Re: [Proposal] Template for CloudStack API Reference Pages

[Rajsekhar K]

Thanks.

Format is to domonstrate the usage of the API. I think that the format
along with an example would help users understand how they can use the API.

For example, the migrateto parameter in the API has the following format:

migrateto[volume-index].volume=[volume-index].pool=Where,
[volume-index] indicates the index to identify the volume that you want to
migrate, volume= indicates the UUID of the volume that you want to
migrate, and pool= indicates the UUID of the pool where you want to
migrate the volume.

An example for this format is:

migrateto[0].volume=<71f43cd6-69b0-4d3b-9fbc-67f50963d60b>[0].pool=[1].volume=<88de0173-55c0-4c1c-a269-83d0279eeedf>[1].pool=<95d6e97c-6766-4d67-9a30-c449c15011d1>[2].volume=<1b331390-59f2-4796-9993-bf11c6e76225>[2].pool=<41fdb564-9d3b-447d-88ed-7628f7640cbc>

Thanks,
Rajsekhar

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Daejuan Jacobs  wrote:

> I assume by "Format" you mean data type.
>
> But I think this looks good. It's simple, yet it manages to nail all the
> points you need when developing on a software's API.
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:33 AM Rajsekhar K 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, All,
> >
> > This is the proposal for a new template for CloudStack API reference
> > pages. This template is based on the reference page templates for REST
> APIs.
> >
> > Please find attached the following documents for your review:
> >
> >- Template for normal and asynchronous CloudStack API references.
> >- Sample API reference page using the template for a CloudStack API
> >(listZones).
> >
> >
> > Please review this template and let me know your thoughts on this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rajsekhar
> >
>

Re: [Proposal] Template for CloudStack API Reference Pages

[Rajsekhar K]

Hi, Yiping,

Thanks for your suggestions. I have updated the template based on your
suggestions. Please find attached the updated template for your reference.

I agree with your suggestion on proof-reading the descriptions. This is an
important part of ensuring effective API references. I think the developers
can do a peer review of the descriptions before they create a PR for
reviewing and checking in the API descriptions.

I hope we will have clarity on the target release soon.

Thanks,
Rajsekhar

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Yiping Zhang  wrote:

> As a user who uses API a lot,  I would like to see following improvements
> in api reference pages:
>
> 1) In brief description for Title section, please specify if the
> referenced API is async or not.  Currently, this info is available only on
> the API listing pages with “(A)” after the api name, but not available or
> obvious anywhere on the api reference page itself.
>
> 2)  For each parameter, in addition to , , 
> attributes, it would be great to also provide following:
>  := integer | string | array | enumerate | boolean etc
>  := true | false | null | 0 etc
>
> A Notes subsection for parameters: IMHO, there are several reasons
> that such a section will be useful:
> * A list of values which have special meaning to the api and what
> are their special meanings, if any.  For example, for listVirtualMachines
> api, projectid=-1 would return instances belonging to ALL projects.  Here
> value “-1” is special.
> * combination of certain parameters are mutually exclusive, or are
> required.  Some of this info are currently present in the parameter’s
> description field. But they are usually too brief, hard to read and hard to
> understand.
>
>
> 3) Add a limitations section:
>This section describes scenarios where the referenced API does not
> apply to, or not implemented yet, or known to not work properly.  Many apis
> have limitations and the information is scattered all over places in
> documents, if exists at all. So most often users can only find out by trial
> and errors.
>
> For example,  assignVirtualMachine api has following limitations: 1)
> does not work with VM instances belonging to a project, 2) not implemented
> for Advanced networking with security group enabled.
>
> 4) Add an Authorization section or just provide info on the page
> somewhere: describe who can make this api call:  root admin, domain admin,
> or regular users.  Currently, this info is  provided by listing available
> apis in different pages titled “Root admin API”, “domain admin api” and
> “User api”.  Personally,  I prefer a separate section on each api’s
> reference page for this info so that it can’t be missed.
>
> 5)  Error response:  I really like the idea of adding this section to the
> reference page.  Please list both HTTP response code as well as CloudStack
> internal error code and error messages.
>
>
>
>
> Finally, please get some one to proof-read all descriptions.  Some of
> current API document are really hard to understand!
>
> BTW: which release is this proposal targeted for ?
>
> Just my $0.02.
>
> Yiping
>
>
> On 11/10/15, 9:10 PM, "Daejuan Jacobs"  wrote:
>
> >I assume by "Format" you mean data type.
> >
> >But I think this looks good. It's simple, yet it manages to nail all the
> >points you need when developing on a software's API.
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:33 AM Rajsekhar K 
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, All,
> >>
> >> This is the proposal for a new template for CloudStack API reference
> >> pages. This template is based on the reference page templates for REST
> APIs.
> >>
> >> Please find attached the following documents for your review:
> >>
> >>- Template for normal and asynchronous CloudStack API references.
> >>- Sample API reference page using the template for a CloudStack API
> >>(listZones).
> >>
> >>
> >> Please review this template and let me know your thoughts on this.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Rajsekhar
> >>
>


