Re: Flex web deployment...

2020-08-12 Thread ronang
Hello, 
It looks very interesting! 
I ame considering using CheerpX but I can't find anything to start working
with. 
Is there is a GIT project or some files I can get somewhere? 
Thanks in advance for the feedback!



--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/


Re: Flex web deployment...

2020-03-11 Thread Ramazan Ergüder Bekrek
Hey look this out I found also something pretty cool it seems that Silverlight 
is also back :)

https://opensilver.net/announcements/introducing-opensilver.aspx

10.03.2020, 17:03, "Ramazan Ergüder Bekrek" :
> To see the talk about the tech with demos you can watch this : 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JUs4c99-mo=youtu.be
>
> 10.03.2020, 16:18, "Carlos Rovira" :
>>  Thanks for sharing, sounds good, but still nothing real until it will be
>>  launched, and at that time I think people will need to evaluate it to see
>>  if it works as expected. For what they say it will only work on Chrome,
>>  that's not bad... and the idea itself seems promising. But time will tell
>>  if it goes to real
>>  Thanks for let us know! :)
>>
>>  El mar., 10 mar. 2020 a las 15:44, Ramazan Ergüder Bekrek (<
>>  e.bek...@yandex.com>) escribió:
>>
>>>   From my researches I found out that it will be possible to run Flash/Flex
>>>   applications after 2020 inside of the browser due to this new technology
>>>   which will use WebAssembly.
>>>
>>>   
>>> https://medium.com/leaningtech/preserving-flash-content-with-webassembly-done-right-eb6838b7e36f
>>>
>>>   Maybe we don't need to freak out at all anymore.
>>
>>  --
>>  Carlos Rovira
>>  http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Flex web deployment...

2020-03-10 Thread Ramazan Ergüder Bekrek
To see the talk about the tech with demos you can watch this : 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JUs4c99-mo=youtu.be

10.03.2020, 16:18, "Carlos Rovira" :
> Thanks for sharing, sounds good, but still nothing real until it will be
> launched, and at that time I think people will need to evaluate it to see
> if it works as expected. For what they say it will only work on Chrome,
> that's not bad... and the idea itself seems promising. But time will tell
> if it goes to real
> Thanks for let us know! :)
>
> El mar., 10 mar. 2020 a las 15:44, Ramazan Ergüder Bekrek (<
> e.bek...@yandex.com>) escribió:
>
>>  From my researches I found out that it will be possible to run Flash/Flex
>>  applications after 2020 inside of the browser due to this new technology
>>  which will use WebAssembly.
>>
>>  
>> https://medium.com/leaningtech/preserving-flash-content-with-webassembly-done-right-eb6838b7e36f
>>
>>  Maybe we don't need to freak out at all anymore.
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Flex web deployment...

2020-03-10 Thread Ramazan Ergüder Bekrek
Well I received this update and it seems to work pretty well now it is up to us 
to test it to see if our flex apps are running well.

https://medium.com/leaningtech/running-flash-in-webassembly-using-cheerpx-an-update-d500b6fbc44e

10.03.2020, 16:18, "Carlos Rovira" :
> Thanks for sharing, sounds good, but still nothing real until it will be
> launched, and at that time I think people will need to evaluate it to see
> if it works as expected. For what they say it will only work on Chrome,
> that's not bad... and the idea itself seems promising. But time will tell
> if it goes to real
> Thanks for let us know! :)
>
> El mar., 10 mar. 2020 a las 15:44, Ramazan Ergüder Bekrek (<
> e.bek...@yandex.com>) escribió:
>
>>  From my researches I found out that it will be possible to run Flash/Flex
>>  applications after 2020 inside of the browser due to this new technology
>>  which will use WebAssembly.
>>
>>  
>> https://medium.com/leaningtech/preserving-flash-content-with-webassembly-done-right-eb6838b7e36f
>>
>>  Maybe we don't need to freak out at all anymore.
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Flex web deployment...

2020-03-10 Thread Carlos Rovira
Thanks for sharing, sounds good, but still nothing real until it will be
launched, and at that time I think people will need to evaluate it to see
if it works as expected. For what they say it will only work on Chrome,
that's not bad... and the idea itself seems promising. But time will tell
if it goes to real
Thanks for let us know! :)

El mar., 10 mar. 2020 a las 15:44, Ramazan Ergüder Bekrek (<
e.bek...@yandex.com>) escribió:

> From my researches I found out that it will be possible to run Flash/Flex
> applications after 2020 inside of the browser due to this new technology
> which will use WebAssembly.
>
>
> https://medium.com/leaningtech/preserving-flash-content-with-webassembly-done-right-eb6838b7e36f
>
> Maybe we don't need to freak out at all anymore.
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Flex web deployment...

