Re: mod_auth_ldap Problem apache2
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:00:34AM +0200, Reinhard Weh wrote: Nein anonymes binding ist nicht erlaubt, sollte man das tun ? Na ja, wenn man anonym zugreifen will, dann schon ;-) Oder besser einen User im Ldap einrichen mit Passwort und diese dann in der .htaccess angeben ? Mußt Du selber wissen. Du hast dann ein Paßwort im Klartext 'rumzukullern. Hängt halt von Eurer Policy ab: entweder anonymes Binding (und auch anonymen Zugriff auf die entsprechenden Attribute!) erlauben - oder eben einen Nutzer mit weitestgehenden Beschränkungen einrichten, der nur genau die benötigten Attribute lesen darf. Ich benutze letztere Variante. Rainer -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: VirtualHosts / SSL
Am 2006-05-01 18:17:31, schrieb Holger Schwarze: Hallo Liste! Ich hätte da mal eine grundlegende Frage zu VirtualHosts und SSL: Ich habe mehrere Domains auf meinem Server (nur eine IP-Adresse), und möchte diese (mit anderen Inhalten) auch unter https:// anbieten. Geht das überhaupt? System: Win2k3, Apache 2.0.55 (http://hunter.campbus.com/). Mehrere Domains:NEIN EINE Domain mit ein paar hosts: JA (Wildcard Cetificat) Greetings Michelle Konzack -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/8845235667100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: VirtualHosts / SSL
Am 2006-05-01 20:36:06, schrieb Holger Schwarze: Gilt das auch für mehrere Subdomains einer Domain, oder bräuchte man dann für jede Subdomain eine eigene IP-Adresse? Neun, Subdomains/Hosts können per Wildcard-Certificat und EINER IP gemacht werden. Auf einem meinem Server habe ich 48 Domains wobei jede Domain eine eigne IP hat und dann mehrere hosts, wovon mindes- tens einer SSL ist. Greetings Michelle Konzack -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/8845235667100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webdav 403 problems.
-Original Message- From: Z.C.B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 5:31 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webdav 403 problems. I have it set up like this, but I can not manage to write to it at all. I originally had some Auth stuff in there, but that has been removed. When ever I try reading or any thing I get a 403 error. Httpd does have the proper permissions for accessing it. 403 isn't just about file permissions... You also need to Allow access to the directory, eg: Directory /home/www/webdav Allow from all /Directory If this doesn't work, read (and post back) your error log entry. Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. Any suggestions as to what to check? Alias /webdav/ /home/www/webdav/ Location /webdav/ Dav On /Location - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du Groupe SWX. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install / setup troubles
-Original Message- From: Bill Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:17 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install / setup troubles Dear Vasiliy: It seems that I am getting an error message in the log file that [warn] Init: (www.psychtest.com:443) You configured HTTP(80) on the standard HTTPS(443) port! From reading your other posts, it is not clear that you have an SSL-enabled apache. That is, mod_ssl is not compiled in or available as a dynamic library. Either go back to the vendor who supplied your distro and get an SSL-enabled version, or check out http://apache.mirror.testserver.li/httpd/binaries/win32/README.html Unless you can confirm you have mod_ssl in your distro, everything else is just a waste of time... Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. If I let the conf.ssl script proceed to the point where it tries configure SSL on, the server terminates. What I have been trying to do is to use https on port 443 and http on port 80 I have a single dedicated IP address -- DNS pointing to the address 209.121.79.58 I would like to serve incoming to the above IP address port 80 as http and incoming port 443 as https: Thanks and have a great day! Bill Angus, MA http://www.psychtest.com - Original Message - From: Vasiliy Boulytchev mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:24 AM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect Problem Bill, Yes, you can :) Its all about how you configure your VirtualHosts. If you elaborate a bit, I would be glad to shoot a sample config :) Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du Groupe SWX. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess and WAP 1.1
