Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Keerhiraja, This one exists: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446, but is connected to OVS component that is a part of PVLAN functionality. Vadim. On 2015-11-24 11:06, Keerthiraja SJ wrote: Regarding this issue is anyone raised issue in Jira if so please provide me it will help me to follow. Thanks, Keerthi On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: Dear Stavros, We also use XS 6.5 with bonding(active-backup) and VLANs, but this discussion is about PVLANs. It is a bit different isolation method that should also work for some CS distributions. Regards, Vadim. On 2015-11-24 09:28, Stavros Konstantaras wrote: Hi Vadim, We use Xenserver 6.5 with bonding interfaces (LACP) and VLANs on top of them at our compute nodes. At Head nodes we use Cloudstack 4.5.2 with bonds and VLANS. Everything works fine until now, however documentation on VLANs is lucking on both Cloudstack and Xenserver. Cheers Stavros Stavros Konstantaras Science faculty Research IT support (FEIOG) University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Fingerprint: E5E5 9B19 D1CD 88CD 4763 3465 A8DC 7C92 330F D59A On 24 Nov 2015, at 02:51, Keerthiraja SJ wrote: Hi All, Will the CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan will work on the upcoming 4.5.3. Thanks, Keerthi On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Remi Bergsma < rberg...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: Hi Vadim, Thanks for your reply. For the 4.6 release we changed the way we work. Instead of branching off early and making a release branch stable, we decided to stabilise master. We got many complaints that master didn't compile at times or functionality wasn't tested before it entered master. Making master stable was quite some work, even harder than making a release branch stable. I can imagine that process gives you the impression of "many problems". In reality, this should bring more stable releases. 4.7 will be built on top of 4.6, so if 4.6 is good, 4.7 will be better (and so on). In the past, 4.5 was not built on top of 4.4 (so you saw problems coming back and had to wait until a .1 or .2 release, indeed). 4.6.0 was released after just two RC voting rounds, while previous releases needed more of them. That says something about the quality IMHO. This is not so related to the question that was asked but I wanted to be sure there weren't any "problems" in 4.6 that I didn't know about (so they could be addressed). It's perfectly fine not to upgrade yet. But please don't give people the impression there are "many problems" while you cannot name them. In the mean while we work on 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 and hopefully some day you'll have a smooth upgrade and enjoy the new features. If you need any help with upgrading, please drop us a line on the dev list. Regards, Remi On 18/11/15 15:45, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: Dear Remi, My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than 4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good to take a risk of immediate update :) Vadim. On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote: Hi Vadim, What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? Regards, Remi On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: Dear Audrey, OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created bug report in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1] [1 [1]] [1 [1]]. Since 4.5.1 this plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated code that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't know if OVS is back there. I doubt. I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? Vadim. On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure PVLAN. Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? Att., Audrey - Mensagem original - De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan Hello Audrey, Look at this document: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CL
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Regarding this issue is anyone raised issue in Jira if so please provide me it will help me to follow. Thanks, Keerthi On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: > Dear Stavros, > > We also use XS 6.5 with bonding(active-backup) and VLANs, but this > discussion is about PVLANs. It is a bit different isolation method that > should also work for some CS distributions. > > Regards, > > Vadim. > > On 2015-11-24 09:28, Stavros Konstantaras wrote: > > Hi Vadim, >> >> We use Xenserver 6.5 with bonding interfaces (LACP) and VLANs on top of >> them at our compute nodes. At Head nodes we use Cloudstack 4.5.2 with bonds >> and VLANS. Everything works fine until now, however documentation on VLANs >> is lucking on both Cloudstack and Xenserver. >> >> Cheers >> Stavros >> >> >> Stavros Konstantaras >> Science faculty Research IT support (FEIOG) >> University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH >> >> Fingerprint: E5E5 9B19 D1CD 88CD 4763 3465 A8DC 7C92 330F D59A >> >> On 24 Nov 2015, at 02:51, Keerthiraja SJ wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Will the CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan will work on the upcoming >> 4.5.3. >> >> Thanks, >> Keerthi >> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Remi Bergsma < >> rberg...@schubergphilis.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Vadim, >> >> Thanks for your reply. For the 4.6 release we changed the way we work. >> Instead of branching off early and making a release branch stable, we >> decided to stabilise master. We got many complaints that master didn't >> compile at times or functionality wasn't tested before it entered master. >> Making master stable was quite some work, even harder than making a >> release >> branch stable. I can imagine that process gives you the impression of >> "many >> problems". >> >> In reality, this should bring more stable releases. 4.7 will be built on >> top of 4.6, so if 4.6 is good, 4.7 will be better (and so on). In the >> past, >> 4.5 was not built on top of 4.4 (so you saw problems coming back and had >> to >> wait until a .1 or .2 release, indeed). >> >> 4.6.0 was released after just two RC voting rounds, while previous >> releases needed more of them. That says something about the quality IMHO. >> >> This is not so related to the question that was asked but I wanted to be >> sure there weren't any "problems" in 4.6 that I didn't know about (so they >> could be addressed). It's perfectly fine not to upgrade yet. But please >> don't give people the impression there are "many problems" while you >> cannot >> name them. >> >> In the mean while we work on 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 and hopefully some day you'll >> have a smooth upgrade and enjoy the new features. >> >> If you need any help with upgrading, please drop us a line on the dev >> list. >> >> Regards, >> Remi >> >> On 18/11/15 15:45, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: >> >> Dear Remi, >> >> My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were >> with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very >> difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user >> perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his >> problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than >> 4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal >> fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good >> to take a risk of immediate update :) >> >> Vadim. >> >> On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote: >> >> Hi Vadim, >> >> What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? >> >> Regards, >> Remi >> >> On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: >> >> Dear Audrey, >> >> OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created >> bug report in JIRA >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1] [1 [1]]. Since >> 4.5.1 >> this >> plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated >> code >> that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of >> problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't >> know >> if OVS is back there. I doubt. >> >> I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want >> to update it? Is PVLAN s
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Dear Stavros, We also use XS 6.5 with bonding(active-backup) and VLANs, but this discussion is about PVLANs. It is a bit different isolation method that should also work for some CS distributions. Regards, Vadim. On 2015-11-24 09:28, Stavros Konstantaras wrote: Hi Vadim, We use Xenserver 6.5 with bonding interfaces (LACP) and VLANs on top of them at our compute nodes. At Head nodes we use Cloudstack 4.5.2 with bonds and VLANS. Everything works fine until now, however documentation on VLANs is lucking on both Cloudstack and Xenserver. Cheers Stavros Stavros Konstantaras Science faculty Research IT support (FEIOG) University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Fingerprint: E5E5 9B19 D1CD 88CD 4763 3465 A8DC 7C92 330F D59A On 24 Nov 2015, at 02:51, Keerthiraja SJ wrote: Hi All, Will the CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan will work on the upcoming 4.5.3. Thanks, Keerthi On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote: Hi Vadim, Thanks for your reply. For the 4.6 release we changed the way we work. Instead of branching off early and making a release branch stable, we decided to stabilise master. We got many complaints that master didn't compile at times or functionality wasn't tested before it entered master. Making master stable was quite some work, even harder than making a release branch stable. I can imagine that process gives you the impression of "many problems". In reality, this should bring more stable releases. 4.7 will be built on top of 4.6, so if 4.6 is good, 4.7 will be better (and so on). In the past, 4.5 was not built on top of 4.4 (so you saw problems coming back and had to wait until a .1 or .2 release, indeed). 4.6.0 was released after just two RC voting rounds, while previous releases needed more of them. That says something about the quality IMHO. This is not so related to the question that was asked but I wanted to be sure there weren't any "problems" in 4.6 that I didn't know about (so they could be addressed). It's perfectly fine not to upgrade yet. But please don't give people the impression there are "many problems" while you cannot name them. In the mean while we work on 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 and hopefully some day you'll have a smooth upgrade and enjoy the new features. If you need any help with upgrading, please drop us a line on the dev list. Regards, Remi On 18/11/15 15:45, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: Dear Remi, My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than 4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good to take a risk of immediate update :) Vadim. On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote: Hi Vadim, What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? Regards, Remi On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: Dear Audrey, OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created bug report in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1] [1 [1]]. Since 4.5.1 this plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated code that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't know if OVS is back there. I doubt. I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? Vadim. On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure PVLAN. Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? Att., Audrey - Mensagem original - De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan Hello Audrey, Look at this document: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN [2] [2] [1 [1]] XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5. Use VLANs - it is more reliable. Vadim. On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Hi Vadim, We use Xenserver 6.5 with bonding interfaces (LACP) and VLANs on top of them at our compute nodes. At Head nodes we use Cloudstack 4.5.2 with bonds and VLANS. Everything works fine until now, however documentation on VLANs is lucking on both Cloudstack and Xenserver. Cheers Stavros Stavros Konstantaras Science faculty Research IT support (FEIOG) University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Fingerprint: E5E5 9B19 D1CD 88CD 4763 3465 A8DC 7C92 330F D59A > On 24 Nov 2015, at 02:51, Keerthiraja SJ wrote: > > Hi All, > > Will the CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan will work on the upcoming > 4.5.3. > > Thanks, > Keerthi > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Remi Bergsma > wrote: > >> Hi Vadim, >> >> Thanks for your reply. For the 4.6 release we changed the way we work. >> Instead of branching off early and making a release branch stable, we >> decided to stabilise master. We got many complaints that master didn’t >> compile at times or functionality wasn’t tested before it entered master. >> Making master stable was quite some work, even harder than making a release >> branch stable. I can imagine that process gives you the impression of “many >> problems”. >> >> In reality, this should bring more stable releases. 