2020-03-10 Thread Ramazan Ergüder Bekrek
>From my researches I found out that it will be possible to run Flash/Flex 
>applications after 2020 inside of the browser due to this new technology which 
>will use WebAssembly.

https://medium.com/leaningtech/preserving-flash-content-with-webassembly-done-right-eb6838b7e36f

Maybe we don't need to freak out at all anymore.




Re: Flex web deployment...

2020-03-09 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Paul,

Lots of people have AIR apps that are basically a startup shell that pull a SWF 
from a server and run it.  Have you investigated that approach?  No Flash 
plug-in involved at all.

-Alex

On 3/9/20, 9:23 PM, "Paul Stearns"  wrote:

Alex:

Interesting idea. I would need to also figure out how to keep the myriad of 
SWF files which comprise the app up to date. Right now I depend on flash to get 
the latest version of a specific SWF file from the website. Browser caching is 
sometimes a problem.

Paul R. Stearns
Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.

15280 NW 79th Ct.
Suite 250
Miami Lakes, Fl 33016

Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
Fax: (305)623-4588


From: Alex Harui 
Sent: 3/10/20 12:05 AM
To: "users@flex.apache.org" , "pa...@compuace.com" 

Subject: Re: Flex web deployment...
Without thinking about this too much, I don't think it makes sense to 
change Flash Player. The browsers don't want to allow it as a plugin.

I don't know what it would take to duplicate however Java runs something it 
downloads to launch an AIR app. It would be interesting to see if you could 
create a Java wrapper that launches an AIR app.

-Alex

On 3/9/20, 2:26 PM, "Paul Stearns" wrote:

Yes 5 was a typo. Should have been;

Why couldn't Adobe/Harman changed Flash to use the methodology Java uses 
for deployment?

For example I have a number of Java applications I use, "Mirth Connect" 
comes to mind, where you access it through a browser, but Mirth Connect is just 
really downloading a Java App, and running it.

Another web loaded Java application I use includes iDrac from Dell.

Since my applications are mostly self contained, this would work great for 
me.

Paul R. Stearns
Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.

15280 NW 79th Ct.
Suite 250
Miami Lakes, Fl 33016

Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
Fax: (305)623-4588


From: "Frost, Andrew"
Sent: 3/9/20 4:59 PM
To: "users@flex.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?
Hi

Responding to a few of these:

1) what's the actual support of Adobe for Flash Player, or if it will left 
to Harman as part of the AIR deal
[AF] Yes we have certain rights around the licensing of Flash Player, as we 
have had since the days of the OSP many years ago! but there are limitations to 
this :-)

2) Flash will be just present on AIR
[AF] This is where we need to clarify terminology: "Flash" as a rendering 
engine and ActionScript VM, yes it's in AIR. "Flash Player" as a browser 
plug-in, no that's not in AIR and hasn't been for several years.

3) donating to Apache has no sense at all, since Flash Player has many 
licensed closed source parts that can't be open source
[AF] Yes sadly this is very much true..

4) Browser vendors are closing plugin doors
[AF] and this is the crux of it. Doesn't matter if you're looking at Flash, 
Java, Silverlight, whatever .. plug-ins aren't going to be a viable solution 
longer term..

5) Why couldn't Adobe/Harman changed Flash to use the methodology Flash 
uses for deployment?
[AF] I'm assuming there's a typo, not quite sure what's meant, but the real 
issue is deployment via the web. If you can deploy a standalone application, 
then you can continue to use workarounds here, but if you need the app to be 
accessed via a standard browser then your best bet (for a Flex app) is likely 
to be Royale :-)

thanks

Andrew

-Original Message-
From: Paul Stearns
Sent: 09 March 2020 19:47
To: Carlos Rovira ; users@flex.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Spam] :Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?

I am investing Royale, but haven't seen any results yet.

I am showing my ignorance here, but, my confusion is, will Java still be 
deployable via web browsers? If so, what is the difference between using a web 
browser to deploy a Java app, and a Flash app?

Why couldn't Adobe/Harmon changed Flash to use the methodology Flash uses 
for deployment?

Paul R. Stearns
Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.

15280 NW 79th Ct.
Suite 250
Miami Lakes, Fl 33016

Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
Fax: (305)623-4588


From: Carlos Rovira
Sent: 3/9/20 3:31 PM
To: users@flex.apache.org, Paul Stearns
Subject: [Spam] :Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?
Hi Paul,

must say don't know what's the actual support of Adobe for Flash Player, or 
if it will left to Harman as part of the AIR deal, maybe Andrew can give some 
light on this. Since Flash will be just present on AI

Re: Flex web deployment...

