RE: CloudStack usage is not working properly
Hi, Yes, that service offering already exists. -Original Message- From: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 11:30 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack usage is not working properly Hi, When you say Changed , did you alter an existing service offering details or move a Instance to a service offering? If you create a new service offering , does the ID show in your Cloud DB and usage DB? Thanks Glenn Regards, Glenn Wagner glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape Town 7130South Africa @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Saturday, 16 April 2016 11:11 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CloudStack usage is not working properly Hello, I've changed service offering 1~2 months ago but is does'nt show the service offering ID in cloud db, I've already restarted cloud-usage service but that is not fixed the issue. I do use CS 4.4 with VMware.
CloudStack usage is not working properly
Hello, I've changed service offering 1~2 months ago but is does'nt show the service offering ID in cloud db, I've already restarted cloud-usage service but that is not fixed the issue. I do use CS 4.4 with VMware.
RE: How to replace Primary Storage
I got it. After migrating the configuration file of the datastore and rebooting the VM that is fine now. is this process risky, I am going to that for functional VM's. thanks -Original Message- From: Kevin Walker [mailto:kwal...@virtualviolet.net] Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2016 4:27 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to replace Primary Storage Are you able to storage vmotion the VM's across? Kind regards Kevin Walker +968 99371303 +44 7714303479 On Jan 3, 2016, at 16:18, Amir Abbasi wrote: Hi, I've enabled maintenance mode on Primary storage 1 and it stopped and moved all vm' on that storage and moved to another PS automatically. But only vmdk files have been moved and "vmx, log and other small files related to Vm's still exist on Primary storage 1. This is why I can't unmount that from vmware. Any idea about forcing CS/VMware to recreate those config files on new PS. I know if I stop the VM's and move storages to third PS will fix the problem probably. -Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 7:46 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: How to replace Primary Storage Hi, Thanks, as I found in older documents if I enable maintenance mode ol Primary Storage then CS will try to move all storages to another Primary Storage with same tag. Has anyone tried that? -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 11:30 PM To: Cloudstack users mailing list Subject: Re: How to replace Primary Storage Hey Amir, this should be doable behind the scenes with vCenter. It will involve live storage migration, then massaging the cloudstack db (volumes table pool_id and folder references). If snapshots are involved, its a bit more involved. > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Amir Abbasi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've added a new Primary Storage to a VMware zone and want to replace > that with old one. Both of them are VMFC (FC). What do you recommend > for live migration? What would happened if I enable maintenance mode > for old Primary storage? > > > > Thanks
RE: How to replace Primary Storage
Hi, I've enabled maintenance mode on Primary storage 1 and it stopped and moved all vm' on that storage and moved to another PS automatically. But only vmdk files have been moved and "vmx, log and other small files related to Vm's still exist on Primary storage 1. This is why I can't unmount that from vmware. Any idea about forcing CS/VMware to recreate those config files on new PS. I know if I stop the VM's and move storages to third PS will fix the problem probably. -----Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 7:46 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: How to replace Primary Storage Hi, Thanks, as I found in older documents if I enable maintenance mode ol Primary Storage then CS will try to move all storages to another Primary Storage with same tag. Has anyone tried that? -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 11:30 PM To: Cloudstack users mailing list Subject: Re: How to replace Primary Storage Hey Amir, this should be doable behind the scenes with vCenter. It will involve live storage migration, then massaging the cloudstack db (volumes table pool_id and folder references). If snapshots are involved, its a bit more involved. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Amir Abbasi wrote: > Hi, > > > > I've added a new Primary Storage to a VMware zone and want to replace > that with old one. Both of them are VMFC (FC). What do you recommend > for live migration? What would happened if I enable maintenance mode > for old Primary storage? > > > > Thanks > >
RE: How to replace Primary Storage
Hi, Thanks, as I found in older documents if I enable maintenance mode ol Primary Storage then CS will try to move all storages to another Primary Storage with same tag. Has anyone tried that? -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 11:30 PM To: Cloudstack users mailing list Subject: Re: How to replace Primary Storage Hey Amir, this should be doable behind the scenes with vCenter. It will involve live storage migration, then massaging the cloudstack db (volumes table pool_id and folder references). If snapshots are involved, its a bit more involved. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Amir Abbasi wrote: > Hi, > > > > I've added a new Primary Storage to a VMware zone and want to replace > that with old one. Both of them are VMFC (FC). What do you recommend > for live migration? What would happened if I enable maintenance mode > for old Primary storage? > > > > Thanks > >
How to replace Primary Storage
Hi, I've added a new Primary Storage to a VMware zone and want to replace that with old one. Both of them are VMFC (FC). What do you recommend for live migration? What would happened if I enable maintenance mode for old Primary storage? Thanks
RE: New Primary Storage marked as not suitable
Thanks, I've added that storage with similar storage tag and that is suitable now. -Original Message- From: Devdeep [mailto:devd...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 8:57 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New Primary Storage marked as not suitable The storage pool is marked as unsuitable probably because the storage tag on the service/disk offering with which the volume was created do not match the tag on the new primary storage (PrimaryStorage2). You may try updating the tag on the new primary and see if it addresses the problem. Regards, Devdeep On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Amir Abbasi wrote: > Hello, > > Disk Total on old Primary Storage is 2.8T and new one is 2T (over > provisioning factor is 2). Currently Disk Allocated is only 5G on > second storage but old one hast 2.5T Disk Allocated. > > -Original Message- > From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 8:04 AM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: New Primary Storage marked as not suitable > > Does the secondary primary storage has enough storage?. I think it showing > warning as not suitable because its volume size may be more(after > applying default thin provisioning factor i.e. multiple by 2) than > destination storage but while doing migration it won't check the storage > capacity(that's bug, its known issue)calculation and initiate the copy > that is the reason you are able to migrate the volume successfully > even though it shows not suitable. > > > Regards > Sadhu > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] > Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 9:57 PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New Primary Storage marked as not suitable > > Hello, > > > > I've added a new Primary storage with tag "PrimaryStorage2" and going > to replace it with the old one with the tag "PrimaryStorage1". Both of > them are VMFS and similar, but when I try to migrate volumes from > PrimaryStorage1, the new PrimaryStorage2 has a "not suitable" mark in > pop up window. I moved a test volume and that was ok seemingly. How > can I find the reason of that issue? > > > > Thanks > >
RE: New Primary Storage marked as not suitable
Hello, Disk Total on old Primary Storage is 2.8T and new one is 2T (over provisioning factor is 2). Currently Disk Allocated is only 5G on second storage but old one hast 2.5T Disk Allocated. -Original Message- From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 8:04 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: New Primary Storage marked as not suitable Does the secondary primary storage has enough storage?. I think it showing warning as not suitable because its volume size may be more(after applying default thin provisioning factor i.e. multiple by 2) than destination storage but while doing migration it won't check the storage capacity(that's bug, its known issue)calculation and initiate the copy that is the reason you are able to migrate the volume successfully even though it shows not suitable. Regards Sadhu -Original Message----- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 9:57 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: New Primary Storage marked as not suitable Hello, I've added a new Primary storage with tag "PrimaryStorage2" and going to replace it with the old one with the tag "PrimaryStorage1". Both of them are VMFS and similar, but when I try to migrate volumes from PrimaryStorage1, the new PrimaryStorage2 has a "not suitable" mark in pop up window. I moved a test volume and that was ok seemingly. How can I find the reason of that issue? Thanks
New Primary Storage marked as not suitable
Hello, I've added a new Primary storage with tag "PrimaryStorage2" and going to replace it with the old one with the tag "PrimaryStorage1". Both of them are VMFS and similar, but when I try to migrate volumes from PrimaryStorage1, the new PrimaryStorage2 has a "not suitable" mark in pop up window. I moved a test volume and that was ok seemingly. How can I find the reason of that issue? Thanks
Failed to deploy Vm with Id: xx on Host with Id: null
Hello, I have CS 4.4.1 with vsphere 5.5. A few days ago there was a problem with Storage and when it get back some vm's was inaccessible, yesterday I just restarted vsphere management with running "services.sh restart" on esx hosts. Hosts are UP and current vm's are running but I can't create new instances in CS.
