes+memory (you can 
do it with virsh), but ACS doesn't support it; forgot why.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 21:24:06
 Subject: Re: XenServer

 I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph support. 
 I do prefer XenServer and the feature list of ACS + XenServer is a bit better.
 
 It sucks not having proper snapshotting in KVM where one can create 
 the whole vm snapshot (volumes + memory) very quickly without the need 
 to bother snapshotting every volume and wait for ages.
 
 Andrei
 - Original Message -
 
 From: motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:43:32 PM
 Subject: Re: XenServer
 
 I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really like 
 XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines running 
 KVM, ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to 
 another takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with Balloon 
 driver, I am traumatize using KVM.
 
 XenServer don't need to install cloudstack agent is already 
 integrated. I am very happy with XenServer. I still need to work out 
 a few lingering issues but thus far am a happy person.
 
 Thanks,
 -Motty
 
 On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky 
 and...@arhont.com
 wrote:
 
  I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on KVM.
  XenServer
  does it so much better!
 
  - Original Message -
 
   From: Vladimir Melnik v.mel...@uplink.ua
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:09:17 PM
   Subject: RE: XenServer
 
   Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic! Now 
   I understand that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already 
   have a bunch of hosts running KVM and it really won't be a good 
   idea to bread such a zoo.
 
   The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change 
   configuration of a virtual machine without restarting it. As I 
   know, KVM doesn't support it yet, am I right? Other XenServer 
   features don't seem to be so exciting to me :)
 
   One more time - thanks to all who have helped me to decide not to 
   do something that I would regret.
 
   Best regards,
   V.
 
 
 --
 Thanks for your support,
  Motty


Re: How change default System Offering For Software Router?

2014-10-31 Thread Andrija Panic
It should be, yes.

BTW the link you sent - it's changing existing VR offering...

To make another system offering a DEFAUTL offering, use the stuff explained
here:
http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/service_offerings.html#changing-the-default-system-offering-for-system-vms

Best

On 30 October 2014 23:28, Hollman Enciso R. hollman.enc...@gmail.com
wrote:

 I have CS 4.3. it's the same for this version ?

 I found this manual http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX138049

 On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  There are some database changes needed - please check admin guide for ACS
  4.2...
 
  On 30 October 2014 22:32, Hollman Enciso R. hollman.enc...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   Hello all, i'm trying to change the default system offering for
 software
   routers with more ram and some tags for the storage. i create a new
  system
   service offering for software router; Now i wanna set as default, how
  can i
   do that ?
  
   I tried to delete the delete the System Offering For Software Router
 but
  i
   obtain an error:  Default service offerings cannot be deleted
  
   any idea ?
  
   thanks
  
   --
   Hollman Eduardo Enciso R.
   http://algolibre.com
   @hollman
  
 
 
 
  --
 
  Andrija Panić
  --
http://admintweets.com
  --
 



 --
 Hollman Eduardo Enciso R.
 http://algolibre.com
 @hollman




-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--


Re: XenServer

2014-10-31 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
Is there a feature request for this support or should we open one? I would like 
to see this implemented for KVM. 

Andrei 
- Original Message -

 From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 11:25:10 PM
 Subject: Re: XenServer

 Andrei, I am hopeful the next incarnation of XenServer will be much
 better/modern, with support for CEPH, GlusterFS etc.

 Re KVM snapshotting, KVM can do live snapshots of the volumes+memory
 (you can do it with virsh), but ACS doesn't support it; forgot
 why.

 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
  From: Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 21:24:06
  Subject: Re: XenServer

  I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph
  support. I do
  prefer XenServer and the feature list of ACS + XenServer is a bit
  better.
 
  It sucks not having proper snapshotting in KVM where one can create
  the whole vm
  snapshot (volumes + memory) very quickly without the need to bother
  snapshotting every volume and wait for ages.
 
  Andrei
  - Original Message -
 
  From: motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:43:32 PM
  Subject: Re: XenServer
 
  I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really like
  XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines
  running
  KVM,
  ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to
  another
  takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with Balloon
  driver,
  I am
  traumatize using KVM.
 
  XenServer don't need to install cloudstack agent is already
  integrated. I
  am very happy with XenServer. I still need to work out a few
  lingering
  issues but thus far am a happy person.
 
  Thanks,
  -Motty
 
  On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
  and...@arhont.com
  wrote:
 
   I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on KVM.
   XenServer
   does it so much better!
  
   - Original Message -
  
From: Vladimir Melnik v.mel...@uplink.ua
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:09:17 PM
Subject: RE: XenServer
  
Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic!
Now
I
understand that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already
have
a bunch of hosts running KVM and it really won't be a good
idea
to
bread such a zoo.
  
The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change
configuration of a virtual machine without restarting it. As I
know,
KVM doesn't support it yet, am I right? Other XenServer
features
don't seem to be so exciting to me :)
  
One more time - thanks to all who have helped me to decide not
to
do
something that I would regret.
  
Best regards,
V.
  
 
  --
  Thanks for your support,
   Motty


Re: XenServer

2014-10-31 Thread Andrija Panic
My vote also for KVM snapshooting - having all the nice fetaures, but
without basic virtualization stuff like snapshotting - it simply drives me
and our client nuts...

On 31 October 2014 10:03, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:

 Is there a feature request for this support or should we open one? I would
 like to see this implemented for KVM.

 Andrei
 - Original Message -

  From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 11:25:10 PM
  Subject: Re: XenServer

  Andrei, I am hopeful the next incarnation of XenServer will be much
  better/modern, with support for CEPH, GlusterFS etc.

  Re KVM snapshotting, KVM can do live snapshots of the volumes+memory
  (you can do it with virsh), but ACS doesn't support it; forgot
  why.

  Lucian

  --
  Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

  Nux!
  www.nux.ro

  - Original Message -
   From: Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 21:24:06
   Subject: Re: XenServer

   I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph
   support. I do
   prefer XenServer and the feature list of ACS + XenServer is a bit
   better.
  
   It sucks not having proper snapshotting in KVM where one can create
   the whole vm
   snapshot (volumes + memory) very quickly without the need to bother
   snapshotting every volume and wait for ages.
  
   Andrei
   - Original Message -
  
   From: motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:43:32 PM
   Subject: Re: XenServer
  
   I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really like
   XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines
   running
   KVM,
   ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to
   another
   takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with Balloon
   driver,
   I am
   traumatize using KVM.
  
   XenServer don't need to install cloudstack agent is already
   integrated. I
   am very happy with XenServer. I still need to work out a few
   lingering
   issues but thus far am a happy person.
  
   Thanks,
   -Motty
  
   On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
   and...@arhont.com
   wrote:
  
I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on KVM.
XenServer
does it so much better!
   
- Original Message -
   
 From: Vladimir Melnik v.mel...@uplink.ua
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:09:17 PM
 Subject: RE: XenServer
   
 Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic!
 Now
 I
 understand that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already
 have
 a bunch of hosts running KVM and it really won't be a good
 idea
 to
 bread such a zoo.
   
 The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change
 configuration of a virtual machine without restarting it. As I
 know,
 KVM doesn't support it yet, am I right? Other XenServer
 features
 don't seem to be so exciting to me :)
   
 One more time - thanks to all who have helped me to decide not
 to
 do
 something that I would regret.
   
 Best regards,
 V.
   
  
   --
   Thanks for your support,
Motty




-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--


Re: ACS 4.4.1 DEB Packages not yet available?