4.7 will be built on >> top of 4.6, so if 4.6 is good, 4.7 will be better (and so on). In the past, >> 4.5 was not built on top of 4.4 (so you saw problems coming back and had to >> wait until a .1 or .2 release, indeed). >> >> >> 4.6.0 was released after just two RC voting rounds, while previous >> releases needed more of them. That says something about the quality IMHO. >> >> This is not so related to the question that was asked but I wanted to be >> sure there weren’t any “problems” in 4.6 that I didn’t know about (so they >> could be addressed). It’s perfectly fine not to upgrade yet. But please >> don’t give people the impression there are “many problems” while you cannot >> name them. >> >> >> In the mean while we work on 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 and hopefully some day you’ll >> have a smooth upgrade and enjoy the new features. >> >> If you need any help with upgrading, please drop us a line on the dev list. >> >> Regards, >> Remi >> >> >> On 18/11/15 15:45, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: >> >>> Dear Remi, >>> >>>My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were >>> with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very >>> difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user >>> perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his >>> problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than >>> 4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal >>> fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good >>> to take a risk of immediate update :) >>> >>> Vadim. >>> >>> On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Vadim, >>>> >>>> What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Remi >>>> >>>> On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear Audrey, >>>> >>>> OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created >>>> bug report in JIRA >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1]. Since 4.5.1 >>>> this >>>> plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated >>>> code >>>> that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of >>>> problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't >>>> know >>>> if OVS is back there. I doubt. >>>> >>>> I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want >>>> to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? >>>> >>>> Vadim. >>>> >>>> On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. >>>> >>>> After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and >>>> yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen >>>> it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure >>>> PVLAN. >>>> >>>> Is it possible to in
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Hi All, Will the CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan will work on the upcoming 4.5.3. Thanks, Keerthi On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi Vadim, > > Thanks for your reply. For the 4.6 release we changed the way we work. > Instead of branching off early and making a release branch stable, we > decided to stabilise master. We got many complaints that master didn’t > compile at times or functionality wasn’t tested before it entered master. > Making master stable was quite some work, even harder than making a release > branch stable. I can imagine that process gives you the impression of “many > problems”. > > In reality, this should bring more stable releases. 4.7 will be built on > top of 4.6, so if 4.6 is good, 4.7 will be better (and so on). In the past, > 4.5 was not built on top of 4.4 (so you saw problems coming back and had to > wait until a .1 or .2 release, indeed). > > > 4.6.0 was released after just two RC voting rounds, while previous > releases needed more of them. That says something about the quality IMHO. > > This is not so related to the question that was asked but I wanted to be > sure there weren’t any “problems” in 4.6 that I didn’t know about (so they > could be addressed). It’s perfectly fine not to upgrade yet. But please > don’t give people the impression there are “many problems” while you cannot > name them. > > > In the mean while we work on 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 and hopefully some day you’ll > have a smooth upgrade and enjoy the new features. > > If you need any help with upgrading, please drop us a line on the dev list. > > Regards, > Remi > > > On 18/11/15 15:45, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: > > >Dear Remi, > > > > My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were > >with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very > >difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user > >perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his > >problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than > >4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal > >fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good > >to take a risk of immediate update :) > > > >Vadim. > > > >On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote: > > > >> Hi Vadim, > >> > >> What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Remi > >> > >> On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: > >> > >> Dear Audrey, > >> > >> OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created > >> bug report in JIRA > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1]. Since 4.5.1 > >> this > >> plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated > >> code > >> that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of > >> problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't > >> know > >> if OVS is back there. I doubt. > >> > >> I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want > >> to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? > >> > >> Vadim. > >> > >> On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: > >> > >> Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. > >> > >> After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and > >> yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen > >> it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure > >> PVLAN. > >> > >> Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? > >> > >> Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? > >> > >> Att., > >> Audrey > >> > >> - Mensagem original - > >> De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" > >> Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" > >> Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 > >> Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan > >> > >> Hello Audrey, > >> > >> Look at this document: > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN > >> [2] > >> [1] > >> XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin > >> for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS > >> 4.5.2 this plugin is missing,