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 6:29 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess and WAP 1.1 Boyle Owen wrote: Doesn't mean much... Could all be using the same DN server for all we know. I understand you being coy about revealing your actual domain name but in this case you are hindering people trying to help you. It is starting to look like a DNS issue whereby some machines on undefined networks are resolving urlB to the correct address while the WAP server that the phone connects to is resolving urlB to an address that doesn't work. Fair enough: http://www.go2mm.net/m/nate Thanks. Testing from the command line works perfectly: the URL above produces a 302 redirect to http://www.stoddardsoftware.com:8080/mobilemovies/m/nate which returns the WML file. So no probs with the apache config. Testing with an online WAP browser (http://www.wapsilon.com/) works perfectly - the WML file is displayed and is functional. Testing with my Nokia 6230 works perfectly - the WML file is displayed and is functional. So I would conclude that there is nothing wrong with the setup at your end. I think you need to look at the setup at the phone's service provider. To recap how WAP works, the phone makes a proprietary (eg, GPRS) connection to a WAP server located in the phone company's premises, and submits the URL. It is the WAP server that makes the HTTP request to your server. It's not really the phone that receives the redirect, it's the WAP server - if it is unable to resolve the redirected hostname or (more likely) if it cannot issue a request to port 8080 (maybe a FW rule), then the request will fail. Do the phone's you've tested with all have the same service provider? Can you find and try a different phone? Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. When it works you'll get a WML document with 1 card in it. Thanks for the help, -Nate - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du Groupe SWX. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Re: ASP on Apache
Hi, Thank's everyone who answered me. I think that I willtry mod_adpdotnet. Is it easy to install mods?Do mod_adpdotnetsupport asp? All I need is to use session, connection, request and other simple objects. It is for a school project, so I cant use asp.NET.Thank you Artem NehamkinSascha Kersken wrote: Hi, You actually have to buy another piece of software to support ASP.NET under Linux with Apache. I don't remember the name of the software. That's mod_adpdotnet which you don't actually have to buy because it's free software under the terms of the Apache Software License. See http://httpd.apache.org/cli/I think what Jonathan ment is that there is a commercial ASP for Apache productout there (chili or something). Quite dated.ASP is dead. Microsoft has declared ASP dead, which makes it rather silly tofigure out how to use a dead Microsoft technology on a non-Microsoft solution.Bury it already and move on to ASP.NET which brings with it plenty of advantages.For Linux, one would need mod_mono for ASP.NET script. For Windows you arecorrect, Apache can use mod_aspdotnet, which is pending a release very shortlyfor Apache 2.0 + 2.2 (the current release and snapshot only run on Apache 2.0).---a nn wrote: Hello How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all?Commercially, there's SUN ASP (formerly Chilisoft):http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=420a8e72There's also mod_aspdotnet, and mod_mono, but they're both for asp.net Ithink.Joost---There's also Apache::ASP which runs under mod_perl. It's not 100%compatible with "real" ASP, but should work for most applications...IssacJoost de Heer wrote: a nn wrote: Hello How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all? Commercially, there's SUN ASP (formerly Chilisoft): http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=420a8e72 There's also mod_aspdotnet, and mod_mono, but they're both for asp.net I think. Joost Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Directory Aliases Or Virtual
Hello Am a newbie, doing research for instantiating models accross the internet. I installed Apache 2.05 but am failing to configure it for aliases, which i can do easily with IIS I want to be able to access different folders, other than the DocumentRoot but i wrote this but it doesnt work. Alias /SRC /TUMWESIGYE RESEARCH/SRC/ Directory /TUMWESIGYE RESEARCH/SRC/ Options Indexes +FollowSymLinks AllowOverride none Order deny,allow Allow from all /Directory I thought that by using http://localhost/src i would access the webpages in this alias - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Directory Aliases Or Virtual
Hi, Broun Emmanuel wrote: Hello Am a newbie, doing research for instantiating models accross the internet. I installed Apache 2.05 but am failing to configure it for aliases, which i can do easily with IIS I want to be able to access different folders, other than the DocumentRoot but i wrote this but it doesnt work. Alias /SRC /TUMWESIGYE RESEARCH/SRC/ Directory /TUMWESIGYE RESEARCH/SRC/ Options Indexes +FollowSymLinks AllowOverride none Order deny,allow Allow from all /Directory I thought that by using http://localhost/src i would access the webpages in this alias Bear in mind that src and SRC are two completely different things. That may not be the problem if you've munged the above configuration. If not then check error.log and post the relevant entries if it's not obvious what's wrong. HTH, Neil. -- Neil Hillard[EMAIL PROTECTED] Westland Helicopters Ltd. http://www.whl.co.uk/ Disclaimer: This message does not necessarily reflect the views of Westland Helicopters Ltd. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] why do I get a 304 when I replace a file with a changed version?
