Re: [us...@httpd] virtual hosts and rewrite rules
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 06:32 +, Melanie Pfefer wrote: > Hi > > I have an apache instance where I defined several rewrite rules and > ProxyPassReverse that redirects to other web applications. > > I added a virtual host in the conf file > > NameVirtualHost *:80 > > ServerAdmin y...@example.com > > DocumentRoot "/usr/local/apache2/htdocs" > > > RewriteEngine On > RewriteRule …. > > ProxyPass … > ProxyPassReverse… > > > …. > > > Now with this new virtual host, the rewrite rules are not working and I get > broken links. I had to comment all the VirtualHost settings. > I thought that the rewrite rules will still work on the default virtual host > but apparently no. > What is missing if I want the rewrite rules to affect the default virtual > host? > > thanks > > If you have vhosts, then the default vhost is not what is specified outside of the vhost tags, it is the first defined vhost in your conf file. This means that any vhost level directives (like RewriteRules, ProxyPass, Location blocks etc) must be defined inside a vhost container to be relevant. Yours aren't, which is why they are ignored. Cheers Tom - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Httpd on Ubuntu 9.04
Hi: I don't want to hijack this thread, but since the question has been answered, I have a related one...WHY does the Debian distro 'relocate' things such as apache? Since I've been getting into the guts of Debian and Ubuntu over the last 2-3 years, I am finding a lot of 'non standard' things that drive me nuts when trying to solve a problem. I consider myself a fairly knowledgable Unix user/developer (at least, back in the bad old days) and some of the changes I've seen in the Debian/Ubuntu distros make me scratch my head and say Why? For example, their use of bin, and sbin, and root being acquired by 'sudo'.. Just curious... On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Res wrote: > On Thu, 21 May 2009, Frank Gingras wrote: > >> The debian maintainers though it would be suitable to rename it to apache2 >> / apache2ctl. >> >> See: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DistrosDefaultLayout > > I often wonder who is worse, Micro$oft or Debian, both want everything > "their" way. > > My solution for the OP is apt-get remove apache2 (http2 or whatever they > call it these days) and get the source (it will be a lot more current then > ubuntu/debians version as well and wont be hacked or butchered) so will be > cleaner and bug free'r. > > If you still have issues you'll far likely get better support here useing it > since few people here would know what butchering Debian have done. > > > -- > Res > > -Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > > - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Httpd on Ubuntu 9.04
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:39 AM, John Hudak wrote: > Forexample, their use of bin, and sbin, and root being acquired by > 'sudo'.. > Just curious... Aren't those all pretty conventional? -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Httpd on Ubuntu 9.04
I've seen apps installed in sbin, and /home/username when from my perspective, they should have been in bin. While I haven't used a lot of different distros (slackware, RH (prior to their business model change), and commercial Unix distros by att, sun, dec, HP), I've never run into 'sudo'...I can understand the security argument for this, but don't necessarily agree with the approach. Anyway. its more of a 'Why do they do this' as a general question as opposed to a specific configuration. Guess I should take this question to the Debian forum On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:39 AM, John Hudak wrote: >> Forexample, their use of bin, and sbin, and root being acquired by >> 'sudo'.. >> Just curious... > > Aren't those all pretty conventional? > > -- > Eric Covener > cove...@gmail.com > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > > - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Httpd on Ubuntu 9.04
