Re: Can't create instances of Fedora OS.
Oops, forgot to tell you my name is Nancy :)
==
*SANOTEC INT. CORP.*
Nancy Kim
sanotecna...@gmail.com
+82-70-7600-5517
+82-10-5150-3631
istarcloud.com
3580 WILSHIRE BLVD., STE 1460, LA, CA 90010
===
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:44 PM, iStar Cloud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to create 10 OS templates, which are Fedora 8~12 - 32/64bit.
> After I uploaded those ISOs, I tried to create instances out of them, but
> it failed getting this message "Unable to start instance 'kmy020'
> (d48b9a9d-e7ea-4e84-a975-2fa8ee9ebe08), see management server log for
> details"
> ('kmy020' is the name of an instance I entered)
>
> Related details log is as follows,
>
> ID ae732d6e-2c95-4136-ae65-6e189db2e7da
> Description: Failed to deploy Vm with Id: 128, on Host with Id: null
> Date: 31 Mar 2014 07:07:45
>
> I didn't have any issues with other OS like ubuntu and centOS, and I'm
> sure the ISO files of them are indefective DVD images as they were tested
> in vmware.
> Is there any compatibility issues between cloudstack and fedora core?
>
>
>
>
>
>
Can't create instances of Fedora OS.
Hi,
I'm trying to create 10 OS templates, which are Fedora 8~12 - 32/64bit.
After I uploaded those ISOs, I tried to create instances out of them, but
it failed getting this message "Unable to start instance 'kmy020'
(d48b9a9d-e7ea-4e84-a975-2fa8ee9ebe08), see management server log for
details"
('kmy020' is the name of an instance I entered)
Related details log is as follows,
ID ae732d6e-2c95-4136-ae65-6e189db2e7da
Description: Failed to deploy Vm with Id: 128, on Host with Id: null
Date: 31 Mar 2014 07:07:45
I didn't have any issues with other OS like ubuntu and centOS, and I'm sure
the ISO files of them are indefective DVD images as they were tested in
vmware.
Is there any compatibility issues between cloudstack and fedora core?
Old archives in Events are missing.
Hi everyone, I installed CloudStack on February 2014, but the history archived in Events menu starts from March. And I can't find records before. I assume there might be a feature that automatically deletes archives after certain period. If it is, where can I edit those settings? Regards, Nancy
Re: Adding hosts of different CPU to the new zone
Wow , good tips! Thank you, Shane! Regards, Nancy On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Shane Wayne wrote: > If you are using KVM, you could find out that you can add Intel host and > AMD host together in the same cluster. > On Mar 26, 2014 1:48 PM, "iStar Cloud" wrote: > > > Thank you Marcel! > > > > Problem solved. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Nancy. > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Marcel Keller > >wrote: > > > > > Hey Nancy, > > > > > > The CPUs in an Cluster must be homogenous and not in a Zone... So just > > add > > > a new cluster in CS and add all the AMD based server to it... > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: iStar Cloud [mailto:sanotecna...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Montag, 24. März 2014 09:38 > > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Subject: Adding hosts of different CPU to the new zone > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I tried to add new hosts to the existing zone whose hosts are of > > XenServer > > > based o n Intel processors. But the new ones I was trying to add are of > > the > > > same hipervisor based on AMD processors. And it failed. > > > After reviewing document, I figured that each host of the same > hipervisor > > > shoud be homogeneous in CPU configurations. > > > Then if I create a new zone, is it possible to add hosts that are AMD > > > based in it? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Nancy > > > > > >
Re: Adding hosts of different CPU to the new zone
Thank you Marcel! Problem solved. Regards, Nancy. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Marcel Keller wrote: > Hey Nancy, > > The CPUs in an Cluster must be homogenous and not in a Zone... So just add > a new cluster in CS and add all the AMD based server to it... > > -Original Message----- > From: iStar Cloud [mailto:sanotecna...@gmail.com] > Sent: Montag, 24. März 2014 09:38 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Adding hosts of different CPU to the new zone > > Hi everyone, > > I tried to add new hosts to the existing zone whose hosts are of XenServer > based o n Intel processors. But the new ones I was trying to add are of the > same hipervisor based on AMD processors. And it failed. > After reviewing document, I figured that each host of the same hipervisor > shoud be homogeneous in CPU configurations. > Then if I create a new zone, is it possible to add hosts that are AMD > based in it? > > > > Regards, > Nancy >
Adding hosts of different CPU to the new zone
Hi everyone, I tried to add new hosts to the existing zone whose hosts are of XenServer based o n Intel processors. But the new ones I was trying to add are of the same hipervisor based on AMD processors. And it failed. After reviewing document, I figured that each host of the same hipervisor shoud be homogeneous in CPU configurations. Then if I create a new zone, is it possible to add hosts that are AMD based in it? Regards, Nancy
Re: The time of usage of vm is counted by 35 hrs a day.