2014-10-31 Thread Stephan Seitz
Wido,

could you point me to some info how you built your packages?

If you could benefit from assistance and/or availability of build
environments, just leave me a note. I would be happy to help :)

- Stephan

Am Donnerstag, den 30.10.2014, 16:18 +0100 schrieb Wido den Hollander: 
 On 10/30/2014 11:04 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
  I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.
  
  Wido, can you create them?
  
 
 Yes. But currently my internet connection isn't the best where I am, so
 it will take some time.
 
 Wido
 
  
  thanks,
  
  On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Seitz
  s.se...@secretresearchfacility.com wrote:
  Hi!
 
  after reading the 4.4.0 - 4.4.1-thread on the list, I think I'm
  prepared for an Update.
 
  Running the management-node on Ubuntu 14.04 and following the documented
  update procedure (which leads to something easy as apt-get upgrade),
  I've noticed that there are no packages for 4.4.1 available at
  http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.4/
 
  Did I miss something? Or is it just not released yet?
 
 
  cheers,
 
  - Stephan
 
 
  
  
  




AW: The IP is already used as SourceNat rather than PortForwarding

2014-10-31 Thread Martin Emrich
Hi!

Thanks for the hint, after creating an otherwise identical offering but with 
conserve mode on, I was able to configure the portforwarding. But it did not 
work yet.
After creating one more offering, but with VirtualRouter instead of Ovs for 
Port Forwarding, the port forwarding finally works.

So thank you very much for saving my weekend so far ;)

But I wonder:
- why do I have to enable conserve mode (which as far as I understand just 
defers configuring the GRE tunnels and starting the virtual router until the 
first instance needs them)?
- Why won't the portforwarding work with the Ovs provider? I followed this 
documentation: 
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/networking/ovs-plugin.html which 
instructed me to use Ovs.
- the GRE tunnels still use my storage network instead of the configured guest 
network on my xenservers (I wrote an email to the list yesterday regarding that)

Any Ideas?

Thanks again,

Martin


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 05:00
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: RE: The IP is already used as SourceNat rather than PortForwarding

Hi Martin,

Are you trying to configure PF on SourceNAT IP address? If yes can you check 
whether the conserver mode is set to Yes in your network offering? 

-Sanjeev

-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 6:26 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: The IP is already used as SourceNat rather than PortForwarding

Hi!

I created an isolated network (with GRE) on Cloudstack 4.4.1. Then I tried to 
configure a port forwarding rule for SSH to an instance. But I get an error 
message is already used as SourceNat rather than PortForwarding.
What am I doing wrong?

Thanks

Martin



Urgent! - agent can't connect

2014-10-31 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi guys,

I had managemetn server stoped for some time, started again - but after
that one of the agents can not connect.

I have enabled debug loging on agent:

Any help would be very appriciated...

2014-10-31 12:05:16,764 INFO  [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null)
Connecting to 10.0.0.1:8250
2014-10-31 12:05:16,851 INFO  [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null)
SSL: Handshake done
2014-10-31 12:05:16,851 INFO  [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null)
Connected to 10.0.0.1:8250
2014-10-31 12:05:16,857 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Detecting a new state but couldn't find a old state
so adding it to the changes: i-3-41-VM
2014-10-31 12:05:16,857 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Detecting a new state but couldn't find a old state
so adding it to the changes: i-3-39-VM
2014-10-31 12:05:16,857 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Detecting a new state but couldn't find a old state
so adding it to the changes: i-3-40-VM
2014-10-31 12:05:16,857 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Detecting a new state but couldn't find a old state
so adding it to the changes: s-28-VM
2014-10-31 12:05:16,872 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtCapXMLParser]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Found /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm as a suiteable emulator
2014-10-31 12:05:16,872 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Executing: /bin/bash -c qemu-img --help|grep convert
2014-10-31 12:05:16,876 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Execution is successful.
2014-10-31 12:05:16,876 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null)   convert [-c] [-p] [-f fmt] [-t cache] [-O
output_fmt] [-o options] [-S sparse_size] filename [filename2 [...]]
output_filename

2014-10-31 12:05:16,876 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) cpus=32, speed=3400, ram=27105792,
dom0ram=805306368, cpu sockets=1
2014-10-31 12:05:16,877 DEBUG [cloud.resource.ServerResourceBase]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Parameters for private nic: 10.0.5.18 -
c4:54:44:1e:35:af-255.255.255.0
2014-10-31 12:05:16,877 DEBUG [cloud.resource.ServerResourceBase]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Parameters for storage nic: 10.0.5.18 -
c4:54:44:1e:35:af-255.255.255.0
2014-10-31 12:05:16,877 DEBUG [cloud.resource.ServerResourceBase]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Parameters for pubic nic: 10.0.5.18 -
c4:54:44:1e:35:af-255.255.255.0
2014-10-31 12:05:16,877 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Executing:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/versions.sh
2014-10-31 12:05:16,885 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Execution is successful.
2014-10-31 12:05:16,892 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Executing: sudo grep InitiatorName=
/etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi
2014-10-31 12:05:16,896 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Exit value is 1
2014-10-31 12:05:16,896 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) sudo: sorry, you must have a tty to run sudo
2014-10-31 12:05:16,897 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(Agent-Handler-1:null) Found existing defined storage pool
234cb38b-afef-4554-a356-8c4f08fa7875, using it.
2014-10-31 12:05:16,901 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-1:null)
Executing: hostname
2014-10-31 12:05:16,902 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-1:null)
Execution is successful.
2014-10-31 12:05:16,902 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-1:null)
Executing: hostname
2014-10-31 12:05:16,903 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-1:null)
Execution is successful.
2014-10-31 12:05:16,905 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-1:null)
Sending Startup: Seq 0-56:  { Cmd , MgmtId: -1, via: 0, Ver: v1, Flags: 1,

Integrate Cloudstack With Jclouds Issues

2014-10-31 Thread Yitao Jiang
Hi, guys

 I wonder if anyone using jclouds to access cloudstack(4.2.1), I googled
but found only a few documents but only a blog about example how
accessing cloudstack version 2.2, and i don't know how to login into
cloudstack to obtain other API


---
Thanks,
Yitao(依涛 姜)
jiangyt.github.io


Re: Urgent! - agent can't connect

2014-10-31 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
 DEBUG


stupid question maybe but did you check the agent version against the
ms version?

-- 
Daan


Re: Urgent! - agent can't connect

2014-10-31 Thread Daan Hoogland
no idea, needs investigation. network flakey? high latency? process on
either side with low prio?

You didn't find exceptions in the logs on either side did you?

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
 hm...yes, fresh install 4.4.1 from provided RPMs:
 cloudstack-agent-4.4.1-NONOSS_3.el6.x86_64

 Same situation also happened, when I had to manually reboot one of the
 non-important host, without previously puting it into maintance..

 AH - agent has just reconnected fineI don't beleive it...any issues on
 why this might happen ?

 On 31 October 2014 12:32, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  DEBUG


 stupid question maybe but did you check the agent version against the
 ms version?

 --
 Daan




 --

 Andrija Panić
 --
   http://admintweets.com
 --



-- 
Daan


Re: Urgent! - agent can't connect

2014-10-31 Thread Andrija Panic
No, I did not...I really don't get it...network is 10GB in between, nothing
special - no network issues really...
There was only exception on management-server side with message that Agent
is disconnecting...but nothing else.

Ah...
Thanks Daan for replies.