John Hudak wrote: I've seen apps installed in sbin, and /home/username when from my perspective, they should have been in bin. While I haven't used a lot of different distros (slackware, RH (prior to their business model change), and commercial Unix distros by att, sun, dec, HP), I've never run into 'sudo'...I can understand the security argument for this, but don't necessarily agree with the approach. Anyway. its more of a 'Why do they do this' as a general question as opposed to a specific configuration. Guess I should take this question to the Debian forum I believe the argument for using sudo is that it becomes possible to run a system without a root account. This is the default for an Ubuntu install. No risk of a user running as root. Prompting the user for his password when he is doing "root things" makes it very clear that he is doing root things. Windows has adopted this idea. Ubuntu has a goal of being usable by less sophisticated users. Deviations from "Unix standards" (whichever one you prefer) should be evaluated against this goal. It seems reasonable to me to call the apache binary, "apache". But there is always pain in getting from here to there when computer standards are being changed. Stephen - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Httpd on Ubuntu 9.04
There is not httpd on Debian/Ubuntu. It's called apache2 and /etc/apache2 is the config folder. To check if apache is installed and where you run the dpkg command, something like this: # sudo dpkg -s apache2 and # sudo dpkg -S apache2 Igor On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Stephen wrote: > John Hudak wrote: > >> I've seen apps installed in sbin, and /home/username when from my >> perspective, they should have been in bin. While I haven't used a lot >> of different distros (slackware, RH (prior to their business model >> change), and commercial Unix distros by att, sun, dec, HP), I've never >> run into 'sudo'...I can understand the security argument for this, but >> don't necessarily agree with the approach. Anyway. its more of a 'Why >> do they do this' as a general question as opposed to a specific >> configuration. >> Guess I should take this question to the Debian forum >> >> > I believe the argument for using sudo is that it becomes possible to run a > system without a root account. > This is the default for an Ubuntu install. No risk of a user running as > root. > > Prompting the user for his password when he is doing "root things" makes it > very clear that he is doing root > things. Windows has adopted this idea. > > Ubuntu has a goal of being usable by less sophisticated users. Deviations > from "Unix standards" (whichever > one you prefer) should be evaluated against this goal. > > It seems reasonable to me to call the apache binary, "apache". But there is > always pain in getting from here to > there when computer standards are being changed. > > Stephen > > > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > >
RE: [us...@httpd] logging URLs
You mean beyond RewriteLog? -Tony --- Manager, IT Operations Format Dynamics, Inc. 303-573-1800x27 abia...@formatdynamics.com http://www.formatdynamics.com > -Original Message- > From: Melanie Pfefer [mailto:melanie_pfe...@yahoo.co.uk] > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:34 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [us...@httpd] logging URLs > > > Hi > > Is it possible for apache to log the URL requested even if some web > applications are obtained via RewriteRule to another servlet or another > apache instance? > > Thank you > > > > > > > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server > Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[us...@httpd] Apache performance issue on AMD 6000+ cpu
Hi, I've searched the archives and the web in general but haven't found an answer. Problem: I recently started setting up a new machine for use as a standard LAMP server and as a box to investigate XEN virtualisation. When doing some crude performance tests using ab, I found that performance of the machine was not what I would have expected. We have a number of XEON based systems in a different hosting provider. My expectation was that the AMD 6000+ box would perform at least as well as the XEON boxes. Command: ab -k -c 100 -n 50,000 http://localhost/ index.html here was a static text file with either standard debian content or a "hello world" message so size of content is usually less than 20 bytes or so. AMD BOX: about 8,000 requests per second. XEON BOX: about 16,000 requests per second. XEON BOX: 2 gb ram 1 x xeon 3050 @ 2.13ghz (dual core) / is on a mirror of 2 seagate barracuda (it