RE: How to delete a zone in database
There is no null record for that zone, also state of all VM's are "Expunging" and "Destroyed"!! -Original Message- From: Kiran manohar Chavala [mailto:kiranchav...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 10:18 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to delete a zone in database Hi Amir Pleas check if there are any instances which ar mysql>select id name,state from vm_instances where removed is null; If you get any id which is not removed, update the database mysql>update vm_instances set removed=now() where id in (select id from vm_instances where removed is null); Regards Kiran On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Amir Abbasi wrote: > Thanks, but I get the following error after removing the secondary storage: > The zone is not deletable because there are virtual machines running > in this zone > > in vm_instance table there are some instances in "Expunging" status, > does it caused the problem? > -Original Message- > From: Kiran manohar Chavala [mailto:kiranchav...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 4:35 PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: How to delete a zone in database > > Hi Amir > > You can delete the templates present in secondary storage from the > database > > mysql > select * from image_store where name=" the secondary storage"; > > note down the id > > > mysql> select * from template_store_ref where store_id= here>; > > > mysql> delete from template_store_ref where store_id= mysql> here>; > > > Then try to remove the secondary storage > > > Regards > > Kiran Manohar > > Citrix systems > On Aug 5, 2015 5:03 PM, "Amir Abbasi" wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > All accounts, Domains and then hosts, clusters, pods, Primary > > Storage have been removed but secondary storage could not be removed > > and I face the following error: > > > > > > > > Cannot delete image store with active templates backup! > > > > > > > > I can see old templates of deleted accounts. How can I delete them > > off from cloud database and then remove old zone? > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > >
RE: How to delete a zone in database
Thanks, but I get the following error after removing the secondary storage: The zone is not deletable because there are virtual machines running in this zone in vm_instance table there are some instances in "Expunging" status, does it caused the problem? -Original Message- From: Kiran manohar Chavala [mailto:kiranchav...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 4:35 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to delete a zone in database Hi Amir You can delete the templates present in secondary storage from the database mysql > select * from image_store where name=" select * from template_store_ref where store_id=; mysql> delete from template_store_ref where store_id= here>; Then try to remove the secondary storage Regards Kiran Manohar Citrix systems On Aug 5, 2015 5:03 PM, "Amir Abbasi" wrote: > Hi All, > > > > All accounts, Domains and then hosts, clusters, pods, Primary Storage > have been removed but secondary storage could not be removed and I > face the following error: > > > > Cannot delete image store with active templates backup! > > > > I can see old templates of deleted accounts. How can I delete them off > from cloud database and then remove old zone? > > > > Thanks in advance > >
How to delete a zone in database
Hi All, All accounts, Domains and then hosts, clusters, pods, Primary Storage have been removed but secondary storage could not be removed and I face the following error: Cannot delete image store with active templates backup! I can see old templates of deleted accounts. How can I delete them off from cloud database and then remove old zone? Thanks in advance
Strange route in System VM's
Hello, I'm not sure why system VM's (SSVM, Console proxy VM) have a route from Management traffic Gateway to Internet IP address of management server. Is that normal? System VM's will no work unless I delete that route. Thanks
SSL Offloading with cloudstack LB
Hello, Is there any way to have SSL Offloader with CLoudstack LB? Thanks
Is there anyway to use SSL termination with cloudstack LB?
Hello, I'm using CS 4.4.1. Thanks
How to install the CloudStack MIB file on SNMP manager system
Hello, I'm working on configuring SNMP on CS4.4.1 but I'm not sure how to apply first step: . For an SNMP manager, install the CloudStack MIB file on your SNMP manager system.. Thanks
RE: cloudstack usage tables are empty
What properties relevant should be copied? cluster.node.IP is the IP address of the ms in db.properties. Thanks -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2015 1:45 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: cloudstack usage tables are empty did you add properties in db.properties.override to point to the ms? you should. copy the properties relevant from db.properties to (new file?) db.properties.override, edit and restart. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Amir Abbasi wrote: > Hello, > > > > I've install cloudstack usage on management server, but tables of > cloud_usage are still empty. the usage_job in db server is has a > record but it shows "/127.0.0.1" as host while the > management server is remote. Is it necessary to fix that? > -- Daan
cloudstack usage tables are empty
Hello, I've install cloudstack usage on management server, but tables of cloud_usage are still empty. the usage_job in db server is has a record but it shows "/127.0.0.1" as host while the management server is remote. Is it necessary to fix that?