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Hi Vadim, All fine, don’t worry! Glad we discussed it :-) Regards, Remi On 19/11/15 10:10, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: >Dear Remi, > >I had this impression you described indeed. Have been with CS >project from version 4.0 and updates always being very exiting thing :) >Your words make me more confident in what you did. The idea to >stabilize master is great! I am sorry for panic. Please, accept my >apologize > >Regards, > >Vadim. > > >On 2015-11-18 21:29, Remi Bergsma wrote: > >> Hi Vadim, >> >> Thanks for your reply. For the 4.6 release we changed the way we work. >> Instead of branching off early and making a release branch stable, we >> decided to stabilise master. We got many complaints that master didn't >> compile at times or functionality wasn't tested before it entered >> master. Making master stable was quite some work, even harder than >> making a release branch stable. I can imagine that process gives you >> the impression of "many problems". >> >> In reality, this should bring more stable releases. 4.7 will be built >> on top of 4.6, so if 4.6 is good, 4.7 will be better (and so on). In >> the past, 4.5 was not built on top of 4.4 (so you saw problems coming >> back and had to wait until a .1 or .2 release, indeed). >> >> 4.6.0 was released after just two RC voting rounds, while previous >> releases needed more of them. That says something about the quality >> IMHO. >> >> This is not so related to the question that was asked but I wanted to >> be sure there weren't any "problems" in 4.6 that I didn't know about >> (so they could be addressed). It's perfectly fine not to upgrade yet. >> But please don't give people the impression there are "many problems" >> while you cannot name them. >> >> In the mean while we work on 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 and hopefully some day >> you'll have a smooth upgrade and enjoy the new features. >> >> If you need any help with upgrading, please drop us a line on the dev >> list. >> >> Regards, >> Remi >> >> On 18/11/15 15:45, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: >> >> Dear Remi, >> >> My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were >> with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very >> difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user >> perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his >> problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than >> 4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal >> fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good >> to take a risk of immediate update :) >> >> Vadim. >> >> On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote: >> >> Hi Vadim, >> >> What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? >> >> Regards, >> Remi >> >> On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: >> >> Dear Audrey, >> >> OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created >> bug report in JIRA >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1] [1 [1]]. >> Since 4.5.1 >> this >> plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated >> code >> that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of >> problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't >> know >> if OVS is back there. I doubt. >> >> I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want >> to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? >> >> Vadim. >> >> On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: >> >> Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. >> >> After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and >> yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen >> it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure >> PVLAN. >> >> Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? >> >> Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? >> >> Att., >> Audrey >> >> - Mensagem original - >> De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" >> Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" >> Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 >> Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan >> >> Hello Audrey, >>
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Dear Remi, I had this impression you described indeed. Have been with CS project from version 4.0 and updates always being very exiting thing :) Your words make me more confident in what you did. The idea to stabilize master is great! I am sorry for panic. Please, accept my apologize Regards, Vadim. On 2015-11-18 21:29, Remi Bergsma wrote: Hi Vadim, Thanks for your reply. For the 4.6 release we changed the way we work. Instead of branching off early and making a release branch stable, we decided to stabilise master. We got many complaints that master didn't compile at times or functionality wasn't tested before it entered master. Making master stable was quite some work, even harder than making a release branch stable. I can imagine that process gives you the impression of "many problems". In reality, this should bring more stable releases. 4.7 will be built on top of 4.6, so if 4.6 is good, 4.7 will be better (and so on). In the past, 4.5 was not built on top of 4.4 (so you saw problems coming back and had to wait until a .1 or .2 release, indeed). 4.6.0 was released after just two RC voting rounds, while previous releases needed more of them. That says something about the quality IMHO. This is not so related to the question that was asked but I wanted to be sure there weren't any "problems" in 4.6 that I didn't know about (so they could be addressed). It's perfectly fine not to upgrade yet. But please don't give people the impression there are "many problems" while you cannot name them. In the mean while we work on 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 and hopefully some day you'll have a smooth upgrade and enjoy the new features. If you need any help with upgrading, please drop us a line on the dev list. Regards, Remi On 18/11/15 15:45, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: Dear Remi, My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than 4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good to take a risk of immediate update :) Vadim. On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote: Hi Vadim, What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? Regards, Remi On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: Dear Audrey, OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created bug report in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1] [1 [1]]. Since 4.5.1 this plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated code that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't know if OVS is back there. I doubt. I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? Vadim. On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure PVLAN. Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? Att., Audrey - Mensagem original - De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan Hello Audrey, Look at this document: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN [2] [2] [1 [1]] XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5. Use VLANs - it is more reliable. Vadim. On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: Hello everybody! I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed as Advanced without Security Groups. When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN, the network is created, but when I try to create a new instance it does not start. I realized that the virtual router also does not start. Adding a Guest Network without PVLAN works as expected. Does anyone have an idea about it? Looking into the log I could find the information below: 2015-11-17 12:03:48