On 31 October 2014 12:46, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:

 no idea, needs investigation. network flakey? high latency? process on
 either side with low prio?

 You didn't find exceptions in the logs on either side did you?

 On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  hm...yes, fresh install 4.4.1 from provided RPMs:
  cloudstack-agent-4.4.1-NONOSS_3.el6.x86_64
 
  Same situation also happened, when I had to manually reboot one of the
  non-important host, without previously puting it into maintance..
 
  AH - agent has just reconnected fineI don't beleive it...any issues
 on
  why this might happen ?
 
  On 31 October 2014 12:32, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrija Panic 
 andrija.pa...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   DEBUG
 
 
  stupid question maybe but did you check the agent version against the
  ms version?
 
  --
  Daan
 
 
 
 
  --
 
  Andrija Panić
  --
http://admintweets.com
  --



 --
 Daan




-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--


RE: Status: update from 4.4.0 - 4.4.1 still broken ?

2014-10-31 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk
Monty,

Thank you for tips. I have Ubuntu at my managment servers and packages 
are not yet ready. So I have to use shapeblue repository like this:
file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/cloudstack.list contains:
deb http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/debian/4.4 ./

I also used this template 
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.1-xen.vhd.bz2
And finally I have updated database with ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` 
ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT NULL DEFAULT  '1'  

After management server restart I was able to see management console 
and log-in into CS ! 
It seems DB update is vital for upgrade. 

Now I am updating system VM, but CS 4.4.1  is already usable. 

Thank you all !   

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 7:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Status: update from 4.4.0 - 4.4.1 still broken ?

HI PL,
I upgrade my testing cluster for 3 times with bad results, until I manually 
updated the DB as Andrija suggested in this email.

Thanks,
Celso

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org
wrote:

 upgrading from 4.4.0 really required this manual db patch:
 ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT  NULL 
 DEFAULT  '1'

 ?
 If so we will update the RN..

 PL

 On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:29 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi Vadim,
  I finally was able to upgrade successfully Cloudstack 4.4.0 to 
  Cloudstack 4.4.1. I used this guider:
 
 
 http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgr
 ade-4.4.html
 
  Download System VMs from here:
 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/
  I specifically used this:
 
 
 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.1-xen
 .vhd.bz2
 
  instead of the one suggested in the guide.
 
  Also, I executed the following two command:
  yum upgrade cloudstack-management
  once that finished successfully
  yum update (updates java)
 
  This also failed for me:
 
  nohup cloudstack-sysvmadm -d IPaddress -u cloud -p password -a  
  sysvm.log 21 
 
  but I run that command any way:
 
  Also I log in to my database server:
 
  ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT  NULL 
  DEFAULT  '1'
 
  restarted management server and all worked.
 
  Hope this help you!
  ThanksMotty
 
 
 
  On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  
  vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote:
 
   I have tried to do upgrade 2nd time and failed again. The sequence 
   of actions is described here:
  
 
 http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgr
 ade-4.4.html
  
   Followed instructions until the end. VM upgrade has taken more 
   than 5 hrs.  The result of update is:
   -
   Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
   ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 25
  
   Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)
  
   Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
   ERROR: Failed to stop console proxy vm with id 1
  
   Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .
  
   Stopping and starting 1 running routing vm(s)...
   2
   Done restarting router(s).
   ---
  
   After restarting managment server workers are not querying status 
   and resources anymore. The last lines at management server log are:
  
   ---
  
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,207 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin UcsManagerImpl
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin VpcVirtualRouterElement
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin BaremetalPxeManagerImpl
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin BaremetalManagerImpl
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin ManagementServerImpl
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin DedicatedResourceManagerImpl
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin InternalLoadBalancerElement
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin LdapManagerImpl
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin ApiRateLimitServiceImpl
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin BaremetalDhcpManagerImpl
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,212 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin ContrailVpcElementImpl
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin ContrailElementImpl
   2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) 
   Discovered plugin 

Re: Status: update from 4.4.0 - 4.4.1 still broken ?

2014-10-31 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
I will update the RN then.


On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
 wrote:

 Monty,

 Thank you for tips. I have Ubuntu at my managment servers and
 packages are not yet ready. So I have to use shapeblue repository like this:
 file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/cloudstack.list contains:
 deb http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/debian/4.4
 ./

 I also used this template
 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.1-xen.vhd.bz2
 And finally I have updated database with ALTER TABLE
 `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT NULL DEFAULT  '1'  

 After management server restart I was able to see management
 console and log-in into CS !
 It seems DB update is vital for upgrade.

 Now I am updating system VM, but CS 4.4.1  is already usable.

 Thank you all !

 Vadim.

 -Original Message-
 From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 7:00 PM
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Status: update from 4.4.0 - 4.4.1 still broken ?

 HI PL,
 I upgrade my testing cluster for 3 times with bad results, until I
 manually updated the DB as Andrija suggested in this email.

 Thanks,
 Celso

 On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org
 wrote:

  upgrading from 4.4.0 really required this manual db patch:
  ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT  NULL
  DEFAULT  '1'
 
  ?
  If so we will update the RN..
 
  PL
 
  On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:29 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
   Hi Vadim,
   I finally was able to upgrade successfully Cloudstack 4.4.0 to
   Cloudstack 4.4.1. I used this guider:
  
  
  http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgr
  ade-4.4.html
  
   Download System VMs from here:
  http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/
   I specifically used this:
  
  
  http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.1-xen
  .vhd.bz2
  
   instead of the one suggested in the guide.
  
   Also, I executed the following two command:
   yum upgrade cloudstack-management
   once that finished successfully
   yum update (updates java)
  
   This also failed for me:
  
   nohup cloudstack-sysvmadm -d IPaddress -u cloud -p password -a 
   sysvm.log 21 
  
   but I run that command any way:
  
   Also I log in to my database server:
  
   ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT  NULL
   DEFAULT  '1'
  
   restarted management server and all worked.
  
   Hope this help you!
   ThanksMotty
  
  
  
   On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
   vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote:
  
I have tried to do upgrade 2nd time and failed again. The sequence
of actions is described here:
   
  
  http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgr
  ade-4.4.html
   
Followed instructions until the end. VM upgrade has taken more
than 5 hrs.  The result of update is:
-
Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 25
   
Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)
   
Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
ERROR: Failed to stop console proxy vm with id 1
   
Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .
   
Stopping and starting 1 running routing vm(s)...
2
Done restarting router(s).
---
   
After restarting managment server workers are not querying status
and resources anymore. The last lines at management server log are:
   
---
   
2014-10-30 08:48:10,207 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
Discovered plugin UcsManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
Discovered plugin VpcVirtualRouterElement
2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
Discovered plugin BaremetalPxeManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
Discovered plugin BaremetalManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
Discovered plugin ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
Discovered plugin ManagementServerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
Discovered plugin DedicatedResourceManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
Discovered plugin InternalLoadBalancerElement
2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
Discovered plugin LdapManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
Discovered plugin ApiRateLimitServiceImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
Discovered plugin BaremetalDhcpManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,212 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
Discovered plugin 

Re: How change default System Offering For Software Router?

2014-10-31 Thread Hollman Enciso R.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:

 It should be, yes.

 BTW the link you sent - it's changing existing VR offering...

 To make another system offering a DEFAUTL offering, use the stuff explained
 here:

 http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/service_offerings.html#changing-the-default-system-offering-for-system-vms

 Best


Thanks a lot.