RE: Failed to create VM from specific template (other templates are fine)
Hello, The template is "Ready" and status is "Download Complete", do you still offer trying again to download template? -Original Message- From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:52 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Failed to create VM from specific template (other templates are fine) If it is not downloaded properly You can stop-start ssvm which will try to download your template . ~prashant On 1/28/15, 1:20 PM, "Amir Abbasi" wrote: >Hello, > > > >Here is a part of the log: > > > >2015-01-28 10:00:54,046 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] >(Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Was >unable > >to find lock for the key template_spool_ref70 and thread id 1503363977 > >2015-01-28 10:00:54,046 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.VolumeOrchestrator] >(Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Una > >ble to create Vol[263|vm=199|ROOT]:Unable to copy template to primary >storage due to exception:Exception: java.lang.Exception > >Message: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing >request body to server > > > >2015-01-28 10:00:54,046 INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] >(Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) > >Unable to contact resource. > >com.cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException: Resource >[StoragePool:1] is >unreachable: Unable to create Vol[263|vm=199|ROOT]:Unab > >le to copy template to primary storage due to exception:Exception: >java.lang.Exception > >Message: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing >request body to server > > > >at >org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.recreateV >olu >me >(VolumeOrchestrator.java:1205) > >at >org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.prepare(V >olu >me >Orchestrator.java:1257) > >at >com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineM >ana >ge >rImpl.java:988) > >at >com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineM >ana >ge >rImpl.java:5195) > >at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor568.invoke(Unknown > Source) > >at >sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccesso >rIm >pl >.java:43) > >at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) > >at >com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProx >y.j >av >a:107) > >at >com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineMa >nag >er >Impl.java:5340) > >at >com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102) > >at >org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInCo >nte >xt >(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:503) > >at >org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(Mana >ged >Co >ntextRunnable.java:49) > >at >org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call >(De >fa >ultManagedContext.java:56) > >at >org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWi >thC >on >text(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) > >at >org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWit >hCo >nt >ext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) > >at >org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(Manage >dCo >nt >extRunnable.java:46) > >at >org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(Asy >ncJ >ob >ManagerImpl.java:460) > >at >java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) > >at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) > >at >java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java: >11 >45) > >at >java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.j >ava >:6 >15) > >at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > >2015-01-28 10:00:54,051 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] >(Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) > >Cleaning up resources for the vm VM[User|i-15-199-VM] in Starting state > >2015-01-28 10:00:54,056 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] >(Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Seq >1-1339820889 > >142821334: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1(172.28.52.4), Ver: >v1, Flags: 100011, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand":{" > &
Failed to create VM from specific template (other templates are fine)
Hello, Here is a part of the log: 2015-01-28 10:00:54,046 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref70 and thread id 1503363977 2015-01-28 10:00:54,046 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.VolumeOrchestrator] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Una ble to create Vol[263|vm=199|ROOT]:Unable to copy template to primary storage due to exception:Exception: java.lang.Exception Message: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing request body to server 2015-01-28 10:00:54,046 INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Unable to contact resource. com.cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException: Resource [StoragePool:1] is unreachable: Unable to create Vol[263|vm=199|ROOT]:Unab le to copy template to primary storage due to exception:Exception: java.lang.Exception Message: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing request body to server at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.recreateVolume (VolumeOrchestrator.java:1205) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.prepare(Volume Orchestrator.java:1257) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManage rImpl.java:988) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManage rImpl.java:5195) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor568.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl .java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.jav a:107) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManager Impl.java:5340) at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext (AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:503) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedCo ntextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(Defa ultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithCon text(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithCont ext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedCont extRunnable.java:46) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJob ManagerImpl.java:460) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:11 45) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:6 15) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 2015-01-28 10:00:54,051 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Cleaning up resources for the vm VM[User|i-15-199-VM] in Starting state 2015-01-28 10:00:54,056 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Seq 1-1339820889 142821334: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1(172.28.52.4), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand":{" isProxy":false,"executeInSequence":false,"checkBeforeCleanup":false,"vmName" :"i-15-199-VM","wait":0}}] } 2015-01-28 10:00:54,056 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-138:ctx-90c00639 job-2709/job-2710 ctx-08257b85) Seq 1-1339820889 142821334: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1(172.28.52.4), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand" :{"isProxy":false,"executeInSequence":false,"checkBeforeCleanup":false,"vmNa me":"i-15-199-VM","wait":0}}] } 2015-01-28 10:00:54,057 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-49:ctx-44763cb1) Seq 1-1339820889142821334: Executing reques t 2015-01-28 10:00:54,057 INFO [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-49:ctx-44763cb1 172.28.52.4) Executing resource StopCommand: { "isProxy":false,"executeInSequence":false,"checkBeforeCleanup":false,"vmName ":"i-15-199-VM","wait":0} 2015-01-28 10:00:54,118 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) SeqA 3-199070: Processing Seq 3-199070: { C md , MgmtId: -1, via: 3, Ver: v1, Flags: 11, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.ConsoleProxyLoadReportCommand":{"_proxyVmId":2,"_load Info":"{\n \"connections\": []\n}","wait":0}}] } 2015-01-28 10:00:54,123 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) SeqA 3-199070: Send
How to add new VLAN range for Guest traffic
Hello, VLAN range which I've added in first CS installation (4.4.1) is running low, is there anyway to add new LAN range for Guest traffic in particular zone? Thanks
RE: Failed to migrate VM from old CS
