RE: DR in CloudStack ?

2013-12-04 Thread Michal Rodzos
Hi Octavian,

In addition there is a lot of redundancy  built into the Virtual Router.
Good explanation available here
http://blogs.clogeny.com/understanding-the-redundant-virtual-router-in-citri
x-cloudplatform/

These articles provide pretty good overview of High Availability in
CloudStack:
http://blogs.clogeny.com/high-availability-disaster-recovery-for-apache-clou
dstack/ 
http://blog.remibergsma.com/2012/05/02/high-availability-with-automatic-fail
over-for-cloudstack-management-servers/ 

Regards,
Michal Rodzos
Solutions Architect

Phone: 1300 144 007 | Mobile: +61 421 834 204
| Skype: michal.rodzos | Twitter


-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 4 December 2013 11:08 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: DR in CloudStack ?

Octavian,

Your Compute Offering needs to be flagged as HA Enabled, this will then
ensure that the VM will move to a new Host in the event of a Host failure.
(FYI if you put a Host into Maintenance Mode, all VMs are migrated,
regardless of their HA status)

To move VMs between Clusters, you need to move the storage first, so this is
not handled automatically.

However the latest version (4.2) now supports Zone Wide Primary Storage for
KVM and VMware so moving VMs between Clusters is possible if you are using
this type of storage configuration.

For XenServer you can use XenStorage Motion to live migrate VMs across
Clusters, but I believe this is initiated by Root Admins, and not after a HA
event.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Octavian Popescu [mailto:octavian.pope...@interoute.com]
Sent: 04 December 2013 12:02
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: DR in CloudStack ?

Hi Geoff,

Thanks, are there any specific features or options in regards to pure DR,
rather than HA? For instance, moving VMs between clusters, pods or zones?

Octavian

-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 04 December 2013 11:36
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: DR in CloudStack ?

Octavian,

CloudStack provides VM HA enabling VMs to fail-over to alternate Hosts 
within the same Cluster so long as the VM is using Shared Storage.

For XenServer and KVM, CloudStack initiates the HA failover when it 
detects a Host has gone down.  For VMware, vCenter handles the HA event.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Octavian Popescu [mailto:octavian.pope...@interoute.com]
Sent: 04 December 2013 10:28
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: DR in CloudStack ?

Hi,

I would like to understand what kind of disaster recovery options are 
provided by CloudStack in case of VM or host failures (e.g. can it do 
failovers from a host to another? from a zone to another?)

Thank you,
Octavian

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies.
If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither 
take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England  Wales.
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a 
registered trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered
trademark.




RE: Replacing Virtual Router with a custom virtual appliance template

2013-12-01 Thread Michal Rodzos @ CloudCentral
Hi Lisa,
Thanks for the link, I did came across it before.
In the mean time I think I've found some information how other people did 
something very similar to what I'm trying:
http://www.slideshare.net/mice_xia/integration-3rd-party-security-solution
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Palo+Alto+Firewall+Integration
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/external+hosted+private+gateways

Looks like some coding is required to develop a CS Plugin and the virtual 
appliance will have the expose some kind of API to for the ACS to be able to 
manage it.

Regards,
 Michal Rodzos
 Solutions Architect

 Phone: 1300 144 007 | Mobile: +61 421 834 204
  | Skype: michal.rodzos | Twitter


From: Lisa B. nordlicht1...@hotmail.de
Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013 7:29 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Replacing Virtual Router with a custom virtual appliance template

hey michal,  i am not sure if this is what you are looking for but i just came 
across this blog post while tracking down a different problem:  
http://blog.remibergsma.com/2012/08/30/going-beyond-cloudstack-advanced-networking-how-i-replaced-the-virtual-router-with-my-own-physical-linux-router/
  good luck! lisa    From: 
michal.rod...@cloudcentral.com.au   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org   
Subject: Replacing Virtual Router with a custom virtual appliance template   
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 14:09:02 +1100   Is it possible to create a 
network offering, which would use a custom   virtual appliance instead of the 
default Debian template? My understanding is currently only following 
network providers are   supported/available in ACS: - Citrix NetScaler  
   - F5 - Juniper SRX - Virtual Router - Cisco ASA 100v 
(Citrix CloudPlatform only?) I've found a wiki page   
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Palo+Alto+Firewall+Integration;
   that somebody managed to integrate the Palo Alto Firewall into ACS.   Plus 
some other people managed to get the midokura or Nicira to work ? So it 
seems that custom network providers are feasible. I'd like to provide a 
premium network offering with a commercial   security gateway/UTM virtual 
appliance as a network provider. Ie the   FortiGate UTM provides VPN, NAT, 
DNS, DHCP, routing and other network   features similar to Virtual Router, but 
also offers security features   like anitispam, virus scanning, deep packet 
inspection, IPS etc. So the   question is how hard is, and how much dev effort 
is required? Other option is to create a network like this   Internet - 
ACS VR- FortiGate TM VM - customer VMs   But not sure how can force all the 
public traffic from the VMs to go   via the FortiGate? The environment 
is XenServer 6.2 and ACS 4.2.1 with Advanced Networking Thanks,   Michal 
Regards,   Michal Rodzos   Solutions Architect 
[CloudCentral - Secure Australian   
Cloud]http://www.cloudcentral.com.au/?utm_source=michalutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=cloudcentral
   Phone: 1300 144 007 | Mobile: +61 421 834 204   [View Michal Rodzos' 
profile on   LinkedIn]http://www.linkedin.com/in/michalrodzos| Skype:   
michal.rodzos | Twitterhttps://twitter.com/cloudcentral



Replacing Virtual Router with a custom virtual appliance template

2013-11-30 Thread Michal Rodzos
Is it possible to create a network offering, which would use a custom
virtual appliance instead of the default Debian template?


My understanding is currently only following network providers are
supported/available in ACS:

-  Citrix NetScaler

-  F5

-  Juniper SRX

-  Virtual Router

-  Cisco ASA 100v (Citrix CloudPlatform only?)

 

I've found a wiki page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Palo+Alto+Firewall+In
tegration# that somebody managed to integrate the Palo Alto Firewall into
ACS. Plus some other people managed to get the midokura or Nicira to work ?

So it seems that  custom network providers are feasible.


I'd like to provide a premium network offering with a commercial security
gateway/UTM virtual appliance as a network provider. Ie the FortiGate UTM
provides VPN, NAT, DNS, DHCP, routing and other network features similar to
Virtual Router, but also offers security features like anitispam, virus
scanning, deep packet inspection, IPS etc. So the question is how hard is,
and how much dev effort is required?


Other option is to create a network like this
Internet - ACS VR- FortiGate TM VM -  customer VMs
But not sure how can force all the public traffic from the VMs to go via the
FortiGate? 


The environment is XenServer 6.2 and ACS 4.2.1 with Advanced Networking

Thanks,
Michal

 

Regards,
Michal Rodzos
Solutions Architect

 
http://www.cloudcentral.com.au/?utm_source=michalutm_medium=emailutm_camp
aign=cloudcentral CloudCentral - Secure Australian Cloud
Phone: 1300 144 007 | Mobile: +61 421 834 204
 http://www.linkedin.com/in/michalrodzos View Michal Rodzos' profile on
LinkedIn| Skype: michal.rodzos |  https://twitter.com/cloudcentral Twitter