appears. write speed on this box is quite poor...) 32 bit debian etch apache 2.2.3 AMD BOX: 6gb ram 1 x amd x2 6000+ (dual core) / on a mirror of 2 samsung drives. Not sure which ones but bonnie tells me I/O perfomance is superior to XEON box. Various versions of debian were tried and various kernels but all gave similar results lenny 64 bit and 32 bit xen and non xen kernels xen guest os in 32 and 64 bit lenny and etch The hosting provider gives us a black box installation menu that didn't seem to be able to install etch so I can't quite compare apples to apples which is unfortunate. Apache configs. In order to try and level this unlevel playing field I tried a lot of different apache configs on the amd box including using exactly the same one as on herbgarden yet performance remained about the same. What I did notice was that according to vmstat 1, cpu idle count never dropped below 50% on the amd box indicating some issue with multithreading. My question is, should I expect the ab test above on the AMD box to be at least the same as on the XEON box rather than then current poor situation? Any pointers appreciated. John Extra info: AMD BOX: # cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 107 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ stepping: 2 cpu MHz : 3100.000 cache size : 512 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow pni cx16 lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy 3dnowprefetch bogomips: 6205.46 clflush size: 64 power management: ts fid vid ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps processor : 1 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 107 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ stepping: 2 cpu MHz : 3100.000 cache size : 512 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 1 cpu cores : 2 apicid : 1 initial apicid : 1 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow pni cx16 lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy 3dnowprefetch bogomips: 6205.46 clflush size: 64 power management: ts fid vid ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 6200668 5367805663888 0 24740 453800 -/+ buffers/cache: 582406142428 Swap: 4200888 04200888 hope:~# - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[us...@httpd] NT/AD authentication / IE / Windows XP
All of our developers are on Windows machines that run Apache 2 (though our production servers are all IIS) [since XP's IIS can't run multiple IIS web sites, our developers need to use Apache]. Some of the sites we developer require Acitve Directory authentication (internal administrative sites). For that, we use the mod_auth_sspi module, and it works fine in Firefox. However, we also need to test in Internet Explorer, and any time we log in on IE, we get the "Authorization Required" screen. Looking at the error log, the message seems to be "user unknown" or "bad password". I've tried searching many times for other people having this problem and haven't been successful. So, it may be something in our configuration. Here's a sample from my vhosts file (with identifiable info redacted): AuthName "Enter your Redacted login" AuthType SSPI SSPIAuth On SSPIAuthoritative Off SSPIDomain redacted.lan SSPIOfferBasic Off Require valid-user Has anyone seen this before? I'd appreciate any help. --- Scott Brady Lead Application Developer Memolink, Inc.
[us...@httpd] How I configure Reverse Proxy using ??
Hi, I configured reverse proxy using directives ProxyPass, ProxyPassReverse, etc... For example in httpd.conf ProxyPass /new1 http://192.168.1.2 ProxyPassReverse /new1 http://192.168.1.2 ProxyPass /new2 http://192.168.1.3 ProxyPassReverse /new2 http://192.168.1.3 Now, I would like to configure Reverse Proxy using How I do it ?? Thank You Ricardo -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-I-configure-Reverse-Proxy-using-%3CLocation%3Etp23675403p23675403.html Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[us...@httpd] Are apache caching modules redudant of memcached?