I receive following message firstly (before message I've mentioned in last e-mail): -- GET command=createNe twork&response=json&sessionkey=XstW326WNiJ3%2FEdkzOjoFKEJWk4%3D&networkOffer ingId=2171422f-26aa-418c-bfc0-6f2227f9fcde&name=tebtest& displayText=tebtest&zoneId=0d46010d-4212-4cab-8b93-cc9e2ba306bc&_=1418280962 433 2014-12-11 10:26:38,710 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-5:ctx-f03b1c6b ctx-2a568b23) Ignoring paremeter displaynetwork as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-11 10:26:38,715 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-5:ctx-f03b1c6b ctx-2a568b23) Ignoring paremeter displaynetwork as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-11 10:26:38,771 DEBUG [o.a.c.n.c.m.ContrailGuru] (catalina-exec-5:ctx-f03b1c6b ctx-2a568b23) Refusing to design this network 2014-12-11 10:26:38,771 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.MidoNetGuestNetworkGuru] (catalina-exec-5:ctx-f03b1c6b ctx-2a568b23) design called 2014-12-11 10:26:38,772 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.MidoNetGuestNetworkGuru] (catalina-exec-5:ctx-f03b1c6b ctx-2a568b23) Refusing to design this network, the physical isolation type is not MIDO 2014-12-11 10:26:38,774 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.NiciraNvpGuestNetworkGuru] (catalina-exec-5:ctx-f03b1c6b ctx-2a568b23) Refusing to design thi s network 2014-12-11 10:26:38,775 DEBUG [o.a.c.n.o.OpendaylightGuestNetworkGuru] (catalina-exec-5:ctx-f03b1c6b ctx-2a568b23) Refusing to desig n this network 2014-12-11 10:26:38,777 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.OvsGuestNetworkGuru] (catalina-exec-5:ctx-f03b1c6b ctx-2a568b23) Refusing to design this netw ork 2014-12-11 10:26:38,811 DEBUG [o.a.c.n.g.SspGuestNetworkGuru] (catalina-exec-5:ctx-f03b1c6b ctx-2a568b23) SSP not configured to be a ctive 2014-12-11 10:26:38,812 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] (catalina-exec-5:ctx-f03b1c6b ctx-2a568b23) Releasing lock for Acct[1d c8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] -Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:03 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com Subject: Failed to migrate VM from old CS Hello, I tried to move a VM from old "CS 3.0" to my new "CS 4.4.1" installation but it failed, here is log messages. Also old public templates can't be used on this new CS. Hypervisor was ESX5.0 on old one and ESX5.1 on new installation. -- GET command=deployVirtualMachine&response=json&sessionkey=qH3a6K5YjssqcJ0rKnshCg muXFk%3D&zoneid=0d46010d-4212-4cab-8b93-cc9e2ba306bc&templateid=6b46ae18-ecb 3-4b50-8d76-46d6aa2d4723&hypervisor=VMware&serviceofferingid=4c4cb9e2-07c2-4 bea-a696-0c16964c813a&diskofferingid=4b9db6b8-8193-467e-ac31-079db8a97ad3&ip tonetworklist%5B0%5D.networkid=09b98bb1-7541-4418-9915-ddc4630e0566&displayn ame=hasibi&name=hasibi&_=1418278784937 2014-12-11 09:50:21,190 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Ignoring paremeter displayvm as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-11 09:50:21,190 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Ignoring paremeter deploymentplanner as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-11 09:50:21,208 DEBUG [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Access to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] granted to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] by DomainChecker 2014-12-11 09:50:21,217 DEBUG [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Access to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] granted to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] by DomainChecker 2014-12-11 09:50:21,228 DEBUG [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Access to Tmpl[221-OVA-221-6-0aedd0a4-48b1-3538-bb5e-73dca23fbda5 granted to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] by DomainChecker 2014-12-11 09:50:21,228 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Ignoring paremeter displayvm as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-11 09:50:21,228 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Ignoring paremeter deploymentplanner as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-11 09:50:21,239 DEBUG [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Access to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] granted to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] by DomainChecker 2014-12-11 09:50:21,255 DEBUG [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Access to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] granted to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] by DomainChecker 2014-12-11 09:50:21,312 DEBUG [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Access to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] granted to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] by D
Failed to migrate VM from old CS
Hello, I tried to move a VM from old "CS 3.0" to my new "CS 4.4.1" installation but it failed, here is log messages. Also old public templates can't be used on this new CS. Hypervisor was ESX5.0 on old one and ESX5.1 on new installation. -- GET command=deployVirtualMachine&response=json&sessionkey=qH3a6K5YjssqcJ0rKnshCg muXFk%3D&zoneid=0d46010d-4212-4cab-8b93-cc9e2ba306bc&templateid=6b46ae18-ecb 3-4b50-8d76-46d6aa2d4723&hypervisor=VMware&serviceofferingid=4c4cb9e2-07c2-4 bea-a696-0c16964c813a&diskofferingid=4b9db6b8-8193-467e-ac31-079db8a97ad3&ip tonetworklist%5B0%5D.networkid=09b98bb1-7541-4418-9915-ddc4630e0566&displayn ame=hasibi&name=hasibi&_=1418278784937 2014-12-11 09:50:21,190 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Ignoring paremeter displayvm as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-11 09:50:21,190 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Ignoring paremeter deploymentplanner as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-11 09:50:21,208 DEBUG [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Access to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] granted to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] by DomainChecker 2014-12-11 09:50:21,217 DEBUG [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Access to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] granted to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] by DomainChecker 2014-12-11 09:50:21,228 DEBUG [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Access to Tmpl[221-OVA-221-6-0aedd0a4-48b1-3538-bb5e-73dca23fbda5 granted to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] by DomainChecker 2014-12-11 09:50:21,228 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Ignoring paremeter displayvm as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-11 09:50:21,228 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.BaseCmd] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Ignoring paremeter deploymentplanner as the caller is not authorized to pass it in 2014-12-11 09:50:21,239 DEBUG [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Access to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] granted to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] by DomainChecker 2014-12-11 09:50:21,255 DEBUG [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Access to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] granted to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] by DomainChecker 2014-12-11 09:50:21,312 DEBUG [c.c.u.AccountManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Access to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] granted to Acct[1dc8b18f-8d39-46b2-b04c-6b3f7f049ee1-tebtest] by DomainChecker 2014-12-11 09:50:21,319 DEBUG [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=213 2014-12-11 09:50:21,337 DEBUG [c.c.v.UserVmManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Allocating in the DB for vm 2014-12-11 09:50:21,351 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Allocating entries for VM: VM[User|i-6-55-VM] 2014-12-11 09:50:21,352 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Allocating nics for VM[User|i-6-55-VM] 2014-12-11 09:50:21,353 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Allocating nic for vm VM[User|i-6-55-VM] in network Ntwk[09b98bb1-7541-4418-9915-ddc4630e0566|Guest|8] with requested profile NicProfile[0-0-null-null-null 2014-12-11 09:50:21,370 DEBUG [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=213 2014-12-11 09:50:21,371 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Allocating disks for VM[User|i-6-55-VM] 2014-12-11 09:50:21,405 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Allocation completed for VM: VM[User|i-6-55-VM] 2014-12-11 09:50:21,405 DEBUG [c.c.v.UserVmManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Successfully allocated DB entry for VM[User|i-6-55-VM] 2014-12-11 09:50:21,441 DEBUG [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=213 2014-12-11 09:50:21,447 DEBUG [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=213 2014-12-11 09:50:21,479 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-5ff3f7b4 ctx-fbe98be9) submit async job-443, details: AsyncJobVO {id:443, userId: 6, accountId: 6, instanceType: VirtualMachine, instanceId: 55, cmd: org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd, cmdInfo: {"sessionkey":"qH3a6K5YjssqcJ0rKnshCgmuXFk\u003d","serviceofferingid":"4c
