Re: Message rejected by bearerbox, no router!
Hello! It seems that Kannel cannot open any ports for listening. Check what is listening on ports 13000 and 13001. Cheers, Dejan - Original Message - From: "Allan hank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:37 AM Subject: Message rejected by bearerbox, no router! Hello Kannel Users, My Kannel has developed a problem! I had removed the Nokia premicell from my FreeBSD 4.9 running kannel 1.2.1 but when i put it back and rebooting, i can no longer send smses. Below is what i see in kannel.org I'll be grateful for all the help provided. Wilson - 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] INFO: Added logfile `/var/log/kannel/kannel.log' with level `0'. 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] INFO: Started access logfile `/var/log/kannel/access.log'. 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] INFO: SSL not supported, no SSL initialization done. 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] DEBUG: HTTP: Opening server at port 13000. 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] ERROR: bind failed 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] ERROR: System error 48: Address already in use 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 1 (gw/bb_http.c:httpadmin_run) 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] DEBUG: starting smsbox connection module 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 2 (gw/bb_boxc.c:smsboxc_run) 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] INFO: AT2[/dev/cuaa1]: configuration shows modemtype 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/cuaa1]: Reading modem definitions from 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/cuaa1]: Found <1> modems in config 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] INFO: AT2[/dev/cuaa1]: read modem definition for 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 3 (gw/smsc/smsc_at2.c:at2_device_thread) 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 4 (gw/bb_smscconn.c:sms_router) 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] INFO: 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [0] INFO: Kannel bearerbox II version 1.2.1 starting 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [1] DEBUG: HTTP: No clients with requests, quitting. 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [1] DEBUG: Thread 1 (gw/bb_http.c:httpadmin_run) terminates. 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [2] ERROR: bind failed 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [2] ERROR: System error 48: Address already in use 2005-03-31 10:02:53 [2] PANIC: Could not open smsbox port 13001 2005-03-31 10:15:36 [7] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms received 2005-03-31 10:15:36 [7] WARNING: Cannot find SMSCConn for message to <+25671888991>, rejected. 2005-03-31 10:15:36 [7] WARNING: Message rejected by bearerbox, no router! -
Re: sendsms script problems
What are your allowed smsc and forced sms parameters. Error means that bearerbox cannot find a smsc to send the message. Aarno On 31.3.2005, at 09:54, Dejan Markic wrote: Hey! Nobody knows anything about this, or am I missing something here? Kind regards, Dejan - Original Message - From: "Dejan Markic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:24 AM Subject: sendsms script problems Hello! I'm now using Kannel (1.4.0) for quite some time, still in testing though, as the SMS gateway and I have stumbled upon a problem. When I disable the SMSC Connection the smssend script still returns HTTP status 202 altough I see in the bearerbox log file that the message was rejected because there is no 'router'. Actual message from log file: 2005-03-29 10:13:23 [17243] [13] WARNING: Cannot find SMSCConn for message to , rejected. 2005-03-29 10:13:23 [17243] [13] WARNING: Message rejected by bearerbox, no router! I was trying to implement somekind of failover, if kannel would report it cannot send the message, I would send it through other methods, but I receive OK status altough kannel will not send it. Can I do something about this?! Thanks for your input! Kind regards, Dejan
Re: sendsms script problems
Hello! Well yes, that I know, I intentionaly disconnected it. The real problem is that the sendsms script still produces HTTP Status 202, which means that the message was sent, but it is not - and it is also not after I connect the SMSC back. Thanks for your input! Kind regards, Dejan - Original Message - From: "Aarno Syvänen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dejan Markic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 10:07 AM Subject: Re: sendsms script problems What are your allowed smsc and forced sms parameters. Error means that bearerbox cannot find a smsc to send the message. Aarno On 31.3.2005, at 09:54, Dejan Markic wrote: Hey! Nobody knows anything about this, or am I missing something here? Kind regards, Dejan - Original Message - From: "Dejan Markic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:24 AM Subject: sendsms script problems Hello! I'm now using Kannel (1.4.0) for quite some time, still in testing though, as the SMS gateway and I have stumbled upon a problem. When I disable the SMSC Connection the smssend script still returns HTTP status 202 altough I see in the bearerbox log file that the message was rejected because there is no 'router'. Actual message from log file: 2005-03-29 10:13:23 [17243] [13] WARNING: Cannot find SMSCConn for message to , rejected. 2005-03-29 10:13:23 [17243] [13] WARNING: Message rejected by bearerbox, no router! I was trying to implement somekind of failover, if kannel would report it cannot send the message, I would send it through other methods, but I receive OK status altough kannel will not send it. Can I do something about this?! Thanks for your input! Kind regards, Dejan
testing kannel
hi friends i am using older versions of kannel eg 0.6 , 0.5 as new versions are not running on my system i have managed to get the bearer box . + wap box running but when i tested to wap gateway using fakewap using an eg --->fakewap -v myport hostconect porttocoonect 10 1 0 http://somwebsite/wml it showed something like packet sent 10 00 01 .. rev() from failed <---what does this maean some ...wsp_wtp error can some one please help me out if the authors can plz help me . this is aki signing off.