In an attempt to address the lsof problem we flagged in this thread -- http://is.gd/CqD0 -- I've been rifling through my httpd.conf looking for unnecessary modules I can trim out of my httpd processes. So far this has basically amounted to me eliminating things like mod_cgi, mod_vhost_alias, mod_speling and other Modules provided by my host by default, but which don't seem necessary to my Django application site. As I review the modules, I see a series of modules relating to caching. They are: LoadModule cache_module modules/mod_cache.so LoadModule disk_cache_module modules/mod_disk_cache.so LoadModule file_cache_module modules/mod_file_cache.so LoadModule mem_cache_module modules/mod_mem_cache.so The site I am operating is using a memory caching system provided by the memcached application. I'm curious whether memcached is redudant to these Apache processes, or dependent on them. In other words, is it safe for me to comment them out? Thanks in advance. I really appreciate the kind expertise available here in the listserv. Ben. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Are-apache-caching-modules-redudant-of-memcached--tp23676109p23676109.html Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
[us...@httpd] Apache with MPM Worker and PHP-5.2.9
Hello, i have a Web Server with the follow configuration: 4 Generic \ 512 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM 4 Generic \ 1024 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM 2 Maxtor \ 146GB:SAS:10K RPM \ Atlas 10K - SAS 2 Intel \ 2.0 GHz 1333FSB - Woodcrest \ Xeon 5130 (Dual Core) 1 Dell \ 9G Drive Controller - SAS/SATA RAID \ PERC 5/i 1 Dell \ 1066/1333FSB Dual Xeon \ PowerEdge 1950/2950 Redhat Enterprise Linux - x86_64 - OS ES 5.0 I need to know if advisable or possible to use Apache with MPM Worker and PHP-5.2.9 . Has anyone already tested/used this? Any aditional information is welcome. Thanks. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Apache with MPM Worker and PHP-5.2.9
Darvin, Some of the php extensions are not thread-safe, so running in this configuration might leads to segfaults. In short, no, don't do it. Frank Darvin Denmian wrote: Hello, i have a Web Server with the follow configuration: 4 Generic \ 512 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM 4 Generic \ 1024 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM 2 Maxtor \ 146GB:SAS:10K RPM \ Atlas 10K - SAS 2 Intel \ 2.0 GHz 1333FSB - Woodcrest \ Xeon 5130 (Dual Core) 1 Dell \ 9G Drive Controller - SAS/SATA RAID \ PERC 5/i 1 Dell \ 1066/1333FSB Dual Xeon \ PowerEdge 1950/2950 Redhat Enterprise Linux - x86_64 - OS ES 5.0 I need to know if advisable or possible to use Apache with MPM Worker and PHP-5.2.9 . Has anyone already tested/used this? Any aditional information is welcome. Thanks. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Apache with MPM Worker and PHP-5.2.9
Is possible to use apache with mpm worker + fastcgi + php5-cgi ? Thanks. On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Frank Gingras wrote: > Darvin, > > Some of the php extensions are not thread-safe, so running in this > configuration might leads to segfaults. > > In short, no, don't do it. > > Frank > > Darvin Denmian wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> i have a Web Server with the follow configuration: >> >> 4 Generic \ 512 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM >> 4 Generic \ 1024 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM >> 2 Maxtor \ 146GB:SAS:10K RPM \ Atlas 10K - SAS >> 2 Intel \ 2.0 GHz 1333FSB - Woodcrest \ Xeon 5130 (Dual Core) >> 1 Dell \ 9G Drive Controller - SAS/SATA RAID \ PERC 5/i >> 1 Dell \ 1066/1333FSB Dual Xeon \ PowerEdge 1950/2950 >> >> Redhat Enterprise Linux - x86_64 - OS ES 5.0 >> >> I need to know if advisable or possible to use Apache with MPM Worker >> and PHP-5.2.9 . >> >> Has anyone already tested/used this? >> >> Any aditional information is welcome. >> >> Thanks. >> >> - >> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. >> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org >> >> > > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > > - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Apache with MPM Worker and PHP-5.2.9