2020-03-09 Thread Paul Stearns
Alex:

Interesting idea. I would need to also figure out how to keep the myriad of SWF 
files which comprise the app up to date. Right now I depend on flash to get the 
latest version of a specific SWF file from the website. Browser caching is 
sometimes a problem.

Paul R. Stearns
Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.

15280 NW 79th Ct.
Suite 250
Miami Lakes, Fl 33016

Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
Fax: (305)623-4588


From: Alex Harui 
Sent: 3/10/20 12:05 AM
To: "users@flex.apache.org" , "pa...@compuace.com" 

Subject: Re: Flex web deployment...
Without thinking about this too much, I don't think it makes sense to change 
Flash Player. The browsers don't want to allow it as a plugin.

I don't know what it would take to duplicate however Java runs something it 
downloads to launch an AIR app. It would be interesting to see if you could 
create a Java wrapper that launches an AIR app.

-Alex

On 3/9/20, 2:26 PM, "Paul Stearns" wrote:

Yes 5 was a typo. Should have been;

Why couldn't Adobe/Harman changed Flash to use the methodology Java uses for 
deployment?

For example I have a number of Java applications I use, "Mirth Connect" comes 
to mind, where you access it through a browser, but Mirth Connect is just 
really downloading a Java App, and running it.

Another web loaded Java application I use includes iDrac from Dell.

Since my applications are mostly self contained, this would work great for me.

Paul R. Stearns
Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.

15280 NW 79th Ct.
Suite 250
Miami Lakes, Fl 33016

Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
Fax: (305)623-4588


From: "Frost, Andrew"
Sent: 3/9/20 4:59 PM
To: "users@flex.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?
Hi

Responding to a few of these:

1) what's the actual support of Adobe for Flash Player, or if it will left to 
Harman as part of the AIR deal
[AF] Yes we have certain rights around the licensing of Flash Player, as we 
have had since the days of the OSP many years ago! but there are limitations to 
this :-)

2) Flash will be just present on AIR
[AF] This is where we need to clarify terminology: "Flash" as a rendering 
engine and ActionScript VM, yes it's in AIR. "Flash Player" as a browser 
plug-in, no that's not in AIR and hasn't been for several years.

3) donating to Apache has no sense at all, since Flash Player has many licensed 
closed source parts that can't be open source
[AF] Yes sadly this is very much true..

4) Browser vendors are closing plugin doors
[AF] and this is the crux of it. Doesn't matter if you're looking at Flash, 
Java, Silverlight, whatever .. plug-ins aren't going to be a viable solution 
longer term..

5) Why couldn't Adobe/Harman changed Flash to use the methodology Flash uses 
for deployment?
[AF] I'm assuming there's a typo, not quite sure what's meant, but the real 
issue is deployment via the web. If you can deploy a standalone application, 
then you can continue to use workarounds here, but if you need the app to be 
accessed via a standard browser then your best bet (for a Flex app) is likely 
to be Royale :-)

thanks

Andrew

-Original Message-
From: Paul Stearns
Sent: 09 March 2020 19:47
To: Carlos Rovira ; users@flex.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Spam] :Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?

I am investing Royale, but haven't seen any results yet.

I am showing my ignorance here, but, my confusion is, will Java still be 
deployable via web browsers? If so, what is the difference between using a web 
browser to deploy a Java app, and a Flash app?

Why couldn't Adobe/Harmon changed Flash to use the methodology Flash uses for 
deployment?

Paul R. Stearns
Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.

15280 NW 79th Ct.
Suite 250
Miami Lakes, Fl 33016

Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
Fax: (305)623-4588


From: Carlos Rovira
Sent: 3/9/20 3:31 PM
To: users@flex.apache.org, Paul Stearns
Subject: [Spam] :Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?
Hi Paul,

must say don't know what's the actual support of Adobe for Flash Player, or if 
it will left to Harman as part of the AIR deal, maybe Andrew can give some 
light on this. Since Flash will be just present on AIR, and not in any other 
place, that could have sense. But that will mean more maintenance effort and 
people needed by Harman.

Anyway, donating to Apache has no sense at all, since Flash Player has many 
licensed closed source parts that can't be open source, or at least that's what 
they always says. But again...donating Flash Player and making it OS, if it 
could be something doable at some point (let's go utopic ;), does not change 
anything, since Browser vendors are closing plugin doors. So even in that case, 
it continue to be a death end.

