SMS Performances

2006-10-31 Thread Colin Pitrat 

Hello,
I'd like to know a little bit about Kannel performances.
The user's guide says

"Hardware requirements are fluffier. Some informal benchmarkings have 
shown that with a reasonably fast PC architecture (e.g. 400MHz Pentium 
II with 128MB RAM), SMS performance's bottleneck is always on the SMSC 
side, even for example with multiple connections summing a pipeline with 
400 msg/sec. We haven't benchmarked Kannel yet on WAP side, so there are 
no hard numbers."


My question is, how do performances degrade when kannel is in "secure" 
mode, i.e. configured to prevent lost of SMS.


Regards,
--
Colin Pitrat (Bull Services Telco)
Bull,  Architect of an Open World (TM)
Tél : +33 (0)  1 30 80 72 93
www.bull.com
begin:vcard
fn:Colin Pitrat
n:Pitrat;Colin
org:Bull;Telco
adr:;;rue Jean Jaures;Les Clayes sous Bois;;78340;France
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:+33 1 30 80 72 93
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.bull.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

Re: Kannel compile-error

2006-10-13 Thread Colin Pitrat 

Looks like ld have a problem with libxml.
If you're using linux or any unix, could you post the output of 
'xml2-config --version' and 'xml2-config --libs', and the output of 
./configure ? You can also try 'cat /usr/lib | grep libxml'.


Colin Pitrat (Bull Services Telco)
Bull,  Architect of an Open World (TM)
Tél : +33 (0)  1 30 80 72 93
www.bull.com


Huber, Gottfried wrote:

Hi all

I try to compile kannel 1.4.1 stable-version.
Can someone help to solve this error ?



Undefined   first referenced
 symbol in file
xmlReadMemory   libgw.a(wml_compiler.o)
xmlGetLastError libgw.a(wml_compiler.o)
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to gw/wapbox
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `gw/wapbox'





Thx
gottfried


begin:vcard
fn:Colin Pitrat
n:Pitrat;Colin
org:Bull;Telco
adr:;;rue Jean Jaures;Les Clayes sous Bois;;78340;France
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:+33 1 30 80 72 93
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.bull.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

Re: sending blank SMSs

2006-07-18 Thread Colin Pitrat 

Hi,
I sent it to the devel mailing list, but without the [PATCH] prefix. 
I'll re-send it ;)


Thanks,
Colin

Stipe Tolj wrote:

Colin Pitrat wrote:

I sent a patch recently to correct this, but I think it hasn't been 
apply. A good reason to send a blank message is if you wan't to send a 
MWI in "discard content" mode for example (I think there's other 
cases). The "" should only be set 
for mt_reply messages.


Colin


Hi Colin,

did you send the patch with [PATCH] subject prefix to the devel@ list? 
Patches in users@ get usually not to the eyes of those that should 
review and vote for commiting.


Stipe

---
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

tolj.org system architecture  Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/  http://www.kannel.org/

mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org   mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
---

Re: sending blank SMSs

2006-07-18 Thread Colin Pitrat 
I sent a patch recently to correct this, but I think it hasn't been 
apply. A good reason to send a blank message is if you wan't to send a 
MWI in "discard content" mode for example (I think there's other cases). 
The "" should only be set for 
mt_reply messages.


Colin

Vincent CHAVANIS wrote:

Take a look at 3398:gw/smsbox.c
But what is your interest in sending blank message ?
Wasting money ?

Vincent.

--
Telemaque - NICE - (FR)
Service Technique - Developpement
http://www.telemaque.fr/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel : +33 4 93 97 71 64 (fax 68)

- Original Message - 
From: "Hillel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "Kannel Users" 
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 10:38 PM
Subject: sending blank SMSs



Hi,

Recently we were testing sending blank SMSs which is an SMS with no content
as the message i.e message ="";

We were surprised that we got back an SMS with the message .

We are using the latest CVS.

Any ideas on what to set in the configuration file to enable blank SMSs? Or
should this work by default?

Thanks

Re: unsubscribe

2006-07-07 Thread Colin Pitrat 

Maybe you want to send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], don't you ?

Colin

Aftab Rashid wrote:
 

 

 


**unsubscribe**

Re: Install kannel as normal user

2006-07-06 Thread Colin Pitrat 
I installed kannel as a standard user without trouble, and it ran just 
well (bearerbox + smsbox + wapbox). The problem here is mbuni can't find 
kannel lib because it's not in the usual directory. The reason is you 
made a mistake in your configure line : you have to tell configure where 
to find it using the --with-kannel-dir option.


Just try
./configure --prefix=/home/myaccount/mbuni 
--with-kannel-dir=/home/myaccount/mbuni


Colin

Javier Valenzuela wrote:

It's possible?, somebody try this?

I try with ./configure --prefix=/home/myaccount/kannel
but later, i have problems with mbuni installation :'(

mbuni...

./configure --prefix=/home/myaccount/mbuni 
--with-kannel=/home/myacount/mbuni


checking Kannel libs... -L/usr/local/lib/kannel -lgwlib -lssl -lrt 
-lbind -lresolv -lnsl -lm  -lpthread -L/usr/lib -lxml2 -lz -lpthread -lm 
-L/usr/lib -lcrypto -lssl
checking Kannel includes... -I/usr/local/include/kannel  
-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_BSD_SOURCE -I/usr/include/libxml2 
-I/usr/include/openssl

checking for cfg_create in -lgwlib... yes
checking for wsp_headers_pack in -lwap... no
configure: error: Kannel WAP lib is required!  <---  My error!  :'(