-- 
Hollman Eduardo Enciso R.
http://algolibre.com
@hollman


Re: XenServer

2014-10-31 Thread Nux!
Andrija,

You can still do volume snapshotting with KVM, works fine.
http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html

All we need is a way to quickly restore the volume, some guys at leaseweb were 
working on something like this, hope to see this feature in future versions.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 09:37:49
 Subject: Re: XenServer

 My vote also for KVM snapshooting - having all the nice fetaures, but
 without basic virtualization stuff like snapshotting - it simply drives me
 and our client nuts...
 
 On 31 October 2014 10:03, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
 
 Is there a feature request for this support or should we open one? I would
 like to see this implemented for KVM.

 Andrei
 - Original Message -

  From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 11:25:10 PM
  Subject: Re: XenServer

  Andrei, I am hopeful the next incarnation of XenServer will be much
  better/modern, with support for CEPH, GlusterFS etc.

  Re KVM snapshotting, KVM can do live snapshots of the volumes+memory
  (you can do it with virsh), but ACS doesn't support it; forgot
  why.

  Lucian

  --
  Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

  Nux!
  www.nux.ro

  - Original Message -
   From: Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 21:24:06
   Subject: Re: XenServer

   I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph
   support. I do
   prefer XenServer and the feature list of ACS + XenServer is a bit
   better.
  
   It sucks not having proper snapshotting in KVM where one can create
   the whole vm
   snapshot (volumes + memory) very quickly without the need to bother
   snapshotting every volume and wait for ages.
  
   Andrei
   - Original Message -
  
   From: motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:43:32 PM
   Subject: Re: XenServer
  
   I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really like
   XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines
   running
   KVM,
   ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to
   another
   takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with Balloon
   driver,
   I am
   traumatize using KVM.
  
   XenServer don't need to install cloudstack agent is already
   integrated. I
   am very happy with XenServer. I still need to work out a few
   lingering
   issues but thus far am a happy person.
  
   Thanks,
   -Motty
  
   On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
   and...@arhont.com
   wrote:
  
I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on KVM.
XenServer
does it so much better!
   
- Original Message -
   
 From: Vladimir Melnik v.mel...@uplink.ua
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:09:17 PM
 Subject: RE: XenServer
   
 Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic!
 Now
 I
 understand that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already
 have
 a bunch of hosts running KVM and it really won't be a good
 idea
 to
 bread such a zoo.
   
 The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change
 configuration of a virtual machine without restarting it. As I
 know,
 KVM doesn't support it yet, am I right? Other XenServer
 features
 don't seem to be so exciting to me :)
   
 One more time - thanks to all who have helped me to decide not
 to
 do
 something that I would regret.
   
 Best regards,
 V.
   
  
   --
   Thanks for your support,
Motty

 
 
 
 --
 
 Andrija Panić
 --
  http://admintweets.com
 --


Re: XenServer

2014-10-31 Thread Andrija Panic
Nux,

I understand this - but a question for you - you have i.e. 3 volumes
attached to a VM - how do you snapshot those and make sure they are
snapshoted in the EXACT same moment, to preserve data integrity of the data
inside VM - you have i.e. database files on 1 volume, database logs on
another.

This is a reall question, not kidding ? What I know, you can turnoff VM,
and then snapshot one by one - but this is not the goal of the
snapshotting...
?

Thanks



On 31 October 2014 16:06, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Andrija,

 You can still do volume snapshotting with KVM, works fine.

 http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html

 All we need is a way to quickly restore the volume, some guys at leaseweb
 were working on something like this, hope to see this feature in future
 versions.

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
  From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 09:37:49
  Subject: Re: XenServer

  My vote also for KVM snapshooting - having all the nice fetaures, but
  without basic virtualization stuff like snapshotting - it simply drives
 me
  and our client nuts...
 
  On 31 October 2014 10:03, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
 
  Is there a feature request for this support or should we open one? I
 would
  like to see this implemented for KVM.
 
  Andrei
  - Original Message -
 
   From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 11:25:10 PM
   Subject: Re: XenServer
 
   Andrei, I am hopeful the next incarnation of XenServer will be much
   better/modern, with support for CEPH, GlusterFS etc.
 
   Re KVM snapshotting, KVM can do live snapshots of the volumes+memory
   (you can do it with virsh), but ACS doesn't support it; forgot
   why.
 
   Lucian
 
   --
   Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
   Nux!
   www.nux.ro
 
   - Original Message -
From: Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 21:24:06
Subject: Re: XenServer
 
I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph
support. I do
prefer XenServer and the feature list of ACS + XenServer is a bit
better.
   
It sucks not having proper snapshotting in KVM where one can create
the whole vm
snapshot (volumes + memory) very quickly without the need to bother
snapshotting every volume and wait for ages.
   
Andrei
- Original Message -
   
From: motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:43:32 PM
Subject: Re: XenServer
   
I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really like
XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines
running
KVM,
ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to
another
takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with Balloon
driver,
I am
traumatize using KVM.
   
XenServer don't need to install cloudstack agent is already
integrated. I
am very happy with XenServer. I still need to work out a few
lingering
issues but thus far am a happy person.
   
Thanks,
-Motty
   
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
and...@arhont.com
wrote:
   
 I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on KVM.
 XenServer
 does it so much better!

 - Original Message -

  From: Vladimir Melnik v.mel...@uplink.ua
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:09:17 PM
  Subject: RE: XenServer

  Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic!
  Now
  I
  understand that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already
  have
  a bunch of hosts running KVM and it really won't be a good
  idea
  to
  bread such a zoo.

  The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change
  configuration of a virtual machine without restarting it. As I
  know,
  KVM doesn't support it yet, am I right? Other XenServer
  features
  don't seem to be so exciting to me :)

  One more time - thanks to all who have helped me to decide not
  to
  do
  something that I would regret.

  Best regards,
  V.

   
--
Thanks for your support,
 Motty
 
 
 
 
  --
 
  Andrija Panić
  --
   http://admintweets.com
  --




-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--


Re: XenServer

2014-10-31 Thread Nux!
Andrija,

AFAIK you can't snapshot all the volumes in the exact same moment, but I am not 
sure if it really needed in your case.
VM snapshot it's what you would need, only supported for Xenserver and VMware; 
we need to push for VM snapshot for KVM as well, I know it's possible as I have 
done it manually with virsh.

There are different ways around a problem though, if you are running mysql with 
innodb for example you could just do a mysqldump (with --single-transaction to 
avoid locking the tables).

HTH
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 15:10:26
 Subject: Re: XenServer

 Nux,
 
 I understand this - but a question for you - you have i.e. 3 volumes
 attached to a VM - how do you snapshot those and make sure they are
 snapshoted in the EXACT same moment, to preserve data integrity of the data
 inside VM - you have i.e. database files on 1 volume, database logs on
 another.
 
 This is a reall question, not kidding ? What I know, you can turnoff VM,
 and then snapshot one by one - but this is not the goal of the
 snapshotting...
 ?
 
 Thanks
 
 
 
 On 31 October 2014 16:06, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 
 Andrija,

 You can still do volume snapshotting with KVM, works fine.

 http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html

 All we need is a way to quickly restore the volume, some guys at leaseweb
 were working on something like this, hope to see this feature in future
 versions.

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
  From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 09:37:49
  Subject: Re: XenServer

  My vote also for KVM snapshooting - having all the nice fetaures, but
  without basic virtualization stuff like snapshotting - it simply drives
 me
  and our client nuts...
 