I think Apache Royale is this days in a very good shape, and is better each 
day... so I maybe people should give a try a

Re: Flex web deployment...

2020-03-09 Thread Alex Harui
Without thinking about this too much, I don't think it makes sense to change 
Flash Player.  The browsers don't want to allow it as a plugin.

I don't know what it would take to duplicate however Java runs something it 
downloads to launch an AIR app.  It would be interesting to see if you could 
create a Java wrapper that launches an AIR app.

-Alex

On 3/9/20, 2:26 PM, "Paul Stearns"  wrote:

Yes 5 was a typo. Should have been;

Why couldn't Adobe/Harman changed Flash to use the methodology Java uses 
for deployment? 

For example I have a number of Java applications I use, "Mirth Connect" 
comes to mind, where you access it through a browser, but Mirth Connect is just 
really downloading a Java App, and running it.

Another web loaded Java application I use includes iDrac from Dell.

Since my applications are mostly self contained, this would work great for 
me.

Paul R. Stearns
Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.

15280 NW 79th Ct.
Suite 250
Miami Lakes, Fl 33016

Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
Fax: (305)623-4588


From: "Frost, Andrew" 
Sent: 3/9/20 4:59 PM
To: "users@flex.apache.org" 
Subject: Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?
Hi

Responding to a few of these:

1) what's the actual support of Adobe for Flash Player, or if it will left 
to Harman as part of the AIR deal
[AF] Yes we have certain rights around the licensing of Flash Player, as we 
have had since the days of the OSP many years ago! but there are limitations to 
this :-)

2) Flash will be just present on AIR
[AF] This is where we need to clarify terminology: "Flash" as a rendering 
engine and ActionScript VM, yes it's in AIR. "Flash Player" as a browser 
plug-in, no that's not in AIR and hasn't been for several years.

3) donating to Apache has no sense at all, since Flash Player has many 
licensed closed source parts that can't be open source
[AF] Yes sadly this is very much true..

4) Browser vendors are closing plugin doors
[AF] and this is the crux of it. Doesn't matter if you're looking at Flash, 
Java, Silverlight, whatever .. plug-ins aren't going to be a viable solution 
longer term..

5) Why couldn't Adobe/Harman changed Flash to use the methodology Flash 
uses for deployment?
[AF] I'm assuming there's a typo, not quite sure what's meant, but the real 
issue is deployment via the web. If you can deploy a standalone application, 
then you can continue to use workarounds here, but if you need the app to be 
accessed via a standard browser then your best bet (for a Flex app) is likely 
to be Royale :-)

thanks

Andrew

-Original Message-
From: Paul Stearns
Sent: 09 March 2020 19:47
To: Carlos Rovira ; users@flex.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Spam] :Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?

I am investing Royale, but haven't seen any results yet.

I am showing my ignorance here, but, my confusion is, will Java still be 
deployable via web browsers? If so, what is the difference between using a web 
browser to deploy a Java app, and a Flash app?

Why couldn't Adobe/Harmon changed Flash to use the methodology Flash uses 
for deployment?

Paul R. Stearns
Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.

15280 NW 79th Ct.
Suite 250
Miami Lakes, Fl 33016

Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
Fax: (305)623-4588


From: Carlos Rovira
Sent: 3/9/20 3:31 PM
To: users@flex.apache.org, Paul Stearns
Subject: [Spam] :Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?
Hi Paul,

must say don't know what's the actual support of Adobe for Flash Player, or 
if it will left to Harman as part of the AIR deal, maybe Andrew can give some 
light on this. Since Flash will be just present on AIR, and not in any other 
place, that could have sense. But that will mean more maintenance effort and 
people needed by Harman.

Anyway, donating to Apache has no sense at all, since Flash Player has many 
licensed closed source parts that can't be open source, or at least that's what 
they always says. But again...donating Flash Player and making it OS, if it 
could be something doable at some point (let's go utopic ;), does not change 
anything, since Browser vendors are closing plugin doors. So even in that case, 
it continue to be a death end.

I think Apache Royale is this days in a very good shape, and is better each 
day... so I maybe people should give a try and consider it as an option for the 
future.

Thanks

El lun., 9 mar. 2020 a las 20:04, Paul Stearns () escribió:
Has Adobe stopped supporting it, and has not turned it over to Apache? Now 
that is just unconscionable.

Paul R. Stearns
Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.

15280 NW 79th Ct.
   

Flex web deployment...

2020-03-09 Thread Paul Stearns
Yes 5 was a typo. Should have been;

Why couldn't Adobe/Harman changed Flash to use the methodology Java uses for 
deployment?

