Fwd: Unable to Deploy Virtual Machine with Custom Service Offering from Application

[mona rathinasamy]

Subject: Unable to Deploy Virtual Machine with Custom Service Offering from
Application



Hi,

 Platform : CloudStack 4.6.0.

 ERROR : "unable to verify user credentials and/or request signature"

Request to CloudStack without custom offering through application :

apiKey=lGMCRQI6maiFCDsKuZAHI63u1upxCrUnNrWbXAnUZZE_qyEv7ozK_yNzYvNfXgX5x5mRcedIKynzSyLA5hf8yg&command=deployVirtualMachine&displayname=admin&displayvm=true&domainid=3776269a-949d-11e5-b907-e06995a35804&keyboard=us&name=priya&networkids=7efa5852-7e1f-4a26-9351-00f9d863aa3e&projectid=527ebed8-23f6-4c9f-9ee0-05926b035b1e&response=json&serviceofferingid=cb9fe060-1870-4bd0-8c0e-3980107acce6&templateid=96e753af-5e1a-4bf9-a28a-9f609ee06202&zoneid=af3ed220-7e36-4459-a6ea-9587a18246c0&signature=FU4xL%2FdGsYoihfWdvT%2FPrwwzthQ%3D
This is working fine.

Request to CloudStack with custom offering through application :

apiKey=lGMCRQI6maiFCDsKuZAHI63u1upxCrUnNrWbXAnUZZE_qyEv7ozK_yNzYvNfXgX5x5mRcedIKynzSyLA5hf8yg&command=deployVirtualMachine&details%5B0%5D.cpuNumber=3&details%5B0%5D.cpuSpeed=1500&details%5B0%5D.memory=512&hypervisor=KVM&iptonetworklist%5B0%5D.networkid=7efa5852-7e1f-4a26-9351-00f9d863aa3e&response=json&serviceofferingid=a1613485-8cdf-4d84-8b97-8c2695128a2f&templateid=37acb430-949d-11e5-b907-e06995a35804&zoneid=af3ed220-7e36-4459-a6ea-9587a18246c0&signature=FU4xL%2FdGsYoihfWdvT%2FPrwwzthQ%3D

ERROR : "unable to verify user credentials and/or request signature"

Values are mapped same as CloudStack command string formation.
It is generating same signature for both. Noticed difference in CloudStack
is cpuSpeed and cpuNumber. In both Speed and Number, first letter in upper
case. During signature generation we will convert all the values to lower
case.

Re: Cloudstack 4.3.0 upgrade to next safest ?

[Simon Weller]

Ivan,

4.5.x and 4.6.x are both very stable and 4.7 is just around the corner.

We have 4.6.1 in our lab right now, running ceph with Centos 7 and we haven't 
seen any problems thus far. 

- i




From: Ivan Rodriguez 
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 6:37 PM
To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Cloudstack 4.3.0 upgrade to next safest ?

Dear Cloudstack Fellows,

We recently build a ceph cluster and we would like to use it with kvm
cloudstack,
our curent setup is still 4.3.0 and centos 6, we are looking now to upgrade
to Centos 7 for kvm hypervisor and upgrade our cloudstack as well.

In our experience cludstack 4.3 is stable, I've seen a few issues with
cloudstack 4.5, what do you guys recommend as the most stable cloudstack
version to use
with centos 7 KVM and ceph rbd ? ?

Regards

Cloudstack 4.3.0 upgrade to next safest ?

[Ivan Rodriguez]

Dear Cloudstack Fellows,

We recently build a ceph cluster and we would like to use it with kvm
cloudstack,
our curent setup is still 4.3.0 and centos 6, we are looking now to upgrade
to Centos 7 for kvm hypervisor and upgrade our cloudstack as well.

In our experience cludstack 4.3 is stable, I've seen a few issues with
cloudstack 4.5, what do you guys recommend as the most stable cloudstack
version to use
with centos 7 KVM and ceph rbd ? ?

Regards

Re: associate specific public ip to isolated network

[Stephan Seitz]

Thanks Jayapal!

Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2015, 21:51 +0530 schrieb Jayapal Reddy: 
> You can achieve this with small work around..
> 1. Acquire an ip address for network. let say you got ip IP1 but you want
> IP2 which is free in cloudstack DB.
> 2. In user_ip_address table swap the 'public_ip_address' column of IP1 and
> IP2.
> 
> Now IP2 is assigned to network and IP1 is free.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
> 
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Stephan Seitz <
> s.se...@secretresearchfacility.com> wrote:
> 
> > hi there!
> >
> > is it possible to associate a specific, given IP to an isolated network?
> >
> > purpuse is, re-build a network with different offering that needs to use
> > the very same ip addresses than the one currently running (meant to get
> > destroyed).
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> >

RE: Unable to add hosts

[Somesh Naidu]

Jay, I missed asking earlier, what host are you working with, KVM?

Regards,
Somesh

From: sayed jahed hussini [mailto:sjahed_hussini...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:59 AM
To: Paul Angus; users@cloudstack.apache.org; Somesh Naidu
Subject: Re: Unable to add hosts

I tried deactivating firewall and adding host, didn't work. Then downgraded 
java (yum downgrade java), still no luck.I had setup this server using the same 
guide about a month ago and it worked last time(same OS version).  Any other 
parts that I need to change?

best,
jay


On Saturday, December 12, 2015 12:47 PM, Paul Angus 
mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:

Hi Jay,

As you've pointed out in your mgmt. server log, it looks like your firewall 
rules haven't been set. Assuming you're using CentOS/RHEL I guess SELinux 
wasn't set to permissive when your ran cloudstack-setup-management

You could try a quick n' dirty; service iptables stop to see if the 
communications from your host can get through, then fix the rules and re-enable 
the firewall.

[ShapeBlue]

Paul Angus

VP Technology

,

ShapeBlue



d:

+44 203 603 0540 | s: +44 203 617 0528

 |

m:

+44 7711 418784


e:

paul.an...@shapeblue.com | t: 
@cloudyangus

 |

w:

www.shapeblue.com


a:

53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden London WC2N 4HS UK



[cid:image07e1ce.png@904e29c0.45b9cae6]



Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services 
India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in 
Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd 
is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under 
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error.



-Original Message-
From: sayed jahed hussini [mailto:sjahed_hussini...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2015 4:23 PM
To: Somesh Naidu mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com>>; 
users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unable to add hosts

I did update nss package, but that didn't resolve the problem either.


On Friday, December 11, 2015 2:03 PM, Somesh Naidu 
mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com>> wrote:


See if updating nss package on your management server helps resolve this.

(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201511.mbox/%3c5a4fe8efa8c8584cbefeeacd9aa077ee61228...@sinpex01cl02.citrite.net%3E)

Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: sayed jahed hussini [mailto:sjahed_hussini...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 11:18 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Unable to add hosts

I installed cloudstack using this guide:
Quick Installation Guide for CentOS 6 — Apache CloudStack Installation 
Documentation 4.6.0 documentation Everything went without any errors. But I am 
unable to add hosts. In /var/log/cloudstack/agent/agent.log I got the following 
error:
INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (main:null) Connecting to 10.1.1.2:8250ERROR 
[utils.nio.NioConnection] (main:null) Unable to initalize the 
threads.java.io.IOException: Connection closed with -1 on reading size..
Also in /var/log/cloudstack/management/setupManagement.log i got the following 
errors:
DEBUG:root:execute:iptables-save|grep INPUT| grep -w 8080DEBUG:root:Failed to 
execute:
DEBUG:root:execute:iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8080 -j 
ACCEPTDEBUG:root:execute:iptables-save|grep INPUT| grep -w 8250 
DEBUG:root:Failed to execute:DEBUG:root:execute:iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp 
--dport 8250 -j ACCEPT

best,Jay

|   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| Quick Installation Guide for CentOS 6 — Apache CloudStack Installation
|Documentation 4.6.0 documenta...NFS Our configuration is going to use
|NFS for both primary and secondary storage. We are going to go ahead
|and setup two NFS shares for those purposes. We’llstart out by
|installing nfs-utils.  |
|  |
| View on cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org | Preview by Yahoo |

|  |
|   |




Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services:
IaaS Cloud Design & Build | 
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Con

Re: associate specific public ip to isolated network

[Jayapal Reddy]

You can achieve this with small work around..
1. Acquire an ip address for network. let say you got ip IP1 but you want
IP2 which is free in cloudstack DB.
2. In user_ip_address table swap the 'public_ip_address' column of IP1 and
IP2.

Now IP2 is assigned to network and IP1 is free.