SSVM stuck on Starting after fresh installation CS 4.4.1 with Vsphere hypervisor
Here is the managemnt logs: 2014-12-01 11:06:03,560 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-1:ctx-2f06bbbe) Seq 1-4157385406016389183: Response Received: 2014-12-01 11:06:03,560 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (DirectAgent-1:ctx-2f06bbbe) Seq 1-4157385406016389183: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopAnswer":{"result":true,"details":"Stop VM s-2-VM Succeed","wait":0}}] } 2014-12-01 11:06:03,560 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-ccf9c7d8 job-2/job-86 ctx-bdae7320) Seq 1-4157385406016389183: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { StopAnswer } } 2014-12-01 11:06:03,560 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-ccf9c7d8 job-2/job-86 ctx-bdae7320) Details from executing class com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand: Stop VM s-2-VM Succeed 2014-12-01 11:06:03,561 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-ccf9c7d8 job-2/job-86 ctx-bdae7320) Failed to start instance VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-2-VM] com.cloud.utils.exception.ExecutionException: Unable to start VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-2-VM] due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManage rImpl.java:1073) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManage rImpl.java:5195) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57 ) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl .java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.jav a:107) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManager Impl.java:5340) at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext (AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:503) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedCo ntextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(Defa ultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithCon text(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithCont ext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedCont extRunnable.java:46) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJob ManagerImpl.java:460) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:11 45) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:6 15) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 2014-12-01 11:06:03,567 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-ccf9c7d8 job-2/job-86 ctx-bdae7320) Cleaning up resources for the vm VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-2-VM] in Starting state 2014-12-01 11:06:03,572 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-ccf9c7d8 job-2/job-86 ctx-bdae7320) Seq 1-4157385406016389185: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1(172.28.52.4), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand":{"isProxy":false,"executeInSequence":fal se,"checkBeforeCleanup":false,"vmName":"s-2-VM","wait":0}}] } 2014-12-01 11:06:03,572 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-ccf9c7d8 job-2/job-86 ctx-bdae7320) Seq 1-4157385406016389185: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1(172.28.52.4), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand":{"isProxy":false,"executeInSequence":fal se,"checkBeforeCleanup":false,"vmName":"s-2-VM","wait":0}}] } 2014-12-01 11:06:03,573 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-18:ctx-77f9412b) Seq 1-4157385406016389185: Executing request 2014-12-01 11:06:03,574 INFO [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-18:ctx-77f9412b 172.28.52.4) Executing resource StopCommand: {"isProxy":false,"executeInSequence":false,"checkBeforeCleanup":false,"vmNam e":"s-2-VM","wait":0} 2014-12-01 11:06:03,641 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.m.HostMO] (DirectAgent-18:ctx-77f9412b 172.28.52.4) find VM s-2-VM on host 2014-12-01 11:06:03,641 INFO [c.c.h.v.m.HostMO] (DirectAgent-18:ctx-77f9412b 172.28.52.4) VM s-2-VM not found in host cache 2014-12-01 11:06:03,642 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.m.HostMO] (DirectAgent-18:ctx-77f9412b 172.28.52.4) load VM cache on host 2014-12-01 11:06:03,729 INFO [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-18:ctx-77f9412b 172.28.52.4) VM s-2-VM is already in stopped state
SSVM stuck on Starting after fresh installation CS 4.4.1 with Vsphere hypervisor
Here is the managemnt logs: 2014-12-01 11:06:03,560 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-1:ctx-2f06bbbe) Seq 1-4157385406016389183: Response Received: 2014-12-01 11:06:03,560 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (DirectAgent-1:ctx-2f06bbbe) Seq 1-4157385406016389183: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopAnswer":{"result":true,"details":"Stop VM s-2-VM Succeed","wait":0}}] } 2014-12-01 11:06:03,560 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-ccf9c7d8 job-2/job-86 ctx-bdae7320) Seq 1-4157385406016389183: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { StopAnswer } } 2014-12-01 11:06:03,560 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-ccf9c7d8 job-2/job-86 ctx-bdae7320) Details from executing class com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand: Stop VM s-2-VM Succeed 2014-12-01 11:06:03,561 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-ccf9c7d8 job-2/job-86 ctx-bdae7320) Failed to start instance VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-2-VM] com.cloud.utils.exception.ExecutionException: Unable to start VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-2-VM] due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManage rImpl.java:1073) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManage rImpl.java:5195) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57 ) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl .java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.jav a:107) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManager Impl.java:5340) at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext (AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:503) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedCo ntextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(Defa ultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithCon text(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithCont ext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedCont extRunnable.java:46) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJob ManagerImpl.java:460) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:11 45) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:6 15) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 2014-12-01 11:06:03,567 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-ccf9c7d8 job-2/job-86 ctx-bdae7320) Cleaning up resources for the vm VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-2-VM] in Starting state 2014-12-01 11:06:03,572 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-ccf9c7d8 job-2/job-86 ctx-bdae7320) Seq 1-4157385406016389185: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1(172.28.52.4), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand":{"isProxy":false,"executeInSequence":fal se,"checkBeforeCleanup":false,"vmName":"s-2-VM","wait":0}}] } 2014-12-01 11:06:03,572 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-2:ctx-ccf9c7d8 job-2/job-86 ctx-bdae7320) Seq 1-4157385406016389185: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239450489, via: 1(172.28.52.4), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand":{"isProxy":false,"executeInSequence":fal se,"checkBeforeCleanup":false,"vmName":"s-2-VM","wait":0}}] } 2014-12-01 11:06:03,573 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-18:ctx-77f9412b) Seq 1-4157385406016389185: Executing request 2014-12-01 11:06:03,574 INFO [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-18:ctx-77f9412b 172.28.52.4) Executing resource StopCommand: {"isProxy":false,"executeInSequence":false,"checkBeforeCleanup":false,"vmNam e":"s-2-VM","wait":0} 2014-12-01 11:06:03,641 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.m.HostMO] (DirectAgent-18:ctx-77f9412b 172.28.52.4) find VM s-2-VM on host 2014-12-01 11:06:03,641 INFO [c.c.h.v.m.HostMO] (DirectAgent-18:ctx-77f9412b 172.28.52.4) VM s-2-VM not found in host cache 2014-12-01 11:06:03,642 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.m.HostMO] (DirectAgent-18:ctx-77f9412b 172.28.52.4) load VM cache on host 2014-12-01 11:06:03,729 INFO [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-18:ctx-77f9412b 172.28.52.4) VM s-2-VM is already in stopped state
ESXi 5.1 as hypervisor with VMFS filesystem
Hello, Is it possibel to install Cloudstack (latest) with that hypervisor?
Can I install CS 4.4.1 with ESXi 5.1 hosts?