Hi Tariq, What I was saying is that HostBill brings CloudStack DB, and updates it in HostBill admin area, where I watch and manage my clients' activities, every 24 hrs. But the amount of time updated that shows how many hrs VM has been running is not 24 hrs. Whenever HostBill updates DB for each customer's VM, the time of usage is piled up 35hrs, when it is supposed to be 24hrs. For example, HostBill updates newly fetched DB at 12:00 everyday. And Customer A starts to run his VM at 12:00 today. Tomorrow at noon, HostBill updates DB at exactly the same time, 12:00. Then the time of usage of Customer A's running VM is supposed to be 24 hrs, but instead it shows 35 hrs. If you need more details about the situation, please let me know. And I asked for the information you wanted to know. This is what I've got from him. 1. Provide the values to the following parameters configured on HostBill's CloudStack management server that you are using: - Those settings do not matter in calculations, as we use: https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.0.0/root_admin/generateUsageRecords.html(with 24h interval) followed by https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.0.0/root_admin/listUsageRecords.html So timezone settings doesnt really matter 2. What version of CloudStack is HostBill using? - Various, customer provided, mostly latest 3. Is HostBill providing the VM usage data directly from the CloudStack Usage database or via HostBill's own database/app? - It pulls data from Cloudstack Usage server every 24h and update HostBill db with calculated amounts/charges Thanks. == *SANOTEC INT. CORP.* Nancy Kim sanotecna...@gmail.com +82-70-7600-5517 +82-10-5150-3631 istarcloud.com 3580 WILSHIRE BLVD., STE 1460, LA, CA 90010 === On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Tariq Iqbal wrote: > Hi Nancy, > > What are you seeing that indicates 35 hours are being accumulated, can > you provide an example? > > Are you able to ask your HostBill representative for the following > information: > > > 1. Provide the values to the following parameters configured on > HostBill's CloudStack management server that you are using: > > * usage.stats.job.exec.time > > * usage.stats.job.aggregation.range > > * usage.sanity.check.interval > > * usage.aggregation.timezone > > * usage.execution.timezone > > 2. What version of CloudStack are they using? > > 3. Are they providing you the VM usage data directly from the > CloudStack Usage database or via their own database/app? > > Best Regards, > > Tariq Iqbal > > S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: > +447909911600 > > tariq.iq...@shapeblue.com<mailto:tariq.iq...@shapeblue.com> | Twitter: > @TariqIqbal_<https://twitter.com/tariqiqbal_> > > From: iStar Cloud [mailto:sanotecna...@gmail.com] > Sent: 18 March 2014 06:40 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: The time of usage of vm is counted by 35 hrs a day. > > Hi CloudStack, > > I've recently found CloudStack mailing archives while googling some > issues. I hope I'm sending this email to the right direction. > > I've been developing cloud hosting website by integrating CloudStack with > billing and client management platform called HostBill. > > Currently I have an issue about the time interval that running vm usage is > updated. > Hostbill is fetching cloudstack DB every 24 hrs. But the actual time > interval that counts how many hrs the VM has been running is not 24 but 35 > hrs a day. Hostbill updates running vm DB from CloudStack every 24 hrs, > then the time of usage is supposed to be piled up 24hrs everytime it is > updated, but 35 hrs are accumulated. You might need to see a picture > attached for better understanding. > > So I asked Hostbill representative about this and he told me there is > nothing he can do about it because the time is fetched all the way from > CloudStack and Hostbill hasn't modified anything related to it. > > Now I have no idea where to start to fix this issue. Any advice would be > appreciated. > > > Regards, > Nancy > Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? > Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support< > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the best > 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. > > Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses > > **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training< > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroom< > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line< > http://shapeblue
The time of usage of vm is counted by 35 hrs a day.
Hi CloudStack, I've recently found CloudStack mailing archives while googling some issues. I hope I'm sending this email to the right direction. I've been developing cloud hosting website by integrating CloudStack with billing and client management platform called HostBill. Currently I have an issue about the time interval that running vm usage is updated. Hostbill is fetching cloudstack DB every 24 hrs. But the actual time interval that counts how many hrs the VM has been running is not 24 but 35 hrs a day. Hostbill updates running vm DB from CloudStack every 24 hrs, then the time of usage is supposed to be piled up 24hrs everytime it is updated, but 35 hrs are accumulated. You might need to see a picture attached for better understanding. So I asked Hostbill representative about this and he told me there is nothing he can do about it because the time is fetched all the way from CloudStack and Hostbill hasn't modified anything related to it. Now I have no idea where to start to fix this issue. Any advice would be appreciated. Regards, Nancy
