Re: root disk resize KVM
Hi Cristian, Yes, root disk resize is allowed from UI/API while deploying a VM. It is supported through the 'rootdisksize' parameter in deployVirtualMachine API. Regards, Suresh On 16/09/21, 8:23 PM, "cristian.c@istream.today" wrote: Hello, It is possible to use root disk resize on the wizard page? Or via API when you deploy a KVM instance? Regards, Cristian
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.2.0 (RC2)
Hi all, The vote for CloudStack 4.15.2.0 *passes* with 5 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 5 person (Daan, Lucian, Nicolas, Gabriel, Rohit) +1 (non binding) 2 person (Pearl, Suresh) 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up. Regards. From: Suresh Anaparti Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 11:22 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.2.0 (RC2) +1 Performed some VM (template/ISO) and volume life cycle tests manually, in fresh installation (MS: CentOS 7.6 + Hypervisor: VMware 6.7.0). Regards, Suresh On 10/09/21, 9:21 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: All, I've created a 4.15.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.15.2.0-RC20210910T2119 Commit: 4aaa850b63c34e0f312002f79bf9e4f699bf314a Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.15.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open for a week until 17 September 2021. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC1) will be available here shortly: https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.15.2.0-RC2/ There is no new systemvmtemplate for 4.15.2, the 4.15.1 systemvmtemplate can be used from here: https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.15/ Docs are not published yet but upgrade notes are similar to the one below without the requirement of registering a new systemvmtemplate: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/tree/4.15/source/upgrading/upgrade Regards.
Re: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with kvm
thanks for the update Christian, sounds strange that the router would require that much to start but glad it worked. On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 1:32 PM wrote: > Hello, > > I have found the issue, after I have changed the CPU and memory for > this " System Offering For Software Router - Local Storage' system offering > the router was deployed in few seconds without any issue. > > CPU mhz from 500 to 2000 and RAM from 256 to 2048. > > > > Regards, > Cristian > > -Original Message- > From: cristian.c@istream.today > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 10:18 AM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with kvm > > Any suggestion on this issue? > > Thank you. > > -Original Message- > From: cristian.c@istream.today > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 5:40 PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with kvm > > Hi, > > >Yes, please see : > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:/var/lib/libvirt/images# libvirtd -v > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : libvirt version: 6.0.0, > package: 0ubuntu8.13 (Frode Nordahl Fri, 16 > Jul 2021 05:16:36 +) > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : hostname: usa-nyc-kvm-001 > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : virLogParseOutputs:1654 : > outputs=1:stderr > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : virLogParseOutput:1492 : > output=1:stderr > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : libvirt version: 6.0.0, > package: 0ubuntu8.13 (Frode Nordahl Fri, 16 > Jul 2021 05:16:36 +) > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : hostname: usa-nyc-kvm-001 > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : virObjectNew:251 : OBJECT_NEW: > obj=0x55935a296b60 classname=virAccessManager > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : virAccessManagerNewDriver:111 > : Initialized with stack > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : virObjectNew:251 : OBJECT_NEW: > obj=0x55935a297f90 classname=virAccessManager > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : virAccessManagerNewDriver:111 > : Initialized with none > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : virObjectRef:386 : OBJECT_REF: > obj=0x55935a296b60 > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : virObjectUnref:348 : > OBJECT_UNREF: obj=0x55935a296b60 > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : main:1177 : Decided on pid > file path '/run/libvirtd.pid' > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : main:1187 : Decided on socket > paths '/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock', '/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock-ro' and > '/run/libvirt/libvirt-admin-sock' > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: error : virPidFileAcquirePath:367 : > Failed to acquire pid file '/run/libvirtd.pid': Resource temporarily > unavailable > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : virFileClose:110 : Closed fd 3 > > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:/var/lib/libvirt/images# /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 > --version QEMU emulator version 4.2.1 (Debian 1:4.2-3ubuntu6.17) Copyright > (c) 2003-2019 Fabrice Bellard and the QEMU Project developers > > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:/var/lib/libvirt/images# lsb_release -a No LSB > modules are available. > Distributor ID: Ubuntu > Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS > Release:20.04 > Codename: focal > > > CPU : > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD > cpu family : 23 > model : 49 > model name : AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor > > > BTW: the SSVM and Proxy console is running fine on this node.. > > > > Thank you! > > -Original Message- > From: Andrija Panic > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 4:40 PM > To: users > Subject: Re: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with kvm > > Can you share qemu/libvirt version/flavour? > > On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 14:18, wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand this error, I created new network with > > VPC in a new zone where I added KVM hypervisor, and I have this issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2021-09-13 11:36:18,621 DEBUG > > [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] > > (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) (logid:42d715f2) Trying to connect to > > 169.254.52.234 > > > > 2021-09-13 11:36:21,684 DEBUG > > [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] > > (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) (logid:42d715f2) Could not connect to > > 169.254.52.234 > > > > > > > > Here is the full log : https://pastebin.com/0NwsccUc > > > > > > > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:~# telnet 169.254.156.179 3922 > > > > Trying 169.254.156.179... > > > > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused ( before > > connection refused, I get no route to host, for sure the nic is not up > > ) > > > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:~# virsh list > > > > Id NameState > > > > --- > > > > 2v-4048-VM running > > > > 4s-4050-VM running > > > > 7r-4092-VM running > > > > > > > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:~# > > > > > > > > > > > > If I check the log inside the router, I see thi
Re: Unable to create Instance from user account
You shouldn't have to de much more, what errors do you get and do you find in the logs? On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:42 AM technologyrss.mail < technologyrss.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > *Hi,* > > I am successfully create vpc and tier then create Instance using root > admin account. But when I create another account and create another > domain. Then I login using this account. This account permission is > domain admin. I try to create Instance but failed action. > > Then I try to create vpc & tier also it is failed. > > What can I do now? what is permission needed for different domain admin. > > > --- > Alamin > > -- Daan
RE: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with kvm
I didn't test with lower values, but with 256 RAM and 500Mhz CPU is not working for me. (KVM ubuntu 20.04 ACS 4.15.1 ) Regards, Cristian -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 11:14 AM To: users Subject: Re: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with kvm thanks for the update Christian, sounds strange that the router would require that much to start but glad it worked. On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 1:32 PM wrote: > Hello, > > I have found the issue, after I have changed the CPU and memory for > this " System Offering For Software Router - Local Storage' system > offering the router was deployed in few seconds without any issue. > > CPU mhz from 500 to 2000 and RAM from 256 to 2048. > > > > Regards, > Cristian > > -Original Message- > From: cristian.c@istream.today > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 10:18 AM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with > kvm > > Any suggestion on this issue? > > Thank you. > > -Original Message- > From: cristian.c@istream.today > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 5:40 PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with > kvm > > Hi, > > >Yes, please see : > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:/var/lib/libvirt/images# libvirtd -v > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : libvirt version: 6.0.0, > package: 0ubuntu8.13 (Frode Nordahl Fri, > 16 Jul 2021 05:16:36 +) > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : hostname: usa-nyc-kvm-001 > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : virLogParseOutputs:1654 : > outputs=1:stderr > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : virLogParseOutput:1492 : > output=1:stderr > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : libvirt version: 6.0.0, > package: 0ubuntu8.13 (Frode Nordahl Fri, > 16 Jul 2021 05:16:36 +) > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : hostname: usa-nyc-kvm-001 > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : virObjectNew:251 : OBJECT_NEW: > obj=0x55935a296b60 classname=virAccessManager > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : > virAccessManagerNewDriver:111 > : Initialized with stack > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : virObjectNew:251 : OBJECT_NEW: > obj=0x55935a297f90 classname=virAccessManager > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : > virAccessManagerNewDriver:111 > : Initialized with none > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : virObjectRef:386 : OBJECT_REF: > obj=0x55935a296b60 > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : virObjectUnref:348 : > OBJECT_UNREF: obj=0x55935a296b60 > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : main:1177 : Decided on > pid file path '/run/libvirtd.pid' > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : main:1187 : Decided on > socket paths '/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock', > '/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock-ro' and '/run/libvirt/libvirt-admin-sock' > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: error : virPidFileAcquirePath:367 : > Failed to acquire pid file '/run/libvirtd.pid': Resource temporarily > unavailable > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : virFileClose:110 : Closed > fd 3 > > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:/var/lib/libvirt/images# > /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 --version QEMU emulator version 4.2.1 > (Debian 1:4.2-3ubuntu6.17) Copyright > (c) 2003-2019 Fabrice Bellard and the QEMU Project developers > > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:/var/lib/libvirt/images# lsb_release -a No LSB > modules are available. > Distributor ID: Ubuntu > Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS > Release:20.04 > Codename: focal > > > CPU : > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD > cpu family : 23 > model : 49 > model name : AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor > > > BTW: the SSVM and Proxy console is running fine on this node.. > > > > Thank you! > > -Original Message- > From: Andrija Panic > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 4:40 PM > To: users > Subject: Re: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with > kvm > > Can you share qemu/libvirt version/flavour? > > On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 14:18, wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand this error, I created new network > > with VPC in a new zone where I added KVM hypervisor, and I have this issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2021-09-13 11:36:18,621 DEBUG > > [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] > > (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) (logid:42d715f2) Trying to connect to > > 169.254.52.234 > > > > 2021-09-13 11:36:21,684 DEBUG > > [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] > > (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) (logid:42d715f2) Could not connect to > > 169.254.52.234 > > > > > > > > Here is the full log : https://pastebin.com/0NwsccUc > > > > > > > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:~# telnet 169.254.156.179 3922 > > > > Trying 169.254.156.179... > > > > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused ( > > before connection refused, I get no route to host, fo
Re: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with kvm
It is strange. The cpu/ram should be good enough for a VR. anyway, good you have solved the problem. -Wei On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 11:46, wrote: > I didn't test with lower values, but with 256 RAM and 500Mhz CPU is not > working for me. (KVM ubuntu 20.04 ACS 4.15.1 ) > > Regards, > Cristian > > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 11:14 AM > To: users > Subject: Re: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with kvm > > thanks for the update Christian, > sounds strange that the router would require that much to start but glad > it worked. > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 1:32 PM wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I have found the issue, after I have changed the CPU and memory for > > this " System Offering For Software Router - Local Storage' system > > offering the router was deployed in few seconds without any issue. > > > > CPU mhz from 500 to 2000 and RAM from 256 to 2048. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > Cristian > > > > -Original Message- > > From: cristian.c@istream.today > > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 10:18 AM > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: RE: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with > > kvm > > > > Any suggestion on this issue? > > > > Thank you. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: cristian.c@istream.today > > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 5:40 PM > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: RE: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with > > kvm > > > > Hi, > > > > > >Yes, please see : > > > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:/var/lib/libvirt/images# libvirtd -v > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : libvirt version: 6.0.0, > > package: 0ubuntu8.13 (Frode Nordahl Fri, > > 16 Jul 2021 05:16:36 +) > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : hostname: usa-nyc-kvm-001 > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : virLogParseOutputs:1654 : > > outputs=1:stderr > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : virLogParseOutput:1492 : > > output=1:stderr > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : libvirt version: 6.0.0, > > package: 0ubuntu8.13 (Frode Nordahl Fri, > > 16 Jul 2021 05:16:36 +) > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : hostname: usa-nyc-kvm-001 > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : virObjectNew:251 : > OBJECT_NEW: > > obj=0x55935a296b60 classname=virAccessManager > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : > > virAccessManagerNewDriver:111 > > : Initialized with stack > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : virObjectNew:251 : > OBJECT_NEW: > > obj=0x55935a297f90 classname=virAccessManager > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : > > virAccessManagerNewDriver:111 > > : Initialized with none > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : virObjectRef:386 : > OBJECT_REF: > > obj=0x55935a296b60 > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: info : virObjectUnref:348 : > > OBJECT_UNREF: obj=0x55935a296b60 > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : main:1177 : Decided on > > pid file path '/run/libvirtd.pid' > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : main:1187 : Decided on > > socket paths '/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock', > > '/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock-ro' and '/run/libvirt/libvirt-admin-sock' > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: error : virPidFileAcquirePath:367 : > > Failed to acquire pid file '/run/libvirtd.pid': Resource temporarily > > unavailable > > 2021-09-13 14:33:40.944+: 75403: debug : virFileClose:110 : Closed > > fd 3 > > > > > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:/var/lib/libvirt/images# > > /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 --version QEMU emulator version 4.2.1 > > (Debian 1:4.2-3ubuntu6.17) Copyright > > (c) 2003-2019 Fabrice Bellard and the QEMU Project developers > > > > > > root@usa-nyc-kvm-001:/var/lib/libvirt/images# lsb_release -a No LSB > > modules are available. > > Distributor ID: Ubuntu > > Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS > > Release:20.04 > > Codename: focal > > > > > > CPU : > > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD > > cpu family : 23 > > model : 49 > > model name : AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor > > > > > > BTW: the SSVM and Proxy console is running fine on this node.. > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrija Panic > > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 4:40 PM > > To: users > > Subject: Re: virtual router stuck on starting - cloudstack 4.15.1 with > > kvm > > > > Can you share qemu/libvirt version/flavour? > > > > On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 14:18, wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand this error, I created new network > > > with VPC in a new zone where I added KVM hypervisor, and I have this > issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2021-09-13 11:36:18,621 DEBUG > > > [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] > > > (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) (logid:42d715f2) Trying to connect to > > > 169.254.52.234 > > > > > > 2021-09-13 11:36:21,684 DEBUG > > > [resource.vi
vm template with data disk
Hi, is it possible to prepare a vm template with a data disk? One or many? Regards, Piotr
The RAM MEM inside KVM instance is not the same as it was set
Hello,
From where do I get this minRam value? I used a compute offering
with 10GB of RAM, if I check the VM I see 4GB Ram.
"[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer":{"vm":{"id":"4156","name":"i-2-4156-VM"
,"state":"Starting","type":"User","cpus":"4","minSpeed":"760","maxSpeed":"19
00","minRam":"(4.00 GB) 4294967296","maxRam":"(10.00 GB)
10737418240","arch":"x86_64","os":"CentOS 7","platformEmulator":"CentOS
7","bootArgs":"","enableHA":"false","limitCpuUse":"false","enableDynamically
ScaleVm":"false","vncPassword":"NutaRZIRWThdE3aU_IkJAA","vncAddr":"10.100.22
.10""
Regards,
Cristian
Re: vm template with data disk
yes, at least for vmware it is. On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:06 PM Piotr Pisz wrote: > Hi, is it possible to prepare a vm template with a data disk? One or many? > > Regards, > Piotr > > > -- Daan
RE: vm template with data disk
I meant KVM :-) Piotr -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 2:00 PM To: users ; pi...@piszki.pl Subject: Re: vm template with data disk yes, at least for vmware it is. On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:06 PM Piotr Pisz wrote: > Hi, is it possible to prepare a vm template with a data disk? One or many? > > Regards, > Piotr > > > -- Daan
RE: Problems setting up HTTPS on CS Managementserver GUI / recommadations relizing
Hi, I do remember having issues with the steps in Shapeblue guide. Eventually I threw some notes for a future guide you can check here -> https://github.com/dredknight/cloud_scripts/blob/master/CloudStack-Xen/ACS-ssl-gui-guide.sh I hope that helps. Best regards, Jordan -Original Message- From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 10:20 PM To: users ; vas...@gmx.de Subject: Re: Problems setting up HTTPS on CS Managementserver GUI / recommadations relizing [X] This message came from outside your organization Hi, afaik the most common setup is (1) start (multiple) cloudstack management server with port 8080 (2) setup a reverse proxy (nginx/pfsense/haproxy, etc) which supports SSL termination and transparent LB. (3) upload ssl certificate in cloudstack GUI, and enable SSL for cloudsack console proxy and secondary storage. -Wei On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 19:19, vas...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi, > > at the moment I am trying to setting up https - access for the > management server with my own certificates. Sadly i wasn't successfull until > now. > OS: Ubuntu 20.04 > Standard Cloudstack > Basically i was following the documentation ( > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/lates > t/installguide/optional_installation.html*ssl-optional__;Iw!!A6UyJA!0d > TT8fqOaTGELyheFRnbrYw22T34WaEoPMbmxwezYicKr808oddMvJAwxkY7LIC7IuZy3pTq > DCm-$ > ) > as well as following guide from shapeblue ( > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.shapeblue.com/securing-cloudst > ack-4-11-with-https-tls/__;!!A6UyJA!0dTT8fqOaTGELyheFRnbrYw22T34WaEoPMbmxwezYicKr808oddMvJAwxkY7LIC7IuZy3n-PQYEK$ > ) for setting up https for the GUI. > > At the moment i am stuck, as i didn't really have clue where and how > to proceed onwards, as i am not finding any problems, warinings or > errors in the cloudstack log's. > Usage of netstat shows, that currently no service is listening on port > 8443. > > Which leads me to a assumption that i maybe messed up > access-priviledges for the actual keystore-file, as the > server.properties noted sais, that the https configuration will only > be used when the keystorefile exists and is readable by the managementserver. > Therefore which permissions are normally used for the keystore to be > accessed by the management server? > > As the documentation states, that more or less every site has it's own > practices on providing webservices to actual users, i would like to > ask for some experiences with different appoaches? > Till now i "stumbled" over some ways the set up a reverseproxy based > on nginx / apache "in front" of the actual CS-Management WebServer, > which shall take care of the certificate handling. Another idea i have > read on a side would be to "by pass" the CS-Management Webserver, > targetting directly to the "root"-volume. Which seems to be a aventures > appoach... > > So i am highly interested in your approaches and experiences > regardning this topic. > > Thanks in advance! >
Re: The RAM MEM inside KVM instance is not the same as it was set
Hi,
Did you set mem.overprovisioning.factor in global setting or cluster
setting ?