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Hi Vadim, Thanks for your reply. For the 4.6 release we changed the way we work. Instead of branching off early and making a release branch stable, we decided to stabilise master. We got many complaints that master didn’t compile at times or functionality wasn’t tested before it entered master. Making master stable was quite some work, even harder than making a release branch stable. I can imagine that process gives you the impression of “many problems”. In reality, this should bring more stable releases. 4.7 will be built on top of 4.6, so if 4.6 is good, 4.7 will be better (and so on). In the past, 4.5 was not built on top of 4.4 (so you saw problems coming back and had to wait until a .1 or .2 release, indeed). 4.6.0 was released after just two RC voting rounds, while previous releases needed more of them. That says something about the quality IMHO. This is not so related to the question that was asked but I wanted to be sure there weren’t any “problems” in 4.6 that I didn’t know about (so they could be addressed). It’s perfectly fine not to upgrade yet. But please don’t give people the impression there are “many problems” while you cannot name them. In the mean while we work on 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 and hopefully some day you’ll have a smooth upgrade and enjoy the new features. If you need any help with upgrading, please drop us a line on the dev list. Regards, Remi On 18/11/15 15:45, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: >Dear Remi, > > My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were >with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very >difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user >perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his >problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than >4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal >fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good >to take a risk of immediate update :) > >Vadim. > >On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote: > >> Hi Vadim, >> >> What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? >> >> Regards, >> Remi >> >> On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: >> >> Dear Audrey, >> >> OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created >> bug report in JIRA >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1]. Since 4.5.1 >> this >> plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated >> code >> that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of >> problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't >> know >> if OVS is back there. I doubt. >> >> I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want >> to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? >> >> Vadim. >> >> On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: >> >> Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. >> >> After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and >> yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen >> it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure >> PVLAN. >> >> Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? >> >> Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? >> >> Att., >> Audrey >> >> - Mensagem original - >> De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" >> Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" >> Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 >> Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan >> >> Hello Audrey, >> >> Look at this document: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN >> >> [2] >> [1] >> XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin >> for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS >> 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was >> present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5. >> Use >> VLANs - it is more reliable. >> >> Vadim. >> >> On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: >> >> Hello everybody! >> >> I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated >> for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary >> Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed >> as Advanced without Security Groups. >> >> When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN,
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Audrey, If you talk about VPC private gateway you should start a new thread. I haven't used it yet. Vadim. On 2015-11-18 17:16, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: Vadim, I will use VPC also, but in my initial tests (CS 4.5.2), when I tried to configure a static route to a private gateway, using the UI or cloudmonkey, the route was not installed in the VR. Did you notice this problem? Audrey - Mensagem original - De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" , "Remi Bergsma" Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 18 de Novembro de 2015 12:45:28 Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan Dear Remi, My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than 4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good to take a risk of immediate update :) Vadim. On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote: Hi Vadim, What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? Regards, Remi On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: Dear Audrey, OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created bug report in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1] [1 [1]]. Since 4.5.1 this plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated code that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't know if OVS is back there. I doubt. I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? Vadim. On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure PVLAN. Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? Att., Audrey - Mensagem original - De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan Hello Audrey, Look at this document: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN [2] [2 [2]] [1 [1]] XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5. Use VLANs - it is more reliable. Vadim. On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: Hello everybody! I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed as Advanced without Security Groups. When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN, the network is created, but when I try to create a new instance it does not start. I realized that the virtual router also does not start. Adding a Guest Network without PVLAN works as expected. Does anyone have an idea about it? Looking into the log I could find the information below: 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) callHostPlugin failed for cm d: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06:b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.150.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) Seq 1-6584825605169088819: Thr owable caught while executing command com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed for cmd: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06: b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.1 50.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.callHostPlugin(CitrixResourceBase.java:3686) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1708) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:541) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xense