api-reference-template-version2.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document

Re: SSVM can not connect to Management

[Dag Sonstebo]

Hi Yan,

looks like you need to do some network troubleshooting:

- Can the management host name resolve itself?
- Once started does the cloudstack-management service keep running?
- Do you get any errors in /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log
- Does netstat show the management server listening on port 8250?
- From any external host can you telnet to port 8250 and get a handshake 
response?

Regards,

Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue







On 19/11/2015, 06:18, "Yan Bai"  wrote:

>The java version is 1.7.0_91. Is there anyone solved this issue before? I
>think there is something wrong in the Management server so it close the
>connection.
>
>Not only the ssvm, one of my host also has this issue. They can not
>communicate with management server on port 8250.
>
>-Yan
>
>On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:
>
>> what is the java version? upgrading java or nss might help. details at
>> http://blog.backslasher.net/java-ssl-crash.html
>>
>> ~Rajani
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Yan Bai  wrote:
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I have an issue of connection between SSVM and Management server. I am
>> > using Cloudstack 4.5.2 and XenServer 6.2
>> >
>> > 192.168.1.10 is the Management server. I have turn off firewall of
>> > Management server.
>> >
>> >
>> > Below is the error log in SSVM(/var/log/cloud.log):
>> >
>> > 2015-11-18 04:21:37,989 INFO  [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null)
>> > Connecting to 192.168.1.10:8250
>> >
>> > 2015-11-18 04:22:38,069 ERROR [utils.nio.NioConnection]
>> > (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to initialize the threads.
>> >
>> > java.io.IOException: Connection closed with -1 on reading size.
>> >
>> > at com.cloud.utils.nio.Link.doHandshake(Link.java:513)
>> >
>> > at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioClient.init(NioClient.java:81)
>> >
>> > at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioConnection.run(NioConnection.java:113)
>> >
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>> >
>> > 2015-11-18 04:22:43,076 INFO  [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null)
>> > Connecting to 192.168.1.10:8250
>> >
>> > 2015-11-18 04:23:43,154 ERROR [utils.nio.NioConnection]
>> > (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to initialize the threads.
>> >
>> > java.io.IOException: Connection closed with -1 on reading size.
>> >
>> > at com.cloud.utils.nio.Link.doHandshake(Link.java:513)
>> >
>> > at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioClient.init(NioClient.java:81)
>> >
>> > at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioConnection.run(NioConnection.java:113)
>> >
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I have ran health check in SSVM and everything looks fine:
>> >
>> > root@s-1-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm# ./ssvm-check.sh
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > First DNS server is  192.168.1.1
>> >
>> > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 48 data bytes
>> >
>> > 56 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.037 ms
>> >
>> > 56 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.895 ms
>> >
>> > --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
>> >
>> > 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
>> >
>> > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.895/0.966/1.037/0.071 ms
>> >
>> > Good: Can ping DNS server
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > Good: DNS resolves download.cloud.com
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > nfs is currently mounted
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > Management server is 192.168.1.10. Checking connectivity.
>> >
>> > Good: Can connect to management server port 8250
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > Good: Java process is running
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > Tests Complete. Look for ERROR or WARNING above.
>> >
>> >
>> > I feel like something with SSL connection. Seems that the connection
>> > between SSVM and Management server is SSL connection. So maybe something
>> > wrong with those ssl keys.
>> >
>> >
>> > -Yan
>> >
>>
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action 

Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

Dear Remi,

   I had this impression you described indeed. Have been with CS 
project from version 4.0 and updates always being very exiting thing :)
   Your words make me more confident in what you did. The idea to 
stabilize master is great! I am sorry for panic. Please, accept my 
apologize


Regards,

Vadim.


