Re: Memory leakage in kannel
Hi, Manish Khare wrote: I do not think that is the reason as I have tested it with 1 message/second. I am using fakesmsc(Not of kannel). Even at 1 msg/sec it is givving same error. Can you please tell me which is the optimal rate of sending message to Kannel ? It is certainly higher than 1 msg/s ! Should I use kannel's fakesmsc ? Fakesmsc is just a testing tool. It is possible that it is leaking memory. Does debug trace after ^C report allocated areas ? Has any one tested the optimal performance of Kannel ? Usually the bottleneck is smsc, not Kannel. On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 pravesh khokhar wrote : The reason could be that the rate with which you are pumping messages to kannel is much greater than the rate at which responses are coming from the SMSC and so as per implementation of kannel kannel keeps on allocating memory for the messages u pump into and deaalocates only when an response comes from smsc. So over a period of load pumping u might get ur all memory allocated and so this error. Regards, Pravesh - Original Message - From: Manish Khare [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Aarno Syvänen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:42 PM Subject: Re: Re: Memory leakage in kannel Hello, I am using SMS service. I have deleted all the WAP files. I am using only SMPP part of it. I have configured it with --alloc=native as it was not working for more then 2-3 hours in another configuration and comming out by giving error. Now it works with 1 msg/sec or 10 msg/sec (any no of messages between this range) and gives error (can not allocate memmory any number System error 11 : resource temporary unavailable); I am using kannel 1.2 version. Can you or any one tell me what could be the reason ? Thanks From Manish Khare On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 Aarno Syvänen wrote : Hi, Manish Khare wrote: Can anyone tell why my kannel gateway works for some time and after some time it crashes by giving error Resource temporaryly unavailable. I am having 248 MB RAM and 1 gb of swap space and running it on Solaris 8 Intel system. Any help please ? From Manish Khare Are you using WAP or SMS services ? Aarno
Re: Memory leakage in kannel
Hi, Manish Khare wrote: Can anyone tell why my kannel gateway works for some time and after some time it crashes by giving error Resource temporaryly unavailable. I am having 248 MB RAM and 1 gb of swap space and running it on Solaris 8 Intel system. Any help please ? From Manish Khare Are you using WAP or SMS services ? Aarno
Re: Re: Re: Memory leakage in kannel
Sir, I do not think that is the reason as I have tested it with 1 message/second. I am using fakesmsc(Not of kannel). Even at 1 msg/sec it is givving same error. Can you please tell me which is the optimal rate of sending message to Kannel ? Should I use kannel's fakesmsc ? Has any one tested the optimal performance of Kannel ? Please reply soon. Thanks From Manish Khare On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 pravesh khokhar wrote : The reason could be that the rate with which you are pumping messages to kannel is much greater than the rate at which responses are coming from the SMSC and so as per implementation of kannel kannel keeps on allocating memory for the messages u pump into and deaalocates only when an response comes from smsc. So over a period of load pumping u might get ur all memory allocated and so this error. Regards, Pravesh - Original Message - From: Manish Khare [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Aarno Syvänen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:42 PM Subject: Re: Re: Memory leakage in kannel Hello, I am using SMS service. I have deleted all the WAP files. I am using only SMPP part of it. I have configured it with --alloc=native as it was not working for more then 2-3 hours in another configuration and comming out by giving error. Now it works with 1 msg/sec or 10 msg/sec (any no of messages between this range) and gives error (can not allocate memmory any number System error 11 : resource temporary unavailable); I am using kannel 1.2 version. Can you or any one tell me what could be the reason ? Thanks From Manish Khare On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 Aarno Syvänen wrote : Hi, Manish Khare wrote: Can anyone tell why my kannel gateway works for some time and after some time it crashes by giving error Resource temporaryly unavailable. I am having 248 MB RAM and 1 gb of swap space and running it on Solaris 8 Intel system. Any help please ? From Manish Khare Are you using WAP or SMS services ? Aarno
Memory leakage in kannel
Hi, Can anyone tell why my kannel gateway works for some time and after some time it crashes by giving error Resource temporaryly unavailable. I am having 248 MB RAM and 1 gb of swap space and running it on Solaris 8 Intel system. Any help please ? From Manish Khare On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Send users mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://kannel.3glab.org/mailman/listinfo/users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of users digest... Today's Topics: 1. RE: Libxml2-2.5 (Solomon Odeny) 2. Multiple Kannel BB for HA (Philippe Girolami (ESF) ) 3. Re: Multiple Kannel BB for HA (Carwyn T. Edwards) 4. RE: Multiple Kannel BB for HA (Paul Keogh) 5. RE: Multiple Kannel BB for HA (Philippe Girolami (ESF)) --__--__-- Message: 1 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Solomon Odeny [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Libxml2-2.5 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:42:21 +0300 Thanks, I have installed the latest libxml2 but still get the following error configure: error: Libxml is too old. You need at least 2.2.5 Any idea what the problem could be? Solomon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aarno Syv=E4nen Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 1:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Libxml2-2.5 Hi, Solomon Odeny wrote: Hello, Anyone knows where I can get the latest version of Libxml. I need at le= ast version 2.2.5 to install the latest kannel. See http://www.xmlsoft.org/downloads.html Aarno --__--__-- Message: 2 From: Philippe Girolami (ESF) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Multiple Kannel BB for HA Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:16:18 +0100 Hello, Has anyone ever deployed multiple BearerBoxes for High-availability purposes ? Do SMS-C usually allow two receivers to bind on the same address range ? How do they handle it usually : distribute load evenly (I'm probably dreaming here). Has anyone figured out a good way of doing this ? Maybe with load balancers ? Regards, Philippe Girolami Software Engineer I-Lab, Ericsson France --__--__-- Message: 3 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 10:39:58 + From: Carwyn T. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Philippe Girolami (ESF) [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Multiple Kannel BB for HA Philippe Girolami (ESF) wrote: Hello, Has anyone ever deployed multiple BearerBoxes for High-availability purposes ? Do SMS-C usually allow two receivers to bind on the same address range ? How do they handle it usually : distribute load evenly (I'm probably dreaming here). Has anyone figured out a good way of doing this ? Maybe with load balancers ? Some operators will let you bind in with multiple RX channels others will not. If they do, the most common policy on the SMSC is to round robin over all the RX channels for a given address range. Other SMSCs/gateways will just use the last RX that connected for that range. Carwyn -- Carwyn Edwards Software Engineer Hay Systems Ltd - http://www.haysystems.com/ International GSM SMS Connectivity Providers (Now with high throughput two way international messaging) --__--__-- Message: 4 From: Paul Keogh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Multiple Kannel BB for HA Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:34:52 - Has anyone ever deployed multiple BearerBoxes for High-availability purposes ? Do SMS-C usually allow two receivers to bind on the same address range ? How do they handle it usually : distribute load evenly (I'm probably dreaming here). Has anyone figured out a good way of doing this ? Maybe with load balancers ? Yes, we've looked at some architectures for this. As pointed out, it depends on the SMSC provider and on your position; if you're just another ESME gateway supplier then you're usually subject to a retail type of policy, if you're supplying core network technology in terms of proxy solutions etc., then they're much more flexible. The SMSC routing algorithm in the BB does have an element of load sharing but as BBs don't know about each other, you need to get down to the IP level to share between BBs. A more visionary approach would be to replace the internal Box comms. with a message queue,