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Vadim, I will use VPC also, but in my initial tests (CS 4.5.2), when I tried to configure a static route to a private gateway, using the UI or cloudmonkey, the route was not installed in the VR. Did you notice this problem? Audrey - Mensagem original - De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" , "Remi Bergsma" Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 18 de Novembro de 2015 12:45:28 Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan Dear Remi, My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than 4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good to take a risk of immediate update :) Vadim. On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi Vadim, > > What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? > > Regards, > Remi > > On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: > > Dear Audrey, > > OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created > bug report in JIRA > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1]. Since 4.5.1 > this > plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated > code > that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of > problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't > know > if OVS is back there. I doubt. > > I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want > to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? > > Vadim. > > On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: > > Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. > > After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and > yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen > it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure > PVLAN. > > Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? > > Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? > > Att., > Audrey > > - Mensagem original ----- > De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" > Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" > Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 > Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan > > Hello Audrey, > > Look at this document: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN > > [2] > [1] > XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin > for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS > 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was > present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5. > Use > VLANs - it is more reliable. > > Vadim. > > On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: > > Hello everybody! > > I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated > for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary > Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed > as Advanced without Security Groups. > > When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN, the network is created, but > when > I try to create a new instance it does not start. I realized that the > virtual router also does not start. Adding a Guest Network without > PVLAN works as expected. > > Does anyone have an idea about it? > > Looking into the log I could find the information below: > > 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] > (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) callHostPlugin failed for cm > d: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06:b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: > GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: > r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.150.236.11, due to There was > a failure communicating with the plugin. > > 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] > (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) Seq 1-6584825605169088819: Thr > owable caught while executing command > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed > for cmd: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06: > b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, > dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.1 > 50.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. > at > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResour
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Dear Remi, My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than 4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good to take a risk of immediate update :) Vadim. On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote: Hi Vadim, What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? Regards, Remi On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: Dear Audrey, OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created bug report in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1]. Since 4.5.1 this plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated code that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't know if OVS is back there. I doubt. I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? Vadim. On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure PVLAN. Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? Att., Audrey - Mensagem original - De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan Hello Audrey, Look at this document: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN [2] [1] XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5. Use VLANs - it is more reliable. Vadim. On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: Hello everybody! I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed as Advanced without Security Groups. When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN, the network is created, but when I try to create a new instance it does not start. I realized that the virtual router also does not start. Adding a Guest Network without PVLAN works as expected. Does anyone have an idea about it? Looking into the log I could find the information below: 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) callHostPlugin failed for cm d: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06:b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.150.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) Seq 1-6584825605169088819: Thr owable caught while executing command com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed for cmd: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06: b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.1 50.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.callHostPlugin(CitrixResourceBase.java:3686) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1708) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:541) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:64) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:87) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer620SP1Resource.executeRequest(XenServer620SP1Resource.java:6 5) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:302) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:1 03) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.cont