On 5/4/06, Jennifer R. Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All - I have an issue with my Apache server that I do not understand. I am no Apache expert, so I am hoping someone within this forum can tell me if this is expected behavior, a config issue or a possible bug. I see nothing in the FAQ's or bug lists that help me with this. I am testing a copy of our website which is running Apache 2.0.52 on Windows 2000. Our website is in process of being moved to Akamai, where our content will be cached. When the TTL expires on Akamai they make a request to our Apache server to see if the content has changed. The problem I have is that my server almost always returns a 304 'not modified' regardless of whether the file has changed or not. For example, I have two files; a.htm b.htm b.htm is simply a copy of a.htm with some minor updates so I can see that it changed when I launch it. If I use windows xcopy command, copy command, drag and drop or even the unix toolkit mv command to swap these two files and then launch a.htm, Apache acts as if there was no change, and sends a 304 every time the TTL expires and Akamai serves up the old file. If I use the windows toolkit 'cp' command to exchange the files, THEN it sends a 200 which in turn updates the Akamai cache and I get the right page. I think this is kind of odd, but perhaps that is what I get for running on Windows :-) (not my choice by the way). Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. Also, any hints and tips to how to better debug this. I am pretty much going on what I see in the access log and on the web page, as well as looking at the headers returned from the Akamai edge server(which show the old file date/time not the new one). Many Thanks in advance for any help! You must make certain that the timestamp changes on the file. One thing you can do is use touch to set it to the current date. Krist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Solothurn, Switzerland - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Re: ASP on Apache
I think that I will try mod_adpdotnet. Is it easy to install mods? Do mod_adpdotnet support asp? It's easy to install mod_aspdotnet. As we've told you several times the free solutions don't support Microsoft ASP pages. Several options exist for ASP.NET, or writing your ASP pages in perl. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] help interpreting error msg
I've never tried using Apache on Windows, but it sounds like it may be a permissions error. Have you checked to see if the apache process has the proper permissions to read that file? -Victor On 5/4/06, Savage, Robert CTR USTRANSCOM J6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm reconstructing a web server after inadvertently (and stupidly) deleting Apache2's ./conf directory instead of copying it to a safe place L. I'm using a fraternal twin of that web server as a model and file source to recreate that ./conf directory. I believe I've restored all of the required files, but the web site doesn't yet display its home page (The page cannot be displayed). I think it's probably first-and-goal and I'm on the one foot line. I'm now going thru the error logs looking for hints. There's an Apache Tomcat5 service running, and a workers2.properties file seems to tie it and Apache2 together. My httpd.conf file contains the following: LoadModule jk2_module modules/mod_jk2.so … IfModule mod_jk2.so #--- # Where to find the workers2.properties file #--- # JkSet config.file F:/www/Apache2/conf/workers2.properties /IfModule I'm unable There's one line in logs/error.log I can't quite figure out: … [error] config.setConfig(): Error reading properties F:/www/apache2/conf/workers2.properties Can someone please explain to me what properties this error message is referring to? --Doc Robert G. (Doc) Savage, CISSP, RHCE, GCIA Senior Systems Analyst BAE Systems Information Technology USTranscom J6-PI (TFMS) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DSN: 779-3275 Fax: 576-4578 -- http://www.victortrac.com
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Re: ASP on Apache
-Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 10:39 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Re: ASP on Apache I think that I will try mod_adpdotnet. Is it easy to install mods? Do mod_adpdotnet support asp? It's easy to install mod_aspdotnet. As we've told you several times the free solutions don't support Microsoft ASP pages. Several options exist for ASP.NET, or writing your ASP pages in perl. I think the OP might be under the impression that ASP is an unambiguous term so, just to clear up a possible terminology misunderstanding: ASP = Active Server Pages. Originally developed by Microsoft, a technology that allowed you to put dynamic content (written in VBScript) into a web-page. The dynamic content could only be parsed by an ASP interpreter that was an add-on to the MS IIS webserver. This was an entirely proprietary commercial package that could only work on MS. However For some odd reason, MS didn't patent or protect the term (maybe it is too generic) so now ASP is used to define several technologies that allow dynamic