  On 31 October 2014 10:03, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
 
  Is there a feature request for this support or should we open one? I
 would
  like to see this implemented for KVM.
 
  Andrei
  - Original Message -
 
   From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 11:25:10 PM
   Subject: Re: XenServer
 
   Andrei, I am hopeful the next incarnation of XenServer will be much
   better/modern, with support for CEPH, GlusterFS etc.
 
   Re KVM snapshotting, KVM can do live snapshots of the volumes+memory
   (you can do it with virsh), but ACS doesn't support it; forgot
   why.
 
   Lucian
 
   --
   Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
   Nux!
   www.nux.ro
 
   - Original Message -
From: Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 21:24:06
Subject: Re: XenServer
 
I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph
support. I do
prefer XenServer and the feature list of ACS + XenServer is a bit
better.
   
It sucks not having proper snapshotting in KVM where one can create
the whole vm
snapshot (volumes + memory) very quickly without the need to bother
snapshotting every volume and wait for ages.
   
Andrei
- Original Message -
   
From: motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:43:32 PM
Subject: Re: XenServer
   
I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really like
XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines
running
KVM,
ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to
another
takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with Balloon
driver,
I am
traumatize using KVM.
   
XenServer don't need to install cloudstack agent is already
integrated. I
am very happy with XenServer. I still need to work out a few
lingering
issues but thus far am a happy person.
   
Thanks,
-Motty
   
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
and...@arhont.com
wrote:
   
 I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on KVM.
 XenServer
 does it so much better!

 - Original Message -

  From: Vladimir Melnik v.mel...@uplink.ua
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:09:17 PM
  Subject: RE: XenServer

  Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic!
  Now
  I
  understand that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already
  have
  a bunch of hosts running KVM and it really won't be a good
  idea
  to
  bread such a zoo.

  The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change
  configuration of a virtual 

Re: [ACS43][MGMT Server][Load Balancing]

2014-10-31 Thread benoit lair
Hi,

i retried an install of LB Mgmt servers :

On the first mgmt server 192.168.0.10 i tried a :
cloudstack-setup-databases cloud:password@192.168.0.200
cloud%3Apassword@192.168.0.10 --deploy-as=root:mypassroot -e file -m
mypassphrase -k mypassphrase -i 192.168.0.100

192.168.0.100 is the vip of the netscaler
the 192.168.0.10 if the first mgmt server node (192.168.0.11 is the second)

Whe i try to start the mgmt server i have this error :

2014-10-31 16:05:14,246 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null)
Execution is successful.
2014-10-31 16:05:14,285 INFO  [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null) Start
configuring cluster manager : ClusterManagerImpl
2014-10-31 16:05:14,285 INFO  [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null)
Cluster node IP : 192.168.0.100
2014-10-31 16:05:14,292 ERROR [o.a.c.s.l.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle]
(main:null) Failed to configure ClusterManagerImpl
javax.naming.ConfigurationException: cluster node IP should be valid local
address where the server is running, please check your configuration

And the management server does not start.

What did i miss ?

Thanks for your responses.

Regards, Benoit.


2014-10-30 10:36 GMT+01:00 Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com:

 Hi,

  On 30-Oct-2014, at 2:52 pm, benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  So when doing a cloudstack-setup-databases with -i 192.168.0.100 i
 have
  to specify the vip of the netscaler ? As well i am on the first node or
 on
  the second node or N node ?

 The -i ip is used as the host IP by CloudStack management server, among
 other things this is especially used by systemvms to connect to mgmt
 server. So, if you’re load balancing using netscaler, use the netscaler IP.
 Make sure to configure ports 8080, 8250 appropriately. Make sure all the
 ACS mgmt servers (primary/first one and others) can connect to mysql server
 from their respective IPs.

  Yes the management server was crashed, for the moment i don't have the
  access to this management server pool.
  As soon i'm getting back to this mgmt server pool, i give you more infos.
 
  I'm going to reinstall some fresh mgmt servers and give you more
 feedback.

 Sure.

  Concerning the mgmt server log entries Resp: Routing to peer, is it
  normal that the mgmt server is producing so much log entries with this
  message (seeing my mgmt log file growing very fast).

 Since, both the management servers are loadbalancing internal calls,
 you’ll see these a lot. You may plan your log storage appropriately or
 configure log4j xml to not log INFO/DEBUG etc.

 Regards,
 Rohit Yadav
 Software Architect, ShapeBlue
 M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

 IaaS Cloud Design  Build
 http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Infrastructure Support
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
 company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
 company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
 Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
 and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
 a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
 license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.



Re: XenServer

2014-10-31 Thread Andrija Panic
Nux, I agree that we need to push that - but since I'm not a develoepr, no
reall use of me :) If I need to push somewhere, just let me know.
Anyway, user want a single click SNAPSHOT - and an option for revert -
talking about public cloud

Cheers

On 31 October 2014 16:18, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Andrija,

 AFAIK you can't snapshot all the volumes in the exact same moment, but I
 am not sure if it really needed in your case.
 VM snapshot it's what you would need, only supported for Xenserver and
 VMware; we need to push for VM snapshot for KVM as well, I know it's
 possible as I have done it manually with virsh.

 There are different ways around a problem though, if you are running mysql
 with innodb for example you could just do a mysqldump (with
 --single-transaction to avoid locking the tables).

 HTH
 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
  From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 15:10:26
  Subject: Re: XenServer

  Nux,
 
  I understand this - but a question for you - you have i.e. 3 volumes
  attached to a VM - how do you snapshot those and make sure they are
  snapshoted in the EXACT same moment, to preserve data integrity of the
 data
  inside VM - you have i.e. database files on 1 volume, database logs on
  another.
 
  This is a reall question, not kidding ? What I know, you can turnoff VM,
  and then snapshot one by one - but this is not the goal of the
  snapshotting...
  ?
 
  Thanks
 
 
 
  On 31 October 2014 16:06, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 
  Andrija,
 
  You can still do volume snapshotting with KVM, works fine.
 
 
 http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html
 
  All we need is a way to quickly restore the volume, some guys at
 leaseweb
  were working on something like this, hope to see this feature in future
  versions.
 
  --
  Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
  Nux!
  www.nux.ro
 
  - Original Message -
   From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 09:37:49
   Subject: Re: XenServer
 
   My vote also for KVM snapshooting - having all the nice fetaures, but
   without basic virtualization stuff like snapshotting - it simply
 drives
  me
   and our client nuts...
  
   On 31 October 2014 10:03, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
 wrote:
  
   Is there a feature request for this support or should we open one? I
  would
   like to see this implemented for KVM.
  
   Andrei
   - Original Message -
  
From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 11:25:10 PM
Subject: Re: XenServer
  
Andrei, I am hopeful the next incarnation of XenServer will be much
better/modern, with support for CEPH, GlusterFS etc.
  
Re KVM snapshotting, KVM can do live snapshots of the
 volumes+memory
(you can do it with virsh), but ACS doesn't support it; forgot
why.
  
Lucian
  
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
  
Nux!
www.nux.ro
  
- Original Message -
 From: Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 21:24:06
 Subject: Re: XenServer
  
 I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph
 support. I do
 prefer XenServer and the feature list of ACS + XenServer is a bit
 better.

 It sucks not having proper snapshotting in KVM where one can
 create
 the whole vm
 snapshot (volumes + memory) very quickly without the need to
 bother
 snapshotting every volume and wait for ages.

 Andrei
 - Original Message -

 From: motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:43:32 PM
 Subject: Re: XenServer

 I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really
 like
 XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines
 running
 KVM,
 ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to
 another
 takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with Balloon
 driver,
 I am
 traumatize using KVM.

 XenServer don't need to install cloudstack agent is already
 integrated. I
 am very happy with XenServer. I still need to work out a few
 lingering
 issues but thus far am a happy person.

 Thanks,
 -Motty

 On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
 and...@arhont.com
 wrote:

  I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on
 KVM.
  XenServer
  does it so much better!
 
  - Original Message -
 
   From: Vladimir Melnik v.mel...@uplink.ua
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: 

Re: Status: update from 4.4.0 - 4.4.1 still broken ?

2014-10-31 Thread motty cruz
Vadim, I am glad it worked for you. I did not realize you were using Ubuntu
for management. I believe thomas.schneide thomas.schnei...@euskill.com gave
that tip about updating the db earlier in this email.

Thanks Lucdion for taking this to development.
-Motty

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org
wrote:

 I will update the RN then.


 On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
 vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
  wrote:

  Monty,
 
  Thank you for tips. I have Ubuntu at my managment servers and
  packages are not yet ready. So I have to use shapeblue repository like
 this:
  file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/cloudstack.list contains:
  deb http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/debian/4.4
  ./
 
  I also used this template
 
 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.1-xen.vhd.bz2
  And finally I have updated database with ALTER TABLE
  `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT NULL DEFAULT  '1'  
 
  After management server restart I was able to see management
  console and log-in into CS !
  It seems DB update is vital for upgrade.
 
  Now I am updating system VM, but CS 4.4.1  is already usable.
 
  Thank you all !
 
  Vadim.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 7:00 PM
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: Re: Status: update from 4.4.0 - 4.4.1 still broken ?
 
  HI PL,
  I upgrade my testing cluster for 3 times with bad results, until I
  manually updated the DB as Andrija suggested in this email.
 
  Thanks,
  Celso
 
  On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org
  wrote:
 
   upgrading from 4.4.0 really required this manual db patch:
   ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT  NULL
   DEFAULT  '1'
  
   ?
   If so we will update the RN..
  
   PL
  
   On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:29 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  
Hi Vadim,
I finally was able to upgrade successfully Cloudstack 4.4.0 to
Cloudstack 4.4.1. I used this guider:
   
   
   http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgr
   ade-4.4.html
   
Download System VMs from here:
   http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/
I specifically used this:
   
   
   http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.1-xen
   .vhd.bz2
   
instead of the one suggested in the guide.
   
Also, I executed the following two command:
yum upgrade cloudstack-management
once that finished successfully
yum update (updates java)
   
This also failed for me:
   
nohup cloudstack-sysvmadm -d IPaddress -u cloud -p password -a 
sysvm.log 21 
   
but I run that command any way:
   
Also I log in to my database server:
   
ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT  NULL
DEFAULT  '1'
   
restarted management server and all worked.
   
Hope this help you!
ThanksMotty
   
   
   
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote:
   
 I have tried to do upgrade 2nd time and failed again. The sequence
 of actions is described here:

   
   http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgr
   ade-4.4.html

 Followed instructions until the end. VM upgrade has taken more
 than 5 hrs.  The result of update is:
 -
 Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
 ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 25

 Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)

 Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
 ERROR: Failed to stop console proxy vm with id 1

 Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .

 Stopping and starting 1 running routing vm(s)...
 2
 Done restarting router(s).
 ---

 After restarting managment server workers are not querying status
 and resources anymore. The last lines at management server log are:

 ---

 2014-10-30 08:48:10,207 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
 Discovered plugin UcsManagerImpl
 2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
 Discovered plugin VpcVirtualRouterElement
 2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
 Discovered plugin BaremetalPxeManagerImpl
 2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
 Discovered plugin BaremetalManagerImpl
 2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
 Discovered plugin ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl
 2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
 Discovered plugin ManagementServerImpl
 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null)
 Discovered plugin DedicatedResourceManagerImpl
 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG 

Re: XenServer

2014-10-31 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
Andrija, 

Also, I might add that the snapshotting should not take a long time, like 
what's currently happening with KVM. It takes absolutely ages for the snapshot 
to complete while the image is being copied from primary to secondary storage. 
If you have a bunch of volumes you want to snapshot, they just take up all the 
queue and eventually timeout. Try taking a snapshot of about 50+ volumes at the 
same time, which is not very uncommon for a medium infrastructure, let alone a 
large cloud. Things will get broken pretty quickly. 

Even if you are using ceph storage with the built in capabilities for doing rbd 
snapshotting, this mechanism is still somewhat broken and buggy. For instance, 
it would be nice to have a working ability to keep the snapshots on the primary 
storage to remove this time consuming primary-secondary storage coping, but 
this feature has been broken for about a year already with no prospects of 
being fixed as far as I can tell. 

So, as it stands at the moment, looking from the customer perspective, the 
snapshotting is broken with KVM and needs to be addressed asap. Not really sure 
why this is not a priority for the dev team? It seems that the team is pushing 
those fancy features into the new releases without concentrating on the basics 
of what the clients want. Very frustrating for the clients ((( 

Andrei 
- Original Message -

 From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 3:35:20 PM
 Subject: Re: XenServer

 Nux, I agree that we need to push that - but since I'm not a
 develoepr, no
 reall use of me :) If I need to push somewhere, just let me know.
 Anyway, user want a single click SNAPSHOT - and an option for revert
 -
 talking about public cloud

 Cheers

 On 31 October 2014 16:18, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

  Andrija,
 
  AFAIK you can't snapshot all the volumes in the exact same moment,
  but I
  am not sure if it really needed in your case.
  VM snapshot it's what you would need, only supported for Xenserver
  and
  VMware; we need to push for VM snapshot for KVM as well, I know
  it's
  possible as I have done it manually with virsh.
 
  There are different ways around a problem though, if you are
  running mysql
  with innodb for example you could just do a mysqldump (with
  --single-transaction to avoid locking the tables).
 
  HTH
  Lucian
 
  --
  Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
  Nux!
  www.nux.ro
 
  - Original Message -
   From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 15:10:26
   Subject: Re: XenServer
 
   Nux,
  
   I understand this - but a question for you - you have i.e. 3
   volumes
   attached to a VM - how do you snapshot those and make sure they
   are
   snapshoted in the EXACT same moment, to preserve data integrity
   of the
  data
   inside VM - you have i.e. database files on 1 volume, database
   logs on
   another.
  
   This is a reall question, not kidding ? What I know, you can
   turnoff VM,
   and then snapshot one by one - but this is not the goal of the
   snapshotting...
   ?
  
   Thanks
  
  
  
   On 31 October 2014 16:06, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
  
   Andrija,
  
   You can still do volume snapshotting with KVM, works fine.
  
  
  http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html
  
   All we need is a way to quickly restore the volume, some guys at
  leaseweb
   were working on something like this, hope to see this feature in
   future
   versions.
  
   --
   Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
  
   Nux!
   www.nux.ro
  
   - Original Message -
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 09:37:49
Subject: Re: XenServer
  
My vote also for KVM snapshooting - having all the nice
fetaures, but
without basic virtualization stuff like snapshotting - it
simply
  drives
   me
and our client nuts...
   
On 31 October 2014 10:03, Andrei Mikhailovsky
and...@arhont.com
  wrote:
   
Is there a feature request for this support or should we open
one? I
   would
like to see this implemented for KVM.
   
Andrei
- Original Message -
   
 From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 11:25:10 PM
 Subject: Re: XenServer
   
 Andrei, I am hopeful the next incarnation of XenServer will
 be much
 better/modern, with support for CEPH, GlusterFS etc.
   
 Re KVM snapshotting, KVM can do live snapshots of the
  volumes+memory
 (you can do it with virsh), but ACS doesn't support it;
 forgot
 why.
   
 Lucian
   
 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
   
 Nux!
 www.nux.ro
   
 - Original Message -
  From: Andrei Mikhailovsky 

Re: XenServer

2014-10-31 Thread Nux!
I meant to push the developers to do it. :)

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 15:35:20
 Subject: Re: XenServer

 Nux, I agree that we need to push that - but since I'm not a develoepr, no
 reall use of me :) If I need to push somewhere, just let me know.
 Anyway, user want a single click SNAPSHOT - and an option for revert -
 talking about public cloud
 
 Cheers
 
 On 31 October 2014 16:18, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 
 Andrija,

 AFAIK you can't snapshot all the volumes in the exact same moment, but I
 am not sure if it really needed in your case.
 VM snapshot it's what you would need, only supported for Xenserver and
 VMware; we need to push for VM snapshot for KVM as well, I know it's
 possible as I have done it manually with virsh.

 There are different ways around a problem though, if you are running mysql
 with innodb for example you could just do a mysqldump (with
 --single-transaction to avoid locking the tables).

 HTH
 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
  From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 15:10:26
  Subject: Re: XenServer

  Nux,
 
  I understand this - but a question for you - you have i.e. 3 volumes
  attached to a VM - how do you snapshot those and make sure they are
  snapshoted in the EXACT same moment, to preserve data integrity of the
 data
  inside VM - you have i.e. database files on 1 volume, database logs on
  another.
 
  This is a reall question, not kidding ? What I know, you can turnoff VM,
  and then snapshot one by one - but this is not the goal of the
  snapshotting...
  ?
 
  Thanks
 
 
 
  On 31 October 2014 16:06, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 
  Andrija,
 
  You can still do volume snapshotting with KVM, works fine.
 
 
 http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html
 
  All we need is a way to quickly restore the volume, some guys at
 leaseweb
  were working on something like this, hope to see this feature in future
  versions.
 
  --
  Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
  Nux!
  www.nux.ro
 
  - Original Message -
   From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 09:37:49
   Subject: Re: XenServer
 
   My vote also for KVM snapshooting - having all the nice fetaures, but
   without basic virtualization stuff like snapshotting - it simply
 drives
  me
   and our client nuts...
  
   On 31 October 2014 10:03, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
 wrote:
  
   Is there a feature request for this support or should we open one? I
  would
   like to see this implemented for KVM.
  
   Andrei
   - Original Message -
  
From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 11:25:10 PM
Subject: Re: XenServer
  
Andrei, I am hopeful the next incarnation of XenServer will be much
better/modern, with support for CEPH, GlusterFS etc.
  
Re KVM snapshotting, KVM can do live snapshots of the
 volumes+memory
(you can do it with virsh), but ACS doesn't support it; forgot
why.
  
Lucian
  
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
  
Nux!
www.nux.ro
  
- Original Message -
 From: Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 21:24:06
 Subject: Re: XenServer
  
 I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph
 support. I do
 prefer XenServer and the feature list of ACS + XenServer is a bit
 better.

 It sucks not having proper snapshotting in KVM where one can
 create
 the whole vm
 snapshot (volumes + memory) very quickly without the need to
 bother
 snapshotting every volume and wait for ages.

 Andrei
 - Original Message -

 From: motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:43:32 PM
 Subject: Re: XenServer

 I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really
 like
 XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines
 running
 KVM,
 ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to
 another
 takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with Balloon
 driver,
 I am
 traumatize using KVM.

 XenServer don't need to install cloudstack agent is already
 integrated. I
 am very happy with XenServer. I still need to work out a few
 lingering
 issues but thus far am a happy person.

 Thanks,
 -Motty

 On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
 

Re: XenServer

2014-10-31 Thread Andrija Panic
Andrei - I agree 100% with you - fancy stuff, new features, and basic ones
needs to be fixed - snapshoting, custom vxlan MTU and so on, GUI
brokne/buggy, and so on.

We have customer who wants to do 90 days snapshoting and possibility to
revert back - with this approach coping from primary to secondary volume,
simple 50GB volume X 90 days = 4.5 TB of data on secondary storage - for
me, this is nonsese... snapshots needs to stay on primary storage (must be
shared storage I undestand etc..)

Anyway, we agree, let see if the issues get fixed by chance :)
Cheers

On 31 October 2014 17:33, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:

 Andrija,

 Also, I might add that the snapshotting should not take a long time, like
 what's currently happening with KVM. It takes absolutely ages for the
 snapshot to complete while the image is being copied from primary to
 secondary storage. If you have a bunch of volumes you want to snapshot,
 they just take up all the queue and eventually timeout. Try taking a
 snapshot of about 50+ volumes at the same time, which is not very uncommon
 for a medium infrastructure, let alone a large cloud. Things will get
 broken pretty quickly.

 Even if you are using ceph storage with the built in capabilities for
 doing rbd snapshotting, this mechanism is still somewhat broken and buggy.
 For instance, it would be nice to have a working ability to keep the
 snapshots on the primary storage to remove this time consuming
 primary-secondary storage coping, but this feature has been broken for
 about a year already with no prospects of being fixed as far as I can tell.

 So, as it stands at the moment, looking from the customer perspective, the
 snapshotting is broken with KVM and needs to be addressed asap. Not really
 sure why this is not a priority for the dev team? It seems that the team is
 pushing those fancy features into the new releases without concentrating on
 the basics of what the clients want. Very frustrating for the clients (((

 Andrei
 - Original Message -

  From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 3:35:20 PM
  Subject: Re: XenServer

  Nux, I agree that we need to push that - but since I'm not a
  develoepr, no
  reall use of me :) If I need to push somewhere, just let me know.
  Anyway, user want a single click SNAPSHOT - and an option for revert
  -
  talking about public cloud

  Cheers

  On 31 October 2014 16:18, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

   Andrija,
  
   AFAIK you can't snapshot all the volumes in the exact same moment,
   but I
   am not sure if it really needed in your case.
   VM snapshot it's what you would need, only supported for Xenserver
   and
   VMware; we need to push for VM snapshot for KVM as well, I know
   it's
   possible as I have done it manually with virsh.
  
   There are different ways around a problem though, if you are
   running mysql
   with innodb for example you could just do a mysqldump (with
   --single-transaction to avoid locking the tables).
  
   HTH
   Lucian
  
   --
   Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
  
   Nux!
   www.nux.ro
  
   - Original Message -
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 15:10:26
Subject: Re: XenServer
  
Nux,
   
I understand this - but a question for you - you have i.e. 3
volumes
attached to a VM - how do you snapshot those and make sure they
are
snapshoted in the EXACT same moment, to preserve data integrity
of the
   data
inside VM - you have i.e. database files on 1 volume, database
logs on
another.
   
This is a reall question, not kidding ? What I know, you can
turnoff VM,
and then snapshot one by one - but this is not the goal of the
snapshotting...
?
   
Thanks
   
   
   
On 31 October 2014 16:06, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
   
Andrija,
   
You can still do volume snapshotting with KVM, works fine.
   
   
  
 http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html
   
All we need is a way to quickly restore the volume, some guys at
   leaseweb
were working on something like this, hope to see this feature in
future
versions.
   