Yes, that is a common configuration. But not mod_php. Frank Darvin Denmian wrote: Is possible to use apache with mpm worker + fastcgi + php5-cgi ? Thanks. On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Frank Gingras wrote: Darvin, Some of the php extensions are not thread-safe, so running in this configuration might leads to segfaults. In short, no, don't do it. Frank Darvin Denmian wrote: Hello, i have a Web Server with the follow configuration: 4 Generic \ 512 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM 4 Generic \ 1024 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM 2 Maxtor \ 146GB:SAS:10K RPM \ Atlas 10K - SAS 2 Intel \ 2.0 GHz 1333FSB - Woodcrest \ Xeon 5130 (Dual Core) 1 Dell \ 9G Drive Controller - SAS/SATA RAID \ PERC 5/i 1 Dell \ 1066/1333FSB Dual Xeon \ PowerEdge 1950/2950 Redhat Enterprise Linux - x86_64 - OS ES 5.0 I need to know if advisable or possible to use Apache with MPM Worker and PHP-5.2.9 . Has anyone already tested/used this? Any aditional information is welcome. Thanks. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Apache with MPM Worker and PHP-5.2.9
will i have any improvement of my performance using : mpm worker + fastcgi + php5-cgi ? and how do I know if an extension is thread-safe? Thanks. On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Frank Gingras wrote: > Yes, that is a common configuration. But not mod_php. > > Frank > > Darvin Denmian wrote: >> >> Is possible to use apache with mpm worker + fastcgi + php5-cgi ? >> >> Thanks. >> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Frank Gingras >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Darvin, >>> >>> Some of the php extensions are not thread-safe, so running in this >>> configuration might leads to segfaults. >>> >>> In short, no, don't do it. >>> >>> Frank >>> >>> Darvin Denmian wrote: >>> Hello, i have a Web Server with the follow configuration: 4 Generic \ 512 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM 4 Generic \ 1024 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM 2 Maxtor \ 146GB:SAS:10K RPM \ Atlas 10K - SAS 2 Intel \ 2.0 GHz 1333FSB - Woodcrest \ Xeon 5130 (Dual Core) 1 Dell \ 9G Drive Controller - SAS/SATA RAID \ PERC 5/i 1 Dell \ 1066/1333FSB Dual Xeon \ PowerEdge 1950/2950 Redhat Enterprise Linux - x86_64 - OS ES 5.0 I need to know if advisable or possible to use Apache with MPM Worker and PHP-5.2.9 . Has anyone already tested/used this? Any aditional information is welcome. Thanks. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org >>> >>> - >>> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server >>> Project. >>> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >>> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >> >> - >> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. >> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org >> >> > > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > > - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Apache with MPM Worker and PHP-5.2.9
Darvin, Using worker over prefork will allow you to serve more clients, for one. The immediate gain will be a lesser memory footprint. Performance gains or losses will largely depends on the scripts you run on your server. As for the second question, that's more of a question for the php mailing lists. Frank Darvin Denmian wrote: will i have any improvement of my performance using : mpm worker + fastcgi + php5-cgi ? and how do I know if an extension is thread-safe? Thanks. On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Frank Gingras wrote: Yes, that is a common configuration. But not mod_php. Frank Darvin Denmian wrote: Is possible to use apache with mpm worker + fastcgi + php5-cgi ? Thanks. On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Frank Gingras wrote: Darvin, Some of the php extensions are not thread-safe, so running in this configuration might leads to segfaults. In short, no, don't do it. Frank Darvin Denmian wrote: Hello, i have a Web Server with the follow configuration: 4 Generic \ 512 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM 4 Generic \ 1024 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM 2 Maxtor \ 146GB:SAS:10K RPM \ Atlas 10K - SAS 2 Intel \ 2.0 GHz 1333FSB - Woodcrest \ Xeon 5130 (Dual Core) 1 Dell \ 9G Drive Controller - SAS/SATA RAID \ PERC 5/i 1 Dell \ 1066/1333FSB Dual Xeon \ PowerEdge 1950/2950 Redhat Enterprise Linux - x86_64 - OS ES 5.0 I need to know if advisable or possible to use Apache with MPM Worker and PHP-5.2.9 . Has anyone already tested/used this? Any aditional information is welcome. Thanks. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Apache with MPM Worker and PHP-5.2.9