content: Apache:ASP is possibly the most extreme since it uses Perl as the scripting language and Apache as the webserver and so the only thing it has in common with MS-ASP is the three letter acronymn. To sum up; ASP means a different thing to different people and so if you ask can I use ASP with apache? you'll get the answer Yes or No depending on who you ask. And both will be correct... :-) Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Diese E-mail ist eine private und persönliche Kommunikation. Sie hat keinen Bezug zur Börsen- bzw. Geschäftstätigkeit der SWX Gruppe. This e-mail is of a private and personal nature. It is not related to the exchange or business activities of the SWX Group. Le présent e-mail est un message privé et personnel, sans rapport avec l'activité boursière du Groupe SWX. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about setting up secure service
On 5/4/06, Bill Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anything else I need to do to get SSL defined? You define SSL by passing the option -DSSL to apachectl or httpd when you start. Another option is to use apachectl startssl when starting, which is basically shorthand for doing apachectl start -D SSL The whole purpose of defining options and using IfDefine sections is to be able to switch on or off sections of your webserver config. Krist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Solothurn, Switzerland - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Directory Aliases Or Virtual
Broun Emmanuel wrote: Hello Am a newbie, doing research for instantiating models accross the internet. I installed Apache 2.05 but am failing to configure it for aliases, which i can do easily with IIS I want to be able to access different folders, other than the DocumentRoot but i wrote this but it doesnt work. Alias /SRC /TUMWESIGYE RESEARCH/SRC/ Try Alias /SRC/ /TUMWESIGYE RESEARCH/SRC/ ^ From default httpd.conf: # Aliases: Add here as many aliases as you need (with no limit). The format is # Alias fakename realname # # Note that if you include a trailing / on fakename then the server will # require it to be present in the URL. So /icons isn't aliased in this # example, only /icons/. If the fakename is slash-terminated, then the # realname must also be slash terminated, and if the fakename omits the # trailing slash, the realname must also omit it. # Directory /TUMWESIGYE RESEARCH/SRC/ Options Indexes +FollowSymLinks AllowOverride none Order deny,allow Allow from all /Directory I thought that by using http://localhost/src i would access the webpages in this alias - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards Bodo - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect Problem
The requests will actually be processed by the rules of the correct named
virtual host (according to the host header); the only problem is that the
certificate the server will use for authenticating to the client is the one
defined in the first of the virtual hosts. At the time of SSL session
establishment, the HTTP request has not yet been transmitted to the server, so
the server cannot possibly know the value of the Host header.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Krist van Besien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:41 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect Problem
On 5/3/06, Stuart, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're running Apache 2.0.46 on Red Hat kernel 2.4. We're trying to
shorten the URL our clients have to use to connect to an application.
We have three environments; development, test, and production. Our
approach is to create a DNS entry in the format of
environment.appname.domain and have it resolve to
environment.webserver.domain and when they arrive look at what application
they are seeking and redirect them to environment.webserver.domain/appname.
We've got this working with the DNS as described and the following
entry in the httpd.conf file.
VirtualHost *
ServerName test.appname.domain
ServerAlias *
Redirect permanent / https://testweb.domain/appname /VirtualHost
Our problem is that if clients mistakenly enter
https://test.appname.domain instead of http://test.appname.domain they
are directed to the default page of https://testweb.domain which is the
index.html file.
How can we fix this, and is there a better way to solve the original
problem?
(repost, aparently some keypresses are interpreted by gmail as hotkey and
caused a prematures send)
Probably https requests are not processed by te virtual server you described
above. Have a look at the ssl config. Also it is not possible to have
namevirtual hosts under ssl, so all ssl requests will go to the same virtual
host (probably the first)
a command that might give you some hints as to what gets processed by which
part of the config is:
httpd -S -DSSL
You could do what you are trying above with a rewrite. This would save you
having to add virtual hosts for every app.
For example:
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(dev|test|prod)\.(.*)\.domain$
RewriteRule (.*)
https://%1web.domain/%2/$1 [R,L]
(Disclaimer: This is of the top of my head, I haven't tested it.)