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Hi Vadim, What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6? Regards, Remi On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" wrote: >Dear Audrey, > > OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created >bug report in JIRA >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446. Since 4.5.1 this >plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated code >that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of >problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't know >if OVS is back there. I doubt. > > I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want >to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? > >Vadim. > >On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: > >> Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. >> >> After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and >> yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen >> it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure >> PVLAN. >> >> Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? >> >> Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? >> >> Att., >> Audrey >> >> - Mensagem original - >> De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" >> Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" >> Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 >> Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan >> >> Hello Audrey, >> >> Look at this document: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN >> >> [1] >> XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin >> for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS >> 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was >> present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5. >> Use >> VLANs - it is more reliable. >> >> Vadim. >> >> On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: >> >>> Hello everybody! >>> >>> I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated >>> for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary >>> Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed >>> as Advanced without Security Groups. >>> >>> When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN, the network is created, but >>> when >>> I try to create a new instance it does not start. I realized that the >>> virtual router also does not start. Adding a Guest Network without >>> PVLAN works as expected. >>> >>> Does anyone have an idea about it? >>> >>> Looking into the log I could find the information below: >>> >>> 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] >>> (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) callHostPlugin failed for cm >>> d: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06:b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: >>> GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: >>> r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.150.236.11, due to There was >>> a failure communicating with the plugin. >>> >>> 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] >>> (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) Seq 1-6584825605169088819: Thr >>> owable caught while executing command >>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed >>> for cmd: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06: >>> b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, >>> dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.1 >>> 50.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. >>> at >>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.callHostPlugin(CitrixResourceBase.java:3686) >>> at >>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1708) >>> at >>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:541) >>> at >>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:64) >>> at >>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:87) >>> at >>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer620SP1Resource.executeRequest(XenServer620SP1Resource.java:6 >>> 5) >>> at >>> com.cloud.ag
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Dear Audrey, OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have created bug report in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446. Since 4.5.1 this plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated code that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't know if OVS is back there. I doubt. I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you want to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you? Vadim. On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure PVLAN. Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? Att., Audrey - Mensagem original - De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan Hello Audrey, Look at this document: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN [1] XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5. Use VLANs - it is more reliable. Vadim. On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: Hello everybody! I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed as Advanced without Security Groups. When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN, the network is created, but when I try to create a new instance it does not start. I realized that the virtual router also does not start. Adding a Guest Network without PVLAN works as expected. Does anyone have an idea about it? Looking into the log I could find the information below: 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) callHostPlugin failed for cm d: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06:b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.150.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) Seq 1-6584825605169088819: Thr owable caught while executing command com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed for cmd: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06: b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.1 50.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.callHostPlugin(CitrixResourceBase.java:3686) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1708) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:541) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:64) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:87) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer620SP1Resource.executeRequest(XenServer620SP1Resource.java:6 5) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:302) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:1 03) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53 ) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.j ava:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292 ) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecuto
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Hi Vadim, thanks for your help. After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had seen it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure PVLAN. Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it? Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box? Att., Audrey - Mensagem original - De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10 Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan Hello Audrey, Look at this document: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5. Use VLANs - it is more reliable. Vadim. On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: > Hello everybody! > > I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated > for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary > Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed > as Advanced without Security Groups. > > When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN, the network is created, but when > I try to create a new instance it does not start. I realized that the > virtual router also does not start. Adding a Guest Network without > PVLAN works as expected. > > Does anyone have an idea about it? > > Looking into the log I could find the information below: > > 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] > (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) callHostPlugin failed for cm > d: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06:b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: > GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: > r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.150.236.11, due to There was > a failure communicating with the plugin. > > 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] > (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) Seq 1-6584825605169088819: Thr > owable caught while executing command > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed > for cmd: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06: > b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, > dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.1 > 50.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. > at > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.callHostPlugin(CitrixResourceBase.java:3686) > at > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1708) > at > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:541) > at > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:64) > at > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:87) > at > com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer620SP1Resource.executeRequest(XenServer620SP1Resource.java:6 > 5) > at > com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:302) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:1 > 03) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53 > ) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) > at > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) > at > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.j > ava:178) > at > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292 > ) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > > Thanks for your help! > > Att., > Audrey
Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Hello Audrey, Look at this document: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5. Use VLANs - it is more reliable. Vadim. On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote: Hello everybody! I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed as Advanced without Security Groups. When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN, the network is created, but when I try to create a new instance it does not start. I realized that the virtual router also does not start. Adding a Guest Network without PVLAN works as expected. Does anyone have an idea about it? Looking into the log I could find the information below: 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) callHostPlugin failed for cm d: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06:b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.150.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) Seq 1-6584825605169088819: Thr owable caught while executing command com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed for cmd: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06: b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.1 50.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.callHostPlugin(CitrixResourceBase.java:3686) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1708) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:541) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:64) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:87) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer620SP1Resource.executeRequest(XenServer620SP1Resource.java:6 5) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:302) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:1 03) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53 ) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.j ava:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292 ) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) Thanks for your help! Att., Audrey
CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Hello everybody! I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed as Advanced without Security Groups. When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN, the network is created, but when I try to create a new instance it does not start. I realized that the virtual router also does not start. Adding a Guest Network without PVLAN works as expected. Does anyone have an idea about it? Looking into the log I could find the information below: 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) callHostPlugin failed for cm d: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06:b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.150.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) Seq 1-6584825605169088819: Thr owable caught while executing command com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed for cmd: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06: b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.1 50.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin. at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.callHostPlugin(CitrixResourceBase.java:3686) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1708) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:541) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:64) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:87) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer620SP1Resource.executeRequest(XenServer620SP1Resource.java:6 5) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:302) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:1 03) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53 ) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.j ava:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292 ) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) Thanks for your help! Att., Audrey