Thanks for all replies. i will try apache mpm worker + fastcgi + php-cgi . On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Frank Gingras wrote: > Darvin, > > Using worker over prefork will allow you to serve more clients, for one. The > immediate gain will be a lesser memory footprint. Performance gains or > losses will largely depends on the scripts you run on your server. > > As for the second question, that's more of a question for the php mailing > lists. > > Frank > > Darvin Denmian wrote: >> >> will i have any improvement of my performance using : mpm worker + >> fastcgi + php5-cgi ? >> and >> how do I know if an extension is thread-safe? >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Frank Gingras >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Yes, that is a common configuration. But not mod_php. >>> >>> Frank >>> >>> Darvin Denmian wrote: >>> Is possible to use apache with mpm worker + fastcgi + php5-cgi ? Thanks. On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Frank Gingras wrote: > > Darvin, > > Some of the php extensions are not thread-safe, so running in this > configuration might leads to segfaults. > > In short, no, don't do it. > > Frank > > Darvin Denmian wrote: > > >> >> Hello, >> >> i have a Web Server with the follow configuration: >> >> 4 Generic \ 512 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM >> 4 Generic \ 1024 MB \ DDR2 667 FB DIMM >> 2 Maxtor \ 146GB:SAS:10K RPM \ Atlas 10K - SAS >> 2 Intel \ 2.0 GHz 1333FSB - Woodcrest \ Xeon 5130 (Dual Core) >> 1 Dell \ 9G Drive Controller - SAS/SATA RAID \ PERC 5/i >> 1 Dell \ 1066/1333FSB Dual Xeon \ PowerEdge 1950/2950 >> >> Redhat Enterprise Linux - x86_64 - OS ES 5.0 >> >> I need to know if advisable or possible to use Apache with MPM Worker >> and PHP-5.2.9 . >> >> Has anyone already tested/used this? >> >> Any aditional information is welcome. >> >> Thanks. >> >> - >> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server >> Project. >> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org >> >> >> >> > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server > Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > > > > - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org >>> >>> - >>> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server >>> Project. >>> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >>> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >> >> - >> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. >> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org >> >> > > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > > - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands
RE: [us...@httpd] Are apache caching modules redudant of memcached?
You can comment them out -Tony --- Manager, IT Operations Format Dynamics, Inc. 303-573-1800x27 abia...@formatdynamics.com http://www.formatdynamics.com > -Original Message- > From: palewire [mailto:ben.we...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:52 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [us...@httpd] Are apache caching modules redudant of > memcached? > > > In an attempt to address the lsof problem we flagged in this thread -- > http://is.gd/CqD0 -- I've been rifling through my httpd.conf looking > for > unnecessary modules I can trim out of my httpd processes. > > So far this has basically amounted to me eliminating things like > mod_cgi, > mod_vhost_alias, mod_speling and other Modules provided by my host by > default, but which don't seem necessary to my Django application site. > > As I review the modules, I see a series of modules relating to caching. > They > are: > > LoadModule cache_module modules/mod_cache.so > LoadModule disk_cache_module modules/mod_disk_cache.so > LoadModule file_cache_module modules/mod_file_cache.so > LoadModule mem_cache_module modules/mod_mem_cache.so > > The site I am operating is using a memory caching system provided by > the > memcached application. I'm curious whether memcached is redudant to > these > Apache processes, or dependent on them. > > In other words, is it safe for me to comment them out? > > Thanks in advance. I really appreciate the kind expertise available > here in > the listserv. > > Ben. > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Are-apache-caching- > modules-redudant-of-memcached--tp23676109p23676109.html > Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server > Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] Are apache caching modules redudant of memcached?