Krist
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solothurn, Switzerland
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] More usage of network bandwidth with Apache Proxy Server
Title: More usage of network bandwidth with Apache Proxy Server Hi, We have been using Apache Proxy Server and we have noticed some strange behavior w.r.t network usage. The network usage of Apache Proxy server and the client machine which is connected to it are being monitored. A download (http://ftp.surfnet.nl/ftp/pub/os/Linux/distr/fedora/1/i386/iso/) have been initiated from the client machine. Before the download gets completed, it is cancelled from the client. It is noticed that the network usage of Apache Proxy Server is still high, even if the download gets cancelled and it remains high for considerable time( the time equivalent for the entire download to complete). What are the reasons for this behavior? To ascertain the fact that Proxy server still process the download, when it is cancelled from client, we did few more tests with only one client connected to Apache Proxy. 1. Download initiated from client, cancelled it after 20 minutes. The after 20 minutes, the Apache Proxy Server is stopped. It is noticed that as soon as download is initiated, the network bandwidth usage (transmit bps ) by Apache Proxy Server goes high ( almost 0.8 Mbps ). When the download is cancelled from client, the transmit bps of Apache proxy serve remains same. Only when Apache is stopped, the transmit bps comes down (obvious). In one of the tests, Apache was not stopped, and monitored the transmit bps, which has remained high for the time equivalent to complete download time. 2. Two proxy servers were used in the second test, where the client is connected to first Apache Proxy Server, which is connected to Second Proxy Server. The download is initiated from client, cancelled it from client, then First Apache Proxy Server is stopped and Finally Second Apache Proxy Server is stopped. When the download is cancelled, the transmit bps of both the First Apache Proxy and Second Apache Proxy remains high. Even if the First Proxy Server is stopped, the transmit bps of Second Proxy Server remains high. 3. Different versions of Apache have been tried. The same behavior is exhibited with httpd 2.0.48, 2.0.50 and 2.2.0. We would like to know why is such behavior being exhibited by Apache Proxy. In case, more information is required, I can send more details. Regards, Saleem *** The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. This email does not constitute any commitment from Cordys Holding BV or any of its subsidiaries except when expressly agreed in a written agreement between the intended recipient and Cordys Holding BV or its subsidiaries. ***
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Session Count Question From a Newbie
Hello all; I new to the administration of an Apache web server and am looking for a way to see how many clients are connected to the web server. We're running Apache 2.0.46 on Red Hat AS 4. Netstat gives me connection info, but shows multiple connections for the clients. How can I report how many clients are connected to the web server at a given time? Ed **Please apply a generous amount of all the usual disclaimers here.** - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Session Count Question From a Newbie
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 08:32 -0500, Stuart, Ed wrote: Hello all; I new to the administration of an Apache web server and am looking for a way to see how many clients are connected to the web server. We're running Apache 2.0.46 on Red Hat AS 4. Netstat gives me connection info, but shows multiple connections for the clients. How can I report how many clients are connected to the web server at a given time? Ed **Please apply a generous amount of all the usual disclaimers here.** Hi, To see live connections, you can use the following: # watch tail /var/log/httpd/access_log To report on connections over time, you might want to use something like webalizer Hope that helps, Rick - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Session Count Question From a Newbie
May not be exactly what you're looking for, but try: http://www.webta.org/projects/apachetop/ -Victor On 5/5/06, Stuart, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all; I new to the administration of an Apache web server and am looking for a way to see how many clients are connected to the web server. We're running Apache 2.0.46 on Red Hat AS 4. Netstat gives me connection info, but shows multiple connections for the clients. How can I report how many clients are connected to the web server at a given time? Ed **Please apply a generous amount of all the usual disclaimers here.** - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.victortrac.com
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Session Count Question From a Newbie
Stuart, Ed wrote: Hello all; I new to the administration of an Apache web server and am looking for a way to see how many clients are connected to the web server. We're running Apache 2.0.46 on Red Hat AS 4. Netstat gives me connection info, but shows multiple connections for the clients. How can I report how many clients are connected to the web server at a given time? Ed Just a quick sanity check: You do understand that there is a big difference between a session (referenced in your subject) and a connection (referenced in your message body)? And you do understand that a connection lasts only for a single request/response, i.e. less than a second? An active user is constantly making new connections (for each request). A session, by definition, lasts over a series of requests/responses. But it is not part of the HTTP protocol and so must be managed (and counted) programatically via PHP, perl, autc. Moreover, there isn't an exact way to tell when a session has ended. They are usually programmed to time out after a certain number of minutes of inactivity. Websites that report the number of users currently online probably cheat a bit by counting either the sessions or distinct IP connections made over the last five or ten minutes. --J - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess and WAP 1.1