Also I'm using VMFS filesystem as primary storage, NFS for sec storage. Thanks
How to add a zone (basic model) with IP range in different subnet
I'm going to install CS on a single server with KVM hypervisor. The additional IP addresses are in diffrent subnet, I've already implemented this scenario with KVM/Libvirtd and with routing (Pointopoint in debian) and virtual machine's networks have been worked without any problem. But with same network settings, in CS installation when I add the POD (Gateway is the main IP of the server and Start IP is a piece of that subnet I get the following error: The start address of the IP range is not in the CIDR subnet
Re: Unable to create a deployment for VM
Hosts are OK! I've downgraded the comoute offering from "4*2.4GHZ and 8G RAM" to "2*2.4GHZ and 4G RAM". - Original Message - From: "James Scott" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 12:10 PM Subject: Re: Unable to create a deployment for VM It looks like not enough CPU? // Hosts's actual total CPU: 38384 and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 307072 What is the Old and New Service Offering? On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Amir Abbasi wrote: Hi, After changing the Service Offering I can't start the VM: 2014-10-07 08:27:53,286 DEBUG [vmware.mo.HostMO] (DirectAgent-418:10.3.1.2) find VM i-47-683-TBN on host 2014-10-07 08:27:53,286 DEBUG [vmware.mo.HostMO] (DirectAgent-418:10.3.1.2) load VM cache on host 2014-10-07 08:27:53,501 INFO [vmware.resource.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-418:10.3.1.2) VM i-47-683-TBN is no longer in vSphere 2014-10-07 08:27:53,502 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-418:null) Seq 46-951962452: Response Received: 2014-10-07 08:27:53,502 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (DirectAgent-418:null) Seq 46-951962452: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 345050455587, via: 46, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, [{"StopAnswer":{"vncPort":0,"bytesSent":0,"bytesReceived":0,"result":true,"details":"VM i-47-683-TBN is no longer in vSphere","wait":0}}] } 2014-10-07 08:27:53,502 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Seq 46-951962452: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 345050455587, via: 46, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, { StopAnswer } } 2014-10-07 08:27:53,502 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Cleanup succeeded. Details VM i-47-683-TBN is no longer in vSphere 2014-10-07 08:27:53,502 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (DirectAgent-418:null) Cleanup succeeded. Details VM i-47-683-TBN is no longer in vSphere 2014-10-07 08:27:53,503 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentAttache] (DirectAgent-418:null) Seq 46-951962452: No more commands found 2014-10-07 08:27:53,543 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=316 2014-10-07 08:27:53,555 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Changing active number of nics for network id=316 on -1 2014-10-07 08:27:53,583 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Successfully cleanued up resources for the vm VM[User|i-47-683-TBN] in Starting state 2014-10-07 08:27:53,587 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Root volume is ready, need to place VM in volume's cluster 2014-10-07 08:27:53,587 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Vol[1000|vm=683|ROOT] is READY, changing deployment plan to use this pool's dcId: 8 , podId: 8 , and clusterId: 12 2014-10-07 08:27:53,587 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) DataCenter id = '8' provided is in avoid set, DeploymentPlanner cannot allocate the VM, returning. 2014-10-07 08:27:53,587 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) DataCenter id = '8' provided is in avoid set, DeploymentPlanner cannot allocate the VM, returning. 2014-10-07 08:27:53,650 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: 47 new host id: null host id before state transition: 46 2014-10-07 08:27:53,656 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Hosts's actual total CPU: 38384 and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 307072 2014-10-07 08:27:53,656 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) release cpu from host: 46, old used: 75400,reserved: 0, actual total: 38384, total with overprovisioning: 307072; new used: 65800,reserved:0; movedfromreserved: false,moveToReserveredfalse 2014-10-07 08:27:53,656 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) release mem from host: 46, old used: 62679678976,reserved: 0, total: 68708712448; new used: 54089744384,reserved:0; movedfromreserved: false,moveToReserveredfalse 2014-10-07 08:27:53,727 INFO [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-47-683-TBN]
Unable to create a deployment for VM
Hi, After changing the Service Offering I can't start the VM: 2014-10-07 08:27:53,286 DEBUG [vmware.mo.HostMO] (DirectAgent-418:10.3.1.2) find VM i-47-683-TBN on host 2014-10-07 08:27:53,286 DEBUG [vmware.mo.HostMO] (DirectAgent-418:10.3.1.2) load VM cache on host 2014-10-07 08:27:53,501 INFO [vmware.resource.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-418:10.3.1.2) VM i-47-683-TBN is no longer in vSphere 2014-10-07 08:27:53,502 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-418:null) Seq 46-951962452: Response Received: 2014-10-07 08:27:53,502 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (DirectAgent-418:null) Seq 46-951962452: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 345050455587, via: 46, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, [{"StopAnswer":{"vncPort":0,"bytesSent":0,"bytesReceived":0,"result":true,"details":"VM i-47-683-TBN is no longer in vSphere","wait":0}}] } 2014-10-07 08:27:53,502 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Seq 46-951962452: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 345050455587, via: 46, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, { StopAnswer } } 2014-10-07 08:27:53,502 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Cleanup succeeded. Details VM i-47-683-TBN is no longer in vSphere 2014-10-07 08:27:53,502 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (DirectAgent-418:null) Cleanup succeeded. Details VM i-47-683-TBN is no longer in vSphere 2014-10-07 08:27:53,503 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentAttache] (DirectAgent-418:null) Seq 46-951962452: No more commands found 2014-10-07 08:27:53,543 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=316 2014-10-07 08:27:53,555 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Changing active number of nics for network id=316 on -1 2014-10-07 08:27:53,583 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Successfully cleanued up resources for the vm VM[User|i-47-683-TBN] in Starting state 2014-10-07 08:27:53,587 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Root volume is ready, need to place VM in volume's cluster 2014-10-07 08:27:53,587 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Vol[1000|vm=683|ROOT] is READY, changing deployment plan to use this pool's dcId: 8 , podId: 8 , and clusterId: 12 2014-10-07 08:27:53,587 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) DataCenter id = '8' provided is in avoid set, DeploymentPlanner cannot allocate the VM, returning. 