Tony -- Thank you for your time and advice. I've gone ahead and commented out the modules, and haven't encountered any problems so far. I'm also wondering how many of the authorization modules are necessary -- considering I have Django doing a lot of that through the DB. But that might be another thread ... =) Ben. On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Anthony J. Biacco < abia...@formatdynamics.com> wrote: > You can comment them out > > -Tony > --- > Manager, IT Operations > Format Dynamics, Inc. > 303-573-1800x27 > abia...@formatdynamics.com > http://www.formatdynamics.com > > > > -Original Message- > > From: palewire [mailto:ben.we...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:52 PM > > To: users@httpd.apache.org > > Subject: [us...@httpd] Are apache caching modules redudant of > > memcached? > > > > > > In an attempt to address the lsof problem we flagged in this thread -- > > http://is.gd/CqD0 -- I've been rifling through my httpd.conf looking > > for > > unnecessary modules I can trim out of my httpd processes. > > > > So far this has basically amounted to me eliminating things like > > mod_cgi, > > mod_vhost_alias, mod_speling and other Modules provided by my host by > > default, but which don't seem necessary to my Django application site. > > > > As I review the modules, I see a series of modules relating to > caching. > > They > > are: > > > > LoadModule cache_module modules/mod_cache.so > > LoadModule disk_cache_module modules/mod_disk_cache.so > > LoadModule file_cache_module modules/mod_file_cache.so > > LoadModule mem_cache_module modules/mod_mem_cache.so > > > > The site I am operating is using a memory caching system provided by > > the > > memcached application. I'm curious whether memcached is redudant to > > these > > Apache processes, or dependent on them. > > > > In other words, is it safe for me to comment them out? > > > > Thanks in advance. I really appreciate the kind expertise available > > here in > > the listserv. > > > > Ben. > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Are-apache-caching- > > modules-redudant-of-memcached--tp23676109p23676109.html > > Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive at > > Nabble.com. > > > > > > - > > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server > > Project. > > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > >" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > >
Re: [us...@httpd] How I configure Reverse Proxy using ??
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:02 PM, ricardo13 wrote: > > Hi, > > I configured reverse proxy using directives ProxyPass, ProxyPassReverse, > Now, I would like to configure Reverse Proxy using > How I do it ?? http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypass | When used inside a section, the first argument is omitted and the local directory is obtained from the . There's nothing more elaborate than that. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Re: [us...@httpd] What is the best way to handle "too many open files" errors?
I just had something of a "slap your forehead" moment on this one. It had be eating me about where all those extra lsof processes came from. And then it hit me. It's the "developer tools" kit from CentOS. Duh. http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/centos_linux_guides/centos_linux_developer_tools_guide/ Any tips for the smartest way to pull it apart after the fact? On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Sean Conner wrote: > It was thus said that the Great Mick Sheppard once stated: > > Hi, > > > > Just to throw a slight spanner in the works here. My understanding of > > 'open files' is open file descriptors. As far as a file descriptor is > > concerned there is no real difference between a physical file on disk > > and a socket (network connection). So eliminating physical files, whilst > > it might get you a little more headroom, is unlikely to solve the > > problem. > > Yes and no. Yes, sockets are considered "opened files" and do count > against the open file limit, that limit is *per process*, not *system > wide*. > I just checked one of our main web servers (serving up a few hundred sites) > and found only three active sockets per process: > >1. the listening socket on port 80, waiting for a connection >2. the listening socket on port 443, waiting for a connection >3. an actual connection to a client > > The main root process only has the first two sockets open. If you have > Apache configured to have at a minimum 30 spare servers, no one Apache > process will have 30 sockets open---sockets just don't work that way. What > it does mean is you have at least 31 apache processes running, one as root > (to bind to the proper ports [1]) and 30 ready to service a request, so at > most, any Apache process will have one socket per Listen statement, and one > socket only when actually processing a request. > > So, for example, let's say you have the following Apache configuration: > > Listen *:80 > StartServers 100 > MinSpareServers 100 > MaxSpareServers 900 > ServerLimit 1000 > MaxClients 1000 > MaxRequestsPerChild 4000 > CustomLog access_log > ErrorLogerror_log > > All your apache processes would have only seven files open (eight if > serving > a request), and they would look something like: > >0 -> /dev/null(STDIN) >1 -> /dev/null(STDOUT) >2 -> error_log(STDERR) >3 -> listening socket >4 -> pipe (for CGI communications) >5 -> pipe (for CGI communications) >6 -> error_log >7 -> access_log > > The real concern are log files, not the number of connections in the > Apache configuration. The only way the number of connections might be a > consideration is if you are using the threading MPM, where each thread (in > a > single process) gets a connection. > > > Remember that as you add connectivity to databases that this will > > increase the number of sockets, and therefore open files, used for each > > page served. > > True, but you really need to look at this at the process level. > > -spc > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > >