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
   
Nux!
www.nux.ro
   
- Original Message -
 From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 09:37:49
 Subject: Re: XenServer
   
 My vote also for KVM snapshooting - having all the nice
 fetaures, but
 without basic virtualization stuff like snapshotting - it
 simply
   drives
me
 and our client nuts...

 On 31 October 2014 10:03, Andrei Mikhailovsky
 and...@arhont.com
   wrote:

 Is there a feature request for this support or should we open
 

Re: ACS 4.4.1 DEB Packages not yet available?

2014-10-31 Thread Wido den Hollander
I downloaded 4.4.1, but the version still says 4.4.1-SNAPSHOT

Is that correct? I don't think so right.

Wido

On 30-10-14 11:04, Daan Hoogland wrote:
 I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.
 
 Wido, can you create them?
 
 
 thanks,
 
 On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Seitz
 s.se...@secretresearchfacility.com wrote:
 Hi!

 after reading the 4.4.0 - 4.4.1-thread on the list, I think I'm
 prepared for an Update.

 Running the management-node on Ubuntu 14.04 and following the documented
 update procedure (which leads to something easy as apt-get upgrade),
 I've noticed that there are no packages for 4.4.1 available at
 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.4/

 Did I miss something? Or is it just not released yet?


 cheers,

 - Stephan


 
 
 


Re: ACS 4.4.1 DEB Packages not yet available?

2014-10-31 Thread Daan Hoogland
doesn't seem right, did you pick from the release dir at apache? I
would complain to the release manager if I wasn't him. will check.

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
 I downloaded 4.4.1, but the version still says 4.4.1-SNAPSHOT

 Is that correct? I don't think so right.

 Wido

 On 30-10-14 11:04, Daan Hoogland wrote:
 I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.

 Wido, can you create them?


 thanks,

 On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Seitz
 s.se...@secretresearchfacility.com wrote:
 Hi!

 after reading the 4.4.0 - 4.4.1-thread on the list, I think I'm
 prepared for an Update.

 Running the management-node on Ubuntu 14.04 and following the documented
 update procedure (which leads to something easy as apt-get upgrade),
 I've noticed that there are no packages for 4.4.1 available at
 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.4/

 Did I miss something? Or is it just not released yet?


 cheers,

 - Stephan








-- 
Daan


Re: ACS 4.4.1 DEB Packages not yet available?

2014-10-31 Thread Daan Hoogland
I checked out 4.4.1 and the pom.xml contains 4.4.1 as version. What
did you download and where do you see a problem?

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
 doesn't seem right, did you pick from the release dir at apache? I
 would complain to the release manager if I wasn't him. will check.

 On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
 I downloaded 4.4.1, but the version still says 4.4.1-SNAPSHOT

 Is that correct? I don't think so right.

 Wido

 On 30-10-14 11:04, Daan Hoogland wrote:
 I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.

 Wido, can you create them?


 thanks,

 On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Seitz
 s.se...@secretresearchfacility.com wrote:
 Hi!

 after reading the 4.4.0 - 4.4.1-thread on the list, I think I'm
 prepared for an Update.

 Running the management-node on Ubuntu 14.04 and following the documented
 update procedure (which leads to something easy as apt-get upgrade),
 I've noticed that there are no packages for 4.4.1 available at
 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.4/

 Did I miss something? Or is it just not released yet?


 cheers,

 - Stephan








 --
 Daan



-- 
Daan


Re: XenServer

2014-10-31 Thread Alexey Zilber
Andrija,

 What we used to do at a big provider with AWS, say a VM has multiple
attached volumes with mysql running across all of them (one for data,
another for binary logs, say another for relay logs), is if the filesystem
supports freezing, you can freeze the fs, then snapshot one by one.  So for
XFS for example, this would be xfs_freeze.  There's creative ways of doing
this, combining filesystem features and LVM.  You can also do similar
things with ZFS.

-Alex

On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Andrei - I agree 100% with you - fancy stuff, new features, and basic ones
 needs to be fixed - snapshoting, custom vxlan MTU and so on, GUI
 brokne/buggy, and so on.

 We have customer who wants to do 90 days snapshoting and possibility to
 revert back - with this approach coping from primary to secondary volume,
 simple 50GB volume X 90 days = 4.5 TB of data on secondary storage - for
 me, this is nonsese... snapshots needs to stay on primary storage (must be
 shared storage I undestand etc..)

 Anyway, we agree, let see if the issues get fixed by chance :)
 Cheers

 On 31 October 2014 17:33, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:

  Andrija,
 
  Also, I might add that the snapshotting should not take a long time, like
  what's currently happening with KVM. It takes absolutely ages for the
  snapshot to complete while the image is being copied from primary to
  secondary storage. If you have a bunch of volumes you want to snapshot,
  they just take up all the queue and eventually timeout. Try taking a
  snapshot of about 50+ volumes at the same time, which is not very
 uncommon
  for a medium infrastructure, let alone a large cloud. Things will get
  broken pretty quickly.
 
  Even if you are using ceph storage with the built in capabilities for
  doing rbd snapshotting, this mechanism is still somewhat broken and
 buggy.
  For instance, it would be nice to have a working ability to keep the
  snapshots on the primary storage to remove this time consuming
  primary-secondary storage coping, but this feature has been broken for
  about a year already with no prospects of being fixed as far as I can
 tell.
 
  So, as it stands at the moment, looking from the customer perspective,
 the
  snapshotting is broken with KVM and needs to be addressed asap. Not
 really
  sure why this is not a priority for the dev team? It seems that the team
 is
  pushing those fancy features into the new releases without concentrating
 on
  the basics of what the clients want. Very frustrating for the clients (((
 
  Andrei
  - Original Message -
 
   From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 3:35:20 PM
   Subject: Re: XenServer
 
   Nux, I agree that we need to push that - but since I'm not a
   develoepr, no
   reall use of me :) If I need to push somewhere, just let me know.
   Anyway, user want a single click SNAPSHOT - and an option for revert
   -
   talking about public cloud
 
   Cheers
 
   On 31 October 2014 16:18, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 
Andrija,
   
AFAIK you can't snapshot all the volumes in the exact same moment,
but I
am not sure if it really needed in your case.
VM snapshot it's what you would need, only supported for Xenserver
and
VMware; we need to push for VM snapshot for KVM as well, I know
it's
possible as I have done it manually with virsh.
   
There are different ways around a problem though, if you are
running mysql
with innodb for example you could just do a mysqldump (with
--single-transaction to avoid locking the tables).
   
HTH
Lucian
   
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
   
Nux!
www.nux.ro
   
- Original Message -
 From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 31 October, 2014 15:10:26
 Subject: Re: XenServer
   
 Nux,

 I understand this - but a question for you - you have i.e. 3
 volumes
 attached to a VM - how do you snapshot those and make sure they
 are
 snapshoted in the EXACT same moment, to preserve data integrity
 of the
data
 inside VM - you have i.e. database files on 1 volume, database
 logs on
 another.

 This is a reall question, not kidding ? What I know, you can
 turnoff VM,
 and then snapshot one by one - but this is not the goal of the
 snapshotting...
 ?

 Thanks



 On 31 October 2014 16:06, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Andrija,

 You can still do volume snapshotting with KVM, works fine.


   
 
 http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html

 All we need is a way to quickly restore the volume, some guys at
leaseweb
 were working on something like this, hope to see this feature in