error code 0x00000058 in response to submit_sm
Hi All We see this in our logs: "SMSC returned error code 0x0058 in response to submit_sm" We believe this is a throttling error... The SMSC group config has: throughput=3 max-pending-submits=100 smsc=smpp We have tried many combinations of the throughput and max-pending-submit tags parameters, but assume that this varies from operator to operator and as yet have not really found an optimum for this particular operator. When this "throttling error" occurs ... what is the behavior of Kannel ... will it retry this submit_sm or ??? Cheerio Russel
RE: SQLBox Patch Download
Try this one: http://www.chimit.nl/kannel/sqlbox_patch-20041031.tar Meanwhile I am waiting to get CVS access so the patch can be in it's own home. Rene Kluwen Chimit -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens David E. Meier Verzonden: dinsdag 29 maart 2005 17:18 Aan: users@kannel.org Onderwerp: SQLBox Patch Download Hi list, where can I download the latest patch containing the sqlbox? The previously published link: http://www.chimit.nl/kannel/ seems to be invalid. Dave
manage at smsc
Hello, I'm searching some source code in order to manage prepaid card (ability to know when credit is null, or billing feature) for use with kannel with smsc AT modem. Does someone has some ideas or have some experience in it ? I m' looking too for account billing source code in order to manage different user ? Thanks for your answer Regards
SQLBOX question
Hello, I'm using kannel with sqlbox. I well understand the table sent_sms but I don't have any documentation regarding send_sms table. Do someone could please give me some information and example to use it ? Regards
Re: error code 0x00000058 in response to submit_sm
Hi Russel, It is a throttling error (according to SMPP Protocol Specification v.3.4 you have exceeded the message limit and SMSC cannot accept more requests). I don't think this is a throughput problem. Talk to your SMSC and ask them what kind of limitations they impose on your SMPP connection. Hope this will help you. Regards, Rodrigo. - Original Message - From: "Russel Stromin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:33 AM Subject: error code 0x0058 in response to submit_sm Hi All We see this in our logs: "SMSC returned error code 0x0058 in response to submit_sm" We believe this is a throttling error... The SMSC group config has: throughput=3 max-pending-submits=100 smsc=smpp We have tried many combinations of the throughput and max-pending-submit tags parameters, but assume that this varies from operator to operator and as yet have not really found an optimum for this particular operator. When this "throttling error" occurs ... what is the behavior of Kannel ... will it retry this submit_sm or ??? Cheerio Russel
Re: error code 0x00000058 in response to submit_sm
Thanks Rodrigo Yes we understand the "throttling error" and are investigation the limitations of this particular operator. My question of what Kannel does with this submit is still unanswered. We know the SMSC does not send the SM ... does Kannel retry it or what ? Cheerio Russel - Original Message - From: "Rodrigo Cremaschi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Russel Stromin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 2:58 PM Subject: Re: error code 0x0058 in response to submit_sm > Hi Russel, > > It is a throttling error (according to SMPP Protocol Specification v.3.4 > you have exceeded the message limit and SMSC cannot accept more requests). > I don't think this is a throughput problem. Talk to your SMSC and ask them > what kind of limitations they impose on your SMPP connection. > > Hope this will help you. Regards, > > Rodrigo. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Russel Stromin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:33 AM > Subject: error code 0x0058 in response to submit_sm > > > > Hi All > > > > We see this in our logs: > > > > "SMSC returned error code 0x0058 in response to submit_sm" > > > > We believe this is a throttling error... > > > > The SMSC group config has: > > > > throughput=3 > > max-pending-submits=100 > > smsc=smpp > > > > We have tried many combinations of the throughput and max-pending-submit > > tags parameters, but assume that this varies from operator to operator and > > as yet have not really found an optimum for this particular operator. > > > > When this "throttling error" occurs ... what is the behavior of Kannel > > ... > > will it retry this submit_sm or ??? > > > > Cheerio > > > > Russel > >
Re: error code 0x00000058 in response to submit_sm
Probably, it won't be discarded, but queued for later retry.
Part of the code dealing with your problem is here
(gateway/gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c). Maybe you should post your question to the
devel guys at devel@kannel.org to know what actually happens.