Thanks for testing it for me. Thanks. Testing from the command line works perfectly: the URL above produces a 302 redirect to http://www.stoddardsoftware.com:8080/mobilemovies/m/nate which returns the WML file. So no probs with the apache config. Testing with an online WAP browser (http://www.wapsilon.com/) works perfectly - the WML file is displayed and is functional. Testing with my Nokia 6230 works perfectly - the WML file is displayed and is functional. That's good. If you could also go here: http://www.go2mm.net/test with your Nokia. It'll just pull the HTTP request information from your phone. It's the same information I posted previously about the phones that failed. The response is text/plain and some phones won't display that, but if you don't get a 404 error, it'll still have stored the HTTP data. So I would conclude that there is nothing wrong with the setup at your end. I think you need to look at the setup at the phone's service provider. To recap how WAP works, the phone makes a proprietary (eg, GPRS) connection to a WAP server located in the phone company's premises, and submits the URL. It is the WAP server that makes the HTTP request to your server. It's not really the phone that receives the redirect, it's the WAP server - if it is unable to resolve the redirected hostname or (more likely) if it cannot issue a request to port 8080 (maybe a FW rule), then the request will fail. I can go directly to the redirect URL (the :8080 one) without issue. I only get the failure when I go to the first URL which is then redirected to the :8080 URL. Do the phone's you've tested with all have the same service provider? Can you find and try a different phone? The phones that I tried are different types and different providers. I have a Siemens phone from ATT Wireless (now Cingular). The Motorla phone was from Verizon. Who is your service provider? Thanks for the help, -Nate - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Re: ASP on Apache
If you truly need asp then run it on a wintel box. If you are using Linux you can run something like VMware and setup a virtual server or something. From: a nn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 12:41 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Re: ASP on Apache Hi, Thank's everyone who answered me. I think that I willtry mod_adpdotnet. Is it easy to install mods?Do mod_adpdotnetsupport asp? All I need is to use session, connection, request and other simple objects. It is for a school project, so I cant use asp.NET. Thank you Artem Nehamkin Sascha Kersken wrote: Hi, You actually have to buy another piece of software to support ASP.NET under Linux with Apache. I don't remember the name of the software. That's mod_adpdotnet which you don't actually have to buy because it's free software under the terms of the Apache Software License. See http://httpd.apache.org/cli/ I think what Jonathan ment is that there is a commercial ASP for Apache product out there (chili or something). Quite dated. ASP is dead. Microsoft has declared ASP dead, which makes it rather silly to figure out how to use a dead Microsoft technology on a non-Microsoft solution. Bury it already and move on to ASP.NET which brings with it plenty of advantages. For Linux, one would need mod_mono for ASP.NET script. For Windows you are correct, Apache can use mod_aspdotnet, which is pending a release very shortly for Apache 2.0 + 2.2 (the current release and snapshot only run on Apache 2.0). --- a nn wrote: Hello How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all? Commercially, there's SUN ASP (formerly Chilisoft): http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=420a8e72 There's also mod_aspdotnet, and mod_mono, but they're both for asp.net I think. Joost --- There's also Apache::ASP which runs under mod_perl. It's not 100% compatible with real ASP, but should work for most applications... Issac Joost de Heer wrote: a nn wrote: Hello How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all? Commercially, there's SUN ASP (formerly Chilisoft): http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=420a8e72 There's also mod_aspdotnet, and mod_mono, but they're both for asp.net I think. Joost Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Re: ASP on Apache
If you feel up to it, you can also install mod_perl and use Apache::ASP http://www.apache-asp.org/index.html Thanx Aaron N Wagner Monitoring Systems and Network Tools CCO-Command Center Operations "SELECT * FROM life ORDER BY important_stuff ASC" From: a nn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 03:41To: users@httpd.apache.orgSubject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Re: ASP on Apache Hi, Thank's everyone who answered me. I think that I willtry mod_adpdotnet. Is it easy to install mods?Do mod_adpdotnetsupport asp? All I need is to use session, connection, request and other simple objects. It is for a school project, so I cant use asp.NET. Thank you Artem Nehamkin Sascha Kersken wrote: Hi, You actually have to buy another piece of software to support ASP.NET under Linux with Apache. I don't remember the name of the software. That's mod_adpdotnet which you don't actually have to buy because it's free software under the terms of the Apache Software License. See http://httpd.apache.org/cli/I think what Jonathan ment is that there is a commercial ASP for Apache productout there (chili or something). Quite dated.ASP is dead. Microsoft has declared ASP dead, which makes it rather silly tofigure out how to use a dead Microsoft technology on a non-Microsoft solution.Bury it already and move on to ASP.NET which brings with it plenty of advantages.For Linux, one would need mod_mono for ASP.NET script. For Windows you arecorrect, Apache can use mod_aspdotnet, which is pending a release very shortlyfor Apache 2.0 + 2.2 (the current release and snapshot only run on Apache 2.0).---a nn wrote: Hello How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all?Commercially, there's SUN ASP (formerly Chilisoft):http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=420a8e72There's also mod_aspdotnet, and mod_mono, but they're both for asp.net Ithink.Joost---There's also Apache::ASP which runs under mod_perl. It's not 100%compatible with "real" ASP, but should work for most applications...IssacJoost de Heer wrote: a nn wrote: Hello How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all? Commercially, there's SUN ASP (formerly Chilisoft): http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=420a8e72 There's also mod_aspdotnet, and mod_mono, but they're both for asp.net I think. Joost Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] LDAP on Apache 2 or PHP?