Thanks,
Jayapal

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Stephan Seitz <
s.se...@secretresearchfacility.com> wrote:

> hi there!
>
> is it possible to associate a specific, given IP to an isolated network?
>
> purpuse is, re-build a network with different offering that needs to use
> the very same ip addresses than the one currently running (meant to get
> destroyed).
>
> thanks!
>
>
>
>

Re: Ceph & KVM clusters on the same servers

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

Dear Vladimir,

You have this in documentation: "Warning. It is NOT recommended to run 
services on this host not controlled by CloudStack." from here: 
http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/hypervisor/kvm.html
Believe me - this is for reason. It is usually bad idea to mix different 
roles at one host unless you want to have all-in-one development 
environment for some specific goal. Linux is great, but more your put on 
one host more fragile becomes the entire system. You can't change one 
part without breaking the other.


Vadim.

On 2015-12-15 16:08, Vladimir Melnik wrote:


Hello,

Have anyone tried to use the same servers for a KVM virtualization
HA-cluster and a Ceph storage cluster?

So guests' VMs and volumes will be quite available. Of course, there'll
be huge network load, so we'll have to design our network wisely. Maybe
a separate network for the management VLAN and for the
management/monitoring network of Ceph, a separate one for the secondary
storage network, another one - for public & private VLANS of guests 
and,
the last but not least, a network to interact with the Ceph storage 
from

hypervisors. Should be working fine, shouldn't it?

If anyone tried to implement this configuration, would you be so kind 
as

to share any of your conclusions about its performance and reliability?
Thank you very much in advance!




Links:
--
[1] 
http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/hypervisor/kvm.html

associate specific public ip to isolated network

[Stephan Seitz]

hi there!

is it possible to associate a specific, given IP to an isolated network?

purpuse is, re-build a network with different offering that needs to use
the very same ip addresses than the one currently running (meant to get
destroyed).

thanks!

VM MTU and Routing Between Hosts

[Spencer Harmon]

Sorry if this is a double post. I missed the subscribe email, so if my initial 
email made it to the mailing list, I apologize. 

I'm trying to create a cloudstack setup (4.5.2 with KVM) with a "Guest"
network on two physical interfaces. I have two bridges on top of a single bond, 
one on the bond itself (cloudbr0) and one on a vlan subinterface of the bond 
(cloudbr1). I have interface tags configured (in this case they match my 
interface names, cloudbr0 and cloudbr1) on the guest networks. The reason for 
this is that I wish to use vxlan for isolation for the majority of clients, but 
I have a few clients that will eventually need to have physical hosts on their 
cloudstack network (necessitating using vlan for isolation). I also need the 
management interfaces to use 1500mtu network interfaces, but I need the vxlan 
interfaces to use 9000mtu to account for the overhead of vxlan.

I added a network offering, making sure to put in the tag of cloudbr1's 
interface. But when I deploy a network using this network offering, it uses 
cloudbr0 instead.

It seems like traffic between VMs on separate hosts, e.g. from a VM on one host 
to a virtual router on another will use the fqdn of the target host and 
whatever kernel routing is applicable. I.e., if I change my hosts file to 
direct connections from hyper0 to hyper1 on the cloudbr1 IP rather than the 
cloudbr0 IP, it will route over the intended interface. The caveat with this 
approach is that the VM was still created with MTU 1500 and the bridge 
interface for the VM at MTU 1450. I'd like for the VM to detect the MTU of the 
intended interface, have MTU 9000 with a bridge at MTU 8950. The latter case 
works as intended if I set both cloudbr0 and cloudbr1 to MTU 9000, but that 
presents a problem for my management network. 

[root@hyper1 ~]# ip -d link show vxlan766720: vxlan7667:
 mtu 1450 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN 
link/ether ba:42:75:e2:23:6c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ffvxlan id 7667
group 239.0.29.243 dev cloudbr0 port 32768 61000 ttl 10 ageing 300 I would post 
some logs, but I'm not sure which (if any) are relevant.
I've grepped for "cloudbr0" and "cloudbr1" in all logs, and didn't see an 
instance of either. Please advise if I can provide any logs or information that 
may help.

Re: VMware Storage DRS

[Rene Moser]

correction

On 12/15/2015 03:19 PM, Rene Moser wrote:
> VR will be rebooted every time a host migration occurred >= ACS 4.5.3.

< ACS 4.5.3.

Re: VMware Storage DRS

[Rene Moser]

Hi Christian

No. not supported yet.

Please be aware of issues with VM DRS before cloudstack 4.6 / 4.5.3
(unreleased), regarding advanced networing with virtual router system VM.

VR will be rebooted every time a host migration occurred >= ACS 4.5.3.

Yours
René

On 12/15/2015 01:28 PM, christian.kir...@zv.fraunhofer.de wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I was wondering if ccp supports the storage DRS feature of VMware vsphere.
> In the docs I was able to find out that the vm DRS is supported, what means 
> that VMware can move vms to different hosts and ccp is aware of the changes.
> Is ccp also aware when VMware migrates a vm disk volume to another primary 
> storage?
> 
> Kind Regards
> Christian
> 

Ceph & KVM clusters on the same servers

[Vladimir Melnik]

Hello,

Have anyone tried to use the same servers for a KVM virtualization
HA-cluster and a Ceph storage cluster?

So guests' VMs and volumes will be quite available. Of course, there'll
be huge network load, so we'll have to design our network wisely. Maybe
a separate network for the management VLAN and for the
management/monitoring network of Ceph, a separate one for the secondary
storage network, another one - for public & private VLANS of guests and,
the last but not least, a network to interact with the Ceph storage from
hypervisors. Should be working fine, shouldn't it?

If anyone tried to implement this configuration, would you be so kind as
to share any of your conclusions about its performance and reliability?
Thank you very much in advance!

-- 
V.Melnik

Re: Unable to add hosts

[sayed jahed hussini]

I tried deactivating firewall and adding host, didn't work. Then downgraded 
java (yum downgrade java), still no luck.I had setup this server using the same 
guide about a month ago and it worked last time(same OS version).  Any other 
parts that I need to change?
best,jay
 


On Saturday, December 12, 2015 12:47 PM, Paul Angus 
 wrote:
 

 Hi Jay,

As you've pointed out in your mgmt. server log, it looks like your firewall 
rules haven't been set. Assuming you're using CentOS/RHEL I guess SELinux 
wasn't set to permissive when your ran cloudstack-setup-management

You could try a quick n' dirty; service iptables stop to see if the 
communications from your host can get through, then fix the rules and re-enable 
the firewall.



| 
|  | 
| 
| Paul Angus |
| 
| VP Technology | ,  | ShapeBlue |

 |

 |
| 
| 
| d:  | +44 203 603 0540 | s: +44 203 617 0528 |  |  | m:  | +44 7711 418784 |

 |
| 
| e:  | paul.an...@shapeblue.com | t: @cloudyangus |  |  | w:  | 
www.shapeblue.com |

 |
| 
| a:  | 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden London WC2N 4HS UK |

 |

 |
|  |

 |

 |
| 
| Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue 
Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under 
license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa 
and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered 
trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error.

 |

 |


-Original Message-
From: sayed jahed hussini [mailto:sjahed_hussini...@yahoo.com.INVALID] 
Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2015 4:23 PM
To: Somesh Naidu ; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unable to add hosts

I did update nss package, but that didn't resolve the problem either.


On Friday, December 11, 2015 2:03 PM, Somesh Naidu  
wrote:


See if updating nss package on your management server helps resolve this.

(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201511.mbox/%3c5a4fe8efa8c8584cbefeeacd9aa077ee61228...@sinpex01cl02.citrite.net%3E)

Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: sayed jahed hussini [mailto:sjahed_hussini...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 11:18 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Unable to add hosts

I installed cloudstack using this guide:
Quick Installation Guide for CentOS 6 — Apache CloudStack Installation 
Documentation 4.6.0 documentation Everything went without any errors. But I am 
unable to add hosts. In /var/log/cloudstack/agent/agent.log I got the following 
error:
INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (main:null) Connecting to 10.1.1.2:8250ERROR 
[utils.nio.NioConnection] (main:null) Unable to initalize the 
threads.java.io.IOException: Connection closed with -1 on reading size..
Also in /var/log/cloudstack/management/setupManagement.log i got the following 
errors:
DEBUG:root:execute:iptables-save|grep INPUT| grep -w 8080DEBUG:root:Failed to 
execute:
DEBUG:root:execute:iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8080 -j 
ACCEPTDEBUG:root:execute:iptables-save|grep INPUT| grep -w 8250 
DEBUG:root:Failed to execute:DEBUG:root:execute:iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp 
--dport 8250 -j ACCEPT

best,Jay

|   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| Quick Installation Guide for CentOS 6 — Apache CloudStack Installation 
|Documentation 4.6.0 documenta...NFS Our configuration is going to use 
|NFS for both primary and secondary storage. We are going to go ahead 
|and setup two NFS shares for those purposes. We’llstart out by 
|installing nfs-utils.  |
|  |
| View on cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |





Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services:
IaaS Cloud Design & Build |CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting |CloudStack Software Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure Support |CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses


  

VMware Storage DRS

[christian.kirmse]

Hi everyone,

I was wondering if ccp supports the storage DRS feature of VMware vsphere.
In the docs I was able to find out that the vm DRS is supported, what means 
that VMware can move vms to different hosts and ccp is aware of the changes.
Is ccp also aware when VMware migrates a vm disk volume to another primary 
storage?

Kind Regards
Christian

Fwd: Unable to Deploy Virtual Machine with Custom Service Offering from Application

[mona rathinasamy]

Subject: Unable to Deploy Virtual Machine with Custom Service Offering from
Application


Hi,

 Platform : CloudStack 4.6.0.

 ERROR : "unable to verify user credentials and/or request signature"

Request to CloudStack without custom offering through application :

apiKey=lGMCRQI6maiFCDsKuZAHI63u1upxCrUnNrWbXAnUZZE_qyEv7ozK_yNzYvNfXgX5x5mRcedIKynzSyLA5hf8yg&command=deployVirtualMachine&displayname=admin&displayvm=true&domainid=3776269a-949d-11e5-b907-e06995a35804&keyboard=us&name=priya&networkids=7efa5852-7e1f-4a26-9351-00f9d863aa3e&projectid=527ebed8-23f6-4c9f-9ee0-05926b035b1e&response=json&serviceofferingid=cb9fe060-1870-4bd0-8c0e-3980107acce6&templateid=96e753af-5e1a-4bf9-a28a-9f609ee06202&zoneid=af3ed220-7e36-4459-a6ea-9587a18246c0&signature=FU4xL%2FdGsYoihfWdvT%2FPrwwzthQ%3D
This is working fine.

Request to CloudStack with custom offering through application :

apiKey=lGMCRQI6maiFCDsKuZAHI63u1upxCrUnNrWbXAnUZZE_qyEv7ozK_yNzYvNfXgX5x5mRcedIKynzSyLA5hf8yg&command=deployVirtualMachine&details%5B0%5D.cpuNumber=3&details%5B0%5D.cpuSpeed=1500&details%5B0%5D.memory=512&hypervisor=KVM&iptonetworklist%5B0%5D.networkid=7efa5852-7e1f-4a26-9351-00f9d863aa3e&response=json&serviceofferingid=a1613485-8cdf-4d84-8b97-8c2695128a2f&templateid=37acb430-949d-11e5-b907-e06995a35804&zoneid=af3ed220-7e36-4459-a6ea-9587a18246c0&signature=FU4xL%2FdGsYoihfWdvT%2FPrwwzthQ%3D

ERROR : "unable to verify user credentials and/or request signature"

Values are mapped same as CloudStack command string formation.
It is generating same signature for both. Noticed difference in CloudStack
is cpuSpeed and cpuNumber. In both Speed and Number, first letter in upper
case. During signature generation we will convert all the values to lower
case.

Re: InsufficientServerCapacityException

[Cristian Ciobanu]

Yes, i'm able to mount, everything is working till the first IP class /29 is 
reached, the problem come out when a VM is deployed from any second IP class.


When i check the logs on VR i see this error :

Dec 14 23:25:36 dnsmasq-dhcp[3884]: read /etc/dhcphosts.txt
Dec 14 23:25:36 dnsmasq-dhcp[3884]: read /etc/dhcpopts.txt
Dec 14 23:26:21 dnsmasq-dhcp[3884]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 06:78:ac:00:00:67 ignored
Dec 14 23:26:26 dnsmasq-dhcp[3884]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 06:78:ac:00:00:67 ignored
Dec 14 23:26:37 dnsmasq-dhcp[3884]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 06:78:ac:00:00:67 ignored
Dec 14 23:26:48 dnsmasq-dhcp[3884]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 06:78:ac:00:00:67 ignored
Dec 14 23:27:03 dnsmasq-dhcp[3884]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 06:78:ac:00:00:67 ignored
Dec 14 23:27:18 dnsmasq-dhcp[3884]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 06:78:ac:00:00:67 ignored

I'm not sure why DHCP server ignored the allocation of the IP from second 
class, because the VM is included on dhcphosts:

root@r-20-VM:/var/log# cat /etc/dhcphosts.txt
06:33:26:00:00:5f,158.xx.1xx.165,TEST2,infinite    ( Works)
06:78:ac:00:00:67,149.xxx.xx.163,TST1,infinite     ( no connection, another /29 
class )
06:90:c0:00:00:5d,158.xx.1xx.163,TEST01,infinite  ( Works )

I'm not sure if i need to have one NIC for each IP class on VR, i ask this 
because i see only one 2 NIC's :

root@r-20-VM:/var/log# ip a
1: lo:  mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
2: eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP 
qlen 1000
    link/ether 06:66:00:00:00:5e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 158.xx.1xx.164/29 brd 158.xx.1xx.167 scope global eth0
3: eth1:  mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP 
qlen 1000
    link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 169.254.2.133/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth1



Thank you !
 
Regards,
Cristian

 
On 12/15/2015 6:15:11 AM, ilya  wrote:
Can you mount the secondary storage on your KVM host?


On 12/14/15 12:32 PM, Cristian Ciobanu wrote:
> OK,
>
> I re-installed again ( fresh install ) but now i have again same error for 
> second IP class (The IP's from second class are not allocated on VM, if i set 
> manually the IP that must be allocated to VM, works )
>
> System configuration:
>
> CS Version : Cloudstack 4.6
> OS: CentOS 6
> Hypervisor: KVM
> Network: Basic - DefaultSharedNetworkOffer
> IP : 2 x /29
>
> I think this is a issue on CS 4.6
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Cristian
>
>
> On 12/14/2015 7:46:17 PM, Cristian Ciobanu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a primary and one secondary.
>
> In my cloudstack management interface i see only 1 primary and one secondary 
> ( ssvm )
>
> Yes, i run with local storage (KVM)
>
>
> Regards,
> Cristian
> www.istream.today [http://www.istream.today/]
> www.shape.host [http://www.shape.host/]
> +40.733.955.922
>
> On 12/14/2015 7:36:49 PM, Nux! wrote:
> Cristian,
>
> Do you have 2 secondary storages?
> Do you run with local storage in KVM?
>
> "could not open disk image 
> /var/lib/libvirt/images/0269e267-c80f-4d23-a079-be188f814d0e: Is a directory" 
> <- this="" is="" really="" wrong.="">
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Cristian Ciobanu"
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, 14 December, 2015 16:43:11
>> Subject: Re: InsufficientServerCapacityException
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> First of all, thank you.
>>
>> The host is UP in cloudstack
>>
>>
>>
>> Logs from SSVM:
>>
>> root@s-28-VM:~# /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
>> 
>> First DNS server is 8.8.8.8
>> PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 48 data bytes
>> 60 bytes from 172.20.255.39: Destination Host Unreachable
>> Vr HL TOS Len ID Flg off TTL Pro cks Src Dst Data
>> 4 5 00 4c00 c4ed 0 0040 40 01 a091 172.xx.255.39 8.8.8.8
>> 60 bytes from 172.20.255.39: Destination Host Unreachable
>> Vr HL TOS Len ID Flg off TTL Pro cks Src Dst Data
>> 4 5 00 4c00 53ee 0 0040 40 01 1191 172.xx.255.39 8.8.8.8
>> --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
>> 2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
>> WARNING: cannot ping DNS server
>> route follows
>> Kernel IP routing table
>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
>> 0.0.0.0 158.xx.xxx.166 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth2
>> 8.8.8.8 172.xx.255.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth1
>> 158.xx.xxx.160 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth2
>> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
>> 172.xx.255.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
>> 
>> Good: DNS resolves download.cloud.com
>> 
>> nfs is currently mounted
>> Mount point is /mnt/SecStorage/821f0c6f-4a92-362d-916f-979a693231d9
>> Good: Can write to mount point
>> Mount point is /mnt/SecStorage/a1ece0a6-d7f9-3e78-bf27-47360eb58d4b
>> Good: Can write to mount point
>> 
>> Management server is 172.xx.255.2. Checking connectivity.
>> G