On 2015-11-18 21:29, Remi Bergsma wrote:


Hi Vadim,

Thanks for your reply. For the 4.6 release we changed the way we work. 
Instead of branching off early and making a release branch stable, we 
decided to stabilise master. We got many complaints that master didn't 
compile at times or functionality wasn't tested before it entered 
master. Making master stable was quite some work, even harder than 
making a release branch stable. I can imagine that process gives you 
the impression of "many problems".


In reality, this should bring more stable releases. 4.7 will be built 
on top of 4.6, so if 4.6 is good, 4.7 will be better (and so on). In 
the past, 4.5 was not built on top of 4.4 (so you saw problems coming 
back and had to wait until a .1 or .2 release, indeed).


4.6.0 was released after just two RC voting rounds, while previous 
releases needed more of them. That says something about the quality 
IMHO.


This is not so related to the question that was asked but I wanted to 
be sure there weren't any "problems" in 4.6 that I didn't know about 
(so they could be addressed). It's perfectly fine not to upgrade yet. 
But please don't give people the impression there are "many problems" 
while you cannot name them.


In the mean while we work on 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 and hopefully some day 
you'll have a smooth upgrade and enjoy the new features.


If you need any help with upgrading, please drop us a line on the dev 
list.


Regards,
Remi

On 18/11/15 15:45, "Vadim Kimlaychuk"  wrote:

Dear Remi,

My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were
with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very
difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user
perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his
problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than
4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal
fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good
to take a risk of immediate update :)

Vadim.

On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Hi Vadim,

What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6?

Regards,
Remi

On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk"  wrote:

Dear Audrey,

OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created
bug report in JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1] [1 [1]]. 
Since 4.5.1

this
plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated
code
that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of
problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't
know
if OVS is back there. I doubt.

I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want
to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you?

Vadim.

On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote:

Hi Vadim, thanks for your help.

After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and
yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen
it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure
PVLAN.

Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it?

Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box?

Att.,
Audrey

- Mensagem original -
De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" 
Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" 
Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10
Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan

Hello Audrey,

Look at this document:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN 
[2]

[2]
[1 [1]]
XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin
for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS
4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was
present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5.
Use
VLANs - it is more reliable.

Vadim.

On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote:

Hello everybody!

I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated
for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary
Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed
as Advanced without Security Groups.

When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN, the network is created, but
when
I try to create a new instance it does not start. I realized that the
virtual router also does not start. Adding a Guest Network without
PVLAN works as expected.

Does anyone have an idea about it?

Looking into the log I could find the information below:

2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN 

Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan

[Remi Bergsma]

Hi Vadim,

All fine, don’t worry! Glad we discussed it :-)

Regards,
Remi




On 19/11/15 10:10, "Vadim Kimlaychuk"  wrote:

>Dear Remi,
>
>I had this impression you described indeed. Have been with CS 
>project from version 4.0 and updates always being very exiting thing :)
>Your words make me more confident in what you did. The idea to 
>stabilize master is great! I am sorry for panic. Please, accept my 
>apologize
>
>Regards,
>
>Vadim.
>
>
>On 2015-11-18 21:29, Remi Bergsma wrote:
>
>> Hi Vadim,
>> 
>> Thanks for your reply. For the 4.6 release we changed the way we work. 
>> Instead of branching off early and making a release branch stable, we 
>> decided to stabilise master. We got many complaints that master didn't 
>> compile at times or functionality wasn't tested before it entered 
>> master. Making master stable was quite some work, even harder than 
>> making a release branch stable. I can imagine that process gives you 
>> the impression of "many problems".
>> 
>> In reality, this should bring more stable releases. 4.7 will be built 
>> on top of 4.6, so if 4.6 is good, 4.7 will be better (and so on). In 
>> the past, 4.5 was not built on top of 4.4 (so you saw problems coming 
>> back and had to wait until a .1 or .2 release, indeed).
>> 
>> 4.6.0 was released after just two RC voting rounds, while previous 
>> releases needed more of them. That says something about the quality 
>> IMHO.
>> 
>> This is not so related to the question that was asked but I wanted to 
>> be sure there weren't any "problems" in 4.6 that I didn't know about 
>> (so they could be addressed). It's perfectly fine not to upgrade yet. 
>> But please don't give people the impression there are "many problems" 
>> while you cannot name them.
>> 
>> In the mean while we work on 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 and hopefully some day 
>> you'll have a smooth upgrade and enjoy the new features.
>> 
>> If you need any help with upgrading, please drop us a line on the dev 
>> list.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Remi
>> 
>> On 18/11/15 15:45, "Vadim Kimlaychuk"  wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Remi,
>> 
>> My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were
>> with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very
>> difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user
>> perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his
>> problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than
>> 4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal
>> fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good
>> to take a risk of immediate update :)
>> 
>> Vadim.
>> 
>> On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Vadim,
>> 
>> What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Remi
>> 
>> On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk"  wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Audrey,
>> 
>> OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created
>> bug report in JIRA
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1] [1 [1]]. 
>> Since 4.5.1
>> this
>> plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated
>> code
>> that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of
>> problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't
>> know
>> if OVS is back there. I doubt.
>> 
>> I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want
>> to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you?
>> 
>> Vadim.
>> 
>> On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Vadim, thanks for your help.
>> 
>> After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and
>> yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen
>> it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure
>> PVLAN.
>> 
>> Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it?
>> 
>> Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box?
>> 
>> Att.,
>> Audrey
>> 
>> - Mensagem original -
>> De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" 
>> Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" 
>> Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10
>> Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
>> 
>> Hello Audrey,
>> 
>> Look at this document:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN
>>  
>> [2]
>> [2]
>> [1 [1]]
>> XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin
>> for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS
>> 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was
>> present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5.
>> Use
>> VLANs - it is more reliable.
>> 
>> Vadim.
>> 
>> On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote:
>> 
>> Hello everybody!
>> 
>> I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated
>> for Public traffic, one for 

Re: CS Custom UI on 4.5

[Sebastien Goasguen]

Erik, do you have any further ideas on this, seems Paco is stuck.

> On Nov 9, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Paco Orozco  wrote:
> 
> Hi Erik,
> 
> Yes, I've delete *.js.gz files.
> 
> The customization that is not working is:
> 
> On index.jsp I've included:
> 
> [code]
> 
> [/code]
> 
> And on upcnet.js I've included:
> 
> [code]
> (function(cloudStack) {
>cloudStack.sections.upcnet = {
>title: ' onclick="window.open(\'../gestio\')">Enterprise Hybrid Cloud'
>};
> })(cloudStack);
> [/code]
> 
> On previous versions, this code allows me to add a link on left
> navigation bar to my "Enterprise Hybrid Cloud".
> 
> On 4.5.2 is not working anymore :-(
> 
> Thanks
> Paco
> 
> On 08/11/15 18:06, Erik Weber wrote:
>> Did you delete the *.js.gz files?
>> 
>> Erik
>> 
>> Den søndag 8. november 2015 skrev Paco Orozco 
>> følgende:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> We've just upgraded our CloudStack portal to 4.5.2, from 4.4.4.
>>> 
>>> We've been using some custom UI modifications in order to add two
>>> external links to left navigation bar, and change the help button to a
>>> own maintained wiki.
>>> 
>>> After this upgrade It doesn't work. I've revised all my code (mainly
>>> *.js files) and It's ok. I've test it on a CS 4.4.4 without problems.
>>> 
>>> Has something change on CS 4.5?
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> Paco
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Paco Orozco (paco.oro...@upcnet.es )
>>> SIP: paco.oro...@upcnet.es 
>>> Backoffice. Àrea de Serveis TIC
>>> UPCNet
>>> Edifici Vértex - Pl. Eusebi Güell, 6
>>> Teléfon centraleta: 93.40.11600
>>> GPG Key ID: 0x3EDEC0AC
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Paco Orozco (paco.oro...@upcnet.es)
> SIP: paco.oro...@upcnet.es
> Service Operation
> UPCNet
> Edifici Vértex - Pl. Eusebi Güell, 6
> Teléfon centraleta: 93.40.11600
> GPG Key ID: 0x3EDEC0AC
> 

Re: CS Custom UI on 4.5

[Erik Weber]

Unfortunately no, I've only done this a few times as PoCs, and not with
recent versions

-- 
Erik

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Sebastien Goasguen 
wrote:

> Erik, do you have any further ideas on this, seems Paco is stuck.
>
> > On Nov 9, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Paco Orozco  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Erik,
> >
> > Yes, I've delete *.js.gz files.
> >
> > The customization that is not working is:
> >
> > On index.jsp I've included:
> >
> > [code]
> >  src="scripts/upcnet.js?t=<%=now%>">
> > [/code]
> >
> > And on upcnet.js I've included:
> >
> > [code]
> > (function(cloudStack) {
> >cloudStack.sections.upcnet = {
> >title: ' > onclick="window.open(\'../gestio\')">Enterprise Hybrid Cloud'
> >};
> > })(cloudStack);
> > [/code]
> >
> > On previous versions, this code allows me to add a link on left
> > navigation bar to my "Enterprise Hybrid Cloud".
> >
> > On 4.5.2 is not working anymore :-(
> >
> > Thanks
> > Paco
> >
> > On 08/11/15 18:06, Erik Weber wrote:
> >> Did you delete the *.js.gz files?
> >>
> >> Erik
> >>
> >> Den søndag 8. november 2015 skrev Paco Orozco 
> >> følgende:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> We've just upgraded our CloudStack portal to 4.5.2, from 4.4.4.
> >>>
> >>> We've been using some custom UI modifications in order to add two
> >>> external links to left navigation bar, and change the help button to a
> >>> own maintained wiki.
> >>>
> >>> After this upgrade It doesn't work. I've revised all my code (mainly
> >>> *.js files) and It's ok. I've test it on a CS 4.4.4 without problems.
> >>>
> >>> Has something change on CS 4.5?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance
> >>> Paco
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Paco Orozco (paco.oro...@upcnet.es )
> >>> SIP: paco.oro...@upcnet.es 
> >>> Backoffice. Àrea de Serveis TIC
> >>> UPCNet
> >>> Edifici Vértex - Pl. Eusebi Güell, 6
> >>> Teléfon centraleta: 93.40.11600
> >>> GPG Key ID: 0x3EDEC0AC
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Paco Orozco (paco.oro...@upcnet.es)
> > SIP: paco.oro...@upcnet.es
> > Service Operation
> > UPCNet
> > Edifici Vértex - Pl. Eusebi Güell, 6
> > Teléfon centraleta: 93.40.11600
> > GPG Key ID: 0x3EDEC0AC
> >
>
>

Re: gpg verification: missing key 0EE3D884

[Rene Moser]

Hi

On 11/17/2015 12:43 AM, Udo Rader wrote:

> So is the key missing from http://www.apache.org/dist/cloudstack/KEYS or

Please use the A graded HTTPs service for downloading software and
verifying keys, to reduce the risk of man in the middle attacks, be more
paranoid!

https://www.apache.org/dist/cloudstack/KEYS

Yours
René

failed to clean restart a network due to bad template url

[Patrick W .]

Hi all,

 

Wondering if this is a bug or if it can be fixed quickly. I’m
running 4.4.1 with xen. Original install was 4.3 and did upgrade to 4.4.1
later.

 

When I attempt to do a clean restart of a network, the existing
VR is getting expunged correctly, but the new VR isn’t being created and I
receive an error: Failed to Restart Network.

 

To workaround this error, I simply need to start a VM part
of this Network and it create the new VR correctly.

 

Management logs show this particular error:


2015-11-19
12:50:09,050 WARN 
[o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] (API-Job-Executor-24:ctx-5625f3c1
job-41558 ctx-c6332a2b) Failed to implement network
Ntwk[35443c6e-f0d0-4dd2-9413-9a8b8112d20f|Guest|8] elements and resources as a 
part
of network restart due to

com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
Template 9 has not been completely downloaded to zone 1

 

Template 9 is the following:


SystemVM Template
(HyperV)

http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.0-6-hyperv.vhd.bz2

DOWNLOAD_ERROR

HTTP Server returned
404 (expected 200 OK)

 

Indeed the url is wrong and it can’t grab it. But why is it
attempting to download the hyperv one, if I’m not using hyper-v at all? Why is 
this ruining the clean restart of a network if I don't need that template at 
all?

 

Any quick fix here? Can someone upload the correct file in
.bz2 instead of .zip? Or can I edit the url in my DB to put the zip equivalent 
(can CS then
correctly complete the download process?)

 
Thanks in advance!