-Wei
On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 13:47, wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
>From where do I get this minRam value? I used a compute offering
> with 10GB of RAM, if I check the VM I see 4GB Ram.
>
>
>
>
> "[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer":{"vm":{"id":"4156","name":"i-2-4156-VM"
>
> ,"state":"Starting","type":"User","cpus":"4","minSpeed":"760","maxSpeed":"19
> 00","minRam":"(4.00 GB) 4294967296","maxRam":"(10.00 GB)
> 10737418240","arch":"x86_64","os":"CentOS 7","platformEmulator":"CentOS
>
> 7","bootArgs":"","enableHA":"false","limitCpuUse":"false","enableDynamically
>
> ScaleVm":"false","vncPassword":"NutaRZIRWThdE3aU_IkJAA","vncAddr":"10.100.22
> .10""
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Cristian
>
>
Re: vm template with data disk
I don't think taht this is implemented for KVM On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 2:31 PM Piotr Pisz wrote: > I meant KVM :-) > > Piotr > > > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 2:00 PM > To: users ; pi...@piszki.pl > Subject: Re: vm template with data disk > > yes, at least for vmware it is. > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:06 PM Piotr Pisz wrote: > > > Hi, is it possible to prepare a vm template with a data disk? One or > many? > > > > Regards, > > Piotr > > > > > > > > -- > Daan > > -- Daan
RE: The RAM MEM inside KVM instance is not the same as it was set
Hi,
Yes, I have found that this is why i have this value.
Regards,
Cristian
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 3:34 PM
To: users
Subject: Re: The RAM MEM inside KVM instance is not the same as it was set
Hi,
Did you set mem.overprovisioning.factor in global setting or cluster setting ?
-Wei
On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 13:47, wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
>From where do I get this minRam value? I used a compute offering
> with 10GB of RAM, if I check the VM I see 4GB Ram.
>
>
>
>
> "[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer":{"vm":{"id":"4156","name":"i-2-4156-VM"
>
> ,"state":"Starting","type":"User","cpus":"4","minSpeed":"760","maxSpee
> d":"19
> 00","minRam":"(4.00 GB) 4294967296","maxRam":"(10.00 GB)
> 10737418240","arch":"x86_64","os":"CentOS
> 7","platformEmulator":"CentOS
>
> 7","bootArgs":"","enableHA":"false","limitCpuUse":"false","enableDynam
> ically
>
> ScaleVm":"false","vncPassword":"NutaRZIRWThdE3aU_IkJAA","vncAddr":"10.
> 100.22
> .10""
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Cristian
>
>
Re: The RAM MEM inside KVM instance is not the same as it was set
For kvm environments, I suggest to set the value to 1 (in global setting
and cluster setting).
-Wei
On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 16:19, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I have found that this is why i have this value.
>
>
> Regards,
> Cristian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wei ZHOU
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 3:34 PM
> To: users
> Subject: Re: The RAM MEM inside KVM instance is not the same as it was set
>
> Hi,
>
> Did you set mem.overprovisioning.factor in global setting or cluster
> setting ?
>
> -Wei
>
> On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 13:47, wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> >From where do I get this minRam value? I used a compute offering
> > with 10GB of RAM, if I check the VM I see 4GB Ram.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> "[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer":{"vm":{"id":"4156","name":"i-2-4156-VM"
> >
> > ,"state":"Starting","type":"User","cpus":"4","minSpeed":"760","maxSpee
> > d":"19
> > 00","minRam":"(4.00 GB) 4294967296","maxRam":"(10.00 GB)
> > 10737418240","arch":"x86_64","os":"CentOS
> > 7","platformEmulator":"CentOS
> >
> > 7","bootArgs":"","enableHA":"false","limitCpuUse":"false","enableDynam
> > ically
> >
> > ScaleVm":"false","vncPassword":"NutaRZIRWThdE3aU_IkJAA","vncAddr":"10.
> > 100.22
> > .10""
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Cristian
> >
> >
>
>
Re: The RAM MEM inside KVM instance is not the same as it was set
Hi, Cristian,
When ACS is deploying a VM, it defines a minimum memory|CPU to the VM, based on
a calculation through the overprovisioning (defined mem|cpu speed /
overprovisioning factor); Therefore, it will define a range of memory|CPU, even
if it does not use scalable (dynamic) service offerings.
For now, the option to avoid this behavior is to keep memory overprovisioning
as "1", as Wei suggested. However, in version 4.16.0, there'll be two new
global settings
("vm.min.memory.equals.memory.divided.by.mem.overprovisioning.factor" and
"vm.min.cpu.speed.equals.cpu.speed.divided.by.cpu.overprovisioning.factor") to
avoid it.
This is the PR which introduced it:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4722
Best regards,
Daniel
On 2021/09/17 15:07:55, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> For kvm environments, I suggest to set the value to 1 (in global setting
> and cluster setting).
>
> -Wei
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 16:19, wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes, I have found that this is why i have this value.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Cristian
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wei ZHOU
> > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 3:34 PM
> > To: users
> > Subject: Re: The RAM MEM inside KVM instance is not the same as it was set
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Did you set mem.overprovisioning.factor in global setting or cluster
> > setting ?
> >
> > -Wei
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 13:47, wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >From where do I get this minRam value? I used a compute offering
> > > with 10GB of RAM, if I check the VM I see 4GB Ram.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > "[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer":{"vm":{"id":"4156","name":"i-2-4156-VM"
> > >
> > > ,"state":"Starting","type":"User","cpus":"4","minSpeed":"760","maxSpee
> > > d":"19
> > > 00","minRam":"(4.00 GB) 4294967296","maxRam":"(10.00 GB)
> > > 10737418240","arch":"x86_64","os":"CentOS
> > > 7","platformEmulator":"CentOS
> > >
> > > 7","bootArgs":"","enableHA":"false","limitCpuUse":"false","enableDynam
> > > ically
> > >
> > > ScaleVm":"false","vncPassword":"NutaRZIRWThdE3aU_IkJAA","vncAddr":"10.
> > > 100.22
> > > .10""
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Cristian
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: vm template with data disk
I would think you could overcome this to some extant with cloud-init on linux. But... Would require user to add a data disk when creating instance. Limited to the 1 disk in the add instance wizard. Possible errors if no data disk added by user. Requires custom cloud-init configuration baked into the template. Assumes device names are consistent (pretty sure this is true for specific Linux distros, but may not hold for all Linux distros). Assumes cloud-init can be configured to do this with the version present on your distro. So not optimal or as easy as a data disk being part of a template, but might work for your use case. Darren -- This e-mail is confidential. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains other than by the intended recipient is forbidden. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately and delete this e-mail. - Original Message - From: "Daan Hoogland" To: "users" , pi...@piszki.pl Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 5:37:50 AM Subject: Re: vm template with data disk I don't think taht this is implemented for KVM On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 2:31 PM Piotr Pisz wrote: > I meant KVM :-) > > Piotr > > > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 2:00 PM > To: users ; pi...@piszki.pl > Subject: Re: vm template with data disk > > yes, at least for vmware it is. > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:06 PM Piotr Pisz wrote: > > > Hi, is it possible to prepare a vm template with a data disk? One or > many? > > > > Regards, > > Piotr > > > > > > > > -- > Daan > > -- Daan