Hi, I would like to connect to active directory using ldap. I'm a bit confused about the configuration though. If I use an apache module will this allow you to connect to AD in all applications or do you have to set it up for PHP, ASP as well? So you'd have it configured in Apache for straight html websites and for those driven by PHP/ASP you'd have it configured there too? THanks. Lisa
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Re: ASP on Apache
I would concur but if this is for a class and if I was going to hand the code to an instructor I would want to make sure that it at least works on the instructors ASP platform. This solution isnt ASP but rather a similar platform for a scripting language. But then again, Im not taking the class. From: Wagner, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 9:17 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Re: ASP on Apache If you feel up to it, you can also install mod_perl and use Apache::ASP http://www.apache-asp.org/index.html Thanx Aaron N Wagner Monitoring Systems and Network Tools CCO-Command Center Operations SELECT * FROM life ORDER BY important_stuff ASC From: a nn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 03:41 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Re: ASP on Apache Hi, Thank's everyone who answered me. I think that I willtry mod_adpdotnet. Is it easy to install mods?Do mod_adpdotnetsupport asp? All I need is to use session, connection, request and other simple objects. It is for a school project, so I cant use asp.NET. Thank you Artem Nehamkin Sascha Kersken wrote: Hi, You actually have to buy another piece of software to support ASP.NET under Linux with Apache. I don't remember the name of the software. That's mod_adpdotnet which you don't actually have to buy because it's free software under the terms of the Apache Software License. See http://httpd.apache.org/cli/ I think what Jonathan ment is that there is a commercial ASP for Apache product out there (chili or something). Quite dated. ASP is dead. Microsoft has declared ASP dead, which makes it rather silly to figure out how to use a dead Microsoft technology on a non-Microsoft solution. Bury it already and move on to ASP.NET which brings with it plenty of advantages. For Linux, one would need mod_mono for ASP.NET script. For Windows you are correct, Apache can use mod_aspdotnet, which is pending a release very shortly for Apache 2.0 + 2.2 (the current release and snapshot only run on Apache 2.0). --- a nn wrote: Hello How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all? Commercially, there's SUN ASP (formerly Chilisoft): http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=420a8e72 There's also mod_aspdotnet, and mod_mono, but they're both for asp.net I think. Joost --- There's also Apache::ASP which runs under mod_perl. It's not 100% compatible with real ASP, but should work for most applications... Issac Joost de Heer wrote: a nn wrote: Hello How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all? Commercially, there's SUN ASP (formerly Chilisoft): http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=420a8e72 There's also mod_aspdotnet, and mod_mono, but they're both for asp.net I think. Joost Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] help interpreting error msg
Victor, Good question. The permissions *looked* OK. I went ahead and added Authenticated Users to the ACL, and I'm no longer seeing that error in the log. I'm not quite done, though. I can get to the home page if I listen on port 80 and http://, but not yet on port 443 and https://. --Doc Robert G. (Doc) Savage, CISSP, RHCE, GCIA Senior Systems Analyst BAE Systems Information Technology USTranscom J6-PI (TFMS) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DSN: 779-3275 Fax: 576-4578 -Original Message- From: Victor Trac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 4:17 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] help interpreting error msg I've never tried using Apache on Windows, but it sounds like it may be a permissions error. Have you checked to see if the apache process has the proper permissions to read that file? -Victor smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