Re: CS Custom UI on 4.5

[Paco Orozco]

Hi

On 19/11/15 21:48, Erik Weber wrote:
> Unfortunately no, I've only done this a few times as PoCs, and not with
> recent versions
> 

I've been doing some research and I think something has broken on 4.5,
because js code doesn't allow HTML on title navigation bar links.

I'll continue trying to generate this code.

Thanks

Paco

-- 
Paco Orozco (paco.oro...@upcnet.es)
SIP: paco.oro...@upcnet.es
Service Operation
UPCNet
Edifici Vértex - Pl. Eusebi Güell, 6
Teléfon centraleta: 93.40.11600
GPG Key ID: 0x3EDEC0AC



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[DISCUSS] ACS 4.5.3 release

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi all,

I want to ask how happy people are with the last 4.5.2 release and if there are 
any issues they want to report or want to be fixed in a future minor release. 
If we’ve enough demand, we can work towards a last 4.5 minor release. Thanks.

Rohit Yadav
Software Architect

[cid:image003.png@01D122E8.F6EFE910]


D: +44 20 3642 6102 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +91 88 262 30892

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com | 
www.shapeblue.com | 
Twitter:@ShapeBlue

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [DISCUSS] ACS 4.5.3 release

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi,

Thanks for sharing. The patches to support CentOS7 as KVM hosts are in 4.5 
branch, so will be available in 4.5.3.

On 20-Nov-2015, at 12:53 PM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman 
> wrote:

I am looking for full Centos 7 support for KVM hosts. I know that 4.6.0 and
4.5.3 will support it. Do we have any fixed date for public 4.6.0 release?

4.6.0 has been released now, you can get it now: 
http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html
And, also available from our repositories:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/

Rohit Yadav
Software Architect

[cid:image003.png@01D122E8.F6EFE910]


D: +44 20 3642 6102 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +91 88 262 30892

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com | 
www.shapeblue.com | 
Twitter:@ShapeBlue

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [DISCUSS] ACS 4.5.3 release

[Özhan Rüzgar Karaman]

Hi Rohid;
I am looking for full Centos 7 support for KVM hosts. I know that 4.6.0 and
4.5.3 will support it. Do we have any fixed date for public 4.6.0 release?

Thanks
Özhan

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I want to ask how happy people are with the last 4.5.2 release and if
> there are any issues they want to report or want to be fixed in a future
> minor release. If we’ve enough demand, we can work towards a last 4.5 minor
> release. Thanks.
>
> Rohit Yadav
> *Software Architect*
>
>
>
> * D: +44 20 3642 6102 <+442036426102> | S: +44 20 3603 0540
> <+442036030540> | M: +91 88 262 30892 <+447770745036>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com  | www.shapeblue.com
>  | Twitter:@ShapeBlue
>    ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place,
> Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS *
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
> 
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework 
> CloudStack Consulting 
> CloudStack Software Engineering
> 
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support
> 
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
> 
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>

Re: gpg verification: missing key 0EE3D884

[John Kinsella]

Just to confirm…

$ gpg --verify apache-cloudstack-4.5.2-src.tar.bz2.asc
gpg: Signature made Wed Aug 19 02:13:04 2015 PDT using RSA key ID 0EE3D884
gpg: Good signature from "Rohit Yadav (CODE SIGNING KEY) 
>”

Thanks!

On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:52 PM, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:

Hi John and Udo,

Thanks for bringing this to attention. I’m unsure how I missed this but updated 
the KEYS file now.

Regards.

On 17-Nov-2015, at 5:28 AM, John Kinsella 
> wrote:

Rohit - looks like your key isn’t in 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS ?

On Nov 16, 2015, at 3:43 PM, Udo Rader 
> wrote:

Hi,

I've downloaded the latest 4.5.2 tar.bz2 and tried to verify the
download using gpg, but gpg tells me that the used key is unknown:

[udo@artio Downloads]$ gpg --verify apache-cloudstack-4.5.2-src.tar.bz2.asc
gpg: assuming signed data in `apache-cloudstack-4.5.2-src.tar.bz2'
gpg: Signature made Wed 19 Aug 2015 11:13:04 AM CEST using RSA key ID
0EE3D884
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found

So is the key missing from http://www.apache.org/dist/cloudstack/KEYS or
am I missing something?

Regards

Udo


Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue





M. +91 88 262 30892 | 
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.