2014-10-07 08:27:53,587 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) DataCenter id = '8' provided is in avoid set, DeploymentPlanner cannot allocate the VM, returning. 2014-10-07 08:27:53,650 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: 47 new host id: null host id before state transition: 46 2014-10-07 08:27:53,656 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Hosts's actual total CPU: 38384 and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 307072 2014-10-07 08:27:53,656 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) release cpu from host: 46, old used: 75400,reserved: 0, actual total: 38384, total with overprovisioning: 307072; new used: 65800,reserved:0; movedfromreserved: false,moveToReserveredfalse 2014-10-07 08:27:53,656 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) release mem from host: 46, old used: 62679678976,reserved: 0, total: 68708712448; new used: 54089744384,reserved:0; movedfromreserved: false,moveToReserveredfalse 2014-10-07 08:27:53,727 INFO [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-33:job-1551) Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-47-683-TBN]
Re: Host stuck in "Alert" status after adding a new primary storage
qlIO.java:3447) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sendCommand(MysqlIO.java:1951) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sqlQueryDirect(MysqlIO.java:2101) at com.mysql.jdbc.ConnectionImpl.execSQL(ConnectionImpl.java:2554) at com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.executeInternal(PreparedStatement.java:1761) at com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.executeUpdate(PreparedStatement.java:2046) at com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.executeUpdate(PreparedStatement.java:1964) at com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.executeUpdate(PreparedStatement.java:1949) at org.apache.commons.dbcp.DelegatingPreparedStatement.executeUpdate(DelegatingPreparedStatement.java:106) at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.persist(GenericDaoBase.java:1267) ... 40 more 2014-08-06 15:33:51,539 WARN [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-21:null) Monitor LocalStoragePoolListener$$EnhancerByC GLIB$$e783b2e5 says there is an error in the connect process for 66 due to Unable to setup the local storage pool for Host[-66-Routi ng] 2014-08-06 15:33:51,539 INFO [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-21:null) Host 66 is disconnecting with event AgentDisc onnected 2014-08-06 15:33:51,541 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-21:null) The next status of agent 66is Alert, current status is Connecting 2014-08-06 15:33:51,541 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-21:null) Deregistering link for 66 with state Alert 2014-08-06 15:33:51,541 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-21:null) Remove Agent : 66 2014-08-06 15:33:51,541 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (catalina-exec-21:null) Processing disconnect 66 - Original Message - From: "Devdeep Singh" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 10:22 AM Subject: RE: Host stuck in "Alert" status after adding a new primary storage Hi Amir, Can you share some more logs of the management server? It looks like management server isn't able to connect to the host; but we'll have to look at rest of the logs to root cause the issue. What hypervisor are you working with? Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Sunday, August 3, 2014 3:59 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Host stuck in "Alert" status after adding a new primary storage Hi, I've removed the new Primary storage but the Host still shows Alert status and here is what I see in logs: 2014-08-03 14:51:09,401 DEBUG [cloud.host.Status] (AgentTaskPool-4:null) Agent status update: [id = 55; name = 10.3.1.5; old status = Alert; event = AgentDisconnected; new status = Alert; old update count = 14014; new update count = 14015] Thanks in advance,
Host stuck in "Alert" status after adding a new primary storage
Hi, I've removed the new Primary storage but the Host still shows Alert status and here is what I see in logs: 2014-08-03 14:51:09,401 DEBUG [cloud.host.Status] (AgentTaskPool-4:null) Agent status update: [id = 55; name = 10.3.1.5; old status = Alert; event = AgentDisconnected; new status = Alert; old update count = 14014; new update count = 14015] Thanks in advance,
Failed to restart network
Hi, The Network exists but VR machin does not exist, is there anyway to force CS to recreate VR (when I try to restart networkwith/without Clean Up option it fails). I'm using CS 3.0. Here the error message in logs: 2014-07-17 12:04:32,219 DEBUG [network.element.VirtualRouterElement] (Job-Executor-88:job-756) Virtual router elemnt doesn't need to apply firewall rules on the backend; virtual router doesn't exist in the network 301
Re: Problem with VPN - Error 792/789
Hi, I've already restarted Network of this account (with clean-up option) but the problem still persists. One more thing, Static Nat is enabled on this IP address. Can I check something in VR machine? - Original Message - From: "Sanjeev Neelarapu" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:28 AM Subject: RE: Problem with VPN - Error 792/789 Stop/Start VR from CS. -Original Message----- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 9:03 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Problem with VPN - Error 792/789 Hi, VR faced read-only file system and afterwards I always face error 792 or 789.
Problem with VPN - Error 792/789
Hi, VR faced read-only file system and afterwards I always face error 792 or 789.
Could not find vpn user
Hello, When I try to remove the vpn user I face the error "Could not find vpn user" but they exists and I can see them in vpn_users table in DB. 2014-04-28 15:44:54,933 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-480:null) Seq 55-1106121211: Executing request 2014-04-28 15:44:55,067 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-18:null) submit async job-243, details: AsyncJobVO {id:243, userId: 2, accountId: 2, sessionKey: null, instanceType: None, instanceId: null, cmd: com.cloud.api.commands.RemoveVpnUserCmd, cmdOriginator: null, cmdInfo: {"response":"json","id":"af367a24-1329-41b4-8fec-835f77e31b33d","sessionkey":"/gB6LovUuiAk7VDK3ipEVbeLAb238\u003d","username":"amir","ctxUserId":"2","_":"1398683760125","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"158165"}, cmdVersion: 0, callbackType: 0, callbackAddress: null, status: 0, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 345050455587, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null} 2014-04-28 15:44:55,072 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-44:job-243) Executing com.cloud.api.commands.RemoveVpnUserCmd for job-243 2014-04-28 15:44:55,076 INFO [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-44:job-243) Could not find vpn user amir 2014-04-28 15:44:55,076 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-44:job-243) Complete async job-243, jobStatus: 2, resultCode: 530, result: com.cloud.api.response.ExceptionResponse@58aeeb0
How to add Storage tags to current disk offerings
Hello, I want to remove older Primary storage, so I should add tags to storages and then remove old disk offerings. Will that affct attached volumes to VM's?
Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers
Great, this my first time, so just for confirmation I'll the following steps: 1- add storage tag to current disk offerings to force craeting new volumes on new Primary storage from now on 2- enable maintenance mode on old primary storage and it will shutdown all instances which has volumes on that. 3- move volumes to New primary storage manually 4- restart netword on each account (clean-up is marked) to recreate VR on new primary storage. Are they the correct steps? - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Battala" To: Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 9:28 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Process I had mentioned will work for all system vms. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message----- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 9:47 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers What about the SSVM's or Virtual routers? How to migrate their volumes to second primary storage? - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Battala" To: Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 8:20 PM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Add the new primary store. Enable Maintenance mode on the old primary store. CS will take care of migrating the VM's running the old store to the new one. Once the migrations are complete CS will report the status. Then remove the old store. Yes You can use tags to force CS to pick the tagged resources. Thanks Rajesh Battala -----Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 2:50 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, Thanks, is there any way to force CS to create virtual machines on a particular Primary-storage from now on (I wan to remove older Primary storage as soon as possible)? - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Battala" To: Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 10:52 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Reboot VR, a new VR will be re-created with new disks and all the rules will be applied again. -Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 10:23 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers originally I face 2 problems; 1- The VPN which has been enabled and working since a few months ago is not working (error 789) after facing the "Read-only file system" issue and I can't delete the VPN users (but I can add new users). 2- sometimes web service of instances (which uses this router) does not load js queries properly, I suspect the VR is not working properly. - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Battala" To: Cc: "Sanjeev Neelarapu" Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 8:52 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Reboot the VR. It will recreate disks and apply all the rules. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 9:34 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Sanjeev Neelarapu Subject: Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, Thank you, Is it possible to force cloudstack to recreate VR instance from scratch (not only cleaning up)? - Original Message - From: "Sanjeev Neelarapu" To: Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:23 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, If the host on which VR is running is disconnected and connected back to Primary storage then the instance becomes read-only. This is the linux behavior nothing to do with the cloudstack. Please restart the VR to make the disk writable. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, I've assigned two primary storages. All virtual routers have been created on Primary-Storage1 but sometimes I face "Read-only file system" on some VR instances. I found no option to migrate their volumes. I have cloudstack 3.0.
Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers
What about the SSVM's or Virtual routers? How to migrate their volumes to second primary storage? - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Battala" To: Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 8:20 PM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Add the new primary store. Enable Maintenance mode on the old primary store. CS will take care of migrating the VM's running the old store to the new one. Once the migrations are complete CS will report the status. Then remove the old store. Yes You can use tags to force CS to pick the tagged resources. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message----- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 2:50 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, Thanks, is there any way to force CS to create virtual machines on a particular Primary-storage from now on (I wan to remove older Primary storage as soon as possible)? - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Battala" To: Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 10:52 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Reboot VR, a new VR will be re-created with new disks and all the rules will be applied again. -----Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 10:23 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers originally I face 2 problems; 1- The VPN which has been enabled and working since a few months ago is not working (error 789) after facing the "Read-only file system" issue and I can't delete the VPN users (but I can add new users). 2- sometimes web service of instances (which uses this router) does not load js queries properly, I suspect the VR is not working properly. - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Battala" To: Cc: "Sanjeev Neelarapu" Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 8:52 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Reboot the VR. It will recreate disks and apply all the rules. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 9:34 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Sanjeev Neelarapu Subject: Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, Thank you, Is it possible to force cloudstack to recreate VR instance from scratch (not only cleaning up)? - Original Message - From: "Sanjeev Neelarapu" To: Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:23 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, If the host on which VR is running is disconnected and connected back to Primary storage then the instance becomes read-only. This is the linux behavior nothing to do with the cloudstack. Please restart the VR to make the disk writable. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, I've assigned two primary storages. All virtual routers have been created on Primary-Storage1 but sometimes I face "Read-only file system" on some VR instances. I found no option to migrate their volumes. I have cloudstack 3.0.
Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers
Hi, Thanks, is there any way to force CS to create virtual machines on a particular Primary-storage from now on (I wan to remove older Primary storage as soon as possible)? - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Battala" To: Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 10:52 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Reboot VR, a new VR will be re-created with new disks and all the rules will be applied again. -Original Message----- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 10:23 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers originally I face 2 problems; 1- The VPN which has been enabled and working since a few months ago is not working (error 789) after facing the "Read-only file system" issue and I can't delete the VPN users (but I can add new users). 2- sometimes web service of instances (which uses this router) does not load js queries properly, I suspect the VR is not working properly. - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Battala" To: Cc: "Sanjeev Neelarapu" Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 8:52 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Reboot the VR. It will recreate disks and apply all the rules. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 9:34 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Sanjeev Neelarapu Subject: Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, Thank you, Is it possible to force cloudstack to recreate VR instance from scratch (not only cleaning up)? - Original Message - From: "Sanjeev Neelarapu" To: Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:23 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, If the host on which VR is running is disconnected and connected back to Primary storage then the instance becomes read-only. This is the linux behavior nothing to do with the cloudstack. Please restart the VR to make the disk writable. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, I've assigned two primary storages. All virtual routers have been created on Primary-Storage1 but sometimes I face "Read-only file system" on some VR instances. I found no option to migrate their volumes. I have cloudstack 3.0.
Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers
originally I face 2 problems; 1- The VPN which has been enabled and working since a few months ago is not working (error 789) after facing the "Read-only file system" issue and I can't delete the VPN users (but I can add new users). 2- sometimes web service of instances (which uses this router) does not load js queries properly, I suspect the VR is not working properly. - Original Message - From: "Rajesh Battala" To: Cc: "Sanjeev Neelarapu" Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 8:52 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Reboot the VR. It will recreate disks and apply all the rules. Thanks Rajesh Battala -----Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 9:34 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Sanjeev Neelarapu Subject: Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, Thank you, Is it possible to force cloudstack to recreate VR instance from scratch (not only cleaning up)? - Original Message - From: "Sanjeev Neelarapu" To: Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:23 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, If the host on which VR is running is disconnected and connected back to Primary storage then the instance becomes read-only. This is the linux behavior nothing to do with the cloudstack. Please restart the VR to make the disk writable. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, I've assigned two primary storages. All virtual routers have been created on Primary-Storage1 but sometimes I face "Read-only file system" on some VR instances. I found no option to migrate their volumes. I have cloudstack 3.0.
Re: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers
Hi, Thank you, Is it possible to force cloudstack to recreate VR instance from scratch (not only cleaning up)? - Original Message - From: "Sanjeev Neelarapu" To: Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:23 AM Subject: RE: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, If the host on which VR is running is disconnected and connected back to Primary storage then the instance becomes read-only. This is the linux behavior nothing to do with the cloudstack. Please restart the VR to make the disk writable. -Sanjeev -Original Message----- From: Amir Abbasi [mailto:abb...@tebyanidc.ir] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers Hi, I've assigned two primary storages. All virtual routers have been created on Primary-Storage1 but sometimes I face "Read-only file system" on some VR instances. I found no option to migrate their volumes. I have cloudstack 3.0.
How to migrate volumes of Virtual routers
Hi, I've assigned two primary storages. All virtual routers have been created on Primary-Storage1 but sometimes I face "Read-only file system" on some VR instances. I found no option to migrate their volumes. I have cloudstack 3.0.