Thanks Jean-Francois, We’ve just confirmed CLOUDSTACK-10239 is a regression and will be included in 4.11 RC2. Thanks for bringing this up.
Boris boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > On 24 Jan 2018, at 9:57, Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > Hi Jean-Francois, I don’t know if you’re following dev@ list, there’s an open > thread for voting on release candidates. If you reply to that thread with > your findings it’ll be more visible to devs and release management. > > Bobby. > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > >> On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:23, Jean-Francois Nadeau <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Thank you both Boris and Nux! >> >> I'll keep an eye 4.11.1. If I may get your attention on another issue >> that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239 :-) >> >> best regards, >> >> Jean-Francois >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov < >> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois, >>> One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now >>> fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a >>> project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0 >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420 >>> >>> Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Boris. >>> >>> On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we are >>> doing testing for 4.11. >>> >>> HTH >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>> >>> Nux! >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> >>> >>> >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com >>> www.shapeblue.com >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <the.jfnad...@gmail.com> >>> To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org> >>> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19 >>> Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at >>> http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/ >>> >>> I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with no >>> DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required to >>> fill some CIDR information. >>> >>> I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the previous >>> approach when required to integrate an existing network. >>> >>> If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using the L2 >>> network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I can't >>> make them public. >>> >>> ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', <Response [531]>, {u'errorcode': 531, >>> u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use >>> network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission >>> denied'}) >>> >>> Provisioning in the root project works just fine.... but really I want to >>> use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so. >>> >>> Thoughts ? >>> >>> >