For example I have a number of Java applications I use, "Mirth Connect" comes 
to mind, where you access it through a browser, but Mirth Connect is just 
really downloading a Java App, and running it.

Another web loaded Java application I use includes iDrac from Dell.

Since my applications are mostly self contained, this would work great for me.

Paul R. Stearns
Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.

15280 NW 79th Ct.
Suite 250
Miami Lakes, Fl 33016

Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
Fax: (305)623-4588


From: "Frost, Andrew" 
Sent: 3/9/20 4:59 PM
To: "users@flex.apache.org" 
Subject: Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?
Hi

Responding to a few of these:

1) what's the actual support of Adobe for Flash Player, or if it will left to 
Harman as part of the AIR deal
[AF] Yes we have certain rights around the licensing of Flash Player, as we 
have had since the days of the OSP many years ago! but there are limitations to 
this :-)

2) Flash will be just present on AIR
[AF] This is where we need to clarify terminology: "Flash" as a rendering 
engine and ActionScript VM, yes it's in AIR. "Flash Player" as a browser 
plug-in, no that's not in AIR and hasn't been for several years.

3) donating to Apache has no sense at all, since Flash Player has many licensed 
closed source parts that can't be open source
[AF] Yes sadly this is very much true..

4) Browser vendors are closing plugin doors
[AF] and this is the crux of it. Doesn't matter if you're looking at Flash, 
Java, Silverlight, whatever .. plug-ins aren't going to be a viable solution 
longer term..

5) Why couldn't Adobe/Harman changed Flash to use the methodology Flash uses 
for deployment?
[AF] I'm assuming there's a typo, not quite sure what's meant, but the real 
issue is deployment via the web. If you can deploy a standalone application, 
then you can continue to use workarounds here, but if you need the app to be 
accessed via a standard browser then your best bet (for a Flex app) is likely 
to be Royale :-)

thanks

Andrew

-Original Message-
From: Paul Stearns
Sent: 09 March 2020 19:47
To: Carlos Rovira ; users@flex.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Spam] :Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?

I am investing Royale, but haven't seen any results yet.

I am showing my ignorance here, but, my confusion is, will Java still be 
deployable via web browsers? If so, what is the difference between using a web 
browser to deploy a Java app, and a Flash app?

Why couldn't Adobe/Harmon changed Flash to use the methodology Flash uses for 
deployment?

Paul R. Stearns
Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.

15280 NW 79th Ct.
Suite 250
Miami Lakes, Fl 33016

Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
Fax: (305)623-4588


From: Carlos Rovira
Sent: 3/9/20 3:31 PM
To: users@flex.apache.org, Paul Stearns
Subject: [Spam] :Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?
Hi Paul,

must say don't know what's the actual support of Adobe for Flash Player, or if 
it will left to Harman as part of the AIR deal, maybe Andrew can give some 
light on this. Since Flash will be just present on AIR, and not in any other 
place, that could have sense. But that will mean more maintenance effort and 
people needed by Harman.

Anyway, donating to Apache has no sense at all, since Flash Player has many 
licensed closed source parts that can't be open source, or at least that's what 
they always says. But again...donating Flash Player and making it OS, if it 
could be something doable at some point (let's go utopic ;), does not change 
anything, since Browser vendors are closing plugin doors. So even in that case, 
it continue to be a death end.

I think Apache Royale is this days in a very good shape, and is better each 
day... so I maybe people should give a try and consider it as an option for the 
future.

Thanks

El lun., 9 mar. 2020 a las 20:04, Paul Stearns () escribió:
Has Adobe stopped supporting it, and has not turned it over to Apache? Now that 
is just unconscionable.

Paul R. Stearns
Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.

15280 NW 79th Ct.
Suite 250
Miami Lakes, Fl 33016

Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
Fax: (305)623-4588


From: Carlos Rovira
Sent: 3/9/20 1:28 PM
To: users@flex.apache.org, Paul Stearns
Subject: Re: Flex 4.16.1 broken for AIR33.1?
Hi Paul,

not bad idea, but don't know a browser that will support Flash, and the problem 
is Adobe is stopping supporting flash player as a plugin, so I'm afraid that's 
not possible.

El lun., 9 mar. 2020 a las 17:40, Paul Stearns ()
escribió:

> Better yet, how about supporting a browser whose main feature is the
> support of Flex?
>
> My applications are 99.9% flex. The main things I use the browser for
> is application deployment, file upload/download and displaying PDF files..
>
> Paul R. Stearns
> Advanced