Re: New L2 nework types are not shared

2018-01-25 Thread Boris Stoyanov 
I think that’s the only outstanding item before we cut rc2. 

Regards,
Boris Stoyanov


boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On 25 Jan 2018, at 14:44, Jean-Francois Nadeau  wrote:
> 
> Perfect. Thanks Boris.
> 
> Can the fix for shared L2 networks also be merged in 4.11 RC2 ?
> 
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:02 AM, Boris Stoyanov <
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Jean-Francois,
>> We’ve just confirmed CLOUDSTACK-10239 is a regression and will be included
>> in 4.11 RC2. Thanks for bringing this up.
>> 
>> Boris
>> 
>> 
>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 24 Jan 2018, at 9:57, Boris Stoyanov 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jean-Francois, I don’t know if you’re following dev@ list, there’s
>> an open thread for voting on release candidates. If you reply to that
>> thread with your findings it’ll be more visible to devs and release
>> management.
>>> 
>>> Bobby.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
>>> www.shapeblue.com
>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>>> @shapeblue
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:23, Jean-Francois Nadeau 
>> wrote:
 
 Thank you both Boris and Nux!
 
 I'll keep an eye 4.11.1.   If I may get your attention on another issue
 that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239
>> :-)
 
 best regards,
 
 Jean-Francois
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov <
 boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
 
> Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois,
> One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now
> fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a
> project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420
> 
> Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues.
> 
> Regards,
> Boris.
> 
> On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! >
> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we
>> are
> doing testing for 4.11.
> 
> HTH
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> 
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" 
> To: "users" 
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19
> Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at
> http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/
> 
> I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with
>> no
> DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required
>> to
> fill some CIDR information.
> 
> I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the
>> previous
> approach when required to integrate an existing network.
> 
> If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using
>> the L2
> network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I
>> can't
> make them public.
> 
> ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', , {u'errorcode':
>> 531,
> u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use
> network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission
> denied'})
> 
> Provisioning in the root project works just fine  but really I
>> want to
> use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so.
> 
> Thoughts ?
> 
> 
>>> 
>> 
>>

Re: New L2 nework types are not shared

2018-01-25 Thread Jean-Francois Nadeau 
Perfect. Thanks Boris.

Can the fix for shared L2 networks also be merged in 4.11 RC2 ?

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:02 AM, Boris Stoyanov <
boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Thanks Jean-Francois,
> We’ve just confirmed CLOUDSTACK-10239 is a regression and will be included
> in 4.11 RC2. Thanks for bringing this up.
>
> Boris
>
>
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> > On 24 Jan 2018, at 9:57, Boris Stoyanov 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jean-Francois, I don’t know if you’re following dev@ list, there’s
> an open thread for voting on release candidates. If you reply to that
> thread with your findings it’ll be more visible to devs and release
> management.
> >
> > Bobby.
> >
> >
> > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:23, Jean-Francois Nadeau 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you both Boris and Nux!
> >>
> >> I'll keep an eye 4.11.1.   If I may get your attention on another issue
> >> that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239
> :-)
> >>
> >> best regards,
> >>
> >> Jean-Francois
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov <
> >> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois,
> >>> One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now
> >>> fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a
> >>> project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0
> >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420
> >>>
> >>> Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Boris.
> >>>
> >>> On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we
> are
> >>> doing testing for 4.11.
> >>>
> >>> HTH
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>>
> >>> Nux!
> >>> www.nux.ro
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> >>> www.shapeblue.com
> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> >>> @shapeblue
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - Original Message -
> >>> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" 
> >>> To: "users" 
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19
> >>> Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at
> >>> http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/
> >>>
> >>> I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with
> no
> >>> DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required
> to
> >>> fill some CIDR information.
> >>>
> >>> I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the
> previous
> >>> approach when required to integrate an existing network.
> >>>
> >>> If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using
> the L2
> >>> network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I
> can't
> >>> make them public.
> >>>
> >>> ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', , {u'errorcode':
> 531,
> >>> u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use
> >>> network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission
> >>> denied'})
> >>>
> >>> Provisioning in the root project works just fine  but really I
> want to
> >>> use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>

Re: New L2 nework types are not shared

2018-01-25 Thread Boris Stoyanov 
Thanks Jean-Francois, 
We’ve just confirmed CLOUDSTACK-10239 is a regression and will be included in 
4.11 RC2. Thanks for bringing this up. 

Boris 


boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On 24 Jan 2018, at 9:57, Boris Stoyanov  wrote:
> 
> Hi Jean-Francois, I don’t know if you’re following dev@ list, there’s an open 
> thread for voting on release candidates. If you reply to that thread with 
> your findings it’ll be more visible to devs and release management.
> 
> Bobby. 
> 
> 
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
> 
> 
> 
>> On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:23, Jean-Francois Nadeau  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Thank you both Boris and Nux!
>> 
>> I'll keep an eye 4.11.1.   If I may get your attention on another issue
>> that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239 :-)
>> 
>> best regards,
>> 
>> Jean-Francois
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov <
>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois,
>>> One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now
>>> fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a
>>> project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420
>>> 
>>> Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Boris.
>>> 
>>> On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! >
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we are
>>> doing testing for 4.11.
>>> 
>>> HTH
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>> 
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>> 
>>> 
>>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
>>> www.shapeblue.com
>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>>> @shapeblue
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" 
>>> To: "users" 
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19
>>> Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at
>>> http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/
>>> 
>>> I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with no
>>> DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required to
>>> fill some CIDR information.
>>> 
>>> I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the previous
>>> approach when required to integrate an existing network.
>>> 
>>> If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using the L2
>>> network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I can't
>>> make them public.
>>> 
>>> ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', , {u'errorcode': 531,
>>> u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use
>>> network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission
>>> denied'})
>>> 
>>> Provisioning in the root project works just fine  but really I want to
>>> use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so.
>>> 
>>> Thoughts ?
>>> 
>>> 
>