/*
* check to see if we got a "throttling error", in which
case we'll just
* sleep for a while
*/
if (pdu->u.submit_sm_resp.command_status ==
SMPP_ESME_RTHROTTLED)
time(&(smpp->throttling_err_time));
else
smpp->throttling_err_time = 0;
bb_smscconn_send_failed(smpp->conn, msg, reason,
octstr_format("%ld/%s",
pdu->u.submit_sm_resp.command_status,
smpp_error_to_string(pdu->u.submit_sm_resp.command_status)));
--(*pending_submits);
} else {
...
- Original Message -
From: "Russel Stromin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rodrigo Cremaschi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: error code 0x0058 in response to submit_sm
Thanks Rodrigo
Yes we understand the "throttling error" and are investigation the
limitations of this particular operator. My question of what Kannel does
with this submit is still unanswered. We know the SMSC does not send the
SM ... does Kannel retry it or what ?
Cheerio
Russel
- Original Message -
From: "Rodrigo Cremaschi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Russel Stromin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: error code 0x0058 in response to submit_sm
Hi Russel,
It is a throttling error (according to SMPP Protocol Specification
v.3.4
you have exceeded the message limit and SMSC cannot accept more
requests).
I don't think this is a throughput problem. Talk to your SMSC and ask
them
what kind of limitations they impose on your SMPP connection.
Hope this will help you. Regards,
Rodrigo.
- Original Message -
From: "Russel Stromin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:33 AM
Subject: error code 0x0058 in response to submit_sm
> Hi All
>
> We see this in our logs:
>
> "SMSC returned error code 0x0058 in response to submit_sm"
>
> We believe this is a throttling error...
>
> The SMSC group config has:
>
> throughput=3
> max-pending-submits=100
> smsc=smpp
>
> We have tried many combinations of the throughput and
> max-pending-submit
> tags parameters, but assume that this varies from operator to operator
and
> as yet have not really found an optimum for this particular operator.
>
> When this "throttling error" occurs ... what is the behavior of
> Kannel
> ...
> will it retry this submit_sm or ???
>
> Cheerio
>
> Russel
>
Re: how inferface a C prog with smsbox
> Why shouldn't you use the HTTP interface? Smsbox is already working, > tested and debugged extensively. Why not use it? > you can make use of the http port that the smsbox > defines, normally its 13013 a tcp port. I use this > extensively. The usage/API is well documented in the > manual. hai arnar, rodrigo, can u please help me with some sample programs which communicates with the smsbox through the http inferface as u said. just guide me, how i should go about, like - should I open a socket to the webserver and pass the http get query to the it. Or should i execute the get query by the "system" command with the help of web browser. like: system( ); If u have sample codes already written for this can u help with it. I know we already have phython script in the "contrib" directory. but that it will more useful if u could share u ideas too. My application is finished but for this part. If i could get some programs i can learn about it and finish it. i will be grateful for ur help
Error while sending XML document...
Hello all I am using kannel-1.4.0 for WAP push. I got a problem while sending the XML document containing OTA settings. While sending from HTTP url I got an error at smsbox. Here I am using fakesmsc Why I am getting such an error? Is there any mistake in the configuration file or at XML file. I saved the XML file at ../gateway-1.4.0/test directory with name MyURLEncodedXMLdocument.xml Here I am attaching the logfile... 2005-04-01 11:45:49[5641] [3]INFO: smsbox: Got HTTP request from 2005-04-01 11:45:49[5641] [3]INFO: sendsms used by 2005-04-01 11:45:49[5641] [3]DEBUG: OTA service with XML document Entity: line 1: error: Start tag expected, '<' not found MyURLEncodedXMLdocument.xml ^ 2005-04-01 11:45:49[5641] [3]ERROR: OTA: No document to parse. Probably an error in OTA source 2005-04-01 11:45:49[5641] [3]DEBUG: Status: 400 Answer: > My configuration file is as follows: #core group = core admin-port = 14000 smsbox-port = 14001 wapbox-port = 14002 admin-password = adpass status-password = stpass admin-allow-ip = "127.0.0.1" box-allow-ip = "127.0.0.1" #SMSC connections group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = ID2 port = 11000 #WAPbox group = wapbox bearerbox-host = "127.1.0.0" syslog-level = 0 #SMSbox group = smsbox smsbox-id = s1 bearerbox-host = localhost sendsms-port = 14003 sendsms-chars = "1234506789hello+=-" global-sender = yy reply-couldnotfetch = "Server down" #Services group = sms-service keyword = nop text = "No operation" group = sms-service keyword = default text = "This is a default" #send-smsusers group=sendsms-user username=otauser password=otapass concatenation=true max-messages=50 And My xml file is as ... The HTTP URL I am passing is : http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:14003/cgi-bin/sendota?username=otauser&password=otapass&to=y&text=MyURLEncodedXMLdocument.xml&type=settings Advanced Thanks for help... Regards G.S.Choudary
Error writing 729 octets to fd 12336
Hi Can anyone please shed some light on the error: Error writing 729 octets to fd 12336: Cheerio Russel
